


Ask the community...
Great decision, Sean! This thread has been incredibly educational for everyone involved. As someone who works in financial compliance, I see these types of schemes regularly, and they always follow the same pattern - complex structures that exist primarily for tax avoidance rather than legitimate business purposes. What's particularly valuable about this discussion is how it demonstrates the importance of community knowledge sharing. The collective experiences shared here - from those who nearly fell for similar schemes to those who got audited - create a comprehensive picture that's much more powerful than any single professional opinion. For future reference, the IRS publishes an annual "Dirty Dozen" list of tax scams that often includes these types of abusive tax shelters. They also maintain a list of "reportable transactions" that must be disclosed on tax returns, and many of these software license/LLC arrangements fall into that category. The fact that you trusted your instincts and sought out community input before making a decision shows exactly the kind of due diligence that protects people from financial harm. Your experience will undoubtedly help others who find this thread after being approached by similar companies. Thanks for sharing your story and for the follow-up on your decision. It's a perfect example of how asking the right questions and getting multiple perspectives can save you from very expensive mistakes.
This whole thread has been such an eye-opener for me as someone who's completely new to understanding these tax schemes. I actually got a very similar pitch from a company called "Health Innovation Partners" just last week, and after reading all these experiences, I can see it follows the exact same playbook - special LLC, $100k software investment, massive tax write-offs, and pressure to decide quickly. What really resonates with me is how everyone emphasized trusting your gut instincts. I had that same "too good to be true" feeling but was starting to second-guess myself because their materials looked so professional and they used a lot of impressive-sounding tax terminology. The point about asking for independent professional references who can verify the strategy is brilliant - when I asked them that question yesterday, they gave me the same runaround about most CPAs not understanding "advanced strategies." That was my red flag moment. Sean, thanks for starting this discussion and for sharing your final decision. You've potentially saved not just yourself but anyone else who finds this thread from making a costly mistake. The collective wisdom shared here is invaluable!
As a tax professional who's been dealing with these schemes for over a decade, I want to applaud everyone who shared their experiences here - this is exactly the kind of community knowledge sharing that protects people from financial predators. Sean, your decision to walk away was absolutely the right call. What strikes me about the My Health CCM pitch is how it hits every single checkbox on the IRS's list of abusive tax shelter characteristics: artificial complexity, disproportionate tax benefits, entity creation solely for tax purposes, and most tellingly, the insistence on using their "approved" professionals. I've represented clients in audits involving virtually identical structures, and the outcomes are consistently bad. The IRS has specific teams dedicated to unwinding these arrangements, and they're very good at it. They'll typically challenge both the inflated valuation of the software licenses AND the business purpose of the entire structure. For anyone else reading this who might be considering similar arrangements, here's my professional advice: if a tax strategy requires you to create new entities, involves transactions primarily with the company selling you the strategy, or promises tax benefits that seem disproportionate to your economic risk, get multiple independent opinions from tax professionals who have ZERO financial relationship with the promoter. The legitimate tax planning world has plenty of genuine opportunities that don't require elaborate schemes or artificial time pressure. Trust your instincts, do your due diligence, and remember that the best tax strategy is one that makes business sense first and tax sense second. Thanks again to everyone who contributed to this invaluable discussion!
Thank you so much for this professional perspective! As someone who's completely new to this community and just starting to learn about tax strategies, your breakdown of the IRS's specific characteristics for abusive tax shelters is incredibly helpful. Your point about the IRS having dedicated teams to unwind these arrangements is both reassuring and terrifying - reassuring that they're actively protecting people from these schemes, but terrifying to think about what would happen if someone got caught up in one. I'm curious - when you mention that the outcomes are "consistently bad" in audits, what's the typical timeline? Do these audits happen quickly after filing, or do people sometimes think they've gotten away with it for years before the IRS catches up? Also, your advice about getting opinions from professionals with "ZERO financial relationship" to the promoter really drives home how important independence is in this process. It seems like these companies deliberately try to control the entire ecosystem of advice around their schemes. This whole thread has been such an education for someone like me who had never even heard of these types of arrangements before. Thank you for sharing your professional expertise!
call the tax advocate service! They helped speed up my verification process
I'm confused about the child tax credit situation with Form 8332. If I let my ex claim our kids using this form, does that mean they get ALL the tax benefits? Or do I still get some of them?
When you release the claim using Form 8332, you're allowing your ex to claim the child as a dependent, which generally means they'll receive the following benefits: - Child Tax Credit - Credit for Other Dependents - Education credits - Dependent care credit However, even if you've released these claims, the custodial parent (presumably you) can still claim: - Head of Household filing status (if you qualify) - Earned Income Credit - Child and Dependent Care Credit The IRS specifically ties some benefits to which parent the child lives with for the majority of the year, regardless of who claims them as a dependent.
Just want to add one more tip that saved me a lot of trouble - make sure you keep detailed records of when you give the completed Form 8332 to your ex. I take a photo of the signed form and send it via email so there's a timestamp, then also give them the original. Last year my ex lost the form right before filing and we had to scramble to get another one signed. Having that digital backup with the date stamp helped prove I had provided it on time. Also helped when the IRS had questions later - I could show exactly when the form was completed and delivered. The whole process is stressful enough without having to worry about lost paperwork!
That's such a smart tip about keeping digital records! I never would have thought to take a photo and email it. I'm just starting this process for the first time and already feeling overwhelmed by all the documentation. Do you recommend any specific way to organize all these tax-related documents? I have the feeling this won't be the last form I need to keep track of between now and when my kids are adults.
I almost messed up my tax loss harvesting by forgetting about the special rules for mutual funds! If anyone's planning to sell mutual funds (not ETFs) on December 31st, remember that mutual funds only trade once per day after market close. You have to place your order before the fund's cutoff time (usually 4pm Eastern) for it to execute on that day. Miss the cutoff and your trade gets processed on the next business day, which would be next year!
Good point! Also, some brokerages have earlier cutoffs for mutual fund orders, like 3pm Eastern instead of 4pm. Always check your specific brokerage's policies.
That's a great add! Fidelity and Schwab typically use the 4pm Eastern fund cutoff, but you're right that some brokerages impose their own earlier deadlines. TD Ameritrade used to require mutual fund orders by 3pm Eastern for same-day execution before they were acquired by Schwab. Always best to give yourself plenty of buffer time rather than trying to squeeze in orders at the last minute. I learned that lesson the hard way a few years ago when I missed tax loss harvesting a big position because my order went through 5 minutes after cutoff.
Just want to add another important timing consideration - if you're planning to do tax loss harvesting with international stocks or ADRs (American Depositary Receipts), be extra careful about the settlement timing. While US stocks typically settle T+2, some international securities can have longer settlement periods. Also, if you're holding stocks in a foreign market that trades on a different schedule (like Tokyo or London), make sure you understand when their December 31st equivalent deadline falls in your local time zone. I had a friend who missed harvesting losses on some European stocks because he didn't account for the time difference properly. The key takeaway remains the same - it's the trade date that matters, not settlement - but just wanted to flag these additional complexities for anyone with international holdings in their portfolio.
Really helpful point about international securities! I've been wondering about this exact issue with some ADRs in my portfolio. Do you know if there's a reliable way to check the settlement periods for specific international stocks, or is this something I'd need to call my broker about? Also, just to clarify on the time zone issue - if I'm holding a stock that trades on the London exchange, would I need to execute the trade by December 31st London time, or December 31st in my local US time zone? The trade date rules can get confusing when markets are in different time zones.
Rami Samuels
I went through this exact same situation in January and I totally get your frustration! Here's what saved me a lot of headache: Before you schedule that dreaded appointment, call the number on your letter FIRST and ask specifically: "Do I qualify for online identity verification through ID.me?" Don't let them brush you off - be persistent about this question. I called at exactly 7:00 AM when they opened (took about 45 minutes of redialing but finally got through). Turns out I WAS eligible for online verification even though my letter only mentioned scheduling an appointment! For the online process: - Both you and your husband will need to complete it if you filed jointly - You can do it on separate devices from home - Takes about 15-20 minutes each - Way better than taking time off work for an appointment If online isn't an option, then yes - both spouses absolutely must attend for joint returns. No way around it, trust me I tried! The key is calling early morning right when they open. Have your SSN, the letter, and your tax return ready when you call. The wait to get through is brutal but SO worth it if you can avoid the in-person hassle. Once verification is complete (whether online or in-person), your refund typically processes within 2-3 weeks. You're almost there! šŖ
0 coins
Rachel Clark
ā¢This is such helpful advice! I'm definitely going to try calling at 7 AM sharp tomorrow with my fingers crossed for the ID.me option. The idea of both my husband and I having to coordinate our work schedules for an in-person appointment has been giving me anxiety, especially since we both have pretty demanding jobs right now. It's so frustrating that the IRS letter doesn't clearly spell out all your options upfront - why make us jump through hoops just to find out we might be able to do it online? Anyway, thanks for the encouragement and the specific script to use when I call. Knowing that others have successfully gotten through this process definitely helps calm my nerves a bit! š¤
0 coins
Lia Quinn
I completely feel your pain on this! Just went through the exact same situation in February and it was such a stressful process. Here's what I wish someone had told me from the start: DEFINITELY call the number on your letter before you schedule any appointment! Even though your letter says to schedule an appointment, you might still qualify for ID.me online verification. I wasted two weeks stressing about coordinating an in-person visit before I found out I could do it online. Call right at 7 AM when they open - that's your best shot at getting through. Have your SSN, the letter, and a copy of your return ready. Ask specifically: "Am I eligible for online identity verification through ID.me?" If you do qualify for online verification: - Both you and your husband will need to complete it separately since you filed jointly - You can do it on your own devices from home - Takes about 15-20 minutes each - SO much better than taking time off work! If you must go in person, unfortunately yes - both spouses are required for joint returns. The IRS is super strict about this and won't make exceptions. The good news is once you complete verification (online or in-person), your refund usually processes within 2-3 weeks. I know it's incredibly frustrating, but you're almost through the worst part! The online option saved my sanity - hopefully it's available for you too! š¤
0 coins
Natalie Chen
ā¢This whole thread has been so reassuring to read! I'm in literally the exact same situation - got my verification letter last week and have been spiraling about having to drag my husband to an IRS office. The fact that so many people here ended up qualifying for the online ID.me option even when their letters didn't mention it is giving me real hope. I'm setting three alarms for 6:55 AM tomorrow to make sure I call right when they open. Fingers crossed I can join the "avoided the in-person appointment" club! Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this community is a lifesaver when dealing with IRS stress! š
0 coins