


Ask the community...
I just went through this exact situation with concert tickets I resold! The key thing to understand is that the 1099-K doesn't mean you owe taxes on the full amount - it's just the platform reporting what you received. For a one-time sale like yours, you'll want to report this as hobby income on Schedule 1 (Form 1040). Report the full $9,215 as "Other Income" on line 8z, then you can deduct your original purchase cost ($8,795 based on your $420 profit) on line 24a as "Other Adjustments to Income." This way you're only paying tax on your actual $420 profit, not the full sale amount. Make sure to keep documentation of your original purchase - email confirmations, credit card statements, anything that shows what you actually paid for those tickets originally. Since this was clearly a one-time thing and not a business venture, Schedule 1 is definitely the right approach rather than Schedule C. The IRS understands that people sometimes sell tickets they can't use - they just want to make sure you're reporting the actual profit correctly.
This is exactly the clarity I needed! I was getting so confused by all the different advice online about Schedule C vs Schedule 1. Your explanation about using line 8z for the income and line 24a for the cost adjustment makes perfect sense for a one-time sale like mine. I've been stressing about this for weeks thinking the IRS would see that $9,215 and assume I made a huge profit when really I only made $420. Thank you for breaking down the specific line numbers - that's going to save me so much time trying to figure out where everything goes in TurboTax!
Just wanted to chime in as someone who's been through this exact scenario! I resold some Broadway tickets last year after getting a 1099-K and was completely panicked about how to handle it properly. The advice about using Schedule 1 is spot on for occasional sales like yours. What really helped me was organizing all my documentation upfront - I created a simple spreadsheet showing the original purchase date, amount paid, sale date, and sale amount. This made it super easy to see my actual profit and have everything ready if needed later. One thing I'd add is to double-check that your math is right on the $420 profit. Sometimes fees from the selling platform aren't immediately obvious, and you might be able to deduct those too as part of your cost basis. For example, if you paid any listing fees or seller fees to the platform, those could potentially reduce your taxable profit even further. The key thing to remember is that the IRS gets that 1099-K too, so they know you received the money. By properly reporting both the income AND your costs, you're showing them the full picture and only paying tax on what you actually gained. Keep those receipts safe - digital copies work perfectly fine!
Has anyone tried going to a tax professional instead of using TurboTax for this duplicate SSN problem? I'm wondering if they have better ways of resolving it or if they just tell you to paper file too.
I'm an enrolled agent (tax pro), and unfortunately, we face the same e-filing blocks that TurboTax does. The IRS system automatically rejects any e-filed return with an SSN that's already been used. However, a good tax pro might be able to help determine WHY it's happening and give better guidance on resolving it compared to TurboTax's generic advice.
Thanks for the insider perspective! I was hoping there might be some special tax pro workaround, but it sounds like the IRS system is the bottleneck regardless of how you file. I guess I'll try some of the other suggestions here first before paying for professional help that might end with the same paper filing recommendation.
I went through this exact nightmare last year! Here's what finally worked for me after weeks of frustration: First, call the Social Security Administration (not the IRS) at 1-800-772-1213 to verify your nephew's SSN is correct and there are no issues with his Social Security record. Sometimes there are name/SSN mismatches in their system that cause the duplicate error. Second, if that checks out clean, you'll likely need to file Form 8948 (Preparer Explanation for Not Filing Electronically) along with your paper return. This form specifically addresses situations where e-filing is rejected due to duplicate SSN issues. The frustrating truth is that when someone else has already filed using that SSN (whether legitimately or fraudulently), the IRS computer system has no way to determine which filer is correct - it just blocks all subsequent attempts. Paper filing forces a manual review where they can sort it out. One silver lining: if it turns out to be fraud, you might qualify for expedited processing of your paper return. Make sure to include a cover letter explaining the situation and any documentation you have proving your right to claim your nephew (custody papers, school records, etc.). Good luck - I know how maddening this process is!
Just FYI - if youre using dependent care FSA money for a preschooler, make sure your provider gives you their Tax ID number or SSN. Lots of people miss this and then cant properly report the FSA benefits. You need to list all care providers and their tax IDs on Form 2441 even with MFS status.
This is so important! I had my return rejected last year because I forgot to include my daycare provider's tax ID number. Also keep in mind that some smaller home daycares might give you their SSN instead of a business EIN.
Great question about MFS and dependent care benefits! I went through something similar last year. A few key points that might help: First, yes - you can absolutely claim the Child Tax Credit for your 4-year-old even with MFS status. That's $2,000 you shouldn't miss out on. For your FSA contributions, those $4,800 in pre-tax deductions have already given you the tax benefit by reducing your taxable income. However, with MFS status, you're actually limited to only $2,500 in dependent care FSA benefits per year (vs $5,000 for joint filers). So if you contributed $4,800, you may need to pay taxes on the excess $2,300. You'll definitely need to complete Form 2441 to report these benefits properly. The form will show your FSA contributions and ensure you're handling the MFS limitations correctly. One thing I'd strongly recommend - actually run the numbers for both MFS and MFJ scenarios. I know the student loan payments are a major factor, but sometimes the tax savings from filing jointly (especially with multiple kids and childcare expenses) can offset the increase in loan payments. Worth double-checking before you finalize your filing status.
Wait, I'm confused about something you mentioned. If the FSA limit is $2,500 for MFS filers, but they've already deducted $4,800 from paychecks throughout the year, how does that work exactly? Does the employer automatically stop the deductions at $2,500, or could someone actually end up with $2,300 that becomes taxable income? That seems like a huge oversight that could catch people off guard at tax time. Also, is there any way to adjust this mid-year if you realize you're going over the limit, or are you stuck with whatever was deducted?
This is a really complex situation that touches on several different tax concepts! Based on what you've described, you're dealing with both the Section 121 exclusion for primary residence sales and the classification of mixed-use properties. The key issue is that the IRS will likely view your RV park as a business investment rather than a replacement primary residence, even if you're living on the property. However, there are some strategies that might help: 1. **Separate the residential from business portions**: If you can clearly delineate what part of the property is your actual residence (whether that's an RV pad, a small house, or a manufactured home), that portion might qualify for the Section 121 exclusion. 2. **Timing matters**: You generally need to purchase your replacement residence within a reasonable timeframe to maintain the exclusion benefits. 3. **Documentation is crucial**: Keep detailed records of all expenses, improvements, and usage to support your position if audited. Given the complexity and potential tax implications (we're talking about significant capital gains here), I'd strongly recommend getting professional advice from a tax attorney or CPA who specializes in real estate transactions. They can help you structure the purchase and development in a way that maximizes your tax benefits while staying compliant with IRS regulations. This isn't a DIY situation - the stakes are too high to guess!
This is really helpful advice! I'm actually in a similar situation - considering selling my primary residence to buy a small ranch where I'd run a glamping business. The point about separating residential from business portions makes a lot of sense. Do you happen to know if there's a minimum square footage or percentage that needs to be designated as "personal residence" to qualify for the Section 121 exclusion? I'm wondering if having just a small cabin on a large commercial property would still count, or if the IRS has specific thresholds they look for. Also, when you mention timing matters for the replacement residence - is there a specific deadline like the 45/180 day rules for 1031 exchanges, or is it more subjective?
@dc11f34c4971 Great question about the thresholds! The IRS doesn't have specific square footage minimums for the Section 121 exclusion, but they do look at whether the space genuinely functions as your primary residence. The key test is whether you use it as your main home where you live, sleep, and conduct your daily personal activities. For timing, the Section 121 exclusion doesn't have the same strict deadlines as 1031 exchanges. You don't need to buy a replacement property at all to claim the exclusion - it's just about selling your primary residence that you've lived in for 2 of the last 5 years. The exclusion amount (up to $250k single/$500k married) applies regardless of what you do with the proceeds. However, if you're trying to argue that part of your new property qualifies as a replacement primary residence, you'd want to establish residency there fairly quickly to support that claim. The IRS looks at factors like where you receive mail, voter registration, driver's license address, etc. Your glamping situation sounds very similar to the original poster's RV park question. Just make sure whatever you designate as your personal residence is clearly separated from the business operation both physically and in your record-keeping!
Just want to add another perspective here - I went through something very similar when I sold my house to buy a working farm with a farmstand business. What really helped was consulting with a tax professional before making the purchase, not after. They helped me structure the transaction so that I clearly allocated the purchase price between the residential portion (my actual farmhouse) and the business portion (the farmstand, storage buildings, commercial kitchen, etc.). This required getting separate appraisals for each use, but it was worth it. The residential portion qualified for the Section 121 exclusion, saving me about $45,000 in capital gains taxes. The business portion was treated as a separate investment, which meant I did pay capital gains on that allocation, but it also meant I could depreciate those business assets going forward. One thing I learned is that you need to be very intentional about how you document everything from day one. The IRS will scrutinize mixed-use properties closely, so having clean records showing the legitimate business purpose versus personal residence use is essential. Don't try to get too creative with the allocations - they need to reflect the actual fair market values and intended use. The key is getting professional guidance before you buy, not trying to figure it out at tax time!
This is exactly the kind of real-world example that's so helpful! Getting separate appraisals for different portions of the property is brilliant - I never would have thought of that approach. It makes total sense though, since you need to justify the allocation with actual market values rather than just picking convenient percentages. The timing point about consulting before purchase (not after) is something I wish more people understood. By the time you're filing taxes, your options are pretty limited. But if you plan ahead, you can structure things to maximize your benefits legally. Quick question - when you got the separate appraisals, did you use the same appraiser for both portions or different specialists? I'm wondering if having one appraiser do both might be simpler for consistency, or if using different appraisers who specialize in residential vs commercial properties would give you stronger documentation. Also really appreciate you sharing the actual dollar amount you saved ($45k) - it helps put the value of proper planning into perspective!
Fidel Carson
I see a lot of talk about deducting the tickets as marketing expenses, which is smart, but there's another angle worth exploring: in-kind donations of inventory. If your play center tickets can be considered "inventory" rather than services, and if the schools are qualified 501(c)(3) organizations, you might qualify for an enhanced deduction under Section 170(e)(3) of the tax code. The deduction could be for your cost basis plus half the difference between cost and fair market value (capped at twice your cost). So if each ticket costs you $5 to provide (your actual costs) but sells for $27, you might be able to deduct more than just your cost. This gets complex though and depends on how your business is structured (sole prop vs corporation) and whether these tickets truly qualify as "inventory" versus services. Might be worth bringing this specific code section up with your accountant.
0 coins
Isaiah Sanders
ā¢This inventory approach sounds interesting but seems complicated. Does it really make that much difference compared to just deducting them as marketing expenses? Marketing seems cleaner and less likely to trigger an audit flag.
0 coins
Landon Flounder
Your accountant is correct about the bookkeeping entries - you do need to record both the revenue and the offsetting donation expense to maintain proper accounting records. However, this doesn't necessarily mean zero tax benefit. The key issue here is classification. While donated services typically aren't deductible as charitable contributions, your situation has legitimate business purposes that could qualify for deductions under different categories: 1. **Marketing/Advertising Expenses**: Since donating to school auctions generates community goodwill and exposes your business to potential customers (parents), these could be classified as ordinary business expenses rather than charitable donations. 2. **Inventory Consideration**: Your tickets might qualify as donated inventory rather than services, especially if you consistently treat them as such in your accounting. This could open up different deduction possibilities. I'd recommend having a focused conversation with your accountant about reclassifying these donations as marketing expenses. This approach often provides the tax benefit you're looking for while maintaining proper accounting practices. The fact that you're tracking school tax IDs suggests there should be some benefit - otherwise, as you noted, why bother with the paperwork? If your current accountant remains inflexible on this issue, consider getting a second opinion from another tax professional who specializes in small business deductions.
0 coins
Salim Nasir
ā¢This is exactly the clarity I needed! The marketing/advertising angle makes so much more sense than trying to force these into the charitable donation box. When I think about it, we really are doing this to build relationships in the community and get our name out there to families who might not know about our play center yet. I'm going to approach my accountant with this specific framing - that these are legitimate marketing expenses generating community goodwill and business exposure. If he's still resistant to this classification, I'll definitely seek a second opinion. The bookkeeping can stay the same (balanced entries) but the tax treatment should reflect the actual business purpose. Thanks for breaking this down so clearly - it's reassuring to know the paperwork tracking isn't pointless!
0 coins