IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I completely understand your frustration! I went through something very similar last year with my energy credit return. Here's what worked for me after weeks of trying: Try calling the IRS at 800-829-1040 right at 7 AM local time on a Tuesday or Wednesday (avoid Mondays and Fridays). When you get the automated system, press 1 for English, then 2 for personal income tax questions, then 1 for form/payment questions, then 3 for all other questions, then 2 again. When it asks for your SSN, just wait - don't enter anything. After it asks twice, it should transfer you to hold for an agent. The key is persistence and timing. I had to try this method about 5-6 times over two weeks before I finally got through, but when I did, the agent was able to tell me exactly what was happening with my return. Your 8-week wait with an energy credit is actually pretty normal, unfortunately. The IRS manually reviews most returns with renewable energy credits, which can take 6-12 weeks during busy season. The "Return Received" status is typical during this review period - it won't change to "Approved" until they finish the manual review process. Hang in there! As long as you haven't received any letters requesting additional documentation, your return is likely just working its way through the queue.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I've been calling at random times during the day which probably explains why I keep getting the "high call volume" message. I'll definitely try the Tuesday/Wednesday 7 AM approach you mentioned. It's actually reassuring to hear that 8 weeks is normal for energy credits - I was starting to worry that something was seriously wrong with my return since all the IRS materials say "most refunds processed within 21 days." They really should update that messaging to be clearer about credits causing longer processing times. Did the agent give you any timeline when you finally got through, or did they just confirm it was in manual review?

0 coins

When I finally got through to an agent, they were actually pretty helpful! They confirmed my return was in the manual review queue specifically because of the residential energy credit I claimed (heat pump installation). The agent told me to expect another 2-4 weeks from that point, and sure enough, my refund was approved about 3 weeks later. The agent also mentioned that if you don't hear anything after 12 weeks total, that's when you should definitely follow up again because something might actually be wrong. But for energy credits, 8-12 weeks is their normal processing window during tax season. One thing that helped me stay sane during the wait was setting up text alerts through the IRS2Go app so I'd get notified immediately when the status changed, rather than obsessively checking the website every day!

0 coins

I've been dealing with IRS delays myself and found that contacting your congressperson's office can sometimes help when you've exhausted other options. Most congressional offices have constituent services staff who can make inquiries to the IRS on your behalf - it's a free service for constituents. You typically need to fill out a privacy release form allowing them to discuss your case with the IRS, but they can often get answers or escalate issues that regular taxpayers can't. I contacted my representative's office after 10 weeks of waiting on an amended return, and they were able to get a response from the IRS within two weeks explaining exactly what was happening. It's worth trying if the other phone strategies don't work out. You can usually find the contact info for your representative's local office on their website under "constituent services" or "casework help.

0 coins

Malik Jackson

•

This thread has been absolutely fantastic! As someone new to both this community and retirement planning, I'm amazed by how clearly everyone has explained these confusing IRS rules. The key insight that really helped me understand is that for Roth IRA contributions, you need to look at your **earned income** from working (wages, salary, self-employment), not your AGI or taxable income after deductions. So with your $8,420 from your part-time job, that becomes your basis for determining contribution limits (up to the annual maximum of $7,000 if you're under 50). What's really exciting is how advantageous your situation is right now. You're getting a rare combination of benefits: - Zero effective tax rate on Roth contributions (since your taxable income is $0 after standard deduction) - Potential Saver's Credit of up to $1,000 through Form 8880 - Decades of completely tax-free growth and withdrawals This is honestly one of the best retirement savings scenarios possible! Even if you can't contribute the full $7,000, any amount you put in now while you're in this favorable tax position will compound significantly over time. Don't forget you have until April 15, 2025 to make 2024 contributions, so there's still time to take advantage of this opportunity. Your future self will definitely thank you for maximizing this while your tax burden is so low!

0 coins

This has been such an incredibly helpful thread! As someone completely new to retirement planning, I'm grateful for how everyone has broken down these complex IRS rules into understandable terms. The distinction between earned income versus AGI/taxable income finally makes sense to me now. It's reassuring to know that having $0 taxable income after the standard deduction doesn't disqualify you from Roth IRA contributions - it's all about that earned income from your actual work. What really strikes me is how this creates such a unique opportunity for people in lower income situations. Getting to contribute to a Roth IRA with essentially no current tax cost, potentially receiving money back through the Saver's Credit, AND setting up decades of tax-free growth - it really does seem like the perfect time to start building retirement wealth. I'm definitely motivated to research Roth IRA options for my own situation now. Even starting with smaller contributions while maintaining an emergency fund seems like it could pay huge dividends over time given these tax advantages. Thank you to everyone who shared their knowledge and experiences - this community is an amazing resource for navigating these confusing financial topics!

0 coins

Liv Park

•

As a newcomer to both retirement planning and this community, I want to thank everyone for making this such a comprehensive and helpful discussion! What really stands out to me is how clearly everyone has explained that it's your **earned income** that determines Roth IRA contribution limits - not your AGI or taxable income after deductions. So for someone with $8,420 in W-2 wages like the original poster, that earned income is what matters for determining how much you can contribute (up to the $7,000 annual limit if under 50). The tax advantages being discussed here are incredible for people in lower income situations. You essentially get a triple benefit: zero current tax burden on contributions since your taxable income is $0 after the standard deduction, potential Saver's Credit worth up to $1,000, and decades of completely tax-free growth. It's like the tax system is designed to reward early retirement savers in lower brackets! I'm particularly grateful for the reminder that there's still time to make 2024 contributions until April 15, 2025. This gives people in similar situations a chance to take advantage of this favorable tax position before it potentially changes as their income grows. This thread has motivated me to research Roth IRA options for my own situation. Even small contributions made during these low-tax years could compound significantly over time. Thanks to everyone for sharing such valuable insights and real-world experiences!

0 coins

Welcome to the community! This thread really has been an incredible resource for understanding Roth IRA contribution rules. I love how you've summarized the key insights - it's all about that **earned income** from working, regardless of what your final taxable income looks like after deductions. Your point about the "triple benefit" is perfect - I hadn't thought about it that way before, but you're absolutely right. Getting zero current tax cost, potential money back through the Saver's Credit, AND decades of tax-free growth really is an amazing combination that's hard to find elsewhere in the tax code. As someone who was also intimidated by retirement planning when I first started, I'd encourage you to not overthink it too much. Even if you can only contribute a few hundred or a thousand dollars while you're in this favorable tax situation, that money will have so much time to grow tax-free. The most important thing is to get started while you have this incredible opportunity. And you're so right about the April 15, 2025 deadline - it's great that people still have time to take advantage of this for the 2024 tax year. Thanks for contributing such a thoughtful summary to an already amazing discussion!

0 coins

Zara Khan

•

The math for catching up after being tax exempt isn't quite as simple as that 50% increase because of how withholding tables work, but you're on the right track with the thinking. When you're tax exempt, you're not just missing the flat percentage that would normally be withheld - you're also missing the progressive nature of how taxes accumulate throughout the year. The withholding tables assume you'll earn that same amount every pay period for the full year, so when you restart withholding mid-year, the system doesn't automatically "know" you need to catch up. A rough rule of thumb: if you were exempt for 4 months out of 12, you'll need to increase your normal withholding by about 60-70% for the remaining months to break even, not just 50%. This accounts for the fact that some of your income may have pushed into higher tax brackets that weren't being withheld during the exempt period. But honestly, rather than trying to estimate this, I'd recommend using the IRS withholding calculator and inputting your actual year-to-date earnings and withholding. It will give you a much more accurate picture of exactly how much you need withheld going forward. The calculator is designed to handle these mid-year changes and will account for your specific income level and tax situation. You're absolutely right that treating the court costs and tax catch-up as separate issues is the way to go!

0 coins

@Zara Khan Thank you for breaking down the math on catching up after being tax exempt! That 60-70% increase figure is really eye-opening - I would have definitely underestimated how much extra withholding would be needed. As someone new to this community, I m'impressed by how thorough and helpful everyone s'responses have been. The original question seemed straightforward but there are clearly so many nuances to consider - the timing of expenses, the difference between the old and new W-4 systems, the progressive tax implications of missed withholding periods, and the distinction between tax liability and separate financial obligations. For anyone else reading this thread who might be in a similar situation, it sounds like the key takeaways are: 1 Use) the IRS withholding calculator rather than trying to estimate, 2 Don) t'confuse court costs with tax-deductible expenses unless you ve'verified they qualify, and 3 Plan) for tax catch-up separately from other financial obligations. This has been incredibly educational!

0 coins

I appreciate everyone's detailed responses here! As someone who works in payroll processing, I wanted to add a practical perspective on what happens when you make this switch mid-year. When you change from 1 to 0 allowances (or adjust your W-4 withholding), the change typically takes effect with your next payroll cycle. However, most payroll systems don't retroactively adjust for the year - they just apply the new withholding rate going forward. This means if you've already been working several months at the lower withholding rate, you'll need even more taken out to compensate. One thing I always recommend to employees in your situation: submit your new W-4 and then monitor your first few paychecks carefully. Calculate whether the new withholding amount, when projected over your remaining pay periods, will actually cover your expected tax liability. You might find you need to use the "additional amount to withhold" line on the W-4 to really catch up from those 4 months of tax exempt status. Also, since you mentioned budgeting for the change in take-home pay - remember that the withholding increase will reduce your net pay, but so will any Social Security and Medicare taxes that weren't being withheld during your exempt period. Make sure you're accounting for both when planning your budget.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

Tyler, you're asking all the right questions! As someone who's helped many new business owners navigate this exact situation, here's the straightforward approach: Yes, you'll need to transfer money from your personal account to your business account first - this is called a "capital contribution" and it's completely normal. Document this transfer clearly (keep records showing it's an investment in your business, not a loan). Then use your business account to purchase all equipment. This creates a clean paper trail showing these are legitimate business expenses from day one. For the tax benefits, you're right that "writing off" doesn't give you immediate cash, but it will reduce your tax liability once you start earning income. Equipment like cameras and laptops can often be fully deducted in the first year under Section 179, which is much better than spreading the deduction over several years. Regarding your friend's approach - accumulating business debt with no plan to repay is definitely problematic. It could trigger audits and potentially make him personally liable if the IRS determines he's not operating the business legitimately. The key is treating your LLC like a real business from the start, with proper documentation and realistic financial planning. You're already on the right track by asking these questions upfront!

0 coins

This is really helpful, thank you! I'm curious about the Section 179 deduction you mentioned - is there a limit to how much equipment I can deduct in the first year? And does it matter if I don't have any income yet to offset these deductions against? I'm wondering if I should time my equipment purchases strategically or if it doesn't matter since I'm just starting out.

0 coins

Great question about Section 179! For 2024, the limit is $1,080,000 for equipment purchases, so your $3,500 in gear is well within that range. However, you're right to think about timing - Section 179 can only offset income, so if you have zero business income this year, those deductions won't provide immediate benefit. The unused deductions don't disappear though. If you can't use the full Section 179 deduction due to lack of income, you can fall back to regular depreciation (spreading it over 5-7 years for computers/cameras) or carry forward the deduction to future years when you do have income. Many new business owners actually prefer to buy equipment right after they land their first few paying clients, so they have some income to offset. But if you need the gear to get those clients in the first place, don't let tax timing hold you back - just know the deductions will be more valuable once you're earning revenue.

0 coins

Benjamin Kim

•

One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of keeping your business and personal expenses completely separate from day one, even during the startup phase. I learned this the hard way when I started my consulting business. Here's what I wish I'd known: Open that business bank account immediately (which you've already done - great!), then make ONE clean transfer from personal to business as your initial capital contribution. Document this clearly as "Initial Capital Investment" or similar. Then use ONLY the business account for all business purchases, no matter how small. I made the mistake of mixing personal and business purchases in my first year, thinking "I'll sort it out later." That created a bookkeeping nightmare and red flags during my first business tax filing. The IRS wants to see clear business purpose and separation. Also, consider getting a business credit card in the LLC's name once you have that initial capital contribution documented. This helps establish business credit history separate from your personal credit, which will be valuable as your business grows. Your instinct to do this properly from the start will save you major headaches later. Many successful business owners started exactly where you are now - with personal funds as the initial investment to get things rolling.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

This is exactly the kind of practical advice I wish I'd had when starting out! The "one clean transfer" approach makes so much sense - I can see how mixing personal and business purchases would create a mess later on. Quick question about the business credit card - should I wait until after I've made that initial capital contribution and have some transaction history in the business account, or can I apply for it right away? I'm wondering if having zero business credit history makes approval unlikely, or if they mainly look at personal credit for new LLCs anyway. Also, when you say "document clearly as Initial Capital Investment" - is this just in the memo line of the bank transfer, or do I need to create some kind of formal document for my records?

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly comprehensive! As someone who works in tax preparation software development, I can add some technical context to why the IRS prefers zeros over blanks. The IRS's automated processing systems use optical character recognition (OCR) and data validation algorithms that are specifically designed to handle numeric entries. When a field contains "0", the system can confidently process it as a deliberate zero-amount entry. Blank fields, however, require additional processing logic to determine whether they represent missing data, non-applicable items, or processing errors. For electronic filing, the XML data structure that gets transmitted to the IRS actually requires explicit values for most fields - the software automatically converts blanks to zeros during the submission process. But for paper returns, those blanks remain blanks, which can trigger quality control flags in their scanning systems. The bottom line: entering "0" makes your return more compatible with both electronic and paper processing workflows. It's a small detail that can prevent big headaches down the road!

0 coins

This technical perspective is fascinating! As someone who's been stressing over this seemingly simple question, it's really helpful to understand the "why" behind the guidance everyone's been giving. The explanation about OCR systems and XML data structures makes it so much clearer why zeros are preferred - it's not just about following rules, but about making sure your return processes smoothly through their automated systems. I never would have thought about the difference between electronic and paper processing workflows. Thanks for sharing this insider knowledge - it definitely reinforces that I should stick with putting zeros everywhere rather than leaving blanks!

0 coins

I've been preparing taxes professionally for small businesses for about 8 years, and this zeros vs. blanks question comes up constantly with my clients. What I always tell them is that consistency is key - pick one approach and stick with it throughout your entire return. From a practical standpoint, I've found that using zeros helps avoid those dreaded "incomplete return" letters from the IRS that can arrive months later. I had one client a few years back who left multiple fields blank on their Schedule C, thinking it looked "cleaner." They ended up getting a CP2000 notice asking for clarification on those blank fields, which turned into a months-long correspondence nightmare even though no additional taxes were owed. For your specific situation with taxable interest and alimony, definitely use "0" on both lines. The IRS instructions for Form 1040 actually do specify this in the fine print - they want to see that you've considered each line item, and "0" is the clearest way to communicate that. One last tip: if you're ever unsure about a specific line, the IRS has a pretty comprehensive FAQ section on their website that addresses form completion questions like this. Much faster than calling their helpline!

0 coins

Prev1...198199200201202...5643Next