IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Dmitry Petrov

โ€ข

Has anyone actually used intercompany transactions to save on taxes? Like could you charge higher rates from your profitable company to your less profitable one to shift where the income shows up? Asking for a friend lol

0 coins

Liam Fitzgerald

โ€ข

That's exactly what the IRS watches for and why they have strict rules about related party transactions. Section 482 of the tax code specifically gives the IRS authority to reallocate income and deductions between related companies if they determine the pricing isn't at "arm's length" (fair market value). If audited, they can essentially throw out your pricing and substitute what they determine is appropriate. Plus, there are penalties for substantial valuation misstatements. Not worth the risk!

0 coins

Great question! I went through something very similar when I restructured my business last year. The key thing to remember is that these intercompany transactions are totally legitimate as long as you're treating them like you would with any unrelated third party. Since you mentioned you're paying market rates between Company Beta and Company Gamma, that's exactly what the IRS wants to see. The technical term is "arm's length pricing" - basically, would you charge the same amount to a completely unrelated company for the same work? A few practical tips from my experience: - Keep detailed invoices and contracts between the companies, just like you would with external vendors - Document how you determined your pricing (market research, competitor analysis, etc.) - Make sure each company has separate bank accounts and maintains its own books - Consider getting a few quotes from outside developers occasionally to validate your internal rates The fact that you have separate EINs and legitimate operations for each company is perfect. The IRS isn't trying to stop legitimate business structures - they just want to make sure companies aren't artificially shifting profits around to avoid taxes. Since your setup sounds legit and you're using fair pricing, you should be good to deduct those expenses normally.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

โ€ข

This is really helpful advice! I'm just getting started with understanding business taxes and this kind of practical guidance is exactly what I needed. The part about documenting pricing methodology makes a lot of sense - I never would have thought to keep market research on file to justify internal rates. One follow-up question: when you say "occasionally get quotes from outside developers" - how often would you recommend doing this? Is it something you'd do annually, or more like whenever you're setting rates for a new type of service between the companies?

0 coins

Sophia Clark

โ€ข

Good news about the CP12 notice! That means you're getting a bigger refund than expected, which is always nice. The IRS found a math error in your favor and corrected it automatically. Since you received the CP12, your refund should be processed within 4-6 weeks from the date on the letter. The fact that it's been 2 weeks already means you're probably halfway there. The "Where's My Refund" tool should show more specific timing once they actually approve and send the refund. CP12 notices are pretty straightforward - no action needed on your part unless you disagree with their correction (which you probably don't since it's more money!). Your grandma was right that it means a refund is coming, she just didn't know about the timeline.

0 coins

Jessica Nguyen

โ€ข

Thanks for the clear explanation! This makes me feel so much better about the situation. I was getting worried that something was wrong with my return, but hearing that it's actually good news and just takes time is reassuring. Guess I'll stop checking my bank account obsessively every day and just wait it out. Your grandma sounds like she knows her tax stuff!

0 coins

Andre Dupont

โ€ข

@Connor Murphy - that s'exactly right! A CP12 with a math error in your favor is definitely one of the better letters you can get from the IRS. Since you mentioned it s'been about 2 weeks since you got the letter, you re'probably looking at another 2-4 weeks before the refund hits your account. The extra $130 is a nice bonus too - probably from a deduction or credit calculation they corrected. Your grandma definitely knows her stuff!

0 coins

KaiEsmeralda

โ€ข

Just wanted to add that CP12 notices are actually one of the better IRS letters to receive! Since yours shows they found a math error that increased your refund by $130, that's essentially free money you weren't expecting. I've gotten a few CP12 notices over the years and the timeline is usually pretty consistent - about 4-6 weeks from the letter date. The IRS has to go through their internal processing steps even after they send the notice, which is why there's still a wait time. One tip: if you have direct deposit set up, make sure your bank account info hasn't changed since you filed. Sometimes refund delays happen because the IRS tries to deposit into an old or closed account. You can verify this info through the "Where's My Refund" tool on their website.

0 coins

Oliver Fischer

โ€ข

For anyone dissolving a C-corp soon - remember that timing can be crucial for tax purposes! We intentionally delayed our liquidation to January so the tax impact hit in the following year. This gave shareholders more time to plan for the capital gains taxes. Also, if your corporation has accumulated E&P (earnings and profits), distributions will be taxed as dividends until E&P is exhausted, before being treated as return of capital. This sequencing can significantly impact the tax treatment of your liquidation. You must exhaust your E&P through dividend distributions before you can distribute amounts that are treated as return of capital or liquidation proceeds.

0 coins

Natasha Ivanova

โ€ข

Do you know if you're supposed to file separate 5452 forms for dividend distributions (from E&P) versus the liquidation distributions? Our accountant mentioned something about this but wasn't clear.

0 coins

Sergio Neal

โ€ข

Yes, you'll typically need to file separate Form 5452s for different types of distributions during liquidation. Distributions from E&P are reported as dividends (usually on Form 1099-DIV in boxes 1a/1b), while liquidation distributions are reported separately (boxes 8 or 9 depending on complete vs partial liquidation). The timing Oliver mentioned is crucial - you must first distribute all accumulated E&P as dividends before any distributions can be treated as return of capital or liquidation proceeds. Each Form 5452 filing should clearly indicate the nature of the distributions being reported using the appropriate checkboxes. Your accountant should be able to determine if your corporation has accumulated E&P from prior years that needs to be distributed first.

0 coins

One important detail that hasn't been mentioned yet - when completing Form 5452 for liquidation distributions, make sure you're consistent with how you report the distributions across all shareholders AND on the corporation's final Form 1120. The IRS will cross-reference these forms, so if you report $X as liquidation distributions on Form 5452, that same amount should appear on the corporation's final return. Also, remember that the corporation must provide each shareholder with their Form 1099-DIV by January 31st following the year of liquidation - these forms will show the liquidation distribution amounts in box 8 or 9. A common mistake is forgetting to file Form 966 within 30 days of adopting the plan of liquidation. This is separate from Form 5452 and is required even for small family corporations. The IRS can impose penalties if Form 966 is filed late, so don't overlook this step in your dissolution timeline.

0 coins

Brooklyn Knight

โ€ข

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive guidance I was hoping to find! As someone new to corporate dissolution, the cross-referencing requirement between Form 5452 and the final Form 1120 is something I definitely wouldn't have thought about on my own. Quick question - you mentioned Form 966 needs to be filed within 30 days of adopting the liquidation plan. Does this mean 30 days from when the shareholders formally vote to dissolve, or 30 days from when we actually start distributing assets? We're planning to have the shareholder meeting next week but won't distribute assets until the following month. Also, thanks for the reminder about the 1099-DIV deadline. I assume the corporation issues these even though it's being dissolved? Do we need to maintain any corporate status just to handle these final tax reporting requirements?

0 coins

Diego Mendoza

โ€ข

Pro tip for anyone dealing with Form 8960: Take a close look at line 8 where you can deduct properly allocable deductions. Many people miss that investment interest expense, investment advisory fees, and expenses related to rental properties can often be used to reduce your NIIT liability. I saved almost $700 last year by properly accounting for these deductions!

0 coins

How exactly do you calculate what portion of these expenses are "properly allocable"? I have some advisory fees but wasn't sure if I could apply 100% of them against the investment income.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

โ€ข

For advisory fees, you generally can deduct the portion that relates to investment income subject to NIIT. If your advisor manages both taxable investments and tax-deferred accounts (like 401k/IRA), you'd need to allocate based on the relative values. For example, if 80% of your managed assets are in taxable accounts generating investment income, you could typically deduct 80% of the advisory fee. The key is having documentation showing the allocation is reasonable. Some advisors will provide statements breaking this down, or you can calculate it based on account values. Investment interest expense is usually more straightforward since it directly relates to generating investment income.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

โ€ข

Just wanted to share my experience as someone who went through this exact situation last year. You're absolutely right that capital gains from stock sales go on line 5a of Form 8960 - that's the correct line for net gain from disposition of property. One thing that caught me off guard was that the NIIT applies to your net investment income OR the amount by which your MAGI exceeds the threshold, whichever is LESS. So even if you have significant capital gains, if your total MAGI is just barely over the $200k threshold, you might only owe the 3.8% tax on a small portion. Also, don't forget to check if you have any investment expenses that can reduce your NIIT liability on line 8. Things like investment advisory fees, safe deposit box fees for storing investment documents, or expenses related to managing rental properties can often be deducted here. I missed this my first time filing and had to amend! The reason they make it a separate form instead of building it into the capital gains worksheet is because the NIIT applies to all types of investment income (dividends, interest, rents, etc.), not just capital gains. It's annoying but makes sense from a tax code structure perspective.

0 coins

Carmen Ruiz

โ€ข

This is really helpful context, especially about the calculation being the lesser of net investment income OR the excess MAGI amount. I hadn't realized that nuance! Just to make sure I understand correctly - if someone has $220k MAGI (so $20k over the $200k threshold) but $50k in capital gains, they'd only pay the 3.8% NIIT on the $20k excess, not the full $50k in gains? That's actually a relief since I was worried about owing 3.8% on all my investment income. The investment expense deduction on line 8 is something I definitely need to look into more carefully. I have some advisory fees that I completely overlooked. Thanks for pointing that out!

0 coins

Ella Knight

โ€ข

I actually had a similar situation with a Section 351 exchange last year and want to share what worked for me. After struggling with the same questions you're asking, I ended up creating a comprehensive statement that included all the required elements under ยง 1.351-3. The key is being very detailed and organized. I structured mine with clear sections: transaction date, all parties involved (with EINs), detailed description of property transferred, fair market values, basis amounts, and securities received. I also included a section documenting any liabilities that were assumed. For the actual filing, I was able to e-file successfully by attaching the statement as a PDF through my tax software's document attachment feature. Most software has this - look for "Supporting Documents" or "Additional Forms" sections. I made sure to reference the statement in my main return with a note like "See attached Section 351 statement" so the IRS would know to look for it. One thing I learned is that it's better to be overly thorough than to leave anything out. The IRS wants to see that you've properly documented the transaction to qualify for tax-free treatment. If you're unsure about any aspect, it's worth consulting with a tax professional who has experience with Section 351 transactions, as getting this wrong could jeopardize the tax-free nature of your exchange.

0 coins

Lucas Kowalski

โ€ข

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! I'm in a very similar situation and have been worried about getting the documentation wrong. Your point about being overly thorough really resonates with me - I'd rather include too much information than risk missing something critical. One quick question: when you mentioned referencing the statement in your main return, did you put that note in a specific section or form, or just wherever seemed most relevant to the transaction? I want to make sure the IRS can easily connect my statement to the actual exchange when they process everything. Also, did your tax software give you any issues with the PDF attachment, or was it pretty straightforward once you found the right section?

0 coins

QuantumLeap

โ€ข

@Lucas Kowalski - For referencing the statement in your main return, I put a brief note in the Other "Income section" since that s'where business-related items often get documented. I wrote something like Section "351 exchange - see attached statement pursuant to ยง 1.351-3 so" it was clear what the attachment related to. The PDF attachment process was actually smoother than I expected. My tax software TurboTax (had) a dedicated section called Forms "and Schedules where" I could upload additional documents. It walked me through the process and even let me preview how the attachment would appear with my return before submitting. One tip: make sure your PDF is clearly named like (Section351_Statement_2023.pdf "and") isn t'too large - most software has file size limits. Also, save a copy for your records because you ll'want to have it handy if the IRS ever has questions about the transaction. The whole process was much less complicated than I initially feared, but the key was being thorough with the documentation upfront.

0 coins

Seraphina Delan

โ€ข

I've been through this exact process twice now - once for transferring assets to my LLC and again when I incorporated my consulting business. The confusion around ยง 1.351-3 statements is totally understandable because the IRS doesn't make it clear at all. Here's what I've learned from experience: You absolutely need to create your own written statement since there's no official form. The statement must be titled "Statement Pursuant to ยง 1.351-3" at the top and include all the regulatory requirements - transaction date, complete party information (names, addresses, EINs), detailed property descriptions with both fair market value and your tax basis, securities received, and any assumed liabilities. For e-filing, every major tax software I've used (TurboTax, H&R Block, TaxAct) has a document attachment feature. It's usually found near the end of the filing process under names like "Supporting Documents," "Additional Forms," or "Attachments." Upload your statement as a clearly-named PDF and reference it in your main return - I typically add a note in the "Other Income" section saying "See attached Section 351 statement." The critical thing is getting this filed with the return for the year your transaction occurred. If you've already filed that year's return, you'll need to submit Form 1040-X with the statement attached. Don't delay on this - the statement is what preserves the tax-free treatment of your Section 351 exchange, and missing it could cost you way more than the hassle of an amended return.

0 coins

Margot Quinn

โ€ข

This is incredibly helpful - thank you for sharing your real-world experience with multiple Section 351 transactions! I'm particularly grateful for the specific software guidance since that's been one of my biggest concerns. One question about the timing aspect: you mentioned that the statement needs to be filed with the return for the year the transaction occurred. In my case, I did the Section 351 exchange in late fall but I'm just now preparing my taxes for that year (haven't filed yet). So I should be able to include the statement with my original return rather than needing to file an amendment, correct? Also, when you say "detailed property descriptions," how specific do you need to get? For example, if I transferred intellectual property (software code, trademarks), do I need to list every individual asset, or is a general description of the IP portfolio sufficient as long as the values are accurate? Thanks again for taking the time to share such detailed guidance - this community has been a lifesaver for navigating these complex tax situations!

0 coins

Prev1...18851886188718881889...5643Next