
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
My cousin hasn't filed or paid his taxes for the past two years, and I'm getting worried. He's pretty open about doing this as some kind of "statement against the system" or whatever. So far nothing has happened to him, but I'm wondering if that's just because he's moved apartments like 4 times since then and maybe the IRS notices haven't caught up to him yet? He seems to think he can just keep ignoring this forever with zero consequences, but I'm not convinced. I tried to talk to him about it last weekend and he just laughed it off saying "they're too busy going after billionaires." Yeah right. How long can someone realistically go without filing or paying before the IRS takes serious action? Do people actually go to jail for this kind of thing or is it just fines? I don't want to see him get in serious trouble but he won't listen to me.
I'm probably missing something obvious here, but I've been trying to check my refund status through SBTPG (Santa Barbara Tax Products Group) since I filed about a week ago. Every time I enter my information, the system keeps saying I don't have an account. I've double-checked my personal details multiple times, and I'm fairly certain I entered everything correctly. I definitely used them as my refund processor through TurboTax, so I should have an account, right? Has anyone else experienced this kind of issue with SBTPG this tax season? I'm wondering if maybe there's some sort of delay between filing and when their system recognizes your account?
I had the same exact issue earlier this tax season! The key thing to remember is that SBTPG operates on a "just-in-time" account creation system. Your account literally doesn't exist in their customer portal until your refund has been approved by the IRS and is ready for processing. I made the mistake of calling them repeatedly for a week, only to learn that this is completely normal. Check your IRS "Where's My Refund" status first - if you're still showing "Return Received" or "Being Processed," then SBTPG won't have your account visible yet. Once you hit "Refund Approved," you should see your SBTPG account within 24-48 hours. It's frustrating but totally normal!
I completely understand your frustration! I went through this same exact situation about three weeks ago. The waiting period between filing and when SBTPG actually shows your account is one of the most stressful parts of tax season. What I learned from calling them multiple times is that their system is designed with a "verification lag" - they literally cannot display your account information until the IRS moves your return from "accepted" status to "approved for refund" status. It's like having a package that's been shipped but hasn't arrived at the distribution center yet - the tracking system has nothing to show you. I recommend setting up a daily check routine: first check Where's My Refund on IRS.gov in the morning, and only if that shows "Refund Approved" should you bother checking SBTPG. This approach saved my sanity and prevented me from obsessively refreshing their website 20 times a day! Your refund is safe, just stuck in the normal government processing pipeline.
I recently took out some of my contributions from my Roth IRA that I've been putting in over the past 4 years. Before doing this, I did my homework and read from several financial sites that you can withdraw your contributions (not earnings) from a Roth IRA without any taxes or penalties. Seemed straightforward enough. But when my 1099-R arrived, it showed distribution code J. This completely threw me off because now TurboTax is saying I owe both taxes AND an early withdrawal penalty since I'm under 59.5 years old. Fortunately, I ended up putting the money back within the 60-day window, so it counted as a rollover and the tax/penalty disappeared. But now I'm confused about what went wrong with my original withdrawal plan. I was hoping to access some of my contributions again when interest rates drop, but I don't want to deal with unexpected taxes. Did I misunderstand something about Roth IRA contribution withdrawals? Or did the financial institution code something incorrectly on the 1099-R? Any clarification would be really appreciated!
This is such a helpful thread! I went through something similar last year and want to add one more piece of advice that saved me headaches: keep copies of ALL your Roth IRA contribution receipts/confirmations from your brokerage. When I had to file Form 8606, I discovered that my old brokerage (which had been acquired by another company) couldn't easily provide historical contribution data going back more than 3 years. Having my own records meant I could accurately complete the form without having to dig through old tax returns or make estimated guesses. Also, if you've been contributing to your Roth for several years like the original poster, double-check that you didn't accidentally exceed the annual contribution limits in any given year. If you did, those excess contributions could complicate your withdrawal calculations and potentially trigger different tax treatment. The peace of mind from having proper documentation is worth the small effort to maintain these records!
Great discussion everyone! As someone who works in tax preparation, I see this Roth IRA contribution withdrawal confusion constantly. The key points mentioned here are spot on, but I want to emphasize one critical thing that often gets overlooked: Even if you file Form 8606 correctly, the IRS automated systems sometimes don't properly match it with your 1099-R, which can trigger incorrect penalty notices months later. This is exactly what happened to several people in this thread. My recommendation: After filing your return with Form 8606, keep a copy of that form easily accessible and monitor your IRS account online (irs.gov) for any notices. If you do get an incorrect penalty notice, you'll need to either call the IRS directly or use a service like the ones mentioned here to get it resolved quickly. Also, for future reference, some newer brokerage platforms are starting to track contribution vs. earnings separately, which should eventually make this process smoother. But for now, assume you'll need to handle the proper reporting yourself regardless of what code appears on your 1099-R. The ordering rules Sofia mentioned are absolutely critical - contributions always come out first, but YOU have to prove that to the IRS through proper documentation!
Great questions! From my experience, Charles Schwab, Fidelity, and Vanguard are generally the best at providing detailed contribution histories when requested. They can usually give you a year-by-year breakdown going back to account opening. TD Ameritrade (now part of Schwab) and E*TRADE are decent but sometimes require more specific requests. Some of the smaller brokerages can be hit-or-miss with historical data, especially if they've been acquired or merged. Regarding IRS online account monitoring - penalty notices typically show up in your online account 2-4 weeks before they're mailed out. So checking monthly can give you a head start on addressing issues. The automated matching problems usually surface 3-6 months after filing, which matches your timeline perfectly. For your current situation, I'd definitely recommend trying one of those callback services rather than the traditional IRS phone marathon. I've had clients use them with good success rates. Just make sure you have your Form 8606 and contribution documentation ready when the agent calls - they can often resolve these matching errors immediately when they can see your proper filing. The key is acting quickly once you get that first penalty notice, because the IRS interest and penalty calculations compound pretty aggressively if left unresolved.
Great questions! In my experience, Charles Schwab is actually one of the better brokerages for providing contribution history - they usually have detailed records going back many years and their customer service can generate reports fairly quickly when requested. Fidelity and Vanguard are also generally good with record-keeping. I've had more challenges with smaller brokerages or when accounts have been transferred between companies, as the historical data sometimes gets fragmented. Regarding the IRS online account monitoring - penalty notices typically show up in your online account 1-2 weeks before the physical notice arrives by mail. I always tell clients to check their IRS account monthly, especially in the few months after filing a return that includes Form 8606. The earlier you catch these automated system errors, the easier they are to resolve. For your current situation, given what others have shared about the difficulty reaching the IRS directly, using a callback service like Claimyr might indeed save you significant time and frustration. The key is getting an actual human to review your account and see that Form 8606 was filed correctly - once they do that, they can usually clear the incorrect penalty immediately. Just make sure to have your Form 8606 and all supporting documentation easily accessible when you do get connected to an agent!
I'm a Canadian citizen working remotely for a US company and I need to apply for an ITIN for tax purposes. My employer mentioned I need to file a W-7 form with the IRS, but I'm really confused about the passport requirement. Do I actually need to mail my original passport to the IRS? That seems crazy risky! I can't be without my passport for months. I've heard conflicting things - some people say you absolutely have to send the original document, others mention certified copies from the embassy work. I tried calling the IRS but gave up after being on hold for almost 2 hours. Has anyone gone through this process recently? I'm especially concerned because I have travel planned in about 6 weeks and obviously can't be without my passport. Are there alternatives that the IRS accepts? I'm in Toronto if that makes any difference for embassy/consulate options.
Just adding another data point - I'm from Montreal and I used the US Consulate route last summer. Made an appointment online, brought my passport + W-7 + tax return, and they certified the copy right there. Took about 25 minutes total. Mailed everything to the IRS and had my ITIN in about 7 weeks. One tip they gave me at the consulate: make sure you call ahead to confirm they offer the passport certification service specifically for ITIN purposes. Some smaller consulates apparently don't offer it or have limited hours for this service.
Great thread with lots of helpful info! I went through this process as a Canadian in 2023 and wanted to add a few practical tips: 1. **Timing is everything** - If you're applying during tax season (January-April), expect longer processing times. I applied in May and got my ITIN in 6 weeks, but friends who applied in February waited 10+ weeks. 2. **Double-check your W-7 form** - The most common mistake I see other Canadians make is in Section 6a where you select your reason for needing an ITIN. Make sure you're checking the right exception box based on your specific situation. 3. **Keep copies of EVERYTHING** - The IRS will return your certified passport copy, but sometimes things get lost in the mail. I made photocopies of all documents before sending them. 4. **US Consulate appointment booking** - Book your consulate appointment ASAP. In Toronto especially, they can be booked weeks out. You can find the online booking system on the US Consulate website. The certified copy route is definitely the way to go - never send your original passport! I was traveling internationally while my application was processing and had zero issues.
For your situation as an independent contractor working remotely for a US company, you'll want to select exception 1(d) "Nonresident alien filing a U.S. tax return." Exception 1(a) is specifically for claiming tax treaty benefits, which doesn't sound like your primary reason for needing the ITIN. As a Canadian contractor receiving US income, you're required to file a US tax return to report that income, which is exactly what exception 1(d) covers. You'll likely be filing Form 1040NR (Nonresident Alien Income Tax Return) along with your W-7 application. Just make sure you have your 1099-NEC or other income documentation from your US client ready to include with your application - the IRS needs to see the tax return that requires the ITIN. Good catch on double-checking this detail - it's exactly the kind of mistake that causes rejections and delays!
For your situation as an independent contractor working remotely for a US company, you'd want to select exception 1(d) "Nonresident alien filing a U.S. tax return." Exception 1(a) is specifically for claiming treaty benefits, which typically applies when you're trying to reduce withholding taxes under the US-Canada tax treaty. As an independent contractor receiving US-source income, you'll be filing Form 1040NR to report that income, which makes 1(d) the correct choice. The key distinction is that you're filing a return to report income rather than claiming a specific treaty benefit to reduce taxes. I'd also recommend including a letter from your US company client explaining the nature of your work relationship and that you're receiving US-source income as an independent contractor. This helps support your application and can prevent any questions from the IRS about why you need an ITIN.
I'm trying to figure out if there's a way to set up a limited partnership where the limited partner (LP) gets most of the profits - say 80%, while the general partner (GP) only gets 20%. I've been doing some research on partnership structures and tax implications, and I know LPs don't have to pay self-employment tax on their distributions. My thought is to make my wife the GP (with the 20% share) and myself the LP (with the 80% share). This way, we could potentially reduce our overall self-employment tax burden since most of the income would flow to me as the LP without SE tax. Is this allowed? Or does the GP always need to have the majority profit share in these arrangements? Just trying to understand if there are any legal requirements around profit distribution percentages between LPs and GPs before we set this up.
Has anyone used the partnership tax calculator on the IRS website? I tried inputting different profit allocation scenarios, but I'm not sure if I'm using it correctly. I also heard that different states have different rules about partnership structures - does anyone know if that's true?
The IRS calculator is pretty basic and doesn't account for complex allocations. I'd recommend the tools at business.gov instead - they're more comprehensive. And yes, states definitely have different rules! California is particularly strict with partnership structures and charges an $800 minimum annual tax regardless of profitability. New York and Delaware have more favorable treatments. Check your state's secretary of state website for specific requirements.
Katherine, I've been through a similar situation with my own partnership structure. One important consideration that hasn't been fully addressed is the "material participation" test for self-employment taxes. Even as an LP, if you materially participate in the business (more than 500 hours annually or meet other criteria), you could still be subject to self-employment tax on your share of the income. Also, make sure you understand the difference between guaranteed payments to your wife as GP versus her distributive share. Guaranteed payments are always subject to self-employment tax regardless of her role, while her distributive share as GP would be subject to SE tax. This affects how you structure her 20% compensation. Before finalizing anything, I'd strongly recommend getting a written opinion from a tax attorney or CPA who specializes in partnership taxation. The IRS has been increasingly scrutinizing these arrangements, and having professional documentation of the business purpose and structure will be crucial if you're ever audited.
Madeline Blaze
This thread has been incredibly educational - I had no idea how sophisticated the IRS tracking systems have become or how much the "protest" framing could backfire legally. What really stands out to me is how many people here have shared stories about the IRS actually being reasonable when approached proactively, versus absolutely ruthless when they have to chase someone down. It seems like your cousin is choosing the worst possible path when better options are still available. The bank levy story from QuantumQuester really drives home what "getting caught" actually looks like in practice - not some dramatic arrest, but waking up to find your entire checking account emptied with no warning. That's probably a more effective wake-up call than abstract warnings about jail time. If I were in your shoes, I'd print out this entire thread and sit down with him. Sometimes seeing multiple strangers all telling the same story carries more weight than family advice. The tax attorney's point about voluntary disclosure programs and the stories about services like taxr.ai and Claimyr might give him concrete next steps instead of just feeling overwhelmed by the whole situation. The window for handling this the "easy way" is closing. Every day he waits, those penalties are compounding and he's losing negotiating power. His anti-system protest is ironically just going to make the system come down harder on him.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
This is such a comprehensive thread - I'm saving it to share with anyone I know who might be in a similar situation. The combination of professional advice from the tax attorney, real horror stories from people who learned the hard way, and practical solutions really covers all the bases. What strikes me most is how the voluntary vs. involuntary compliance makes such a huge difference in outcomes. It's like the IRS has two completely different faces - one that's willing to work with you if you come forward, and another that's absolutely merciless if they have to hunt you down. The cousin's "protest" angle is particularly troubling because he's essentially gift-wrapping a criminal intent case for prosecutors if it ever gets to that point. Someone needs to explain to him that effective protest requires actually having the moral high ground, and deliberately breaking tax laws while bragging about it isn't exactly the path to martyrdom he seems to think it is. Hopefully showing him all these real experiences will break through the ideological stubbornness. Sometimes people need to hear "this is what actually happened to me" rather than "this is what could theoretically happen to you.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
As someone who went through a similar situation with my brother, I can't stress enough how much your cousin is underestimating the IRS's reach and persistence. The "moving around to avoid notices" strategy is completely ineffective in 2025 - they have access to employment databases, banking records, credit reports, and can even track people through utility connections and voter registration. What's most concerning is his framing of this as a "protest." I've seen this exact mindset lead to criminal referrals because it demonstrates willful intent to evade taxes rather than simple non-compliance due to confusion or financial hardship. The IRS treats deliberate defiance very differently than accidental non-filing. The financial penalties alone should scare him - failure to file penalties are 5% per month (up to 25%), plus failure to pay penalties, plus compound interest. A $3,000 tax bill can easily become $6,000+ in just two years. And unlike other debts, tax obligations don't disappear in bankruptcy and have a 10-year collection statute that doesn't even start until taxes are assessed. The good news is he still has options if he acts quickly. The IRS has excellent voluntary disclosure programs and is surprisingly willing to work with people who come forward proactively. Payment plans, currently not collectible status, and even offers in compromise are all possibilities - but only if he stops running and starts engaging with the system. Show him this thread. Sometimes hearing real experiences from people who learned the hard way is more convincing than family warnings.
0 coins
Sean Doyle
What finally got through to my brother was actually a combination of fear and hope - showing him both the worst-case scenarios AND the fact that he still had good options if he acted quickly. I printed out stories from people who had their accounts levied and wages garnished, but I also highlighted the success stories from people who used voluntary disclosure programs. The key was framing it as "you're in control right now, but you won't be if you wait." I avoided lecturing about responsibility and focused on practical outcomes - "here's what happens if you keep waiting vs. here's what happens if you file next week." Numbers were definitely more convincing than emotional appeals. What really sealed the deal was when I showed him that the IRS actually had most of his income information already (through W-2s and 1099s) and was likely preparing substitute returns that would cost him way more than if he filed himself. Making it clear that doing nothing wasn't actually maintaining the status quo - it was actively making things worse - finally motivated him to act. The voluntary disclosure route ended up working out really well. He owed less than we feared, got on a payment plan he could afford, and most importantly, the criminal prosecution risk disappeared once he came into compliance voluntarily.
0 coins
Adaline Wong
What finally got through to my brother was actually a combination of the financial reality and showing him success stories of people who resolved similar situations. I avoided the doom-and-gloom approach and instead focused on "here's what your options look like right now versus what they'll look like in six months." The breakthrough moment was when I showed him that the IRS actually has programs specifically designed for people in his situation - it wasn't about begging for mercy, but about using systems that already exist. The Voluntary Disclosure Program made him feel like he was taking control of the situation rather than just surrendering. I'd suggest leading with the practical solutions people mentioned here (taxr.ai for understanding his specific situation, the installment agreement options, etc.) rather than the scary stories. Once he sees there's a clear path forward, the urgency of the penalties becomes motivation instead of paralyzing fear. The "protest" angle might even work in your favor - frame it as "here's how you can outsmart the system by using their own programs against them" rather than "you need to give up and comply.
0 coins