
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
My son recently purchased a new home (he's keeping his previous house as a rental property) with a 30-year fixed mortgage at around 7.5%. He's married with an 8-year-old daughter. I've set up my estate planning so he'll inherit everything when I pass - all accounts are joint, POD, or TOD. Currently, I have about $1.4 million in CDs which make up my entire estate along with my paid-off house valued around $350k. Several of my CDs are maturing between July-December this year, and I've been considering "loaning" him approximately $750k at the IRS intrafamily long-term rate. This would effectively reduce their mortgage interest to about 4.4% on that amount, saving them roughly $25-30k each year. But I'm wondering if it's worth all the hassle - getting a second mortgage to protect my interests in case they divorce (and to keep his payments tax deductible), hiring a CPA to handle the paperwork, etc. Especially since he'd likely refinance anyway once interest rates drop. Would really appreciate some thoughts on whether this makes sense financially and tax-wise. Is there a simpler approach I'm missing?
Hey everyone, I could use some guidance about selling my vehicle that I took the Section 179 deduction for. I'm a mortgage broker with an S-Corp and I purchased a 2024 Expedition last year for my business and took the full Section 179 deduction on my taxes. Now I'm considering trading it in for something else - possibly a vehicle that wouldn't qualify for Section 179. I'm trying to figure out what my tax hit would be. Would I only need to pay tax on the amount I deducted in 2024 multiplied by my tax rate? Or would I have to pay tax on the entire original purchase price of the Expedition times my tax rate? That seems excessive but tax law can be weird. Also, if I were to buy another vehicle that DOES qualify for Section 179 (thinking about something smaller and more fuel-efficient like a crossover), would that new purchase offset some of the tax liability from selling the Expedition? I'd really appreciate any insights from those who've dealt with this before. Thanks!
Has anyone used the Section 179 deduction for an SUV recently? I thought there was a weight requirement of over 6,000 lbs for the full deduction? My CPA told me some SUVs don't qualify for the full amount.
Yes, there's definitely a weight requirement. The vehicle must have a GVWR (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating) of over 6,000 pounds to get the full Section 179 deduction. Many larger SUVs like the Expedition, Tahoe, Sequoia, etc. qualify, but smaller crossovers typically don't. If your SUV doesn't meet the weight requirement, there's a much lower cap on the deduction amount (around $19,000 I think, but that changes yearly). Also, the vehicle needs to be used at least 50% for business to qualify for any Section 179 deduction at all. If business use drops below 50% in a later year, you'll have recapture issues.
One thing to consider that might help reduce your tax burden - if you're planning to buy another business vehicle anyway, you could potentially time the purchase and sale strategically within the same tax year. Since you're looking at possibly getting a smaller, more fuel-efficient crossover, make sure it meets the 6,000+ lb GVWR requirement for Section 179 eligibility. Many crossovers don't qualify, which would limit your deduction to around $19,000 instead of the full amount. Also, since you mentioned you're a mortgage broker with an S-Corp, remember that the Section 179 deduction flows through to your personal return. If you expect your income to be significantly different next year, it might be worth considering the timing of both the sale and any new vehicle purchase to optimize your overall tax situation. The recapture is definitely painful, but at least you got the benefit of the deduction when you needed it. Just make sure to set aside cash for the tax hit when you do sell!
I'm trying to help my brother out with some cash flow issues by loaning him $65,000 for about 6 months. I know I need to charge at least the minimum interest rate according to the IRS to avoid it being considered a gift, but I'm confused about which Applicable Federal Rate (AFR) table I should be using. Is it the short-term, mid-term, or long-term rates? And do I use the monthly, annual, or semi-annual column? I've looked at the IRS website but it's not super clear to me which one applies specifically for a family loan with a 6-month term. Any help would be appreciated!
Has anyone actually been audited by the IRS over a family loan with the wrong interest rate? I'm loaning my sister $30k and don't want to deal with all this AFR stuff but also don't want to get in trouble.
YES! My parents got caught in an audit 3 years ago because they loaned me $45k interest-free for my first house. The IRS determined the "missing interest" was actually a gift and made them file a gift tax return. They didn't owe gift tax because it was under the lifetime exemption, but they had to pay income tax on the imputed interest they never actually received! The audit was a nightmare - just charge the minimum AFR rate and save yourself the headache.
I went through this exact situation last year when I loaned my daughter $50,000 for her business. Here's what I learned from my tax attorney: For a 6-month loan, you definitely need the short-term AFR rate. Since you're getting paid back in one lump sum at the end, use the semi-annual compounding rate from the IRS Revenue Ruling published for the month you make the loan. The key thing everyone misses is that you MUST actually charge and collect the interest, not just put it on paper. I made the mistake of "forgiving" the interest at the end, and my CPA told me that could still trigger gift tax issues since I was essentially giving her the interest amount. Also, make sure your loan agreement includes a specific maturity date, not just "about 6 months." The IRS wants to see definite terms. I used a simple promissory note template but had it notarized just to be extra safe. One more tip: if your brother can't pay the full amount back at 6 months, don't just verbally extend it. You'll need to formally modify the loan agreement or it could look like you're just gifting money with extra steps.
I just finished my 2024 taxes and got hit with owing federal taxes which honestly caught me off guard. Looking to avoid this next year and need some strategies to reduce my tax liability for filing in 2025. Here's my situation: * Filing married jointly with my wife * I'm a W-2 employee * Already maxed out my 401k ($23,000 for 2024) * Already maxed my HSA ($8,300 for family in 2024) * Have Traditional IRA, Roth IRA and a brokerage account but my MAGI is over $146K so Traditional IRA deduction isn't an option * My wife's only contributing about 10% of her 401k limit (so lots of room there) * For deductions, we claim our 2 kids, mortgage interest, property taxes - the usual stuff * No significant medical expenses to deduct Is my only real option just to increase my federal withholding on each paycheck so I don't get stuck with a bill at tax time? Or are there other strategies I'm missing that could actually reduce what I owe overall?
Has anyone tried bunching charitable deductions? With the higher standard deduction ($29,200 for married filing jointly in 2024), we've started doing this where we donate 2-3 years worth of charitable contributions in a single year so we can itemize that year, then take the standard deduction in the off years. We're also looking into donor-advised funds where you can get the tax deduction immediately but distribute the actual charitable gifts over time. Anyone have experience with these strategies?
We've been doing the bunching strategy for 3 years now and it works really well. We donate to our church and various charities in January and December of the same year, then nothing the next year. Increases our deduction by about $6,500 in the "on" years. Never tried a donor-advised fund though - seems like it might have fees that eat into the benefit?
One strategy you might be overlooking is a backdoor Roth IRA conversion. Since your MAGI is over $146K and you can't deduct traditional IRA contributions, you could still contribute $7,000 to a non-deductible traditional IRA, then immediately convert it to a Roth IRA. This won't reduce your current tax liability, but it's tax-free growth for retirement. Also, since you mentioned having kids, make sure you're getting the full Child Tax Credit ($2,000 per child under 17). The credit phases out at higher incomes but doesn't start until $400K for married filing jointly. Another option: If your employer offers a cafeteria plan or flexible spending account beyond just healthcare, you might be able to redirect some compensation to pre-tax benefits like commuter benefits, life insurance premiums, or dependent care assistance. Finally, consider timing any major purchases or medical expenses. If you're close to the 7.5% AGI threshold for medical deductions, you might bunch medical expenses into one year to exceed the threshold.
I've been on workers compensation for the entire 2025 calendar year with no other income coming in. Just got my latest paystub and noticed something weird - it's showing negative numbers for my W2 wages. Is that actually supposed to happen or should I be contacting payroll about a potential error? This is my first time on workers comp and I'm confused about how it should appear on my paystubs and eventually my W2. Really appreciate any insights from people who might have gone through this before!
Has anyone here used TurboTax when they had a year with workers comp? Did it handle the situation correctly or did you need to make adjustments?
I went through this exact same situation two years ago and it was really confusing at first! The negative W2 wages are completely normal - it's just how payroll systems handle the transition from regular taxable wages to non-taxable workers comp benefits. What probably happened is your employer initially processed some payments as regular wages early in the year, then had to "reverse" or correct those entries once your workers comp status was finalized. The negative numbers you're seeing are essentially the system's way of backing out those wages so they don't incorrectly appear as taxable income on your final W2. Your actual W2 at year-end will show the correct amount of taxable wages you earned (which sounds like it would be zero if you've been on workers comp the entire year). Don't worry about having to explain negative numbers to the IRS - they'll never see those paystub details, just the final corrected totals on your W2 form.
Lourdes Fox
Has anyone used an online promissory note or do you need to get a lawyer involved? I'm in a similar situation with my daughter but trying to keep costs minimal as we're only talking about a $200k loan.
0 coins
Bruno Simmons
I used an online template for a family loan of $150k and had significant problems. The template didn't include state-specific requirements, and when my son later applied for a business loan, their bank wouldn't recognize our loan documentation. We ended up having to redo everything with an attorney anyway, which cost more in the long run.
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
One thing I'd add to consider is the impact on your son's debt-to-income ratio for future lending. When we did a similar loan with our daughter, we discovered that some lenders treat family loans differently than traditional mortgages when calculating DTI for subsequent loans or refinancing. Also, regarding the "hassle" factor you mentioned - while there is paperwork involved, the annual savings of $25-30k you mentioned would more than justify the setup costs. Even if he refinances in 2-3 years when rates drop, you'd still save significant money during that period. Just make sure to discuss what happens if rates do drop significantly and he wants to refinance early. Will there be prepayment penalties? Having those terms clear upfront prevents awkward conversations later.
0 coins