Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This is exactly the type of complex transaction where getting multiple professional opinions is crucial. I went through a similar sale of my orthopedic practice to a private equity group last year, and the interplay between tax optimization, regulatory compliance, and deal structure was mind-boggling. One aspect that really caught me off guard was how the valuation methodology impacts the tax treatment. The buyers wanted to use an income approach that allocated most value to the management contract (ordinary income for me), while I pushed for an asset approach that recognized more goodwill value (capital gains treatment). The difference was substantial - nearly $200K in my case. Also, don't underestimate the importance of the transition period length. We structured a 24-month earnout that allowed me to maintain some S-Corp ownership while gradually transferring to a physician employee. This provided tax deferral benefits and gave the MSO time to prove their operational capabilities before I fully exited. The regulatory landscape varies significantly by state and specialty. Orthopedics has different compliance requirements than primary care, and some states are much more restrictive about MSO fee arrangements than others. Make sure your attorney has specific experience with medical practice transactions in your state and specialty.
Sarah Ali
ā¢This is incredibly helpful insight about the valuation methodology impact on tax treatment. I hadn't fully grasped how the buyer's preferred valuation approach could essentially force me into ordinary income treatment on what should rightfully be capital gains. The 24-month earnout structure you mentioned sounds like a smart compromise - it seems like it would give me time to properly evaluate the MSO's operations while maintaining some control during the transition. Did you find that having the earnout tied to specific performance metrics helped or complicated the arrangement? I'm wondering if there's a risk of the MSO making operational changes that could negatively impact the earnout payments. Also, you mentioned orthopedics having different compliance requirements - I'm in internal medicine, so I imagine the regulatory landscape might be somewhat different. Did you encounter any specialty-specific issues with payor contract transfers or credentialing that I should be aware of?
The earnout structure definitely helped, but you're right to be concerned about performance metrics. We tied it to gross revenue and patient retention rather than profitability, which prevented the MSO from manipulating expenses to reduce my earnout. I'd strongly recommend avoiding net income-based earnouts since the MSO controls operational decisions that directly impact profitability. For internal medicine, you'll likely face fewer specialty-specific regulatory hurdles than orthopedics, but payor credentialing can still be tricky. Primary care contracts often have different requirements around medical home designations and quality reporting that need to transfer properly. Make sure your purchase agreement addresses who handles MIPS reporting during the transition period - this caught us by surprise. One thing specific to internal medicine practices is that many have ancillary revenue streams (lab work, imaging, etc.) that may require separate credentialing processes. The MSO structure works well for these since they can often handle the non-clinical ancillary services directly, but make sure the purchase price allocation properly reflects the value of these revenue streams. Also consider your existing patient panel demographics - if you have a high percentage of Medicare patients, the provider number transition becomes even more critical since any disruption in Medicare billing can significantly impact cash flow.
As someone who recently completed a similar transaction selling my family medicine practice to a non-physician management group, I want to emphasize the importance of getting your legal structure right from day one. The MSO arrangement mentioned by others is absolutely the way to go, but there are some nuances that can make or break the deal. One critical point that hasn't been fully addressed is the employment agreement structure for the physician who will eventually take over your S-Corp ownership. We initially planned for me to transfer ownership to a new physician employee after 18 months, but discovered that the employment terms needed to be carefully structured to avoid creating tax issues under IRC Section 409A (deferred compensation rules). The key insight from my experience is that the management fee percentage needs to be genuinely arm's length and documented with a formal valuation study. We used 20% of collections, but had to provide extensive documentation showing this was market rate for the services provided. The IRS scrutinizes these arrangements heavily, especially when the percentage seems high relative to the actual management services. Also, don't overlook the impact on your retirement plan assets. If your S-Corp has a 401(k) or profit-sharing plan, the sale structure affects whether you can maintain those benefits or need to distribute/roll over the assets. In our case, we had to terminate the existing plan and establish new arrangements, which created some unexpected timing issues for both me and my employees. The good news is that when structured properly, these deals can work extremely well for both parties. The buyers get operational control and cash flow, while you get capital gains treatment on the sale proceeds and a clean exit strategy.
This is extremely valuable information about the Section 409A implications - I hadn't even considered how the employment agreement for the successor physician could trigger deferred compensation rules. That seems like exactly the kind of technical detail that could derail an otherwise well-structured transaction. The point about documenting the management fee with a formal valuation study is particularly important. I'm wondering - did you hire an independent valuation firm specifically for this, or was it something your attorney or CPA could handle? Given the IRS scrutiny you mentioned, it seems like having third-party validation of the fee structure would be essential. The retirement plan complications you mentioned are also concerning. How far in advance did you need to start planning for the plan termination? I have a decent amount in our practice 401(k) and hadn't thought about how the sale structure might force early distribution of those assets. One follow-up question about your 18-month transition period - were you able to maintain full clinical autonomy during that time, or did the MSO start influencing clinical decisions even before the ownership transfer was complete?
Connor Byrne
ā¢We hired an independent valuation firm specifically for the management fee documentation - it cost about $15K but was absolutely worth it for the credibility with the IRS. Our attorney recommended against trying to do this internally since the IRS views self-prepared valuations skeptically in MSO arrangements. For the retirement plan, we started the termination process about 6 months before closing. The timing is critical because you need to provide proper notice to participants and coordinate with the plan administrator. We were able to facilitate direct rollovers for most employees, but a few chose lump-sum distributions which created some tax complications for them. Regarding clinical autonomy during the transition - this was actually one of the most important negotiation points. We maintained 100% clinical decision-making authority, and the MSO agreement explicitly prohibited any interference with medical judgments. They handled billing, scheduling, HR, and facilities management, but all patient care decisions remained entirely with the physicians. This separation is crucial both for regulatory compliance and for maintaining your medical license protections. The key is making sure the MSO agreement clearly delineates which functions are "clinical" vs "administrative" and ensures the MSO stays strictly on the administrative side. Any blurring of these lines can create serious regulatory issues with your state medical board.
Join the conversation
This is exactly why I stopped casual sports betting last year. The tax situation is absolutely brutal for recreational gamblers. I had a similar experience where I won about $3,200 but lost $3,800 overall, so I was down $600 for the year but still had to pay taxes on that $3,200 as if it was pure income. What really got me was realizing that even if you break even or win slightly, you're still getting crushed because you lose the benefit of your standard deduction if you itemize to claim losses. It's like the IRS designed the system specifically to punish casual gamblers. I've gone back to just watching games without betting. The few extra dollars in excitement aren't worth the tax headache and the feeling that the government is taking a cut of money I never actually profited from.
I'm in almost the exact same boat! Just getting started with understanding all this tax stuff and it's honestly mind-blowing how unfair the gambling tax system is. I had no idea when I started putting small bets on games that I'd have to report winnings as income even when I'm losing money overall. Your example of being down $600 but still owing taxes on $3,200 is infuriating. It feels like the system is designed to discourage regular people from even small recreational betting while probably not affecting high-roller types who have accountants handling everything. Thanks for sharing this - definitely making me reconsider whether those small weekend bets are worth the hassle come tax time.
Aaron Boston
This is such an important topic that more people need to understand before they start betting. I made the same mistake last year - started casual betting thinking it was just harmless fun, but the tax implications are absolutely brutal. What really bothers me is that betting apps don't clearly warn users about these tax consequences when you sign up. They make it so easy to start betting but don't explain that you could end up owing taxes on "winnings" even when you lose money overall for the year. I think the worst part is how the tax code treats gambling completely differently from other activities. If I invest in stocks and lose money, I can deduct up to $3,000 in losses against my regular income. But with gambling, losses are only deductible as itemized deductions and only up to winnings. It makes no sense. Thanks for sharing this - hopefully it saves some people from learning this lesson the hard way like we did.
Mia Alvarez
ā¢You're absolutely right about the betting apps not warning people about tax consequences! I just started using a couple of these apps this year and had no clue about any of this until I stumbled across this thread. It's honestly pretty shocking that they make signing up so simple but don't mention anywhere that you might owe taxes on winnings even if you're losing money overall. Seems like something they should be required to disclose upfront, especially since most people using these apps are probably casual bettors who have no idea about the tax implications. Really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences here - definitely going to be much more careful about my betting activity knowing all this now.
Join the conversation
I went through this exact same situation two years ago with Chase Bank - used their wire routing number instead of the ACH routing number for my tax refund. The good news is that your money isn't lost! Here's what happened in my case: The bank rejected the deposit after about 5-7 business days, and the IRS automatically reissued it as a paper check. The whole process took about 3 weeks from when the IRS first attempted the deposit. The "Where's My Refund" tool eventually updated to show "Your refund will be mailed as a check" instead of showing it as deposited. One tip that helped me was checking with my bank every few days to see if they had received and rejected anything - sometimes they can see attempted deposits in their system even before they officially bounce back to the IRS. Also, make sure your mailing address is current with the IRS since they'll be sending that paper check! Try not to stress too much - this is actually a pretty common mistake and the IRS has systems in place to handle it. Your $1,300 will find its way to you, it's just going to take a bit longer than expected.
Jabari-Jo
ā¢This is really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same thing! I'm dealing with Chase too and made the same wire vs ACH routing number mistake. It's been about 12 days since the IRS said they deposited it, so I'm hoping to see that status change soon. Did Chase give you any kind of confirmation or reference number when they rejected the deposit? I've called them a couple times and they keep saying they don't see anything, but maybe I need to be more specific about what to ask for. Really appreciate you sharing your timeline - it helps calm my nerves knowing there's light at the end of this tunnel!
I actually work at a local IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center and see this routing number mix-up probably 2-3 times a week during tax season. You're definitely not alone in this! Here's what typically happens: When a bank receives a deposit with the wrong routing number type (wire vs. ACH), they'll usually reject it within 5-10 business days and send it back to the IRS with a "account not found" or "invalid routing" code. The IRS system is set up to automatically convert these failed direct deposits into paper checks. A few things that might help while you wait: 1. Keep checking "Where's My Refund" - it should update to "check mailed" status once the bank rejection is processed 2. If you're really anxious, you can call your bank and ask them to check for any "rejected ACH deposits" or "returned deposits" - sometimes they can see these in their system before the official rejection is processed 3. Make sure your address is current with the IRS since that paper check will be coming The whole process usually takes 2-4 weeks total. I know it's stressful when you need that money, but your refund isn't lost - it's just taking the scenic route to get to you!
Thank you so much for this detailed explanation! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who works at the IRS and sees this regularly. I've been checking Where's My Refund obsessively and it's still showing "deposited" after about 10 days, but based on what you're saying it sounds like I'm still within the normal timeframe for the bank rejection to process. I called my bank again yesterday and specifically asked about "rejected ACH deposits" like you suggested - they said they'd check their pending rejections system and call me back if they find anything. Fingers crossed that helps get some clarity on the timing. Really appreciate you taking the time to break down the process step by step. Knowing that this happens 2-3 times a week makes me feel a lot less like an idiot for making this mistake!
Join the conversation
I just went through this situation! One thing to remember is you need to file Form 8843 if you're claiming the closer connection exception to the substantial presence test. And keep super detailed records of your entry/exit dates - I learned the hard way that the IRS and CBP records can sometimes differ from what you remember.
NeonNomad
ā¢What documents did you use to prove your entry/exit dates? I've been trying to get my I-94 travel history but the CBP website only shows the last 5 years and I need older data.
For older I-94 records beyond what's available on the CBP website, you can file a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with CBP. Form G-639 is what you need - it's specifically for requesting immigration records. It can take several months to get a response, so file it as soon as possible if you need those records for tax purposes. Alternatively, if you have old passports with entry/exit stamps, those can serve as documentation. Some people also keep airline tickets, hotel reservations, or credit card statements that show transactions in specific countries on certain dates - these can help establish your travel timeline. Just make sure whatever documentation you use is consistent and complete. The IRS wants to see a clear pattern of when you were physically present in the US versus abroad.
Ava Thompson
ā¢This is really helpful advice! I'm also dealing with a similar residency determination issue and was worried about proving my exact travel dates. One quick question - if I file the FOIA request now, will that delay my tax filing? I'm supposed to file by April 15th but I'm not sure I'll get the CBP records back in time. Can I file my return based on my best recollection and then amend it later if the official records show something different?
Hannah Flores
Just wanted to add some clarity on the record-keeping requirements if you do end up qualifying for any vehicle deductions through self-employment activities. The IRS is particularly strict about vehicle expense documentation, so you'll need to maintain contemporaneous records showing: 1. **Mileage logs** - Date, destination, business purpose, and odometer readings for each trip 2. **Total annual mileage** - Both business and personal use to calculate your business use percentage 3. **Actual expenses** - If you choose actual expense method over standard mileage rate, keep receipts for gas, maintenance, insurance, etc. For Section 179 specifically, remember that if your business use drops below 50% in any subsequent year, you'll have to "recapture" some of the deduction as income. This is why accurate ongoing record-keeping is crucial. I'd also suggest consulting with a tax professional before making a large vehicle purchase with the intent to claim Section 179. The interaction between W2 income and self-employment income for vehicle expenses can get complex, and the penalties for getting it wrong can be significant.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
ā¢This is really helpful advice about the record-keeping requirements! I'm curious about the recapture rule you mentioned - how does the IRS determine when your business use percentage drops below 50%? Do they audit this annually, or is it something you self-report? And if you're using the vehicle for multiple purposes (W2 work, side business, personal), does the recapture only apply to the Section 179 portion claimed through the side business, or could it affect other deductions too?
0 coins
Carmen Ruiz
ā¢Great question! The recapture is based on your self-reporting when you file your annual tax return. You track your business use percentage each year, and if it drops below 50% in any year during the vehicle's recovery period, you must recapture the excess Section 179 deduction as ordinary income on Form 4797. The recapture only applies to the Section 179 portion - it doesn't affect other deductions. So if you claimed Section 179 based on your side business use, but your side business use drops while your total business use (including W2 work) stays the same, you'd still need to recapture because Section 179 specifically requires the property to be used more than 50% for the business that claimed it. This is why it's crucial to be conservative with your business use estimates and maintain detailed records. The IRS doesn't automatically audit this annually, but if they do examine your return, they'll look at your documentation to verify your claimed percentages. The recapture can be quite painful because you're essentially paying back the tax benefit plus interest.
0 coins
Alexis Robinson
Based on all the discussion here, it sounds like your best immediate option as a W2 employee is to approach your employer about setting up an accountable plan for vehicle reimbursement, as Ava mentioned. This would give you tax-free reimbursement at the current 67 cents per mile rate without the complexity of trying to qualify for Section 179. However, if you're serious about the Section 179 deduction, you might want to consider whether any of your work activities could qualify as legitimate self-employment. For example, if you're doing networking events that could lead to consulting opportunities, or if you have any skills you could offer as independent services, you might be able to establish a legitimate side business that would qualify for Section 179. The key thing to remember is that the IRS looks at substance over form - you can't just call yourself self-employed to get tax benefits. You'd need genuine business activities with profit motive, separate from your W2 work. Given the record-keeping requirements and recapture risks that Hannah outlined, make sure any business use percentage you claim is well-documented and conservative. I'd definitely recommend consulting with a tax professional before making a major vehicle purchase, especially one where you're counting on Section 179 benefits to justify the decision.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
ā¢This is excellent advice about approaching the employer first for an accountable plan - that's definitely the path of least resistance and most immediate benefit. I'm curious though, for those who do have legitimate side businesses, how do you handle the timing of the vehicle purchase versus establishing the business? Like, if someone bought a vehicle in January but didn't start their consulting side business until March, would the Section 179 deduction be prorated, or would they lose eligibility entirely for that tax year? And does the business need to show actual revenue, or is it enough to demonstrate legitimate business activities and intent to profit? @bf421e3da8c5 you mentioned substance over form - I'm wondering if there are any safe harbors or bright-line tests the IRS uses to distinguish between legitimate business activities versus someone just trying to create deductions.
0 coins