IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Thanks for all the helpful responses everyone! I really appreciate the clarification on how SEP IRA catch-up contributions work. Based on what I'm reading here, it sounds like I can make my regular SEP contribution (the 25% of net self-employment income) plus add a $1,000 catch-up contribution as a traditional IRA contribution to the same account. I'm definitely going to look into the solo 401k option for 2024 that Harmony mentioned - the higher catch-up limit of $7,500 sounds much better than the $1,000 IRA limit. And good point about double-checking the tax software calculations, Rudy. I'll make sure my software isn't trying to add catch-up directly to the SEP calculation. One follow-up question though - when I make that $1,000 catch-up contribution as a traditional IRA contribution, do I need to do anything special to designate it as such, or does the account custodian handle that automatically?

0 coins

Omar Mahmoud

•

Great question about designating the catch-up contribution! You'll typically need to specify this when you make the contribution through your account custodian (like Fidelity, Schwab, etc.). Most custodians have separate options when you initiate the contribution - one for "SEP-IRA employer contribution" and another for "Traditional IRA contribution." When you make that $1,000 catch-up, you'd select the traditional IRA option and many systems will even ask if it's a catch-up contribution specifically. Your custodian should provide you with the proper tax forms (like Form 5498) that will show both contribution types separately for tax reporting purposes. If you're unsure, definitely call your custodian before making the contribution to confirm their process - each one handles it slightly differently in their systems.

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! I'm in a similar situation - turned 52 last year and have been contributing to a SEP IRA for my freelance work. I had no idea about the traditional IRA catch-up workaround that Melissa mentioned. One thing I want to add for anyone reading this - make sure you understand the income limits for traditional IRA deductibility if you also have a day job with a 401k. I learned the hard way that having workplace retirement plan coverage can phase out your ability to deduct traditional IRA contributions depending on your income level. The SEP contribution isn't affected by this, but that $1,000 catch-up might not be deductible if your total income is too high and you're covered by another plan. Also, definitely agree with everyone saying to double-check your tax software calculations. I caught mine trying to add the catch-up directly to my SEP calculation too. Had to manually separate them on the forms.

0 coins

Sofia Price

•

That's a really important point about the income limits, Logan! I didn't realize that having a workplace 401k could affect the deductibility of that traditional IRA catch-up contribution. Do you know what the income thresholds are for 2024? I have a part-time W-2 job with a simple 401k in addition to my freelance work, so this could definitely apply to me. Also, when you say you had to manually separate them on the forms, are you talking about separating them on your tax return, or when making the actual contributions to your account? I want to make sure I handle this correctly from the start.

0 coins

As someone who went through this exact process last year as a 1099 contractor, I wanted to share what worked for me. I had been doing freelance accounting work for about 2.5 years when my husband and I decided to buy our first home. The biggest challenge was indeed the income documentation. Lenders wanted to see not just my tax returns, but also profit & loss statements, bank statements showing consistent deposits, and letters from my main clients confirming ongoing work relationships. I learned that organization is absolutely critical - having everything ready upfront made a huge difference. One thing that really helped was working with a loan officer who specialized in self-employed borrowers. They knew exactly what documentation to request and how to present my income in the most favorable light to underwriters. They also suggested I get a CPA letter summarizing my business income trends, which seemed to carry weight with the underwriting team. Your situation sounds quite strong actually - having your wife's W-2 income as a foundation plus your consistent 1099 earnings should work in your favor. The key is finding the right lender and being prepared with thorough documentation. Don't get discouraged if you get a "no" from the first lender - shop around until you find one that understands self-employed borrowers. Feel free to ask if you want more specific details about the documentation process!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! The point about getting a CPA letter summarizing business income trends is really valuable - I hadn't thought about that approach. It sounds like having that professional third-party validation could make a big difference with underwriters. I'm particularly interested in your mention of getting letters from main clients confirming ongoing work relationships. How detailed did those need to be? Did they need to specify contract terms, expected duration, or payment amounts? I have a few long-term clients that could probably provide something like this, but I want to make sure I'm asking for the right information. The specialization aspect makes a lot of sense too. I think I've been looking at this too broadly - sounds like I should specifically seek out loan officers who market themselves as working with self-employed borrowers rather than just going to any random bank. Thanks for offering to share more details - this community has been incredibly helpful for understanding what to expect!

0 coins

I went through this exact situation about 8 months ago as a freelance software engineer with 1099 income, so I can definitely relate to your concerns! The good news is that with your financial profile - consistent income growth, your wife's stable W-2 earnings, excellent credit scores, and that solid down payment - you're in a much stronger position than many self-employed borrowers. Here are the key things that made the difference for me: **Timing matters for business expenses** - I learned this the hard way. The year I applied for my mortgage, I had claimed some significant equipment deductions that really hurt my qualifying income. If you're planning any major business purchases, consider timing them strategically around your mortgage application. **Prepare a comprehensive income narrative** - Beyond just tax returns, I created a detailed summary showing my income progression, client retention rates, and future contract commitments. This helped demonstrate stability despite the 1099 status. **Consider portfolio lenders** - These are banks that keep loans in-house rather than selling them. They often have more flexibility with self-employed borrowers since they're not bound by strict secondary market guidelines. **Your wife's W-2 income is a huge asset** - Many lenders will be much more comfortable with your application because you have that stable income foundation. Some might even qualify you primarily on her income with yours as supplemental. The process took about 6 weeks total, which was longer than a traditional W-2 mortgage but not unreasonable. Don't get discouraged if you hit some bumps - persistence and the right lender make all the difference. You've got this!

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

This is such great advice, especially about portfolio lenders! I hadn't heard of that term before but it makes total sense that they'd have more flexibility. Do you have any recommendations for finding portfolio lenders, or is this something I'd need to ask about specifically when shopping around? The point about timing business expenses is really hitting home for me too. I was actually planning to upgrade my home office setup next month (new computer, monitors, etc.) but now I'm thinking I should wait until after we close on the house. It's frustrating to have to choose between legitimate business deductions and mortgage qualification, but I guess that's just the reality of being self-employed. Your comment about creating an income narrative is intriguing - did you do this yourself or work with someone to put it together? I feel like I could tell a compelling story about my client relationships and income growth, but I want to make sure I present it in a way that will resonate with underwriters. Thanks for sharing your timeline too - 6 weeks doesn't sound too bad considering all the extra documentation involved. Really appreciate you taking the time to share your experience!

0 coins

Reina Salazar

•

I went through this exact same decision last year for my freelance consulting business! Here's what I learned from actually using these systems: The bundled TurboTax with QuickBooks Self-Employed is definitely more limited than standalone Home & Business. If you think you might ever need to handle rental properties, multiple business types, or complex deductions, go with Home & Business. For your situation with sporadic income and lots of expenses, I'd actually lean toward Wave + TurboTax Home & Business. Here's why: Wave's expense categorization is really solid, and since you're already using a receipt app, you can easily import those into Wave. The manual transfer to TurboTax at year-end isn't that painful when you only have a few transactions per month. The QuickBooks integration is nice, but you're paying $15-25/month for convenience you might not need. That's $180-300 annually vs. Wave (free) + Home & Business (~$120). For someone just starting out with infrequent transactions, that savings adds up. One tip: Whatever you choose, set up your expense categories early to match what you'll need for Schedule C. This makes tax time so much smoother regardless of which software combo you use!

0 coins

I've been through this exact decision process recently for my consulting business! After testing both approaches, here's what I discovered: The key insight that helped me decide was understanding my actual usage patterns. Like you, I thought I'd barely use QuickBooks most months, but I found the automatic bank connection and transaction categorization actually saved me hours during busy periods when I'd otherwise let receipts pile up. However, given your specific situation - sporadic income, mainly check payments, and strong receipt tracking habits - Wave + TurboTax Home & Business is probably your best bet. Here's why: 1. You're already organized with receipt management, so you won't benefit as much from QuickBooks' automation 2. With only a few transactions per year, the manual data entry isn't burdensome 3. The cost savings ($180+ annually) is significant for a starting business 4. Home & Business gives you room to grow if you later form an LLC One thing to consider: If you do go the QuickBooks route temporarily, make sure to export your data AND take screenshots of your dashboard/reports before canceling. The export files don't capture everything, and having visual references can be helpful later. Also, whichever path you choose, I'd recommend doing a "practice run" with your current year's data before tax season hits. It'll help you identify any gaps in your process early!

0 coins

Mila Walker

•

This is really helpful advice! I like the idea of doing a practice run before tax season - that's something I hadn't thought of. Quick question about the bank connection you mentioned: does Wave also have automatic bank syncing, or is that a QuickBooks-only feature? I'm trying to figure out if the main difference is just the TurboTax integration or if there are other automation features I'd be missing by going with Wave.

0 coins

Has anyone had experience with options that aren't clearly Section 1256 contracts? I have some foreign index options and I'm not sure if they qualify for the 60/40 treatment or if they're just regular capital assets.

0 coins

Nick Kravitz

•

Only options on "broad-based" indices qualify as Section 1256 contracts. Foreign indices generally don't qualify unless they're specifically listed by the IRS. If your foreign index has fewer than 10 stocks or if the options aren't regulated by the CFTC, they're probably just regular capital assets with standard short/long term treatment.

0 coins

KhalilStar

•

I went through this exact same headache last year with SPX spreads that crossed tax years. The key insight that finally solved it for me was understanding that the "mark-to-market" treatment under Section 1256 creates two separate tax events: one on December 31st (the deemed sale) and another when you actually close the position. For your bear put spread, you need to calculate the fair market value of each leg as of December 31st. The long 4800 put and short 4700 put each get treated as if they were sold and immediately repurchased at those values. This creates your 2023 tax liability/benefit under the 60/40 rules. Regarding the tax software issue with negative cost basis - this is definitely a common problem. What worked for me was creating separate entries for each leg rather than trying to enter them as a spread. For the short leg, I entered the premium received as the "proceeds" and the December 31st mark-to-market value as the "cost basis." This gives the correct economic result without triggering the software's validation errors. The IRS instructions are confusing on this point, but the underlying principle is that each Section 1256 contract stands alone for tax purposes, even when they're part of a larger strategy. Don't let the software limitations force you into incorrect reporting - the tax law is what matters, not what the software easily accepts.

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been struggling with the same issue and your explanation about treating each leg separately makes perfect sense. Quick question though - when you calculated the December 31st fair market value, did you use the closing prices on that day or some kind of average? Also, did you have to file any additional forms beyond the standard Form 6781 to document the mark-to-market calculations?

0 coins

Margot Quinn

•

Another free option worth mentioning is FreeTaxUSA Business - they offer 1099 preparation and e-filing at a much lower cost than most other services. I used them last year for about 15 contractors and found their interface really user-friendly. You can import contractor information from a CSV file if you have it organized in a spreadsheet, which saves tons of time versus entering everything manually. They handle both the IRS Copy A filing electronically and generate clean PDF copies for your contractors. The whole process took me maybe an hour including the e-filing submission. They also send email confirmations when the IRS accepts your filings, which gives good peace of mind that everything went through properly.

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

Thanks for mentioning FreeTaxUSA Business! I've been looking for alternatives to the more expensive services. Quick question - do they also handle the 1096 transmittal form automatically, or do you need to prepare that separately? Also, when you say "much lower cost," what kind of pricing are we talking about compared to something like TurboTax Business?

0 coins

Demi Hall

•

For a professional approach without breaking the bank, I'd recommend starting with the IRS fillable PDFs as your first option. You can download the current year's Form 1099-NEC and Form 1096 directly from irs.gov, fill them out electronically, and print them on regular paper for your contractors (Copy B). This gives you that clean, professional look you're after. However, since you mentioned having "several" contractors, you might want to consider one of the automated services mentioned here like taxr.ai or FreeTaxUSA Business, especially if you're dealing with more than 3-4 forms. The time savings and reduced error potential often justify the small cost. One critical point - remember that Copy A (the red scannable version that goes to the IRS) requires either official pre-printed forms from an office supply store OR electronic filing. You can't just print Copy A on regular paper. The electronic filing route through services like FIRE or third-party providers eliminates this issue entirely. Also, don't forget the January 31st deadline for both providing forms to contractors AND filing with the IRS - it's coming up fast! Good luck with your filings.

0 coins

StarSailor}

•

This is really helpful - thank you for the comprehensive breakdown! I'm just getting started with my first business and have 6 contractors to file for, so this definitely clarifies my options. One quick follow-up question: if I go the electronic filing route to avoid the red paper issue, can I still print out professional-looking copies for my contractors from the same system, or do I need to handle the contractor copies separately? Want to make sure I'm not missing any steps in the process.

0 coins

Prev1...22322233223422352236...5644Next