I went through the exact same frustrating experience with my ITIN application last year! The "missing information" rejection without specific details is unfortunately very common. Here's what I learned from my experience: First, definitely look for a rejection code on your notice - it's usually a small number or letter that corresponds to the specific issue. Sometimes it's easy to miss because it's not prominently displayed. Second, I'd strongly recommend calling the ITIN line (1-800-908-9982) early in the morning - I found I had better luck getting through around 8 AM when they first open. Have your rejection notice and W-7 form ready when you call. For treaty benefits specifically, make sure you're using the correct treaty article and exemption code on your W-7. I initially put the wrong code because I misunderstood which article of the treaty applied to my situation. The IRS website has country-specific treaty tables that show exactly which codes to use for different types of income. Also, since you moved here last year, double-check that your supporting documents (passport, etc.) are still valid and that any required translations are properly certified. Good luck - don't give up! It's worth getting right for the treaty benefits you're entitled to.

I completely understand your frustration - ITIN rejections with vague explanations are unfortunately very common, especially for first-time applicants. The good news is that this is definitely fixable! A few immediate steps I'd recommend: 1. **Look for a rejection code** - Even though the letter seems vague, there's usually a small code (like "R 07" or similar) somewhere on the notice that indicates the specific issue. It might be in small print or in a corner. 2. **Call the ITIN hotline early** - Try 1-800-908-9982 right when they open at 8 AM. Yes, you'll likely wait 30-60 minutes, but it's much better than the impossible wait times later in the day. Have your rejection notice and original W-7 form ready. 3. **Double-check your treaty code** - Since you mentioned claiming treaty benefits, verify you selected the correct exemption code for your specific country and income type. The IRS has detailed treaty tables on their website that show exactly which codes apply to different situations. 4. **Consider a Certified Acceptance Agent** - They can review your documents in person and catch common issues before submission. Plus, you won't have to mail original documents. Don't give up! The treaty benefits you're entitled to are worth the extra effort to get this right. Most people succeed on their second attempt once they know exactly what needs to be corrected.

My tax preparer told me that the IRS is getting stricter about this "two HOH in one physical house" situation. You might want to keep really detailed records of exactly who pays for what. Like, if you claim you pay 60% of expenses, have documentation showing which specific bills you pay. Especially if you get audited.

This is a really nuanced situation that trips up a lot of people in blended families. From what you've described, it sounds like you and your partner could both potentially qualify for Head of Household status, but you'll need to be very careful about how you structure and document your finances. The key thing the IRS looks at is whether you're maintaining separate households economically, even if you're under the same roof. Since you contribute 60% of household expenses and she covers the rest, that's actually a good foundation - but you'll want to make sure you can clearly demonstrate which expenses each of you pays for. I'd recommend setting up separate systems for tracking who pays what bills, groceries, childcare costs, etc. Some couples in your situation even use separate checking accounts for household expenses to make the paper trail clearer. The IRS wants to see that you're each genuinely maintaining a household for your respective qualifying dependents. One thing to double-check: for your shared son, make sure you're the one who can legitimately claim to provide more than 50% of his support if you're planning to claim him as your qualifying person for HOH status. Only one parent can claim a child as a dependent. Given how complex this can get, it might be worth consulting with a tax professional who has experience with blended family situations to make sure you're setting everything up correctly from the start.

I'm in a very similar situation with multiple K1s from various partnership investments, and I've been watching this discussion with great interest. The combination approach that several people have mentioned - using taxr.ai for document extraction paired with professional software like Drake Tax - really resonates with me. I actually tried FreeTaxUSA last year thinking it might handle K1s better than TurboTax, but ran into similar freezing issues when I got to the more complex partnership details. It's frustrating because these aren't even that unusual anymore - lots of people have K1s from REITs, energy partnerships, and private equity. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is TaxSlayer Pro. A colleague recommended it as a middle ground between consumer and full professional software. Has anyone here tried it for multiple K1s? The price point seems reasonable at around $150, though I'm wondering if it's robust enough for the more complex partnership reporting. @Melissa, I'm really curious what you end up deciding and how it works out. The deadline pressure is real, but it sounds like you've gotten some solid options to explore. The Drake Tax demo approach seems like a smart way to test the waters without committing to the full price upfront.

I've been following this discussion closely as someone who's dealt with similar K1 nightmares for years. What strikes me about all these suggestions is how we're essentially having to piece together solutions because the tax software industry hasn't caught up with how common complex investments have become. I want to add one more consideration that I haven't seen mentioned: timing and deadline pressure. While Drake Tax and other professional software options sound excellent for next year's planning, if you're already stressed about the current deadline, you might want to consider a hybrid approach for this year. For immediate relief, I'd suggest trying the taxr.ai document extraction first - it could solve your data entry headaches quickly and let you import clean data into whatever filing software you choose, even if it's just a more stable consumer option like FreeTaxUSA or H&R Block Premium for this year's filing. Then use the extension period (if needed) to properly evaluate and learn the professional software options for next year. The IRS automatic extension gives you until October 15th to file, as long as you estimate and pay any taxes owed by the April deadline. This way you're not learning entirely new software under extreme time pressure while also trying to handle complex K1 reporting. Sometimes the best solution is the one that gets you through the immediate crisis while setting you up for better long-term success.

Just to add some clarity for everyone here - I work in tax preparation and see a lot of confusion about the heat pump credits. The key thing to remember is that for 2024 installations, you're looking at the 25C credit (Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit) which is 30% up to $2,000 specifically for heat pumps. DIY installations have ALWAYS qualified - there's never been a professional installation requirement for this credit. I think some tax preparers get confused because certain state rebate programs do require professional installation, but the federal tax credit does not. For efficiency standards, most modern mini-splits will qualify. You need to meet the highest efficiency tier established by CEE, which for air-source heat pumps is typically 16+ SEER2 and 9+ HSPF2 for single-speed units, or 18+ SEER2 and 9.5+ HSPF2 for variable-speed units. @CosmicCommander - for your $8,000 installation, you'd be eligible for the full $2,000 credit (not $2,600 - that's the max for the full 25C credit including all qualifying improvements). Make sure to use Form 5695 when filing your 2024 return!

Great thread everyone! I'm seeing a lot of helpful information here. Just wanted to add a few points from my own experience: I successfully claimed the DIY heat pump credit for my 2024 installation and can confirm everything @Giovanni Colombo and @Zoey Bianchi said is accurate. The key documentation you'll need includes: 1. Purchase receipts showing the equipment cost and date 2. Manufacturer's certification or spec sheet showing the efficiency ratings meet CEE standards 3. Photos of the installation (helpful but not required) One thing I learned the hard way - keep ALL your receipts, including any electrical work you had to do. Things like upgraded breakers, disconnect switches, and conduit runs can sometimes qualify for the electrical panel credit if they're substantial enough. Also, don't let tax preparers tell you DIY doesn't qualify - I had to educate mine too! The IRS has never required professional installation for residential energy credits. If you're getting pushback, show them IRS Publication 5695 instructions which make no mention of installation requirements. @CosmicCommander - definitely claim that credit for your 2024 installation! With $8k spent, you're looking at the full $2,000 heat pump credit. Just make sure your system meets the efficiency requirements (most modern mini-splits do).

Has anyone tried calling Vanguard specifically for a country-by-country breakdown? I remember seeing something on their website about supplemental tax info being available for certain funds.

I went through this exact same frustration last year with my Vanguard international funds. After trying multiple approaches, here's what worked for me: First, check if your tax software has "Other Countries" or "Multiple Countries" as an option in the dropdown - many people miss this because it's often at the bottom of the list. If that's not available, I found that most tax preparers recommend selecting a major developed country where your fund likely has significant holdings. For Vanguard's international funds, "United Kingdom" or "Germany" are common choices since these funds often have substantial exposure to European markets. The key thing to remember is that the IRS Publication 514 specifically addresses this situation. When investment companies report foreign taxes as "Various," they're following proper reporting procedures. The IRS is primarily concerned with the accuracy of the total foreign tax amount for your credit calculation, not the precise country-by-country breakdown. One tip: if you're really concerned about accuracy, you can attach a statement to your return explaining that the foreign taxes were reported as "Various" on your 1099-DIV and that you selected [whatever country] as a reasonable approximation based on the fund's geographic allocation. Don't let this stress you out too much - it's a very common issue that tax professionals deal with regularly!