


Ask the community...
Has anyone dealt with 1099-R forms from multiple years where the Box 5 amounts suddenly changed? My mom's pension had $0 in Box 5 for years then suddenly showed $8,200 this year with no explanation, but the taxable amount barely changed.
That could indicate they changed how they're administering the pension plan's insurance component. Sometimes plans will shift costs between the employer and retirees, or change insurance providers altogether which can affect how premiums are reported. If the taxable amount didn't change much despite the new Box 5 entry, it likely means these insurance premiums were already being accounted for in previous years' calculations but weren't being explicitly reported in Box 5. I'd recommend requesting a detailed explanation from the plan administrator about what changed in the reporting structure.
I work in retirement plan administration and see this confusion constantly! The key thing to understand is that Box 5 insurance premiums don't always reduce Box 2a because of how qualified plans handle different types of contributions and costs. In your sister's case, that $15,675.50 in Box 5 likely represents premiums for life insurance coverage that was purchased as part of her pension plan. If these premiums were paid with pre-tax dollars from the plan (which is common), then they're already included in the taxable calculation - they don't get subtracted. The small difference between Box 1 ($52,410) and Box 2a ($51,728.80) is probably from a completely different source - maybe after-tax contributions she made to the plan years ago that are now being returned tax-free. I'd strongly recommend having her contact Nationwide directly to request a detailed breakdown of how they calculated Box 2a. They should be able to explain exactly what portion of the distribution represents taxable income vs. return of basis vs. insurance costs. Don't guess on this - pension taxation can be really complex and getting it wrong could trigger an audit or penalties.
For anyone confused about all these transcript dates - the "cycle date" (which includes that Feb 13 processing date everyone's seeing) is literally just the date when the IRS computer system processed that batch of returns. It has almost nothing to do with your individual return status. Think of it like this: IRS computers run weekly cycles to update their systems. If your return was in that batch, you get that cycle's date. It means very little for predicting your refund timing. What DOES matter: - Code 150: Return filed and entered into system - Code 570: Processing paused for review (temporary) - Code 971: Notice issued (they're sending you a letter) - Code 846: REFUND ISSUED (this is the one you want!) The date next to your 846 code is your actual refund date. Add 1-5 business days for bank processing.
Thank you all for the detailed explanations! This is exactly what I needed to hear. I was getting really anxious about that Feb 13 date thinking it meant something was wrong with my return. I just checked my transcript again after reading these comments and I do see code 150 (return filed) but no 846 code yet. Since I filed on Jan 30th and we're still within that 21-day processing window, I guess I just need to be patient and wait for that 846 code to appear. Really appreciate everyone breaking down what these codes actually mean - the IRS website is so confusing! I'll stop obsessing over that Feb 13 processing date now that I know it's just a batch processing marker. Will keep checking for that magical 846 code instead.
You're definitely on the right track! Since you're still within that 21-day window and have the 150 code, everything sounds normal. I was in the exact same boat last week - filed around the same time as you and was driving myself crazy checking my transcript multiple times a day. What helped me was setting a reminder to check just once every few days instead of obsessively refreshing. The 846 code will appear when it appears, and checking every hour won't make it happen faster! Plus all these helpful explanations from everyone here really put my mind at ease about those confusing processing dates. Fingers crossed you see that 846 code soon! With the child tax credit you mentioned, that's going to be a nice refund when it hits.
Has anyone had experience with California state taxes as an L1 visa holder? I'm in a similar situation but worried about California's high state tax rates. I know federal taxes have these special rules for resident vs nonresident aliens, but does California follow the same rules?
California treats you as a resident for state tax purposes from the moment you move there with the intent to work/live. They don't follow the substantial presence test like federal taxes. So you'll file as a CA resident for the part of the year you lived there, regardless of your federal alien status. And yes, prepare yourself for those high state tax rates!
I went through this exact situation two years ago when I moved from the UK on an L1 visa. The key thing to understand is that while you're technically a nonresident alien until you meet the substantial presence test, you can still adjust your W-4 withholding to be more accurate for your expected final tax liability. What I did was calculate my expected tax for the full year assuming I'd make the first-year choice election (which lets you be treated as a resident for the entire tax year). Then I worked backwards to figure out what additional withholding amount to put on my W-4 to get close to that target. This way I wasn't massively overwithholding like the standard nonresident alien rates would cause. The important thing is to be conservative - it's better to slightly overwithhold than to owe penalties for underpayment. I'd recommend doing the calculations for both scenarios (staying nonresident vs making the first-year choice) so you can see the difference and plan accordingly. Your HR department should be fine with a revised W-4 as long as you explain you're anticipating a status change during the year. Also don't forget that your wife will need an ITIN if she doesn't have an SSN but you want to file jointly!
Another crappy thing about gambling taxes - even if you DO have enough deductions to itemize, you still have to report all your winnings as income, which can affect income-based things like healthcare subsidies, student loan payments, and social security benefits. I won about $12k last year (but lost $13k) and that pushed my AGI just high enough to reduce my premium tax credit by $1,800. So even though I could deduct my losses, I still effectively lost another $1,800 due to the higher income reporting. The system is incredibly punitive.
This is exactly why I stopped casual sports betting last year. The tax situation is absolutely brutal for recreational gamblers. I had a similar experience where I won about $3,200 but lost $3,800 overall, so I was down $600 for the year but still had to pay taxes on that $3,200 as if it was pure income. What really got me was realizing that even if you break even or win slightly, you're still getting crushed because you lose the benefit of your standard deduction if you itemize to claim losses. It's like the IRS designed the system specifically to punish casual gamblers. I've gone back to just watching games without betting. The few extra dollars in excitement aren't worth the tax headache and the feeling that the government is taking a cut of money I never actually profited from.
I'm in almost the exact same boat! Just getting started with understanding all this tax stuff and it's honestly mind-blowing how unfair the gambling tax system is. I had no idea when I started putting small bets on games that I'd have to report winnings as income even when I'm losing money overall. Your example of being down $600 but still owing taxes on $3,200 is infuriating. It feels like the system is designed to discourage regular people from even small recreational betting while probably not affecting high-roller types who have accountants handling everything. Thanks for sharing this - definitely making me reconsider whether those small weekend bets are worth the hassle come tax time.
Madison King
I actually just received a CP2000 notice last month for unreported unemployment from 2022. It wasn't that bad honestly. The letter clearly showed what income they had on file versus what I reported. They calculated I owed about $1,400 more in taxes, plus around $300 in penalties and interest. I checked their math and it was correct, so I just paid it online through the IRS website and it was done. The whole process was pretty straightforward. My advice is to just fix it by filing an amended return now rather than waiting. The penalties just keep adding up the longer you wait.
0 coins
Shelby Bauman
I'm going through something very similar right now! I forgot to report a 1099-G for about $5,200 in unemployment benefits from last year. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been really helpful - it sounds like this is way more common than I thought. Based on what I'm seeing, it looks like being proactive and filing an amended return is definitely the way to go rather than waiting for them to catch it. Maya's breakdown of the penalties and interest really puts it in perspective - the 20% penalty plus accumulating interest makes waiting pretty costly. Has anyone here actually filed the amended return themselves, or did you end up using a tax professional? I'm trying to figure out if Form 1040-X is something I can handle on my own or if I should get help. The math seems straightforward enough but I don't want to mess it up and make things worse.
0 coins