IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

ShadowHunter

•

Quick question - I thought Ireland ended the Double Irish in 2015? Why are we still talking about it in 2025?

0 coins

Ireland announced the end of the Double Irish in 2014, but allowed companies already using it to continue until 2020 as a transition period. So it was fully phased out by 2020. We still discuss it because: 1) It was one of the most successful tax avoidance strategies ever developed 2) Many companies still have enormous cash reserves offshore from years of using this structure 3) Current tax strategies evolved from it and use similar principles 4) It's a clear example of how international tax systems can be leveraged

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

Great question! As someone who's studied international tax policy, I think it's important to understand that while the Double Irish is now defunct, it perfectly illustrates how multinational corporations exploit gaps between different countries' tax systems. The key insight is that tax avoidance strategies like this rely on what's called "treaty shopping" - using networks of subsidiaries in different jurisdictions to minimize overall tax burden. Companies would essentially create a paper trail where profits would flow through multiple entities, each designed to take advantage of specific tax benefits or loopholes. What's fascinating (and concerning) is that even though Ireland closed the Double Irish loophole, similar principles are still being used today through other structures. The OECD has been working on global minimum tax rates partly because of strategies like this, but it's an ongoing cat-and-mouse game between tax authorities and corporate tax planners. For your business class project, I'd recommend also looking into the "Dutch Sandwich" which was often used in combination with the Double Irish, and more recent developments like the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative that's trying to address these issues globally.

0 coins

Chloe Harris

•

Has anyone actually gotten in trouble for missing Form 8615 in the past? I think I was supposed to file it last year (I was a dependent with dividend income) but didn't know about it. Now I'm worried...

0 coins

I did once, about 3 years ago. Had about $4K in stock dividends my grandparents had set up for me, and was still claimed as dependent by my parents. The IRS sent a letter about 6 months after filing saying I should have used Form 8615, recalculated my tax, and sent a bill for the difference plus a small interest charge. No penalties though since it was clearly just a mistake.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

Just wanted to add some perspective as someone who works in tax preparation - you're absolutely right to be concerned about getting this right, but the good news is that based on your situation, you definitely don't need Form 8615. The key factors are: 1) You're filing as independent (nobody can claim you as a dependent), and 2) Your taxable scholarship income isn't considered "unearned income" for Form 8615 purposes anyway. That form is specifically targeting investment income like dividends, interest, and capital gains that parents might try to shift to their kids' returns. Your situation with $23k in taxable scholarships for room/board is actually pretty straightforward - just report it as income on your 1040. The fact that your previous preparer missed this entirely is concerning and suggests you made the right call handling it yourself this year. One tip: when you're reporting that scholarship income, make sure you're not double-counting it anywhere else on your return. And definitely keep good records of what portions of your scholarships went toward qualified vs non-qualified expenses in case the IRS ever asks. The IRS is generally reasonable with honest mistakes, especially from students navigating this stuff for the first time. If you made an error somewhere, they'll typically just send you a notice with the correction rather than assuming fraud. You're clearly trying to do things right, which goes a long way.

0 coins

This is really reassuring to hear from someone who works in tax prep! I've been so stressed about messing something up on my first time filing independently. Quick question - when you say "make sure you're not double-counting" the scholarship income, what exactly should I watch out for? I reported the $23k as "other income" on my 1040, but I'm wondering if there are other places it might accidentally get included again?

0 coins

Does anyone know if the Build America, Buy America Act influences whether research is considered domestic? We manufacture in the US but use some imported components in our R&D prototypes.

0 coins

That's a relief! We were worried we'd have to track the origin of every component. So just to be clear, if we're conducting the actual research activities in our US facility, we use the 5-year schedule regardless of component sourcing?

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

Exactly right. The physical location where the research activities take place determines the amortization period, not the origin of the materials or components used. Since your actual R&D work is happening in your US facility, those expenses fall under the 5-year schedule. The sourcing of components doesn't change this classification.

0 coins

I'm dealing with a similar Section 174 situation but have an additional wrinkle - we're a software company that does both internal R&D for our own products and contract R&D work for clients. Does anyone know if the Section 174 amortization rules apply differently to contract R&D work versus internal R&D? Our accountant thinks the contract work might be treated as regular business expenses rather than Section 174 R&D expenses since we're being paid by clients for that work. But I'm not sure if that's correct, especially since the actual research activities are the same whether we're doing them for ourselves or for clients. Has anyone encountered this distinction between internal versus contract R&D work under Section 174?

0 coins

Aria Khan

•

Those codes are actually pretty promising! 150 means your return was accepted and processed, 806 shows your withholding credits, and 768 is your earned income credit - all good signs. The fact that you don't see any 570 or 971 freeze codes means you're likely in the clear for processing. That 846 code (refund issued) should pop up soon, and once it does, you'll typically see your deposit within 1-3 business days. I've been through this dance before and the waiting is brutal, but you're definitely on the right track! Keep checking your transcript weekly for updates šŸ¤ž

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

This is super helpful! I'm new to all this transcript stuff and was getting worried when I didn't see the 846 code yet. Good to know those freeze codes aren't there - that would've been a nightmare šŸ˜… Thanks for breaking it down in simple terms!

0 coins

Based on your codes, you're actually in a pretty good spot! 150 confirms your return was processed and tax liability calculated, 806 shows your federal withholding credits, and 768 is your earned income credit posting to your account. The key thing is I don't see any mention of freeze codes (570/971) or examination codes which would definitely slow things down. That 846 code you're waiting for is the golden ticket - once that appears with a date, your refund will typically hit your account within 1-5 business days depending on your bank. The IRS has been pretty backed up this year so even clean returns like yours can take a few weeks to fully process. I'd say keep checking your transcript every Friday morning when they usually update, and you should see that 846 pop up soon! The detective work definitely gets easier once you know what to look for šŸ•µļøā€ā™€ļø

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear! Been refreshing my transcript like crazy thinking something was wrong when I didn't see 846 right away. The detective work analogy is so accurate lol - I literally have a notebook with all these codes written down trying to figure out what they mean. Good to know Friday mornings are when they update, I've been checking randomly throughout the week. Thanks for the reassurance that everything looks normal! šŸ™

0 coins

Jacob Lewis

•

Has anyone considered the possibility that this might qualify as a section 179 expense? Since you're doing this for a business purpose (rental property) and it's under the threshold, you might be able to take the full deduction in year 1.

0 coins

Section 179 doesn't apply to buildings or land improvements for residential rental properties. It's specifically excluded by the tax code. You can only use Section 179 for actual business equipment and certain qualified improvement property, but not for landscaping on residential rentals.

0 coins

Jayden Reed

•

This is a tricky situation that I've seen come up with several HOA-managed rental properties. The key factor here isn't who owns the landscaping after installation, but rather the purpose and nature of the improvement you're making. Since you're adding new privacy landscaping that wasn't there before, this is almost certainly going to be treated as a capital improvement that needs to be depreciated. The IRS focuses on whether you're adding value to your rental property business, not the technical ownership transfer to the HOA. However, you should definitely explore whether this qualifies as a 15-year land improvement rather than 27.5-year residential property depreciation, as Mia mentioned. Landscaping improvements can often qualify for the shorter depreciation period. One thing to consider: document everything about the current state of the property. If there are any existing dead or dying plants that you're replacing, those portions might qualify as maintenance expenses rather than improvements. But the new privacy screening elements will likely need to be capitalized. I'd also suggest getting a second opinion from a tax professional who specializes in rental properties, especially given the unusual HOA ownership aspect of your situation.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

This is really helpful advice, especially about documenting the current state and potentially treating replacement plants differently from new additions. I'm wondering though - since the HOA agreement specifically states that plantings become their property, could this create any issues with claiming depreciation on something I technically don't own after installation? I'm also curious about the 15-year vs 27.5-year depreciation question. Would the fact that these are privacy plantings rather than purely decorative landscaping affect which classification applies? The primary purpose is functional (blocking sight lines) rather than aesthetic improvement. Thanks for the suggestion about consulting a rental property tax specialist - I think the HOA ownership transfer aspect makes this complicated enough that professional guidance is probably worth the cost.

0 coins

Prev1...26502651265226532654...5643Next