


Ask the community...
I'm also waiting on a Navy Federal deposit with a 2/24 DDD! Filed jointly for the first time this year too. Haven't received mine yet, but based on what others are saying, I'm planning to check my account first thing tomorrow morning. The text alert suggestion from Edward is really smart - I just set that up now so I don't have to keep obsessively checking my account. It's reassuring to hear that Navy Federal is generally reliable with posting on the actual DDD date. Fingers crossed we both see our deposits hit tomorrow!
Same here! Also Navy Federal with a 2/24 DDD and first time filing jointly. I've been checking my account way too often today. The text alert tip is brilliant - just set mine up too. It's nice to know there are others in the exact same situation. Hopefully we'll all wake up to good news tomorrow morning! Has anyone noticed if Navy Federal shows pending deposits before they actually post, or do they just appear as available funds right away?
Navy Federal customer here! I had a DDD of 2/24 as well and mine posted around 3 AM this morning. I'm also filing jointly for the first time this year, so that doesn't seem to affect the timing. For what it's worth, I never saw it show as pending - it just appeared as available funds when I checked this morning. The text alert suggestion from Edward is spot on - that's actually how I found out it had hit before I even checked the app. If you haven't received yours yet, I'd definitely check again tomorrow morning since deposits can post throughout the early morning hours.
That's such great news to hear! I'm one of the people still waiting with the same 2/24 DDD and joint filing situation. It's really encouraging to know that yours posted right on time and that the joint filing didn't cause any delays. I just checked my account again and still nothing, but I'll definitely be looking first thing in the morning. Thanks for sharing your experience - it gives me hope that mine will show up soon too! Did you get your refund amount exactly as expected, or were there any surprises?
Just want to add one practical tip - when you take over as trustee for a revocable trust, it's usually a good idea to get an EIN for the trust even if you're not filing 1041s. Many financial institutions require an EIN for trust accounts, and having one doesn't obligate you to file trust tax returns if it's a grantor trust.
Does getting an EIN mean you have to file a 1041 though? I thought having a tax ID for the trust means you're required to file trust tax returns. That's what my bank told me when I set up accounts for my dad's trust.
No, getting an EIN doesn't automatically require you to file 1041s. The filing requirement depends on the type of trust and circumstances, not just having a tax ID number. For a revocable trust with a living grantor, you can have an EIN for banking purposes without being required to file Form 1041. The confusion often comes from bank representatives who may not fully understand trust taxation rules. They see a trust EIN and assume tax filings are required, but that's not necessarily the case. The EIN is primarily needed because financial institutions need a tax identification number to open accounts and report income - they can't use the grantor's SSN for trust accounts even when it's a grantor trust for tax purposes. So you can safely get an EIN for operational purposes while still reporting all trust income directly on your dad's personal tax return.
Based on everyone's helpful responses, it sounds like the corporate trustee definitely made an error by filing 1041s for your uncle's revocable trust. Since he's still living and the trust is revocable, all income should indeed flow directly to his Form 1040. Regarding those high trustee fees ($38,000 on $75,000 of income seems excessive), you might want to review the trust document to see what fee structure was agreed upon. Even if the fees were legitimate, they shouldn't be generating K-1s in a grantor trust situation. For going forward, I'd recommend: 1) Stop filing 1041s immediately, 2) Consider whether amended returns for recent years make sense (especially if there were tax benefits your uncle missed), and 3) Make sure all future trust income gets reported directly on his personal return. The various tools others mentioned (TaxR.ai, Claimyr) might be worth exploring if you need professional guidance, but definitely consult with a CPA who understands trust taxation to clean this up properly. Six years of incorrect filings is a lot to unwind, but it's definitely fixable.
I work in benefits administration and deal with this every year. Here's a simple rule: NEVER have overlapping HSA and FSA coverage, even for a single day. The safest approach is to: 1) Terminate HSA contributions with your last January paycheck (the one paid on/before Jan 31) 2) Start FSA with your first February paycheck Technically, your HSA contribution limit for 2025 will be prorated for just January, so you're only eligible for 1/12 of the annual limit anyway during this year of transition. If you've already maxed out January's prorated amount with your first two January paychecks, you're already at your limit.
Are you sure about that 1/12 proration? I thought the HSA limit wasn't prorated as long as you're eligible on December 1st and satisfy the testing period. But if you lose eligibility early in the year, do you actually need to prorate?
You're right to question that - the proration rule is more complex. If you're HSA-eligible on December 1st, you can contribute the full annual amount regardless of when during the year you became eligible (this is called the "last month rule"). However, if you lose HSA eligibility before December 1st, then yes, your contribution limit gets prorated based on the number of months you were eligible. In the original poster's case, since they're switching to FSA coverage starting February 1st, they won't be HSA-eligible on December 1st, so their 2025 HSA contribution limit will indeed be prorated to just January (1/12 of the annual limit). If they've already contributed more than that 1/12 amount in their first two January paychecks, they'd actually have excess contributions that need to be corrected.
This is a great example of why you can't trust HR departments with complex tax rules! I had a similar situation two years ago where my company's benefits team gave me completely wrong information about HSA/FSA transitions. The key issue here is that once you have FSA coverage starting February 1st, you become HSA-ineligible immediately. This means any HSA contribution made after that date - even if it's coded for January - creates a compliance problem because the physical contribution occurs when you're no longer eligible. Plus, as others have mentioned, since you're losing HSA eligibility before December 1st, your 2025 contribution limit will be prorated to just 1/12 of the annual maximum (since you're only eligible for January). If you've already contributed more than that amount in your first two January paychecks, you'll need to request a return of excess contributions anyway. My advice: Stop that final HSA contribution immediately, and double-check that your January contributions don't exceed the prorated limit. It's much easier to prevent these issues than to fix them after the fact on your tax return.
This is really helpful information! I'm dealing with a similar transition situation and hadn't realized the proration issue. Quick question - if someone has already over-contributed in January before realizing the 1/12 limit applies, what's the best way to get those excess contributions back? Do you just contact the HSA provider directly, or does it have to go through payroll since it was a payroll deduction?
Just want to add - hobby losses are treated differently than business losses. Since you're just selling personal items without intent to make a profit, this would be considered a hobby activity. You report the income on Schedule C but check "No" for business activity. The downside is you can only claim enough expenses to offset your income - you can't claim a loss if your expenses exceed your income. But since you're just trying to show zero profit, that shouldn't be an issue in your case.
Wait, so if OP spent $30k buying these cards over the years but only sold them for $26k, they can't claim that $4k loss?
That's correct. With hobby activities, you can only deduct expenses up to the amount of income you received. So in your example, they could deduct $26k of their $30k expenses, zeroing out the income, but couldn't claim the additional $4k as a loss on their taxes. This is different from a legitimate business where you can deduct all expenses and carry forward losses. It's one of the drawbacks of hobby classification, but it's still better than paying taxes on the full $26k without deducting any expenses.
I don't think this needs to be on Schedule C at all. This sounds like selling personal items, which would go on Schedule D as capital gains/losses. You report your basis (what you paid) and your selling price, and pay taxes only on the gain if there is any.
Schedule D is for investment assets, not personal belongings. Trading cards would only go on Schedule D if they were bought specifically as an investment. If you're just selling off your personal collection, it's different.
Actually, @Taylor Chen might be onto something here. The IRS treats collectibles as capital assets when held for personal use. If OP bought these cards for personal enjoyment and is now selling them, they could potentially report this on Schedule D instead of Schedule C. The key question is whether this was truly personal collecting or if there was business intent. Given that OP received a 1099-K though, they ll'need to account for that reported income somewhere on their return - either Schedule C or Schedule D would work, but Schedule D might be more appropriate for personal collectibles.
Mei Wong
This is such a common misconception that trips up so many people! The key thing to understand is that when you sell ANY portion of an investment, you're not withdrawing your "original money" - you're selling a percentage of your total holdings. Think of it this way: if you buy 100 shares of a stock for $25 each ($2500 total) and they double to $50 each, you now have $5000 worth of stock. If you sell 50 shares at $50 each (getting $2500), you're not getting your "original investment" back - you're selling half your position, which has a cost basis of $1250 (50 shares Γ $25 original cost) and realizing $1250 in taxable gains. This applies regardless of whether it's stocks, crypto, or other investments. The IRS doesn't care that the dollar amount you're withdrawing equals your original investment - they care about the cost basis of what you're actually selling. For your tax planning purposes, if you sell $2500 worth in 2025, you'll owe taxes on the gains portion in that tax year. The exact amount depends on your cost basis calculation method (FIFO, LIFO, or specific identification if you have proper documentation).
0 coins
LunarLegend
β’This explanation really clicked for me! I was making the same mistake as the original poster - thinking I could just take out my "principal" without tax consequences. Your stock example makes it crystal clear that selling 50% of your holdings means 50% of the cost basis and 50% of the gains, regardless of what dollar amount that equals. I'm curious though - is there any legitimate way to minimize the tax impact when you need to access some of your investment gains? Like timing the sales across different tax years or using tax-loss harvesting from other positions?
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
Great question! There are definitely several legitimate strategies to minimize tax impact when accessing investment gains: **Timing strategies:** - If you're close to the one-year mark, waiting for long-term capital gains rates (typically 0%, 15%, or 20% vs ordinary income rates for short-term) - Spreading sales across multiple tax years to stay in lower tax brackets - Timing sales in years when your overall income is lower **Tax-loss harvesting:** - Selling losing positions to offset gains from your profitable sales - Be careful of the wash sale rule (can't buy back the same security within 30 days) - This can be especially effective if you have a diversified portfolio with some winners and losers **Other considerations:** - If you have both taxable and tax-advantaged accounts, consider which account to draw from first - For crypto specifically, some people use the specific identification method to sell their highest-cost-basis coins first (though you need excellent records) - Consider charitable giving of appreciated assets if you're philanthropically inclined The key is planning ahead rather than making reactive decisions. A tax professional can help model different scenarios based on your specific situation, especially if you have significant gains involved.
0 coins
Mei Lin
β’This is incredibly helpful! I've been sitting on some crypto gains for months trying to figure out the best way to access them without getting hammered on taxes. The timing strategy makes a lot of sense - I bought most of my positions about 10 months ago, so waiting a couple more months to hit that one-year long-term capital gains threshold could save me a significant amount. I'm especially interested in the tax-loss harvesting approach. I have a few positions that are down from where I bought them. Would it make sense to sell those at a loss in the same tax year that I take profits from my winning positions? And does the wash sale rule apply to crypto the same way it does to stocks?
0 coins