IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Brady Clean

•

This is exactly the kind of complex tax situation where having proper documentation from day one is crucial. I've seen too many businesses get into trouble with the IRS because they didn't establish clear policies upfront. A few additional considerations that might help: **Allocation Method**: Consider using a "days available" method to allocate costs. If the suite is available 365 days per year, but only used for entertainment 50-60 days, you might be able to argue that a larger portion should be treated as facility rental rather than entertainment. **Business Purpose Documentation**: Create a standard form for each suite usage that captures: date, attendees, business purpose, topics discussed, and outcomes. This becomes invaluable if you face an audit. **Separate the LLC's Books**: Make sure the LLC maintains separate books and records. Each member company should receive detailed K-1s showing their share of different types of expenses (facility rental vs. entertainment). **Consider Revenue Recognition**: Since you mentioned the LLC will have some revenue from reselling unused tickets, make sure you're properly accounting for this income and how it affects the overall deduction calculations. The fact that you're asking these questions upfront puts you way ahead of most businesses. Document everything, work with a qualified CPA, and you should be in good shape. The key is being able to demonstrate legitimate business purpose for the arrangement.

0 coins

This is really comprehensive advice, thank you! The "days available" allocation method is something I hadn't considered but makes a lot of sense for our situation. Since we have access Monday-Friday during business hours year-round, that's potentially 260+ days of pure business facility usage versus maybe 40-50 actual event days. One follow-up question - when you mention creating K-1s for each member company, does the LLC need to elect partnership taxation, or does this happen automatically? We haven't made any specific tax elections yet and I want to make sure we're set up correctly from the start. Also, for the business purpose documentation form you mentioned - is there a particular format or level of detail that works best for IRS scrutiny? I'd rather over-document than under-document at this point.

0 coins

Great questions! For the LLC tax election - if you don't make a specific election, a multi-member LLC is automatically treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes, so yes, you'll be issuing K-1s to each member company. This is actually what you want for this situation since it allows the pass-through treatment of the different expense categories. For the business purpose documentation, I'd suggest a simple form that captures: Date, Duration of business use, Attendees (name, company, role), Primary business purpose, Specific topics discussed, Follow-up actions/outcomes, and whether any entertainment component was involved. The IRS looks for contemporaneous records, so complete these same-day or next-day, not months later when preparing taxes. One more tip on the "days available" method - make sure your lease agreement supports this interpretation. If the lease specifically allocates costs to events vs. general facility access, that strengthens your position. If not, you might want to consider an amendment that clarifies the breakdown between facility rental and event access components. Also document any actual business meetings held in the suite on non-event days with agendas, attendee lists, and meeting minutes. This creates a paper trail showing legitimate business facility usage that's completely separate from any entertainment aspects.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful - thank you all for sharing your experiences! I'm seeing a pattern here that proper documentation and allocation methodology are absolutely critical for these suite arrangements. One thing I wanted to add that hasn't been mentioned yet: consider the optics and "reasonableness" test from the IRS perspective. Even if you follow all the technical rules perfectly, luxury suite expenses can still draw scrutiny simply because they seem excessive for smaller businesses. To strengthen your position, I'd recommend: 1. **Comparative Analysis**: Document that the suite arrangement is actually more cost-effective than alternatives (hotel meeting rooms, catering venues, etc.) when used for legitimate business meetings 2. **Industry Benchmarking**: If your industry commonly uses entertainment for client relations, document this as standard business practice 3. **Revenue Connection**: Track and document any actual business generated from suite usage - new clients, deals closed, partnerships formed, etc. 4. **Professional Appearance**: Make sure the suite usage supports your business image and client expectations in your industry The IRS will often challenge luxury expenses not just on technical grounds, but on whether they're "ordinary and necessary" for your specific business. Having a clear business case beyond just tax optimization will serve you well if questioned. Also, since you're in Michigan, be aware that the state may have different rules about what constitutes deductible entertainment expenses, especially if any of the member companies are professional services firms subject to additional restrictions.

0 coins

This is such a valuable point about the "reasonableness" and optics considerations! I've been so focused on the technical allocation rules that I hadn't really thought about how to justify the business necessity aspect. Your suggestion about comparative analysis is brilliant - we could actually document the cost per meeting/event compared to booking conference rooms at hotels or event venues. Given that we're splitting the suite cost among 6 companies, the per-use cost for legitimate business meetings might actually be quite reasonable. The industry benchmarking point is interesting too. In our case, several of the member companies are in professional services (accounting, law, consulting) where client entertainment is pretty standard practice. Would it help to document that our competitors or peer firms use similar arrangements? One question on the revenue connection tracking - how specific does this need to be? Like if we have a client meeting in the suite and then close a deal with that client 3 months later, is that too indirect of a connection to document as business benefit from the suite usage?

0 coins

IRS Transcript Shows $0 Tax (Code 150) With $10,924 Refund From Credits & Withholding - Is This Normal?

I just pulled my transcript for 2024 and I'm really confused about what I'm seeing. The code 150 (Tax return filed) shows $0.00 but I'm supposed to get a refund of $10,924.00. Looking at my Internal Revenue Service transcript dated 01-31-2025 (Request Date: 01-31-2025, Response Date 01-31-2025), I can see my withholdings (code 806) of $178.00 and credits including an Earned Income Credit (code 768) of $7,418.00 and another credit (code 766) of $3,328.00. But why would the tax return amount (code 150) be $0.00? The transcript shows this information: FORM NUMBER: 1040 TAX PERIOD: Dec. 31, 2024 ACCOUNT BALANCE: -10,924.00 ACCRUED INTEREST: 0.00 AS OF: Feb. 11, 2025 ACCRUED PENALTY: 0.00 AS OF: Feb. 11, 2025 ACCOUNT BALANCE PLUS ACCRUALS (this is not a payoff amount): -10,924.00 Under "INFORMATION FROM THE RETURN OR AS ADJUSTED" it shows: EXEMPTIONS: 04 FILING STATUS: Head of Household ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME: [blank] TAXABLE INCOME: [blank] TAX PER RETURN: 0.00 SE TAXABLE INCOME TAXPAYER: 0.00 SE TAXABLE INCOME SPOUSE: 0.00 TOTAL SELF EMPLOYMENT TAX: 0.00 RETURN DUE DATE OR RETURN RECEIVED DATE (WHICHEVER IS LATER) Apr. 15, 2025 PROCESSING DATE Feb. 17, 2025 The transactions section shows: TRANSACTIONS CODE EXPLANATION OF TRANSACTION | CYCLE | DATE | AMOUNT 150 Tax return filed | 20250504 | 02-17-2025 | $0.00 806 W-2 or 1099 withholding | | 04-16-2025 | -$178.00 766 Credit to your account | | 04-16-2025 | -$3,328.00 768 Earned income credit | | 04-16-2025 | -$7,418.00 Is this going to cause any problems with my refund? I'm concerned because even though all my credits and withholdings are there (adding up to $10,924.00), I don't understand why the tax return amount itself shows as zero. The Product Contains Sensitive Taxpayer Data warning is on my transcript, so I wonder if that has anything to do with it. I filed as Head of Household with 4 exemptions, and my total self-employment tax is $0.00. My taxable income and adjusted gross income fields are blank on the transcript. Does this mean I didn't have any taxable income for the year? Could that explain why my tax return amount (code 150) is $0.00? Can someone explain if this is normal? Will I still get my refund of $10,924.00 even though my tax per return is showing as $0.00?

Miguel Diaz

•

Just want to add that you should definitely keep an eye on your "Where's My Refund" tool on the IRS website too! Since your processing date was Feb 17th, you're right in that 21-day window. The tool will show you once it moves to "refund approved" and then "refund sent" status. With everything looking normal on your transcript (no holds, no additional review codes), you should see movement soon. Also heads up - direct deposit usually comes a few days before they update the tool, so don't panic if your bank gets it before the IRS site updates! šŸ™Œ

0 coins

Summer Green

•

Thanks for mentioning the "Where's My Refund" tool! I didn't know that direct deposit could come before the website updates - that's really good to know. I'll definitely keep checking both. It's been so stressful trying to figure out if everything was processing correctly, but all these explanations are making me feel way more confident about my situation 😊

0 coins

Looking at your transcript, everything appears completely normal! The $0.00 on Code 150 just means you had no federal income tax liability after your deductions - this is actually a good thing! Your refund comes from the refundable credits and withholdings: - $178 withholdings (Code 806) - $3,328 credit (Code 766) - likely Child Tax Credit - $7,418 Earned Income Credit (Code 768) Total: $10,924 refund The blank AGI and taxable income fields along with $0 tax liability suggest your income was low enough that after standard deduction and other allowances, you owe no federal tax. This is perfectly normal for Head of Household filers with lower incomes who qualify for EIC. Your processing date of 02-17-2025 means you should expect your refund within 21 days (by around March 10th) assuming no issues. The negative account balance of -$10,924 confirms this is the amount you'll receive. No red flags or holds visible on your transcript, so you should be good to go! šŸ‘

0 coins

This is such a clear breakdown, thank you! I'm in a similar situation and was confused about the $0 tax liability too. It's really helpful to see how the refundable credits work - I had no idea you could get back more than you paid in taxes. The 21-day timeline from processing date is also good to know. Really appreciate you taking the time to explain all the codes! šŸ™

0 coins

I just read "Taxes: What They Don't Teach You" by Richard Hendrix and it had a great chapter specifically for high-earning employees. Best tip I got was about coordinating spousal benefits and tax brackets if you're married. Saved us almost $3,800 just by adjusting how we handle retirement contributions between my wife and me.

0 coins

Do you think this book would be useful for someone who's single? Most tax advice seems to be geared toward married couples.

0 coins

Yes, about 70% of the book is applicable to singles. The early chapters focus on individual strategies regardless of marital status, covering retirement accounts, investment tax efficiency, and healthcare-related tax benefits. The book also has specific sections for different life situations, including a dedicated chapter for single high-income earners that discusses alternative tax-advantaged investment strategies and timing of major purchases/deductions. There are definitely marriage-specific strategies in the later chapters, but you'd still get significant value from the rest.

0 coins

Isabel Vega

•

As someone who recently went through this exact situation with a big salary increase, I can't stress enough how important it is to start planning early in the year rather than scrambling at tax time. One book that hasn't been mentioned yet is "The High Earner's Tax Handbook" by Robert Kiyosaki's tax strategist. It's specifically written for W-2 employees making over $100k and covers some advanced strategies like mega backdoor Roth conversions and tax-efficient charitable giving that most basic tax books skip. The biggest game-changer for me was learning about the timing of various deductions and income recognition. Simple things like when to exercise stock options, how to bunch charitable deductions, and coordinating bonuses with retirement contributions can save thousands. Don't just focus on the obvious stuff - there are legitimate strategies that can significantly reduce your tax burden even as a regular employee. Also, consider setting up a meeting with a fee-only financial advisor who specializes in tax planning. Sometimes the cost of professional advice pays for itself many times over, especially when you're dealing with your first high-income year.

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about the mega backdoor Roth strategy you mentioned - is that something that's available to all high earners or does it depend on your employer's 401k plan? I've heard the term but never fully understood how it works for regular employees. Also, when you mention timing of stock options, are you referring to ISOs or just regular employee stock purchase plans? I'm starting a job that has both and I'm trying to figure out the tax implications of each.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in almost exactly the same situation as Dmitry - inherited a duplex that's been running at losses for about 18 months now. Reading through everyone's responses, I realize I've been making some critical mistakes in how I document my rental activities. Based on what everyone's shared, it sounds like the key isn't avoiding losses entirely (which might be impossible in the short term), but rather proving you're genuinely trying to operate as a business to generate profit. I've been way too casual about record-keeping and haven't been documenting my efforts to improve the property's profitability. Starting this week, I'm going to implement some of the suggestions here - creating a business activity log, getting at least one formal rental market analysis, and properly documenting all my improvement efforts. The inheritance angle that Zoey mentioned gives me some hope too, since I do have legitimate reasons for the initial losses. One question for the group - for those who've gone through IRS scrutiny on rental properties, how far back do they typically look when evaluating your "profit motive"? I'm wondering if I need to go back and reconstruct documentation for activities I did last year but didn't properly document at the time.

0 coins

Haley Stokes

•

@Klaus Schmidt Great question about how far back the IRS looks! From what I understand, they typically examine your entire history with the property to establish a pattern, but they focus most heavily on the 3-5 years leading up to the audit or challenge. The good news is you don t'necessarily need to reconstruct everything perfectly from last year. However, I d'definitely recommend starting that business activity log immediately and being very thorough going forward. For past activities, try to gather what documentation you can - bank records for improvements, emails with contractors or property managers, photos of repairs with dates, etc. Even if it s'not perfectly organized, having some evidence is better than none. Since you mentioned the inheritance situation, make sure to document the timeline of when you inherited the property and what condition it was in. Photos from when you first took ownership, any inspection reports, and records of what you had to do to make it rentable can all help establish why you had initial losses and what your plan was to achieve profitability. The IRS really wants to see that you have a reasonable business plan and you re'making efforts to follow it, even if results are slow to come. Your proactive approach starting now will definitely help your case if it ever comes up!

0 coins

Aria Khan

•

As someone who went through a similar situation with an inherited rental property, I want to emphasize something that hasn't been mentioned yet - the timing of when you start implementing these business practices really matters. The IRS doesn't expect you to be profitable immediately, especially with inherited properties, but they do want to see that you're making reasonable business decisions within a reasonable timeframe. In my case, I inherited a triplex that was losing money for the first two years, but I was able to demonstrate to the IRS during an audit that I had a legitimate business plan and was following it. Here's what worked for me: I created a simple 3-year business plan showing how I intended to get the property profitable (raising rents to market rate, completing necessary repairs, improving tenant screening). I updated this plan annually and documented my progress against it. When the IRS reviewed my situation, they could see I wasn't just hoping things would magically improve - I had specific goals and was working toward them systematically. For your situation, since you mentioned you're barely breaking even some months and actually losing money others, I'd suggest calculating exactly what rent increase or expense reduction you'd need to become cash-flow positive, then create a timeline for achieving that. Document every step you take toward that goal. This kind of forward-thinking approach really helps establish profit motive, even during loss years. The fact that you're asking these questions now shows you're taking a business-like approach, which is exactly what the IRS wants to see!

0 coins

Laura Lopez

•

@Aria Khan This is exactly the kind of strategic thinking I needed to hear! The idea of creating a formal 3-year business plan with specific timelines and measurable goals makes so much sense. I ve'been approaching this too reactively - just dealing with problems as they come up rather than having a clear roadmap to profitability. Your point about timing is really important too. I m'about 2 years into this inheritance situation, so I m'probably at that critical point where the IRS would expect to see some kind of systematic approach emerging. The fact that you successfully defended your position during an audit by showing this kind of documentation gives me a lot of confidence. I m'going to start working on a business plan this weekend - calculating exactly what rent increases I need, mapping out necessary property improvements, and setting realistic timelines for each phase. Having that annual review and update process you mentioned sounds like it would really strengthen the case for genuine profit motive. Thanks for sharing your real-world experience with this! It s'one thing to read about the rules in theory, but hearing from someone who actually went through the audit process and came out successful is incredibly valuable.

0 coins

Sunny Wang

•

I'm reading all these comments and feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Our entire government is in chaos and everyone's just like "keep paying your taxes, nothing to see here!" WTF? Not saying anyone should commit tax fraud, but maybe consider adjusting your withholdings to the legal minimum while keeping good records of what you would normally pay? Then if things stabilize you can make estimated payments to catch up without penalties?

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•

That's actually a very risky approach. If you intentionally underwithhold throughout the year planning to "catch up" later, you may still face underpayment penalties even if you pay the full amount by tax day. The IRS requires quarterly estimated payments precisely to prevent this strategy. The legal minimum withholding typically requires you to pay either 90% of your current year tax or 100% of your prior year tax (110% if your income is over $150,000) through withholding or quarterly estimated payments throughout the year. Anything less can trigger penalties regardless of whether you eventually pay in full.

0 coins

Avery Flores

•

I understand the confusion, but I want to emphasize what others have said - continuing to pay your taxes is absolutely the right approach. I've been through several IRS reorganizations during my career, and the core tax collection and enforcement systems always remain operational. What many people don't realize is that the IRS processes over 150 million individual tax returns annually through highly automated systems. These computer systems that match your reported income to what employers and banks report to the IRS don't get shut down during administrative changes. If you're genuinely concerned about where your tax dollars are going during this transition, you can actually track federal spending through USAspending.gov. Your tax payments continue funding Social Security, Medicare, military operations, infrastructure maintenance, and other essential services that operate continuously regardless of IRS staffing changes. The best thing you can do is maintain accurate records, file electronically if possible to avoid paper processing delays, and continue making your regular tax payments. If you have specific concerns about your tax situation, consider consulting with a licensed tax professional who can give you personalized advice based on your circumstances rather than making decisions based on general uncertainty about government operations.

0 coins

Ava Johnson

•

This is really helpful perspective, thank you! As someone new to this community, I was getting pretty worried reading the original post. The point about USAspending.gov is great - I had no idea you could actually track where tax money goes. That definitely helps with the uncertainty about whether payments are "going nowhere" during transitions. One thing I'm curious about - you mentioned filing electronically to avoid delays. Are there any other practical steps we should take during this transition period? I'm a pretty straightforward W-2 employee but want to make sure I'm not missing anything important.

0 coins

Prev1...21742175217621772178...5644Next