


Ask the community...
Has anyone used both a professional appraiser and the IRS's Art Appraisal Services for valuable collectibles in an estate? My parents have some artwork that might need special handling on the 706.
We used both for my father's estate which included several paintings. Definitely get your own independent qualified appraiser first. The IRS Art Appraisal Services is not there to help you - they review submitted appraisals to see if they agree with the valuation. For items over $50k, it's worth having a qualified appraiser with experience in estate tax valuations.
This is exactly the kind of complex estate planning question that keeps me up at night! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my grandmother's estate planning. One additional consideration that might be worth discussing with your mother's financial advisor - the timing of when she passes could significantly impact the filing threshold since the basic exclusion amount changes each year (it's inflation-adjusted). For 2024, it's $13.61 million, and it will likely be higher in future years until the current law sunsets after 2025. Also, don't forget that if your mother remarries (I know this might seem unlikely, but it happens!), that could complicate the DSUE situation since she can only carry forward the DSUE from her last deceased spouse. Just something to keep in the back of your mind for comprehensive planning. Given the complexity here, I'd really recommend getting a second opinion from an estate tax specialist who deals with portability elections regularly. The peace of mind is worth the consultation fee, especially when you're dealing with estates of this size.
You raise an excellent point about the timing and inflation adjustments! I hadn't fully considered how the changing exemption amounts could affect the filing requirements year to year. That's actually quite strategic to think about. The remarriage scenario is something I definitely hadn't thought of - Mom is only 68 and in good health, so while it seems unlikely now, you're absolutely right that it could happen. It's good to know that would affect the DSUE portability. I think you're spot on about getting a second opinion from an estate tax specialist. Between all the helpful responses here, I'm realizing this is more nuanced than I initially thought, especially with the gift sequencing that @Aisha Patel mentioned and the potential for changing exemption amounts. Better to invest in proper professional guidance upfront than deal with expensive corrections later. Thanks for adding that perspective about the annual adjustments - it s'making me think we should probably model out a few different scenarios based on different timing assumptions.
fr fr the tax system actually works for once lol
With your income level and 4 dependents, you're looking at some solid refund potential! The Child Tax Credit alone could be $8,000 ($2,000 per child), plus you'll likely qualify for a substantial Earned Income Tax Credit. Given that you had $2,592 withheld and got $10k back last year on similar income, I'd estimate you're looking at $10,000-$12,000 this year. The extra withholding this year should boost your refund even more. Just make sure you have all your documentation ready when you file!
Just to add some clarity from the technical side - when you recharacterized your Roth IRA contribution to traditional before filing your 2022 return, you essentially treated it as if the contribution was always made to the traditional IRA. The 1099-R with Code R in 2023 is just the custodian's way of reporting that recharacterization transaction to the IRS. Since you did this before filing your 2022 taxes, your original return should have reflected the traditional IRA contribution (either as deductible or non-deductible depending on your income and workplace plan). The key question now is whether you properly reported that traditional IRA contribution on your 2022 return. If you didn't report it at all, you might need to file Form 8606 for non-deductible contributions to establish basis, but that's separate from the 1099-R Code R issue. The 1099-R itself goes on your 2023 return with no additional tax owed since box 2a shows $0 taxable amount.
This is really helpful - I think I'm starting to understand the situation better now. So when I recharacterized before filing my 2022 return, I should have treated it as if I made a traditional IRA contribution that year, but I actually didn't report any IRA contribution at all on my 2022 return. Does this mean I definitely need to amend my 2022 return to add Form 8606 for the non-deductible contribution? And would I need to do this even though the 1099-R shows up in 2023? I'm trying to figure out if this is just a reporting issue or if I actually made an error that needs to be corrected.
Yes, if you didn't report the traditional IRA contribution at all on your 2022 return after doing the recharacterization, you should amend to add Form 8606. This establishes your basis in the traditional IRA, which is crucial for future tax calculations when you eventually take distributions. Think of it this way - you moved money from a Roth IRA (after-tax contribution) to a traditional IRA before filing. Since you're not eligible for a deduction due to your 401k and income level, this becomes a non-deductible traditional IRA contribution that needs to be tracked on Form 8606. Without this form, the IRS has no record that you already paid taxes on this money, so it could be taxed again when you withdraw it later. The 1099-R in 2023 is separate - it just reports the recharacterization transaction itself. But the underlying contribution that was recharacterized should have been reported on your 2022 return via Form 8606.
Based on all the helpful responses here, it sounds like you have two separate issues to address: 1. **The 2023 1099-R with Code R**: This should be reported on your 2023 tax return (not 2022) since that's when it was issued. The $0 in box 2a means there's no taxable amount - it's just informing the IRS about the recharacterization transaction. You can safely ignore TurboTax's suggestion to amend 2022 for this specific form. 2. **The missing 2022 traditional IRA contribution reporting**: Since you recharacterized before filing your 2022 return but didn't report any IRA contribution that year, you should consider amending your 2022 return to add Form 8606. This establishes basis for your non-deductible traditional IRA contribution (assuming you're not eligible for the deduction due to your 401k and income level). The Form 8606 is important because it tells the IRS you already paid taxes on this money, preventing it from being taxed again when you eventually withdraw it. This is separate from the 1099-R Code R issue - it's about properly documenting the contribution that resulted from your recharacterization. So to summarize: Report the 1099-R on your 2023 return, but consider amending 2022 to add Form 8606 for the traditional IRA contribution tracking.
This is exactly the clear breakdown I needed! Thank you for separating these two issues - I was getting confused trying to figure out if they were related. So just to confirm my understanding: I'll report the 2023 1099-R with Code R on this year's return (ignoring TurboTax's amendment suggestion), and separately I should amend my 2022 return to add Form 8606 to document the non-deductible traditional IRA contribution that resulted from the recharacterization. This way I'll have proper basis tracking for future withdrawals. Really appreciate everyone's help sorting through this IRA mess!
The real question is why cant the IRS learn from the states smh
facts. its 2025 and were still waiting weeks/months for basic processing
Same situation here! Filed both federal and state on Jan 2nd, got my state refund last week but IRS is still showing "processing" with no updates. It's honestly wild how much faster state systems are - makes you wonder what the holdup is on the federal side. At least we know the states have their act together!
Nia Harris
Has anybody used care.com or similar services for finding backup childcare? I'm wondering if using an agency vs hiring directly affects the tax deduction situation at all.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
ā¢I use care.com and it doesn't change the deduction rules. You still need the Tax ID of whoever provided the care. In some cases the platform might be considered the provider (if they're the ones paying the caregiver), but in most cases on care.com you're paying the caregiver directly so you need their info.
0 coins
Gemma Andrews
One thing to keep in mind is that your irregular 1099 schedule might actually work in your favor for justifying these additional childcare expenses. Since you can't predict when you'll be called in for those 14+ hour shifts or overnight assignments, having backup childcare available becomes a legitimate necessity for maintaining your income. The key is documentation - keep a detailed log of your work calls/assignments and how they correlate with your childcare needs. This will help support your claim that the nanny/au pair expenses are directly tied to your ability to work, especially during times when regular daycare isn't available (evenings, weekends, extended hours). Also consider that with your unpredictable schedule, you might qualify for a higher percentage of the Child and Dependent Care Credit if your irregular income puts you in a lower AGI bracket. The credit percentage can be up to 35% of qualifying expenses for lower income levels.
0 coins
Ava Garcia
ā¢This is really helpful advice about documentation! I'm new to this community but dealing with a very similar situation. Quick question - when you say "keep a detailed log," what specific information should I be tracking? Just the dates and times I get called in, or do I need more detail than that? I want to make sure I'm documenting everything correctly from the start rather than trying to reconstruct it later during tax season.
0 coins