


Ask the community...
Don't forget to check local requirements too! My teenager had to get a business license for his lawn business in our town even though he's under 18. It only cost $25 but we had no idea until a neighbor (who happens to work for the city) mentioned it to us. Some places don't require it for minors or under certain income levels, but worth checking your local rules.
Great question! I went through this exact situation with my daughter's tutoring business last year. Here are the key points that helped us: First, yes - since your son will likely exceed $400 in self-employment income, he'll need to file a tax return and pay self-employment taxes (about 15.3% for Social Security and Medicare). This applies even though he's a minor and your dependent. He'll use Schedule C to report his business income and expenses. Keep detailed records of everything - income from each customer and all business expenses. Even small things add up: gas for the mower, oil, replacement parts, business-related mileage when you drive him to customers, etc. The good news is that with proper expense tracking, his taxable income will be lower than his gross earnings. And since he's likely under the standard deduction threshold for regular income tax, he'll probably only owe the self-employment tax portion. One tip: have him set aside about 15-20% of his earnings in a separate account for taxes. This way you're not scrambling to pay when filing time comes. It's also great practice for him to learn about business finances! Don't stress too much - this is actually a wonderful learning opportunity for him about entrepreneurship and taxes. The IRS has good resources for small business owners, and there are plenty of tax prep services that handle simple Schedule C situations like this.
This is such helpful advice! I'm actually in a similar situation with my son's snow removal business here in Minnesota. The part about setting aside 15-20% for taxes is brilliant - I wish I had thought of that earlier in the season. We've been scrambling to figure out what he owes and it's definitely more manageable when you plan ahead. One question though - when you mention business-related mileage, does that include driving him to pick up supplies like salt and shovels? We've made quite a few trips to Home Depot for his business and I wasn't sure if those counted as deductible expenses.
Has anyone used H&R Block for filing with treaty benefits? I'm in the same situation with a South Korea-US treaty but wondering if their software can handle this or if I should look elsewhere.
I went through this exact same situation with my university in Germany before transferring to a US school! The key thing to understand is that when your university withholds taxes incorrectly despite treaty exemptions, you're essentially getting an involuntary loan to the government that you need to claim back. Here's what worked for me: File Form 8833 as others mentioned, but also make sure to keep detailed records of ALL correspondence with your university about the treaty. When NFU told you to "just claim it on your taxes," get that in writing if possible. The IRS sometimes asks for documentation showing you tried to resolve it at the source first. One thing I learned the hard way - if you're claiming the same treaty exemption year after year, you need to file Form 8833 EVERY year, not just the first time. Also, make sure your university is correctly coding your income on the 1042-S or W-2. Sometimes they use the wrong income codes which can complicate your filing. The good news is that once you get the process down, it becomes pretty routine. I've been doing this for three years now and it's gotten much easier. Just don't let the university's laziness cost you money - you're entitled to that exemption!
This is really helpful advice, especially about getting the university's response in writing! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my school is basically refusing to handle the treaty exemption properly. Quick question - when you mention keeping records of correspondence, did you find that the IRS actually asked for those documents during processing, or is it more of a "just in case" thing? I'm wondering how much documentation I should be prepared to provide. Also, you mentioned income codes on the 1042-S/W-2 - do you know what the correct codes should be for treaty-exempt income? My university's payroll office seems clueless about this stuff and I want to make sure they're not making it even more complicated than it needs to be.
Just wanted to add my experience - I ended up going with a local CPA who charged $125 for ITIN renewal as a Certifying Acceptance Agent. The price included document verification and submitting everything to the IRS. What really helped me was calling around to multiple places first. I got quotes ranging from $75 (at a community tax center) to $250 (at a fancy downtown firm). The $200 quote you got isn't outrageous, but you can definitely find it cheaper if you shop around. One thing to ask when getting quotes: make sure they're actually a CAA (Certifying Acceptance Agent) so you don't have to mail your original documents. Some places will charge you the same amount but still make you mail everything yourself, which defeats the purpose of paying someone!
This is really helpful advice! I didn't even know to ask about CAA certification when getting quotes. That explains why some places were so much cheaper - they probably weren't offering the document verification service. I'm definitely going to call around more before deciding. The convenience of not having to mail my passport is probably worth paying a bit more, but I want to make sure I'm getting a fair price for that service. Thanks for sharing the price range you found - gives me a good benchmark for what to expect!
I went through ITIN renewal last year and ended up doing it myself after getting similar quotes around $150-200. The Form W-7 really isn't that complicated if you read through the instructions carefully - it's mostly basic personal information and checking boxes for why you need the ITIN. The biggest decision is whether you want to mail your original documents to the IRS (free but risky) or pay a Certifying Acceptance Agent to verify them in person. I ended up getting certified copies of my documents from the issuing agencies instead, which cost me about $25 total but gave me peace of mind. If you do decide to pay someone, definitely shop around and make sure they're a legitimate CAA. You can actually search for authorized agents on the IRS website. Also ask exactly what's included - some places charge extra fees on top of their base rate that they don't mention upfront.
Thanks for mentioning the certified copies option! I had no idea that was a possibility. $25 sounds way more reasonable than $200, and I like the idea of not having to mail my original passport to the IRS or deal with finding a CAA. How long did it take you to get the certified copies from the issuing agencies? And did the IRS accept them without any issues? I'm trying to figure out if the time and hassle savings of paying someone is worth it versus doing it myself with certified copies.
Great question! The previous answers are spot on - you can absolutely use your business losses to reduce your W-2 income, and this is completely separate from your standard deduction. This is actually one of the main tax advantages of having a business, even in the early loss years. Just to add a practical perspective: when you file Schedule C with your $8,300 loss, that loss flows directly to Line 3 of your Form 1040 as a negative number. So your calculation would be: - W-2 wages: $62,000 - Business loss: ($8,300) - Total income: $53,700 - Less standard deduction: $13,850 - Taxable income: $39,850 This could save you around $1,600-2,000 in taxes depending on your tax bracket. Keep excellent records as others mentioned - separate business bank account, save all receipts, and document your business activities. The IRS is more likely to scrutinize Schedule C losses, especially in early years, but as long as you're genuinely trying to build a profitable business and can document legitimate expenses, you should be fine. Consider consulting a tax professional for your first year with business losses - they can help ensure you're maximizing deductions while staying compliant.
This is exactly the breakdown I needed to see! So if I'm understanding correctly, that $1,600-2,000 tax savings basically means my business "loss" actually put money back in my pocket compared to if I hadn't started the business at all. That's pretty encouraging for someone just starting out. You mentioned consulting a tax professional for the first year - is this mainly to make sure I'm not missing any deductions, or are there other complications with Schedule C that I should be worried about? I'm trying to decide if it's worth the cost or if I can handle it with tax software.
Exactly right - that tax savings essentially means your business expenses are being subsidized by the tax system, which is one of the key benefits of business ownership even during unprofitable years! Regarding the tax professional question: for most straightforward Schedule C situations, good tax software can handle it fine. However, I'd recommend a professional consultation if you have any of these situations: mixed personal/business use items (like a home office or vehicle), significant startup costs that might need to be amortized rather than expensed immediately, or if you're unsure about what qualifies as a legitimate business expense. A tax pro can also help you set up good record-keeping systems from the start and advise on estimated tax payments if your business becomes profitable next year. Many charge $200-400 for a consultation and Schedule C prep, which could easily pay for itself if they find additional deductions or help you avoid costly mistakes. But if your expenses are straightforward (equipment, inventory, basic operating costs) and well-documented, tax software should work fine.
One important detail to add to the excellent advice already given - make sure you understand the timing of when you can deduct different types of startup expenses. Some of your $8,300 in losses might need to be handled differently depending on what they were for. Generally, ordinary business expenses (like inventory, supplies, advertising) can be deducted immediately. But certain startup costs like legal fees for business formation, market research, or pre-opening advertising might need to be amortized over 15 years rather than deducted all at once, though you can elect to deduct up to $5,000 of startup costs immediately if your total startup costs are under $50,000. Equipment purchases over certain amounts might also need to be depreciated over several years unless you elect Section 179 expensing (which lets you deduct the full cost immediately up to certain limits - $1.16 million for 2023). This won't change the fact that you can offset your W-2 income, but it might affect how much of that $8,300 loss you can actually claim this year versus future years. Worth double-checking how your expenses are categorized to make sure you're maximizing your current-year deduction!
Fatima Al-Farsi
This is exactly the type of complex partnership liquidation issue that trips up many practitioners. You're absolutely right that Partner C's capital account should zero out upon complete liquidation. The key is understanding that when a partner with a negative capital account receives a liquidating distribution, they're essentially receiving more than their "share" of partnership assets. The $33,000 distribution plus the forgiveness of their $38,000 negative capital account results in a $71,000 economic benefit, which is taxable gain. On the K-1 Section L, you'll show: (1) the $33,000 cash distribution as a negative adjustment, and (2) a positive $71,000 adjustment labeled something like "gain recognition on liquidation of negative capital account." This brings the ending capital account to zero, which is correct for a fully liquidated partner. Don't forget to check if the partnership has any "hot assets" under Section 751 that would cause part of this gain to be ordinary income rather than capital gain. Also verify your partnership agreement doesn't have any special provisions for deficit restoration that might affect this treatment.
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
β’This is really helpful! I'm new to partnership tax issues and have been struggling with understanding how negative capital accounts work in liquidations. Your explanation about the $71,000 economic benefit makes it much clearer - I hadn't thought about it as the partner receiving "more than their share" of assets. One follow-up question: when you mention checking the partnership agreement for deficit restoration provisions, what exactly should I be looking for? Are there specific clauses that would change how we handle the negative capital account liquidation?
0 coins
Yara Assad
β’Great question! When reviewing partnership agreements for deficit restoration provisions, look for clauses that require partners to contribute cash or property to eliminate negative capital account balances upon liquidation or dissolution. These are sometimes called "DRO" (Deficit Restoration Obligation) provisions. If the partnership agreement contains a deficit restoration clause, Partner C might be legally obligated to contribute $38,000 to bring their capital account to zero before receiving any distribution. This would change the tax treatment significantly - instead of recognizing $71,000 of gain, they might have a different result. However, most partnership agreements don't include deficit restoration provisions because partners typically don't want personal liability for partnership losses beyond their investment. If your agreement is silent on this issue (which is common), then the standard treatment applies - Partner C recognizes the gain as described. Also check for any "qualified income offset" provisions under Treasury Regulation 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d), which can affect how negative capital accounts are handled. These provisions are often found in agreements with special allocations to ensure compliance with the substantial economic effect requirements.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
I've been preparing partnership returns for over 15 years, and negative capital account liquidations are definitely one of the trickier areas. Your analysis is spot on - Partner C should recognize $71,000 of gain and their capital account should zero out. One additional consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet is the timing of when to report this. Make sure you're treating this as a liquidating distribution in the year it actually occurred, not spread over multiple years. The entire gain recognition happens in the year of liquidation, even if there were installment payments or other complications. Also, double-check that Partner C's original capital account calculation was correct. Sometimes negative capital accounts result from errors in prior year allocations of income, loss, or distributions. If there were mistakes in earlier years, you might need to consider amended returns before finalizing the liquidation treatment. The Section L entries you're planning are exactly right - negative adjustment for the cash received, positive adjustment for the gain recognition to zero out the account. Just make sure your gain calculation considers the partner's outside basis as well, since that affects the ultimate tax consequences to Partner C personally.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
β’This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I'm relatively new to partnership taxation and this whole thread has been a great learning experience. The point about checking prior year allocations is something I hadn't considered - that could definitely affect the baseline negative capital account balance. Quick question about the outside basis calculation you mentioned: if Partner C's outside basis was different from their capital account balance, would that change the amount of gain they recognize on the liquidation? Or does the gain calculation only depend on the capital account and distribution amounts? I want to make sure I understand the relationship between these two concepts correctly.
0 coins