


Ask the community...
Does anyone know if TurboTax automatically applies your loss carryover from the previous year if you used TurboTax for both years? I swear it used to do this automatically but now I cant find where its pulling that data from.
Yes, TurboTax should import it automatically if you're using the same account and you have last year's return in your TurboTax account. You can check by looking at Schedule D - there should be a line showing your carryover from last year. If it's not there, you might need to manually enter your capital loss carryover.
I went through this exact same struggle last year! The Capital Loss Carryover Worksheet can be really confusing at first. Here's what helped me get through it: First, you definitely need your 2023 tax return - specifically Schedule D and Form 8949 if you filed one. Look for line 21 on your 2023 Schedule D, which shows your net capital loss for that year. For your situation with $4,300 in losses, you're right that there's a $3,000 annual limit for deducting capital losses against ordinary income. So if your net loss last year was more than $3,000 after accounting for any gains, the excess carries forward. The worksheet asks for your prior year AGI to determine if you need to use the Capital Loss Carryover Worksheet or if you can use a simpler method. Most people with straightforward situations can just enter the carryover amount directly on Schedule D. One thing that tripped me up initially - make sure you're looking at your NET capital loss from last year, not just the gross losses. TurboTax should have calculated this for you on last year's Schedule D. If you can't find your 2023 return, you can get a transcript from the IRS website or call them. Don't stress too much - once you have the right numbers, it's actually pretty straightforward!
This is super helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation and was wondering - when you say "net capital loss," does that mean I need to subtract ALL my gains from ALL my losses first, or do short-term and long-term get calculated separately before netting? I had both types of transactions last year and I'm not sure if I should be looking at one combined number or keeping them separate through the whole process.
This is exactly the kind of situation where keeping detailed records pays off! I've been a professional gambler for 5 years and dealt with similar multi-state issues. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given - make sure you're tracking which specific tournaments or sessions generated each W2G. Some states (like Pennsylvania) want to see the actual location and date of the gambling activity, not just the total amount. This becomes crucial if you're audited. Also, regarding your $78,000 total income vs $65,000 in W2Gs - that $13,000 difference needs to be carefully documented. Keep all your session logs organized by state and date. I use a simple spreadsheet that tracks: Date, Location, Buy-in, Cash-out, Net Result, and any expenses for that session. This makes the state allocation much easier. For Illinois specifically, since that's your home state, you'll report ALL your gambling income there (not just Illinois income), then claim credits for taxes paid to other states. The other states only get the income earned within their borders. One last tip: consider consulting with a tax pro who specializes in gambling taxes if your income continues to grow. The multi-state issues get complex quickly, and the penalties for getting it wrong can be substantial.
This is incredibly helpful advice, especially about tracking the specific tournaments and sessions for each W2G! I'm just getting started with professional gambling taxes and feeling overwhelmed by all the state requirements. Quick question - when you say Pennsylvania wants to see the actual location and date, do you mean on the tax return itself or just in your records in case of audit? And for that spreadsheet system you mentioned, do you also track things like travel costs to each location, or do you handle those separately when doing the state allocations? I'm realizing I probably should have been more detailed in my record-keeping from the start, but better late than never I guess!
@Margot Quinn Great questions! For Pennsylvania, you typically just need the detailed records for audit purposes - the actual return usually just shows the total amounts. But having that backup documentation organized by location and date is crucial if they ever ask for it. For my spreadsheet system, I actually track travel costs in a separate tab but cross-reference it to the main session log. So if I have a trip to Atlantic City, I ll'note the travel expenses on that date range, then when I do state allocations, I can easily see which expenses relate to which states income.' I also recommend adding a column for Tournament/Cash "Game Type -" it helps when some states have different rules for tournament winnings vs cash game winnings. And don t'beat yourself up about the record-keeping! Most of us learned this stuff the hard way. The key is being consistent going forward. One more tip: scan or photograph all your buy-in receipts and W2Gs immediately. I learned this after spilling coffee on a stack of important documents during tax season last year!
As someone who's been through the multi-state professional gambling tax maze, I want to emphasize one crucial point that hasn't been mentioned yet: make sure you understand each state's definition of "professional gambler" status. While you claim professional status on your federal Schedule C, not all states automatically recognize this. Some states treat ALL gambling winnings as "other income" regardless of your professional status, which can affect how you deduct expenses and losses. For example, I discovered that one state I filed in didn't allow me to deduct my full business expenses against gambling winnings the way federal law does. They had a cap on gambling loss deductions even for professional gamblers. This completely changed my tax liability calculation for that state. I'd strongly recommend researching each state's specific rules before filing. Some states have published guidance on professional gambling, while others require you to dig through their tax code or call their departments directly. The differences can be significant - I've seen cases where the same income and expenses result in vastly different tax liabilities depending on how the state treats professional gambling status. Also, keep in mind that your professional gambler status might need to be "proven" to each state independently if you're ever audited. Having consistent documentation across all states showing the business nature of your activities is essential.
This is such an important point that I wish I had known when I started! I just went through this exact issue with New Jersey - they initially rejected my Schedule C expense deductions and treated my poker winnings as "casual gambling income" even though I've been doing this professionally for two years. I had to send them additional documentation proving my professional status, including my business license, detailed records showing the systematic nature of my play, and evidence that this was my primary source of income. It took three months to resolve, but they eventually accepted my professional status and allowed the full business expense deductions. @Ethan Taylor - do you know if there s'a standard set of documentation that most states accept to prove professional gambling status? I m'trying to get ahead of this for my other state filings. Also, have you found any states that are particularly difficult about recognizing professional gambler status, or any that are more accommodating? The variation between states on this issue is honestly one of the most frustrating parts of multi-state gambling taxes. Federal law is clear, but then you have to navigate 50 different interpretations!
This thread has been incredibly educational! As someone who's been on an O-1 visa for about 16 months, I was planning to file a 1040NR because I assumed my "non-immigrant" status meant non-resident for tax purposes. Reading through all these experiences has been a real eye-opener. I had no idea that immigration status and tax residency were separate determinations. With 16 months of continuous presence in the US, I clearly meet the substantial presence test and should be filing a regular 1040, not a 1040NR. What's particularly helpful is seeing how many people have successfully corrected this mistake through amended returns and actually received substantial refunds. I'm definitely going to work through Publication 519 to confirm my substantial presence calculation, then file my current year return as a resident alien. The professional insight about potential $3,000-5,000 refunds per year when correcting these mistakes is really encouraging. I suspect I may have missed out on significant tax benefits by not claiming the standard deduction and various credits available to resident aliens. Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences - this community has potentially saved me from years of incorrect filings!
Welcome to the community, Ava! Your O-1 situation is very similar to what many of us have experienced with other work visas. With 16 months of presence, you're absolutely right that you meet the substantial presence test and should be filing as a resident alien. One thing that might be particularly relevant for O-1 visa holders is that you may have some unique deductions available as a resident alien that you wouldn't have access to as a non-resident. Since O-1 visas are for individuals with extraordinary ability, you might have professional expenses, travel costs, or other business deductions that could be more beneficial when filed on a regular 1040. I'd definitely recommend going through that Publication 519 calculation, but with 16 months of continuous presence, you're well over the threshold. The potential refunds from amended returns could be even more significant for O-1 holders given the typically higher income levels associated with that visa category. Good luck with your filing - you're making the right decision by getting this sorted out now rather than continuing with incorrect 1040NR filings!
This has been such an incredibly helpful thread! I've been reading through everyone's experiences and I'm amazed at how common this confusion is between immigration status and tax residency status. I'm currently on an H-1B visa and have been in the US for about 20 months now. Like so many others here, I was completely convinced that being on a "non-immigrant" visa meant I should be filing 1040NR forms. I've already filed two years of returns using 1040NR, missing out on the standard deduction and likely other benefits. The professional insight from Alexis about potential refunds of $3,000-5,000 per year is both encouraging and a bit painful - thinking about how much I may have overpaid! But I'm grateful this thread exists because it's giving me the confidence to file amended returns and correct my mistake. I'm going to download Publication 519 this weekend and work through the substantial presence test calculation, though with 20 months of continuous presence I'm certain I qualify as a resident alien. Then I'll file 1040X forms for my previous returns and make sure to file a regular 1040 for this year. One quick question for those who have been through this process - when you filed your amended returns, did you amend them in chronological order (oldest first) or does it matter? Also, should I wait for the amended returns to be processed before filing my current year return, or can I file everything together? Thank you to everyone who shared their experiences - this community is truly invaluable for navigating these complex tax situations!
Hey Kayla! I totally understand your panic - I went through the exact same thing when I got my first 1099-K from Vinted last year for around $680 in sales. The whole thing seemed so complicated at first! Here's the thing that helped me the most: you're NOT taxed on the full $643.50 shown on your 1099-K. That's just the gross amount you received. Your actual taxable income is only the profit you made, if any. Since you mentioned these were personal clothes you sold for less than you originally paid, you'll likely end up owing little to no taxes once you account for everything properly. Here's my simple approach: 1. Make a list of what you sold and estimate what you originally paid for each item (reasonable estimates are fine - I used current prices at stores where I shop and adjusted down for when I bought them) 2. Add up ALL your expenses: Depop's 10% fee, PayPal processing fees, shipping costs, packaging materials like mailers and tape 3. Subtract both your original costs and expenses from the $643.50 - that's your actual taxable profit You'll report this on Schedule C, but don't let that intimidate you! Most tax software walks you through it step by step. The fact that you're barely over the $600 threshold actually helps show this was just casual personal selling, not a business. I ended up owing almost nothing after accounting for my original costs and all those little fees that really add up. You've got this - it's way more manageable than it seems at first!
This is such a great breakdown, thank you! I'm in literally the exact same situation - first 1099-K from selling old clothes and completely overwhelmed. Your point about only paying taxes on actual profit vs the gross amount is so important and something I totally didn't understand at first. I love your step-by-step approach, especially the part about estimating original costs by looking at current store prices and adjusting down. That makes it feel much more manageable than trying to hunt down receipts from years ago for every single item. One quick question - when you say "reasonable estimates are fine," about how detailed did you get? Like if you sold 20 different clothing items, did you estimate each one individually or did you do broader categories like "5 H&M tops, probably averaged $15 each when I bought them"? I want to be thorough but also don't want to overcomplicate things for what was really just a one-time closet cleanout. Also really appreciate you mentioning that being barely over the threshold helps show it's casual selling. I was worried that might somehow make it worse, but you're right - it clearly shows this wasn't any kind of business operation!
Hey Kayla! I was in your exact shoes last year when I got my first 1099-K from eBay for selling old video games and electronics. That feeling of panic when you see the form and have no idea what to do with it is so real! The most important thing to remember is that the $643.50 on your 1099-K is NOT what you owe in taxes - it's just the gross payments you received. You only pay taxes on actual profit, which is what's left after you subtract what you originally paid for those clothes and all your selling expenses. Since you mentioned selling personal clothes for less than you originally paid, you'll likely have very little taxable income once you account for everything properly. Here's what worked for me: 1. Go through your Depop sales history and list each item you sold 2. Estimate what you originally paid for each piece (reasonable estimates are totally fine - I looked at current prices at stores where I typically shop and adjusted down for when I bought them) 3. Calculate all your expenses: Depop's 10% fee, PayPal processing fees, shipping costs, packaging supplies like mailers and tape 4. Report everything on Schedule C - your tax software will walk you through it The fact that you're only $43 over the threshold actually works in your favor because it clearly shows this was casual personal selling, not a business operation. Most people in your situation end up owing very little after proper accounting. Don't stress too much about perfect documentation - reasonable estimates based on your shopping habits are acceptable for personal items. The IRS understands people don't keep receipts for clothes forever. You've got this!
Ravi Patel
I'm in almost the exact same situation as everyone else here! My parents have been charging me $575/month for their finished basement for about 10 months now, and we just had that same panic moment when we realized they haven't been reporting any of it as rental income. Reading through all these real experiences has been incredibly reassuring. It's clear this is a very common situation with family arrangements, and what I'm taking away is that while the income does need to be reported, the actual tax impact after legitimate deductions is typically much more manageable than the initial fear suggests. What gives me the most confidence is hearing how understanding the IRS has been with elderly taxpayers making honest mistakes. My parents are in their mid-70s and have always been very diligent about their taxes - they just never considered this arrangement as "rental income" since I'm their own child and we're all just trying to make the housing situation work. Based on everyone's experiences here, I'm going to help my parents start documenting all their home expenses right away and calculate what percentage of the house I'm using (probably around 17-19% including the basement space plus shared laundry and bathroom access). Then we'll either use one of the tax analysis tools mentioned or consult with a tax professional to get a clear picture of their actual situation. Thank you to everyone who shared their stories - you've turned what felt like a potential tax crisis into something that feels completely manageable with proper documentation and professional guidance!
0 coins
Emma Davis
ā¢I just joined this community and I'm so grateful to have found this thread! I'm in a very similar situation - my parents have been charging me $680/month for their spare bedroom for about 6 months, and we literally just had that same "oh my goodness" realization about the tax implications yesterday. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been such a lifesaver. It's amazing to see how common this situation is and how the initial panic about "unreported rental income" consistently transforms into something much more manageable once you understand the deduction opportunities and see actual numbers from real families. Your percentage calculation of 17-19% for the basement plus shared areas sounds very reasonable based on what others have calculated. What really strikes me is how many people mention their parents feeling relieved once everything was properly organized and filed, rather than continuing to worry about the unknown. I'm planning to follow the same approach you've outlined - start documenting all home expenses immediately, calculate our percentage (probably around 11-13% for my situation), and work with a tax professional. Based on all these real experiences, it sounds like families consistently find the actual tax impact is much smaller than initially feared, especially with elderly parents who clearly made honest oversights. Thank you for sharing your experience and adding to this incredibly helpful discussion! It's so comforting to know we're not alone in navigating this situation.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
I'm in almost exactly the same situation as everyone else in this thread! My parents have been charging me $625/month for their spare bedroom for the past 7 months, and we just had that same moment of realization about the tax implications when my dad's accountant friend casually mentioned it during a family gathering. What's been most helpful from reading all these experiences is seeing how this is such a common situation with family arrangements, and more importantly, how the actual tax impact is typically much more reasonable than the initial panic suggests. The consistent stories about legitimate deductions (utilities, property taxes, insurance, maintenance) significantly reducing the taxable rental income really puts things in perspective. I'm particularly encouraged by all the accounts of the IRS being understanding with elderly taxpayers who make honest oversights. My parents are 67 and 72 and have always been extremely careful with their taxes - they just genuinely never thought of this as "rental income" since I'm their own child and we're all just trying to navigate housing costs together. Based on everything I've learned from this discussion, I'm going to help my parents start tracking all their home expenses immediately and calculate what percentage of the house I'm using (probably around 12-14% including my bedroom plus shared kitchen and bathroom access). Then we'll work with a tax professional to handle both the going-forward reporting and any needed amended returns for the previous months. Thank you to everyone who shared their real experiences - you've completely transformed what felt like a potential tax disaster into something that feels entirely manageable with proper organization and professional guidance. It's such a relief to know that so many families have successfully navigated this exact situation!
0 coins