IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

As someone who just went through estate administration myself, I can't stress enough how important it is to get this fiscal year decision right from the start. You're absolutely on the right track thinking strategically about this. One thing I learned the hard way - document everything meticulously when you make your fiscal year election. Keep records of when each income item was received and when expenses were incurred. The IRS can be very particular about the timing, especially if they ever audit the estate return. Also, since you mentioned expecting more income after October, consider whether any of that income might be recurring (like rental income, dividend payments, etc.). If so, you'll want to factor that into your long-term tax planning strategy beyond just this first fiscal year. Have you considered consulting with a CPA who specializes in estate taxation? Given the complexity of balancing the fiscal year choice with distribution timing and the relatively compressed estate tax brackets, the cost of professional advice often pays for itself in tax savings. Plus, they can help ensure you're not missing any deductions that estates are entitled to claim.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

This is excellent advice about documentation! As someone new to estate administration, I'm finding there are so many details to track. Could you elaborate on what specific documentation you wish you had kept better records of? I'm currently using spreadsheets to track income and expenses by date, but I'm wondering if there's a particular format or level of detail that would be most helpful if the IRS ever has questions about the fiscal year election or timing of distributions. Also, regarding the CPA recommendation - at what point in the process did you decide to bring in professional help? I'm trying to balance doing my due diligence with knowing when I'm in over my head. The estate isn't huge, but the tax implications seem complex enough that professional guidance might be worth the investment.

0 coins

Great question about documentation! From my experience, I wish I had been more detailed in tracking the source and nature of each income item - not just the amount and date, but exactly what it was (interest, dividends, business income, asset sales, etc.). This becomes crucial when preparing the 1041 because different types of income have different reporting requirements and may affect distribution strategies differently. For expenses, I learned to categorize them as either estate administration expenses (deductible on 1041) or expenses related to producing income. Keep receipts and note the business purpose for each expense. Also document any expenses that could potentially be deducted on either the estate tax return (706) or income tax return (1041) - you get to choose which gives the better tax benefit, but you need good records to make that decision. Regarding the CPA timing - I brought one in right after I realized I was spending more time researching tax code than actually administering the estate. For me, that was about 3 months into the process when I started getting significant income items and had to make the fiscal year decision. The CPA's fee was about $2,500 but saved me an estimated $8,000+ in taxes through strategic planning I wouldn't have known about. If your estate has more than minimal income or complex assets, it's usually worth the consultation early rather than trying to fix mistakes later.

0 coins

Having dealt with estate administration recently, I'd add one more strategic consideration to what's already been shared here. Since you're expecting more income after October, think about whether that timing creates an opportunity for multi-year tax planning. If you set your fiscal year to end July 31st (which seems optimal given your May expense and July income), you could potentially time future distributions in subsequent years to smooth out the tax impact. For example, if you know significant income is coming in November-December, you might want to make distributions to beneficiaries early in that next fiscal year to offset the higher income. Also, don't overlook the estate's standard deduction ($300 for 2024/2025) and personal exemption ($100) - they're small but every bit helps with these compressed tax brackets. One practical tip: if you do decide to use the 65-day rule for distributions, mark those dates clearly on your calendar now. It's easy to lose track of deadlines when you're juggling all the other aspects of estate administration. The October 4th deadline (65 days after July 31st) would be critical for your tax planning to work properly. The documentation advice from others here is spot-on - the IRS loves clear paper trails, especially for timing elections that affect multiple tax years.

0 coins

This multi-year planning perspective is incredibly valuable - thank you for highlighting that! As someone just starting to navigate estate administration, I hadn't considered how the fiscal year choice would ripple into subsequent years' tax strategies. Your point about marking the 65-day deadline is really practical advice. I can already see how easy it would be to get caught up in other estate matters and miss that critical October 4th date. I'm going to set multiple calendar reminders now while it's fresh in my mind. One follow-up question about the multi-year approach: when you mention timing distributions in subsequent years to offset higher income, are there any restrictions on how frequently you can make distributions to beneficiaries? Or can you essentially distribute income as it comes in to keep the estate's taxable income minimized year over year? Also, regarding the estate's standard deduction and personal exemption - are those amounts the same regardless of which fiscal year end date you choose, or do they get prorated based on the length of the tax year?

0 coins

Has anyone dealt with POS systems that have integrated payment processing hardware? Our client has those Square-type systems that combine traditional POS functions with the credit card reader. Would those components potentially be treated differently?

0 coins

Natalie Chen

•

In my experience, even with integrated payment processing, the entire unit is still treated as a single asset under the 7-year class life. The IRS generally doesn't want us breaking down assets into components unless they're truly separate and distinct assets.

0 coins

Tami Morgan

•

Great discussion everyone! As someone who's dealt with this exact scenario multiple times, I can confirm that restaurant POS systems should definitely be depreciated over 7 years under Asset Class 57.0 (Distributive Trades and Services). The key insight that helped me understand this classification is that the IRS looks at the primary business function of the asset, not just its technical components. Even though these systems contain computers and software, their primary purpose is facilitating the core revenue-generating activities of the restaurant - order taking, payment processing, inventory tracking, etc. I've also found that when in doubt on asset classifications, it's worth considering the broader business context. Restaurant POS systems are typically designed and marketed specifically for food service operations, they're often required by franchisors as part of operational standards, and they integrate deeply with restaurant-specific functions like kitchen display systems and inventory management. Thanks for sharing those tool recommendations too - always looking for ways to streamline the depreciation analysis process!

0 coins

Don't stress too much! I work with a lot of freelancers and this happens more than you'd think. Here's what I tell them: always report your REAL income, not what's on an incorrect form. The IRS computers mainly flag when reported income is LOWER than what's on forms. When you report MORE, it rarely triggers issues. Think about it - the IRS is happy when you pay taxes on more income! Keep solid records, but don't lose sleep over this. The startup's mistake shouldn't become your problem.

0 coins

So what exactly should we put on Schedule C in this situation? Do we list the 1099 amount and then add the additional income somewhere else, or just put the total correct amount?

0 coins

On Schedule C, you just report the total correct amount of income you actually received. Don't try to split it between what's on the 1099 and what's missing - just put the full, accurate total on the appropriate income line. The IRS matching system will see that you reported MORE than what's on the 1099, which typically doesn't trigger any automated notices. If by some chance there are questions later, your documentation showing the actual payments received will support the higher amount you reported. Keep it simple - accurate total income on Schedule C, solid records in your files, and you're good to go!

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation two years ago with a small marketing agency that basically disappeared after sending me an incorrect 1099. Here's what I learned: First, you're absolutely right to report the actual amount you received - that's what the IRS expects. I reported the correct (higher) income on my Schedule C and kept detailed records of all my payments, invoices, and attempts to contact the company. The key thing that gave me peace of mind was creating a simple one-page summary document that I kept with my tax records. It listed: - The incorrect 1099 amount vs. actual income received - Dates and methods of all my attempts to get it corrected - A brief explanation that the company became unresponsive I never needed to submit this with my return, but having it organized made me feel much more confident about my filing. The IRS never questioned anything because I reported MORE income than what was on their forms. Your bank deposits and invoices are solid evidence - you're in good shape. Don't let their poor record-keeping create stress for you when you're doing everything correctly!

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful - thank you for sharing your experience! I like the idea of creating that one-page summary document. It sounds like having everything organized in one place would make me feel much more confident about the whole situation, even if I never have to actually use it. Did you find that having those detailed records made you less anxious about potential future questions from the IRS? I keep worrying that somehow this discrepancy will come back to haunt me years later, but it sounds like when you're reporting MORE income rather than less, it's really not something to lose sleep over.

0 coins

Just a heads up - if you do decide to amend, make sure you check if you'd actually benefit from filing jointly vs separately. Most couples do save money filing jointly, but there are certain situations where filing separately is better (like if one spouse has income-based student loan payments or significant medical expenses). Worth calculating both ways before going through the amendment process.

0 coins

Ayla Kumar

•

This! My husband and I accidentally filed separately last year and were about to amend until we realized we'd actually save about $1800 by staying with separate returns due to his income-based student loan situation. Definitely worth checking both scenarios.

0 coins

StarSeeker

•

Just wanted to add that the error code you mentioned (IND-508-01) specifically indicates that your SSN was already used on another return with a different filing status. This confirms what others have said - your wife's return was processed as "married filing separately" even though she selected "married filing jointly" in TurboTax. The key thing to understand is that when you use separate TurboTax accounts, the software treats them as separate returns by default, regardless of what filing status you select. For a true joint return, all the income and tax information from both spouses needs to be on the same Form 1040. Before you decide whether to amend or just file separately, I'd recommend using the IRS withholding calculator or a tax calculator to see which option gives you the better outcome. Sometimes the peace of mind of getting it "right" isn't worth the extra hassle if filing separately doesn't cost you much more in taxes.

0 coins

That error code explanation is super helpful! I was wondering what that specific code meant. Quick question - if we do decide to just file separately to avoid the amendment hassle, do I need to do anything special when I refile my return, or can I just change the filing status and resubmit through TurboTax?

0 coins

One mistake I made that cost me thousands: if you've been using standard mileage and switch to actual expenses, you have to use the straight-line depreciation method for the remaining years. You can't use accelerated depreciation or Section 179. The IRS assumes you've already received a portion of the depreciation through your standard mileage deductions from previous years. Also, be aware that when you sell the vehicle, you'll need to recapture that depreciation, which will be taxed at ordinary income rates rather than capital gains rates. Something to keep in mind for future planning.

0 coins

Thanks for pointing this out! I hadn't considered the depreciation recapture when I eventually sell the vehicle. Is there a specific way to calculate how much depreciation I've already "taken" through the standard mileage rate for the past two years?

0 coins

Yes, there's a specific calculation for this. The IRS considers a portion of the standard mileage rate to be depreciation. For 2022, it was 26 cents per mile and for 2023, it's 27 cents per mile. You'd take the total business miles you drove in each year and multiply by the depreciation portion for that year. For example, if you drove 30,000 business miles in 2022, that's 30,000 Ɨ $0.26 = $7,800 in depreciation already "taken" through the standard mileage rate. When you switch to actual expenses, you'd use this figure to reduce your depreciable basis in the vehicle. This prevents you from double-dipping on depreciation that was effectively included in your standard mileage deductions from previous years.

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! I'm a freelance photographer and have been wrestling with this exact decision for my 2023 Honda CR-V that I use exclusively for shoots and client meetings. One thing I want to add that hasn't been fully addressed - make sure you understand the timing implications if you switch from standard mileage to actual expenses mid-year. You can't use standard mileage for part of the year and actual expenses for the rest of the same tax year. You have to pick one method for the entire year. Also, if you do switch to actual expenses, don't forget about other deductible costs beyond just gas, maintenance, and depreciation. You can also deduct registration fees, vehicle taxes, tolls and parking fees for business trips, and even car washes if they're for maintaining your professional image (though keep receipts and don't go overboard on this one). Given your high mileage (30k/year) and the fact that you purchased the vehicle new, the actual expense method might work out better, especially with current gas prices and maintenance costs on higher-mileage vehicles. Just run the numbers both ways before you commit to the switch.

0 coins

Great point about not being able to mix methods within the same tax year! I'm actually in a similar situation as a new community member here - just starting out as a freelance consultant and trying to figure out the best approach for my vehicle expenses. One question I have about the "other deductible costs" you mentioned - how strict is the IRS about the car wash deduction for professional image? That seems like it could be a gray area that might raise red flags during an audit. Do you have any experience with how auditors view those types of peripheral vehicle expenses? Also, for someone just starting out who doesn't have historical mileage data, would you recommend starting with actual expenses from day one, or is it safer to begin with standard mileage and potentially switch later once I have a better sense of my actual costs?

0 coins

Prev1...23602361236223632364...5645Next