Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This is reassuring to read everyone's experiences! I'm dealing with something very similar right now - my WMR updated yesterday showing an offset, but my transcript shows code 846 for the full amount with no 898 code anywhere. The debt in question was from unemployment overpayment that I paid back in full last November, so this shouldn't even be happening. Reading through all these responses, it sounds like the transcript is definitely more reliable than WMR. I'm going to follow the advice here and call the Treasury Offset Program number tomorrow to confirm the debt status, and also get written documentation from the unemployment office showing it was satisfied. Has anyone noticed if there's a pattern with certain cycle codes being more prone to these system sync issues? I'm also -05 cycle like the original poster, so I'm wondering if that's coincidental or if Thursday processors see this more often. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - it's really helping calm my nerves about this!
Welcome to the community! Your situation sounds almost identical to what the original poster described. I just went through this same nightmare in January and can definitely relate to the stress you're feeling right now. From what I've learned lurking in this community, the -05 cycle code thing might not be coincidental. Several people have mentioned similar timing issues with Thursday processors. It seems like the WMR and transcript systems have different update schedules, and sometimes the WMR pulls old offset data that hasn't been cleared from the system yet. Definitely get that written documentation from the unemployment office - that saved me when I had to prove a debt was already satisfied. Also, when you call the Treasury Offset Program, ask them to check the "current status" not just what's in their system, because apparently there can be a lag there too. Fingers crossed you get your full refund just like everyone else here! Keep us updated on what happens.
I'm going through this exact same situation right now! My WMR showed an offset notice this morning, but when I checked my transcript, there's a code 846 for my full refund amount with no 898 code anywhere. The debt they're supposedly offsetting was from a state tax issue that I resolved and paid in full back in December. Reading through everyone's experiences here is giving me so much relief. It sounds like the transcript is definitely the more reliable source, and multiple people have confirmed they received their full refunds despite what WMR was showing. I'm planning to call the Treasury Offset Program number that @Amara Eze shared (800-304-3107) first thing tomorrow morning to get confirmation that the debt is cleared from their system. I'll also reach out to my state tax office to get written documentation showing the debt was satisfied before I filed this year's return. Has anyone noticed approximately how long it takes for WMR to sync up with the transcript data? I'm curious if WMR will eventually update to show the correct information or if it just stays wrong until after the refund is issued. Thanks everyone for sharing your stories - this community is a lifesaver when dealing with IRS stress!
Join the conversation
Has anyone actually gotten penalized for using the wrong form? I sent 1099-MISCs to my investors last year but now I'm thinking they should have been 1099-DIVs based on this thread...
I did! Used 1099-MISC instead of K-1s for my LLC partners and got hit with a $270 per form penalty ($90 per partner × 3 partners). Had to file corrected forms and pay the penalty. Don't mess around with this stuff!
This is such a common confusion for new business owners! I went through the exact same thing last year. The key is understanding the legal relationship you have with your investors, not just calling them "investors." If they gave you money in exchange for ownership in your business (equity), you'll likely need 1099-DIV for distributions or Schedule K-1 if you're structured as a partnership/LLC. If they loaned you money and you're paying them back with interest, that's 1099-INT territory. If they're getting guaranteed payments regardless of your business performance, that might be 1099-NEC or 1099-MISC depending on the specifics. My advice: dig out those original investment contracts and look at the exact wording. Words like "loan," "equity stake," "ownership percentage," or "guaranteed return" will tell you everything you need to know about which forms to use. Don't guess on this - the penalties for using wrong forms can be expensive as others have mentioned!
This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown I needed! I'm realizing now that I've been overthinking this - I should just go back to my original agreements and see what language was actually used. My investors put in money expecting a percentage of profits, so it sounds like they have equity stakes rather than loans. Do you happen to know if there's a dollar threshold for when I need to issue these forms? I don't want to create unnecessary paperwork if the amounts are really small.
Join the conversation
Does anyone know if there's a repayment cap for Form 8962? My income ended up being way higher than I estimated (got a big promotion mid-year), and line 24 is showing I owe back over $4,000 in premium tax credits. That can't be right, can it??
Yes, there are repayment caps based on your income as a percentage of the federal poverty line! For 2023 taxes, if your income is below 200% of FPL, the cap is $350 for single filers or $700 for families. If your income is 200-300% of FPL, the cap is $950/$1,900. And for 300-400% FPL, it's $1,500/$3,000. However, if your income ended up above 400% of the federal poverty line, there unfortunately isn't a repayment cap - you'd have to repay the full amount. This is one of the most painful surprises people encounter with marketplace insurance.
That $4,000 sounds about right unfortunately if your income jumped significantly above 400% of the federal poverty line. I went through something similar when I got a big bonus that pushed me over the threshold - ended up owing back nearly $3,500 in premium tax credits. The really frustrating part is that there's no gradual phase-out once you hit that 400% mark. It's like falling off a cliff - you go from having a repayment cap to owing back everything. You might want to double-check your calculations on Form 8962 to make sure everything is accurate, but if your promotion put you well above the 400% threshold, that amount could be correct. For next year, you might want to consider declining advance premium tax credits and just claiming the credit when you file your taxes, especially if your income is variable. That way you won't face this surprise repayment situation again.
This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with Form 8962 for the first time too and was completely overwhelmed. Reading through everyone's experiences makes me feel less alone in this confusion. One thing I'm still not clear on - if I had marketplace coverage for only part of the year (I switched to employer insurance in September), do I need to prorate everything on the form? My 1095-A only shows coverage through August, but I'm not sure if that affects the calculations differently. Also, for those who mentioned income changes during the year, did you have to report those changes to the marketplace when they happened, or is it okay to just reconcile everything on Form 8962 at tax time? I got a raise in July but didn't think to update my marketplace application at the time. Thanks for all the insights everyone - this community is a lifesaver!
Join the conversation
As someone who's been through a similar situation with employer-paid education benefits, I wanted to share what ultimately worked for me. The key is understanding that you have multiple avenues to resolve this, even when HR initially pushes back. First, try approaching your employer one more time, but this time with specific documentation. Print out IRS Publication 15-B, Section 3, which covers working condition fringe benefits for education. Highlight the part that explains education qualifies when it "maintains or improves skills needed in your present work." For RN-to-NP programs, this often applies since you're building upon your existing nursing knowledge base. If your employer still won't budge, you're not stuck. You can file your return showing the W-2 as issued, but then claim the adjustment by filing Form 4852 (Substitute for Form W-2) along with a detailed explanation of why the education qualifies as a non-taxable working condition fringe benefit. Include documentation like your job description, the education program details, and how it relates to your current nursing role. The fact that your employer is paying for this education actually strengthens your case - it suggests they see value in the education for your current position. Keep all documentation about your nursing program and how it enhances your current ICU skills, as this will be important if there are ever any questions. Don't let HR's initial resistance discourage you. Many HR departments aren't well-versed in the nuances of education benefit taxation, especially for healthcare professionals. You have legitimate options to get this resolved correctly.
This is really comprehensive advice! I'm curious about the Form 4852 approach - when you file that along with your regular return, does it typically trigger any additional scrutiny from the IRS? I'm in a similar situation and want to make sure I'm prepared for any follow-up questions they might have. Also, for the documentation you mentioned keeping, would it be helpful to get something in writing from my supervisor about how they view my NP education in relation to my current RN duties? My manager has mentioned several times that the advanced skills I'm learning directly benefit our unit's patient care, but I've never asked her to document that formally.
Form 4852 doesn't automatically trigger additional scrutiny, but it does signal to the IRS that there's a discrepancy between what your employer reported and what you're claiming. The key is providing clear, detailed documentation upfront to justify the adjustment. Getting written documentation from your supervisor would be extremely valuable! A letter explaining how your NP education directly enhances your current ICU nursing duties and benefits patient care in your unit would strengthen your case significantly. Ask your manager to specifically mention how the advanced skills you're learning apply to your current role rather than preparing you for a different position. When filing Form 4852, include a cover letter explaining the situation, attach relevant IRS publications (like Pub 15-B), and provide documentation showing the education maintains/improves your current job skills. The more thorough your initial submission, the less likely you'll face follow-up questions. Most adjustments for legitimate working condition fringe benefits are processed without issue when properly documented. The fact that you can show your employer values this education for your current role (through your manager's letter) combined with the specific nature of ICU-focused advanced nursing skills makes your case quite strong.
I'm a healthcare administrator who's dealt with these education benefit classifications many times, and I wanted to add some practical perspective to help you navigate this situation. The good news is that RN-to-NP education often does qualify as a working condition fringe benefit, especially in your case where you're remaining in nursing and your employer is directly paying the institution. The "maintains or improves skills" test is key here - since NP education builds upon your existing nursing knowledge base rather than training you for a completely different field, you likely have a strong case. For dealing with your HR department, try this approach: Request a meeting and bring IRS Publication 15-B (specifically pages 16-17 about working condition fringe benefits). Ask them to show you in writing which part of their tuition questionnaire led them to conclude this should be taxable income. Often, HR departments make assumptions based on incomplete understanding of the tax code. If they still won't cooperate, document everything. Get your current job description, your NP program curriculum, and a statement from your nursing supervisor about how this education enhances your current role. This documentation will be crucial whether you're filing Form 4852 or appealing to your employer again. One often-overlooked point: The fact that your employer is paying tuition directly to the university (rather than reimbursing you) actually strengthens the argument that they view this as benefiting your current employment relationship, not preparing you to leave. Don't give up - I've seen many of these situations resolved in the employee's favor once the proper documentation and IRS citations are provided.
This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! As someone new to navigating these tax complexities, I really appreciate you breaking down the specific steps and documentation needed. The point about employer direct payment to the university being favorable is particularly interesting - I hadn't considered how the payment method itself could support the argument that this benefits my current employment relationship. One question: when you mention requesting a meeting with HR to discuss their tuition questionnaire, how should I frame that request? I don't want to come across as confrontational, especially since they already shut down my initial inquiry. Should I position it as seeking clarification for future reference, or be more direct about wanting to correct what I believe is a misclassification? Also, for the statement from my nursing supervisor about how the education enhances my current role - are there specific points or language that would be most helpful to include to align with IRS requirements?
Nia Davis
I went through almost this exact situation last year! The key thing to understand is that even though you're below 100% FPL, you still need to complete Form 8962 because advance premium tax credits were paid on your behalf when you were on your dad's marketplace plan. Here's what worked for me: On Line 6, check "Yes" because you meet the exception - you were enrolled in a qualified health plan where APTC was paid, even though your income is below 100% FPL. For the monthly calculations, you'll put zeros for January-June (Medicaid months) and then work with your dad to determine the allocation percentage for July-December. The good news is that there are repayment limitations based on income. Since you're below 200% FPL, your maximum repayment is capped at a much lower amount than the full credit received. In many cases with very low income like yours, you might not owe anything back at all. Make sure to coordinate with your dad on the allocation percentage - you both need to use the same percentage on your returns. The IRS instructions for Form 8962 have examples of how to calculate this based on the premium amounts for each person covered.
0 coins
Daniel Price
•This is really helpful! I'm new to dealing with tax forms like this and was getting overwhelmed by all the IRS language. Just to make sure I understand - when you say "allocation percentage" with your dad, does that mean like if the total premium was $500/month and my portion was estimated at $200, then my allocation would be 40%? And then I'd use that 40% for all the calculations on my Form 8962 for those months? Also, when you mention repayment limitations - where exactly do I find that information on the form? I want to make sure I'm not missing any protections available to me given my income level.
0 coins
Mikayla Davison
•Yes, you've got the allocation concept right! If the total family premium was $500 and your estimated portion was $200, then your allocation would be 40% (200÷500). You'd use that same 40% for all the Form 8962 calculations during the months you were on your dad's plan. For the repayment limitations, look at the instructions for Form 8962 - there's a table that shows maximum repayment amounts based on your income as a percentage of the Federal Poverty Line. Since you mentioned being "way below" 100% FPL, you'll likely fall into the lowest repayment category. The form itself will calculate this for you in the later sections, but it's good to know these protections exist so you don't panic about potentially owing thousands. One more tip: keep good records of your coordination with your dad on the allocation percentage. If the IRS ever questions it, you'll want documentation showing how you both calculated and agreed on the split.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Rashid
I had a very similar situation two years ago and want to share what I learned after going through this whole process. The confusion around Line 6 on Form 8962 when you're below 100% FPL but were covered under a family member's marketplace plan is really common. You absolutely do need to complete Form 8962 even though your income is below the poverty line. The key is understanding that you qualify for the exception because advance premium tax credits were paid for coverage that included you. This is different from someone who was never enrolled in a marketplace plan at all. For your specific timeline: January-June with Medicaid means $0 premium tax credit calculations for those months. July-December on your dad's plan means you'll need to work out the allocation with him - and this is crucial because you both must use the same percentage on your respective returns or it will trigger IRS notices. One thing that really helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet with each month, what coverage I had, and what my share of any premium tax credits should be. It made the Form 8962 calculations much clearer. Also, don't worry too much about owing money back - the repayment caps for low-income taxpayers are designed to protect people in exactly your situation. The most important thing is to coordinate with your dad before either of you files. Having mismatched allocation percentages between related returns is one of the fastest ways to get additional IRS correspondence!
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•This is such a helpful breakdown! I'm dealing with a similar situation for the first time and the spreadsheet idea is brilliant. One question - when you mention coordination with your dad on the allocation percentage, did you find any specific guidance on how to calculate that split? Like, is it based on age, actual premium costs, or something else? I want to make sure we do this right the first time since you mentioned mismatched percentages cause IRS issues.
0 coins