


Ask the community...
Does anyone know if TurboTax Business can handle LLC returns regardless of the classification? My LLC is set up as an S-Corp and I'm trying to decide if I need to hire an accountant or can DIY.
I used TurboTax Business last year for my S-Corp and it worked fine, but honestly it was pretty complicated. If your situation is simple it might be OK, but if you have multiple income streams, employees, or significant deductions, you might want a professional. The S-Corp payroll requirements alone can be tricky.
@Layla Mendes - I went through this exact same confusion when I first started my LLC! Here's what I learned: if you only have one member (just yourself), your LLC automatically defaults to "disregarded entity" status, which means you file taxes as a sole proprietor using Schedule C on your personal return. You don't need to file a separate business return. The easiest way to confirm is to look for any Form 8832 or Form 2553 in your records - these would show if you made a special election. If you can't find either of these forms, you're almost certainly under the default classification. Since you mentioned this is for a web design business you started last year, you'll likely be filing Schedule C with your 2025 personal tax return. Just make sure to track all your business expenses throughout the year - things like software subscriptions, equipment, home office expenses, etc. can really add up to significant deductions! If you want to double-check, the IRS business line at 800-829-4933 can tell you what's on file, though be prepared for potentially long wait times.
This is really helpful advice! I'm also a newcomer to the LLC world and had no idea about the default classifications. Just to clarify - if I have a single-member LLC and stick with the disregarded entity status, do I still need to get an EIN or can I just use my SSN on the Schedule C? And are there any downsides to staying with the default classification versus electing S-Corp status for a small web design business?
I'm going through this exact same situation and honestly, all these responses have been such a lifesaver! I filed my return on February 12th using my old SunTrust routing number and have been panicking ever since realizing the merger changed everything. Reading through everyone's successful experiences here has really calmed my nerves. It sounds like Truist has really thought this through and set up robust systems to handle the transition. The fact that multiple people have confirmed their refunds went through smoothly with the old routing number is incredibly reassuring. I think what I'm going to do is call Truist tomorrow just to double-check my account status and maybe set up those mobile alerts that Riya mentioned. Better to be proactive and get that peace of mind rather than continue stress-checking my account balance every hour! Has anyone noticed if there's a specific time of day that refunds typically hit your account? I know it's probably random, but I'm trying to figure out if I should expect it overnight or during business hours. Thank you all so much for sharing your experiences - this community is amazing during tax season stress!
Carmen, I'm so glad this thread has helped calm your nerves too! I was in the exact same boat a few weeks ago. Regarding refund timing - in my experience with Truist, direct deposits typically hit overnight between 12 AM and 6 AM, usually on Wednesday or Friday mornings. But honestly, the IRS processing timeline is more of a factor than the specific time of day. Calling Truist tomorrow is a great idea - their customer service has been really helpful with merger questions. The mobile alerts are definitely worth setting up so you're not constantly refreshing your account like I was doing! You're going to be just fine - the automatic forwarding system really does work seamlessly.
I'm dealing with this exact same SunTrust/Truist routing number situation! Filed my return on February 5th using the old routing number before I realized everything had changed with the merger. I've been checking my account obsessively waiting for my refund to appear (or not appear). Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful and reassuring. It sounds like the automatic forwarding system is working really well for most people. I especially appreciate hearing the specific timelines - like Paolo getting his refund deposited normally just 15 days after filing with the old routing number. I think I'm going to follow the advice here and call Truist directly tomorrow to confirm my account status. The mobile alert suggestion is brilliant too - I'm definitely setting that up to stop the constant manual checking that's driving me crazy. Quick question for those who have already received their refunds: did you notice any difference in the deposit description or memo compared to previous years? I'm wondering if there's any indication on the bank side that the routing was redirected automatically. Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences - this thread has been a huge stress reliever during an already anxious tax season!
Aaron, I can actually answer your question about the deposit description! When my refund came through last week (also used the old SunTrust routing number), the deposit memo looked exactly the same as previous years - it just said "IRS TREAS 310 TAX REF" with no indication that any routing redirect had happened behind the scenes. From the customer perspective, it was completely seamless. The only way I knew there had been any automatic forwarding was because I specifically asked the Truist rep when I called them. Your refund should process just fine - the system really does work as smoothly as everyone here has described!
I'm gonna go against the grain here... Just use FreeTaxUSA or Cash App Taxes (formerly Credit Karma Tax). Both handle investments including stock sales and dividends. FreeTaxUSA is free for federal and like $15 for state. Cash App Taxes is completely free for both federal and state. I switched from TurboTax to FreeTaxUSA two years ago when my taxes got more complicated with investments and rental property. Saved over $120 and the process was actually easier! TurboTax is just really good at making you think you need their expensive versions when you don't.
Thanks for the alternative suggestions! I hadn't even heard of Cash App Taxes. Do they handle everything well with stock transactions? I made maybe 15-20 trades throughout the year.
Yes, Cash App Taxes handles stock transactions well! I had about 25 trades last year and it worked perfectly. The interface is clean and they support importing from most brokerages directly, so you don't have to manually enter each transaction. One thing to note is that Cash App Taxes might ask fewer "hand-holding" questions than TurboTax, which some people actually prefer. If you already understand the basics of what you need to report, it's faster and more straightforward. But if you want lots of guidance and explanations at each step, FreeTaxUSA might be a better middle ground - still much cheaper than TurboTax but with more explanations than Cash App Taxes.
As someone who's been through a similar transition from simple W-2 filing to dealing with investments, I'd recommend starting with the document analysis approach others mentioned. Understanding exactly what forms you'll need is crucial before choosing software. For your specific situation - multiple W-2s, stock sales, dividends, and retirement accounts - you're definitely looking at needing investment-capable software. The key distinction is that selling stocks requires Schedule D and Form 8949, which kicks you out of basic versions of any tax software. Your 403b contributions should already be reflected on your W-2 (look for box 12 with codes like D, E, F, G, or H), so that part is actually straightforward. The Roth IRA contributions typically don't need to be reported unless you qualify for the Saver's Credit, which at 19 you might depending on your income level. Between TurboTax Premier and the alternatives like FreeTaxUSA or Cash App Taxes, it really comes down to how much hand-holding you want. TurboTax is more expensive but walks you through everything step-by-step. The alternatives can save you $100+ and handle the same forms, but assume you're comfortable reading instructions and answering questions without as much guidance. Given this is your first year with investments, you might appreciate TurboTax's explanations this time around, then switch to a cheaper alternative next year once you understand the process better.
This is really comprehensive advice! I'm leaning toward trying one of the free alternatives first since I'm pretty comfortable with technology and following instructions. If I get stuck, I can always switch to TurboTax Premier later in the season. One question though - you mentioned the Saver's Credit for Roth IRA contributions. Do you know roughly what the income threshold is for that? With 3 W-2s plus investment income, I'm not sure if I'd qualify but it would be nice to know if there's a potential credit I'm missing out on. Also, has anyone had experience importing brokerage data directly into these tax programs? My broker is Schwab and I'm hoping I don't have to manually enter all those trades!
You're absolutely correct in your understanding! With only $78 in unearned income, your daughter has no filing requirement since it's well below the $1,250 threshold for dependents with unearned income. And you're right that you don't need to report this anywhere on your MFJ return. Form 8814 is only used when you *choose* to report your child's unearned income on your return instead of filing separately for them - but this is only an option when the child actually has a filing requirement in the first place. Since your daughter doesn't need to file, Form 8814 isn't relevant to your situation. The IRS will receive the 1099 under your daughter's SSN and will see that the income is below the filing threshold, so everything is handled automatically on their end. No action needed from you at all - you can breathe easy knowing you're handling this correctly!
This is really helpful confirmation! I'm in a similar situation with my 6-year-old's UTMA account that earned about $95 last year. I was getting anxious reading about all the kiddie tax rules and forms, but it sounds like I'm overthinking a pretty straightforward situation. It's reassuring to know that the IRS systems automatically handle these below-threshold amounts and there's no mysterious paperwork I'm missing. Thanks for the clear explanation!
Great question and you've got the right understanding! With just $78 in unearned income, your daughter is well below the $1,250 filing threshold for dependents, so no return is required for her. And since there's no filing requirement, there's nothing you need to report on your MFJ return either. One thing to keep in mind for future years - as that UTMA account grows and generates more income, you'll want to track when you might hit those thresholds. The $1,250-$2,300 range requires filing but no kiddie tax, and above $2,300 is when the kiddie tax rules kick in. But for now with $78, you're in the clear! It's also worth noting that even though you don't need to report anything, the IRS will still receive the 1099 information under your daughter's SSN. They'll see it's below the threshold and no further action is expected. So you can file your return with confidence knowing you're handling this correctly.
This is such a relief to read! I'm new to UTMA accounts and opened one for my 3-year-old last month. I was already stressing about tax implications even though it's only earned about $12 so far. It's good to know that these small amounts are handled so simply by the IRS system. I'll bookmark this thread for when the account grows larger and I actually need to worry about those higher thresholds you mentioned. Thanks for breaking down the different income ranges - that's really helpful for planning ahead!
Carmen Lopez
This has been such a comprehensive discussion! I wanted to add something that might help others who are just starting to deal with these vacation home complexities. One area that often creates confusion is the interaction between state tax treatment and federal vacation home rules. While we've covered the federal Section 280A limitations thoroughly, don't forget that some states have their own rules for vacation home deductions that might not align perfectly with federal treatment. For example, I've worked with clients who had vacation properties in states that don't conform to all federal passive activity loss rules, which created additional complexity in tracking state vs. federal carryovers. Make sure to research your specific state's treatment, especially if the property is located in a different state than where your client resides. Also, I'd recommend documenting your methodology for expense allocation between personal and rental use in your workpapers. The IRS could challenge how you allocated utilities, maintenance, depreciation, etc. between the personal and rental portions, so having a clear, defensible method documented upfront can save headaches later. Finally, consider the long-term strategy - if a vacation home consistently generates losses and the client isn't using the personal use days, it might make sense to convert it to a pure rental property to unlock those trapped losses under the more flexible passive activity rules.
0 coins
Maya Diaz
ā¢This is such valuable insight about state conformity issues! I'm relatively new to vacation home taxation and hadn't considered how state rules might diverge from federal treatment. Could you give an example of how a state might treat vacation home losses differently? I'm particularly curious about states like Florida or Texas that don't have state income tax - do they present any unique considerations for vacation home owners, or is it mainly an issue with states that have their own complex tax codes? Also, your point about documenting the expense allocation methodology is excellent. Are there any particular allocation methods that are generally more defensible than others? I've been using a simple days-based allocation (rental days / total days used), but I'm wondering if there are more sophisticated approaches that might be more appropriate for certain types of expenses.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
ā¢@Maya Diaz Great questions! For states without income tax like Florida and Texas, you re'right that there aren t'conformity issues since there s'no state income tax to worry about. The complexity mainly arises in states with their own tax codes. For example, some states don t'allow passive loss carryovers at all, while others might have different phase-out thresholds for the $25,000 rental real estate allowance. I ve'seen cases where California has different timing rules for when certain deductions can be claimed compared to federal treatment. Regarding allocation methods, the IRS generally accepts a days-based approach, but there are some nuances. For expenses that are more directly tied to rental use like (advertising, rental management fees, or repairs made specifically for tenants ,)those can often be allocated 100% to the rental activity. For shared expenses like utilities and general maintenance, the days-based method you re'using is typically the most defensible. Some practitioners use a more sophisticated approach for expenses like utilities - allocating based on actual rental vs. personal use periods rather than just total days in the year. For instance, if the property was only available for rent during certain months, you might allocate utilities only during those periods. Just make sure whatever method you choose is consistently applied and well-documented!
0 coins
Zara Rashid
This has been an absolutely fantastic deep dive into vacation home loss limitations! As someone who's been preparing taxes for over 15 years, I can say these are some of the most nuanced rules in the tax code. I wanted to add one practical tip that has saved me countless hours of research: when dealing with clients who have vacation homes, I always start the engagement by having them complete a detailed questionnaire about their property use patterns for the past few years. This includes not just their own personal use, but any family member use, business use, and even days spent on major repairs or improvements. Getting this information upfront helps me immediately identify whether we're dealing with Section 280A vacation home limitations or Section 469 passive activity rules - or in complex cases, both types of losses from different periods. It also helps me spot potential issues like when someone thinks they're running a "business" rental but family use is pushing them into vacation home territory. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of the "principal residence" test under Section 280A. If the vacation home is used as the taxpayer's principal residence for any part of the year (not just vacation use), it can create additional complications in the allocation of expenses and loss limitations. This sometimes happens with clients who work remotely and spend extended periods at their "vacation" home. The recordkeeping suggestions throughout this thread are spot-on. I always recommend clients take photos of their property calendar or rental booking system at year-end to support their use calculations. Contemporary documentation is key if the IRS ever questions the personal use percentages.
0 coins
Simon White
ā¢This is such a comprehensive resource - thank you to everyone who's contributed! As someone new to the community and just starting to handle vacation home cases, I'm amazed at the complexity involved. @Zara Rashid, your questionnaire approach is brilliant! I can see how getting all that information upfront would prevent so many headaches down the road. I'm definitely going to implement something similar for my practice. One thing I'm still wrapping my head around is the interaction between all these different limitations. If a client has multiple rental properties - some vacation homes, some regular rentals - and also has other passive activities like limited partnership interests, how do you prioritize which losses get used first when there's passive income available? Is there a specific ordering rule, or is it taxpayer election? I imagine the strategy could vary significantly depending on which type of losses are more likely to be usable in future years vs. those that might get "trapped" indefinitely. Also, for the principal residence test you mentioned - does that apply even if someone is working remotely temporarily, like during COVID when many people spent extended time at vacation homes? I'm wondering if there are any recent guidance or cases addressing this scenario.
0 coins