IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Edwards Hugo

•

Wait, I'm confused about something basic. If I'm day trading in my regular brokerage account (not IRA), aren't all my trades already "realized" at the time I sell anyway? What's the advantage of MTM if I'm already selling everything within the same tax year?

0 coins

Gianna Scott

•

The main advantage for active traders isn't about realization (you're right that trades you complete are already realized) but about: 1. Business treatment vs. investment treatment - allowing you to deduct all trading-related expenses directly against your trading income 2. Bypassing the $3,000 capital loss limitation against ordinary income 3. No wash sale rules to track and manage For someone making hundreds of trades yearly, the business expense deductions alone can be significant - home office, computers, software, education, etc.

0 coins

One critical point that often gets overlooked is the timing of the MTM election. You must make this election by the due date (including extensions) of the tax return for the year PRECEDING the year you want it to take effect. So if you want MTM treatment for 2025, you needed to make the election by the due date of your 2024 return (typically April 15, 2025, or October 15 with extension). You can't wait until you see how your 2025 trading goes and then decide - the election must be prospective. There's a limited exception for new traders who can make the election by the due date of the return for the first year they qualify as a trader, but this requires careful documentation that you weren't previously engaged in trading activities. Also worth noting: the MTM election only applies to securities held in connection with your trading business. If you hold some positions as investments (not for trading), those can still receive capital gains treatment, but you need clear documentation distinguishing between your trading inventory and investment holdings from the time of acquisition. The business expense deductions under trader status are substantial but require meticulous record-keeping since the IRS frequently audits trader status claims.

0 coins

This is really helpful information everyone! I've been dealing with a similar situation with my adult kids - I send them money for textbooks, groceries, etc. and they pay me back for things like car insurance. Probably $400-500/month back and forth. Based on what everyone's shared, it sounds like I don't need to worry for 2024 taxes since the threshold is still $20k AND 200 transactions. But I'm definitely going to start keeping better records just in case. The screenshot idea is brilliant - I usually just send money with a pizza emoji or whatever, but adding actual descriptions makes way more sense. One question though - if these payment apps are making so many mistakes with the 1099-Ks, shouldn't there be some kind of penalty for them when they report personal transfers as income? Seems like they're creating a lot of unnecessary work for taxpayers and the IRS.

0 coins

You're absolutely right that there should be penalties for incorrect reporting! From what I understand, payment platforms can face fines from the IRS for filing incorrect 1099-Ks, but enforcement has been pretty weak so far. The bigger issue is that many of these companies are being overly cautious and reporting everything rather than risk missing actual business transactions. The good news is that the IRS is aware this is a widespread problem. They've been working with payment processors to improve their systems and provide clearer guidance on what should and shouldn't be reported. That's part of why they keep delaying the $600 threshold - they know the current reporting is a mess. Your approach with better record-keeping is smart. Even though you probably won't hit the thresholds, having that documentation ready will save you major headaches if you ever do receive an incorrect 1099-K.

0 coins

Emma Morales

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar boat with my spouse - we probably send $600-800/month between our accounts for bills, groceries, date nights, etc. I've been losing sleep over whether we'd get hit with a massive 1099-K. The clarification about the delayed threshold is huge relief. $20k AND 200 transactions means we're nowhere close for 2024 taxes. But I'm definitely taking everyone's advice about better documentation moving forward. One thing I'm curious about - has anyone actually contacted Meta/Facebook directly about how they're handling the categorization? Their customer service is notoriously terrible, but I'm wondering if there's a way to proactively mark transfers as personal/family payments to avoid issues when the $600 threshold does eventually kick in. Also really appreciate the tools people have shared (taxr.ai and claimyr.com). Even though I might not need them this year, it's good to know they exist for when these rules actually take effect.

0 coins

Omar Mahmoud

•

Has anyone actually calculated what the reduced per diem would be if certain meals were provided? Like is there an official breakdown for how much of the daily rate is allocated to breakfast vs lunch vs dinner?

0 coins

Chloe Harris

•

The IRS doesn't officially break it down, but the generally accepted allocation (used by many federal agencies) is: Breakfast: 20% of the daily rate Lunch: 30% of the daily rate Dinner: 50% of the daily rate So if your daily per diem rate was $70 and the company provided free breakfast and lunch, you could claim $35 (50% of the daily rate) for dinner. Remember that all business meal deductions (including per diem) are only 50% deductible after you calculate the amount, so you'd ultimately deduct $17.50 per day in this example.

0 coins

This is exactly the situation I was in last year! I was a 1099 contractor on a 6-month assignment about 400 miles from home. The key thing to remember is that the IRS doesn't care about the total dollar amount - they care about whether your assignment meets the "temporary" criteria (under one year) and whether you're truly away from your tax home. I claimed the full per diem for the entire period and had no issues. The amount does seem high when you calculate it out, but that's just the reality of extended business travel. Make sure you keep detailed records of your assignment dates, the temporary nature of the work, and your tax home location. For the cafeteria situation, I had something similar - free lunch was provided but I had to pay for breakfast and dinner. I calculated partial per diem using the standard breakdown (breakfast 20%, lunch 30%, dinner 50%) and only claimed 70% of the daily rate. Keep good documentation showing which meals were provided versus which you paid for yourself. One tip: consider keeping receipts for a few meals even though you're using per diem. It can help demonstrate that you were actually incurring meal expenses during your assignment if questions ever come up.

0 coins

This is really helpful to hear from someone who actually went through this! I'm curious about your suggestion to keep some meal receipts even when using per diem - did you just keep a few random ones or was there a strategy to which meals you kept receipts for? Also, when you calculated the 70% rate for partial meals, did you apply that calculation daily or did you do some kind of weekly/monthly average? I want to make sure I'm being as accurate as possible with my documentation.

0 coins

I used to work for elderly services. This screams financial exploitation tbh. The attorney and caregiver tag-team blocking you out is sus af

0 coins

Tasia Synder

•

ong this happens way more than ppl think 😤

0 coins

This is exactly why I always tell people to get their affairs in order early. The IRS doesn't mess around with unreported income, especially when it involves cash payments to caregivers. Your parent's attorney is giving terrible advice - even seniors have filing obligations if they meet income thresholds. I'd recommend getting a second opinion from a tax professional ASAP and maybe consider whistleblower protection if you decide to come forward about the unreported payments. The estate could be looking at serious liability here.

0 coins

Great thread! I'm a tax preparer and wanted to add a few technical details that might help clarify things further. The 10% early withdrawal penalty is technically called an "additional tax" rather than a penalty, but it functions the same way - it's added to your tax liability without being included in your taxable income. This shows up on Form 5329 if you're filing manually, or gets calculated automatically in tax software. One thing I see people miss is that if you had federal income tax withheld from your 401k distribution (which should show in Box 4 of your 1099-R), that withholding applies to both your regular income tax AND the 10% additional tax. So if you had 20% withheld from an $8,000 distribution ($1,600), that $1,600 covers part of both the income tax on the $8,000 AND the $800 penalty. Also, for future reference, if you know you'll need to take an early withdrawal, consider doing it in December rather than January if possible. This gives you a full year to adjust your withholding or make estimated payments to cover the additional tax burden, rather than scrambling to catch up mid-year. The AGI ripple effects that Diego mentioned are spot-on - retirement distributions can impact everything from child tax credit eligibility to Medicare premium calculations. Tax software handles these automatically, which is why manual calculations often fall short.

0 coins

This is incredibly detailed and helpful information! As someone new to this community and dealing with my first early 401k withdrawal, I really appreciate the professional insight. The clarification that it's technically an "additional tax" rather than a penalty is interesting - that helps explain why it's not treated as taxable income itself. Your point about the withholding applying to both the regular income tax AND the 10% additional tax is something I definitely wouldn't have understood without this explanation. I had 20% withheld from my distribution, so knowing that this covers both parts of my tax liability is reassuring. The timing advice about taking withdrawals in December vs January is also really smart - I never would have thought about the impact on estimated payments and withholding adjustments. I'll definitely keep that in mind if I ever face this situation again (hopefully not!). Thanks for taking the time to share your professional expertise with the community. It's clear there are so many nuances to retirement account taxation that go beyond the basic "withdrawal + 10% penalty" understanding most of us have.

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I want to thank everyone for this incredibly informative discussion! I'm facing a similar situation with an early 401k withdrawal and was equally confused about whether the penalty itself was taxable. Reading through all these responses has been so helpful. The consensus is clear that the 10% penalty is NOT taxable income - it's an additional tax calculated separately and added to your total tax liability. Maxwell's explanation about it being technically an "additional tax" shown on Form 5329 really clarified things for me. What I found most valuable was learning about all the secondary effects of the withdrawal that can throw off manual calculations - the tax bracket progression, AGI phase-outs for credits and deductions, and other ripple effects throughout the tax return. No wonder my own spreadsheet estimates were way off compared to tax software! For anyone else in this situation, it sounds like the key takeaways are: 1. The 10% penalty itself is not taxable income 2. The withdrawal amount gets added to your taxable income (potentially pushing you into higher brackets) 3. Tax software accounts for complex interactions that are easy to miss in manual calculations 4. Double-check your 1099-R distribution code to ensure it's accurate 5. If you had withholding, it applies to both the income tax AND the penalty Thanks again to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these complex tax situations!

0 coins

Prev1...21392140214121422143...5643Next