


Ask the community...
22 Does anyone know if electric vehicles get any special depreciation treatment for business use? I'm looking at a Tesla Model Y which is around 4,500 lbs (so under the 6,000 threshold) but heard there might be extra incentives.
15 Yes! For 2025, there's a commercial clean vehicle credit under Section 45W that can give you up to $7,500 for smaller vehicles like the Model Y when purchased for business use. This is separate from depreciation but definitely helps with the overall cost. The vehicle still follows regular depreciation rules based on its weight class, but the upfront credit makes a big difference.
Just wanted to share my experience as someone who recently went through this exact decision! I ended up choosing the heavier vehicle (Ford F-150 at 6,100 lbs) over a smaller SUV, and it made a huge difference on my taxes. The key thing I learned is that you need to look at your total business use percentage and cash flow needs. Even though the heavier truck cost me $12,000 more upfront, the enhanced depreciation benefits meant I could deduct about $25,000 more in year one (at 80% business use). This significantly reduced my tax liability and improved my cash flow. One tip - make sure you get the GVWR (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating) from the manufacturer's specs, not the curb weight. The GVWR is what the IRS uses to determine eligibility. Some vehicles that seem close to 6,000 lbs might actually qualify based on their GVWR even if their curb weight is lower. Also, don't forget to factor in your state taxes too - some states have additional depreciation benefits for business vehicles that can make the decision even more favorable toward the heavier option.
Make sure to double check your state tax return too! I had the exact same issue with inherited stocks last year. Got my federal return sorted out with the lower capital gains rate, but completely missed that my state was still taxing the gains as regular income. Most states follow federal rules for capital gains, but some have their own calculations.
Great point about state taxes. Some states like California don't give preferential treatment to capital gains and tax them as ordinary income regardless of how they're treated federally. Worth checking your specific state's rules.
Just want to add one more thing that might help others dealing with inherited investments - make sure you understand the "stepped-up basis" rules too. When you inherit stocks, the cost basis is "stepped up" to the fair market value on the date of death, which means you only pay capital gains tax on appreciation that happens after you inherited them. This is different from if someone had gifted you the stocks while alive (where you'd use their original cost basis). The K1 you received should already reflect this stepped-up basis, but it's worth understanding so you can verify the numbers look correct. Also, if the estate held the stocks for more than a year before distributing them to you, they automatically qualify for long-term capital gains treatment regardless of how long you personally held them. This is another inheritance tax benefit that many people don't realize exists.
This is really helpful information about stepped-up basis! I had no idea about the automatic long-term treatment for inherited assets. That explains why my K1 showed long-term gains even though my uncle had only owned some of the stocks for a few months before he passed. Quick question - does this stepped-up basis apply to all inherited investments, or are there exceptions I should know about? I also inherited some mutual funds and a small IRA account, so I want to make sure I'm handling everything correctly for next year's taxes too.
Has anyone actually tried just putting "0" (zero) in Box 6 on TurboTax to see if that works? I'm facing the same issue and wondering if that's a valid workaround.
I had this exact same problem last year! TurboTax was being super finicky about Box 6 even though my 1099-NEC had it completely blank. After trying several approaches, I found that entering just the two-letter state code where the withholding occurred worked perfectly. In your case, since you mentioned having state tax withheld in Box 5, try entering "PA" (assuming that's where the withholding went based on your earlier comment). This satisfies TurboTax's requirement without making up fake information, and it's actually the logical solution since state withholding has to correspond to some state. I was worried about doing this at first, but my return was processed without any issues and I never heard anything from the IRS or state about it. The key thing is that you're accurately reporting your income and the actual withholding amounts - the state identifier is really just for their matching systems.
Thanks for sharing your experience! This is really reassuring to hear from someone who actually went through this last year. I was getting so worried about "making up" information, but you're right that using the state abbreviation is actually the logical solution when there's state withholding involved. Did you end up contacting your client later to get their actual state ID number, or did you just leave it as the state code on your final return?
Just so you know, you might want to look at alternatives to TurboTax too. I used H&R Block Premium last year for a very similar situation (3 rental properties, side business, backdoor Roth) and found it handled everything well for a lower price than TurboTax Self-Employed.
I second this! I switched from TurboTax to H&R Block last year and saved about $50 for essentially the same features. They handled my rental properties and 1099 income just fine.
Based on your complex tax situation, you definitely need TurboTax Self-Employed. Here's why: Your rental properties in multiple states require multi-state tax filing capabilities that only Premier/Self-Employed versions handle well. The Self-Employed version is better for this since you also have 1099 consulting income. For your Canadian accounts ($80k CAD retirement + $35k CAD checking/savings = $115k CAD total), you'll need to file FBAR (FinCEN Form 114) since you exceed the $10,000 USD threshold. Self-Employed includes guidance for these foreign account reporting requirements. The backdoor Roth IRAs (both regular and mega) require careful Form 8606 reporting to avoid double taxation, and Self-Employed has better guidance for these transactions. Your Airbnb STR situation using the 14-day rule needs proper reporting to avoid audit flags - Self-Employed handles short-term rental income better than lower tiers. The consulting work from home likely qualifies for home office deductions, which Self-Employed specializes in calculating correctly. Given all these moving parts (multiple income streams, multi-state rentals, foreign accounts, complex retirement contributions), the Self-Employed version will save you more in properly claimed deductions than the extra cost over Premier. The specialized guidance alone is worth it for your situation.
Evelyn Xu
One thing nobody's mentioned yet is the QBI (Qualified Business Income) deduction. With both an LLC and S corp, you potentially get a 20% deduction on your business income, but the calculation is different. For a single-member LLC, the QBI deduction applies to your net profit after the self-employment tax deduction. With an S corp, it applies to your business profit minus your salary. So when you're comparing tax savings, make sure you factor this in too! I switched from LLC to S corp last year and saved on self-employment taxes, but my QBI deduction was slightly lower. Still came out ahead overall though.
0 coins
Dominic Green
ā¢Can you break down the math on how that worked for you? Like what was your total income and how much did you actually save? I'm trying to figure out if it's worth the extra hassle for my wedding photography business.
0 coins
Evelyn Xu
ā¢Sure thing! My business made about $120K last year. As an LLC, I would've paid self-employment tax on the full amount (minus the deduction for half of self-employment tax), so about $17,000 in SE tax. My QBI deduction would have been roughly $22,800. As an S corp, I took a salary of $75K and distributions of $45K. I paid about $11,475 in FICA taxes (the equivalent of self-employment tax when you're both employer and employee), and my QBI deduction was calculated on just the $45K, so about $9,000. So I paid about $5,525 less in FICA/SE tax, but my QBI deduction was $13,800 lower, which at my tax bracket (24%) meant about $3,300 more in income tax. So my net savings was about $2,225. Not as much as I'd hoped, but still worth it, and I expect to save more as my business grows.
0 coins
Hannah Flores
Dont forget state taxes! Some states tax S corps differently than LLCs. California, for example, has a minimum $800 tax for S corps PLUS a 1.5% tax on net income. I learned this the hard way - saved about $4k in federal taxes by switching to an S corp, then got hit with $2,200 in additional CA taxes I wasn't expecting. Still came out ahead but not by as much as I thought.
0 coins
Kayla Jacobson
ā¢Oh wow, I'm in California too and didn't know this! Does the LLC have the same $800 minimum tax?
0 coins
Nasira Ibanez
ā¢Yes, LLCs in California also have the $800 minimum franchise tax, but they don't have the additional 1.5% tax on net income that S corps do. So if your business is profitable, the S corp can end up costing more in CA state taxes even though you might save on federal taxes. It's definitely something to factor into your analysis before making the switch. I wish I had known this before I elected S corp status!
0 coins