IRS

CommunityGovernment Services

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Three consecutive J1 Visas - Am I considered a resident for tax purposes under Substantial Presence Test?

This will be my third year in a row on a J1 visa and I'm really confused about my tax filing status. I've had two J1 intern visas running from August 2022 until now, and before that I was on a J1 student visa for about 7 months in 2021. When I calculated all my days according to the Substantial Presence Test formula, it looks like I technically qualify as a resident for tax purposes. I'm not sure what to do next - should I go ahead and file Form 1040 like a regular resident, or am I still supposed to use Form 1040-NR for nonresidents? The IRS website is super confusing on this point and I got different answers from friends in similar situations. I don't want to file incorrectly and get in trouble later. Has anyone dealt with this specific J1 visa tax situation before?

Quick tip from someone who went through this: make sure you're applying the correct "lookback period" for the Substantial Presence Test. You need to count days from the current year at full value, previous year at 1/3 value, and year before that at 1/6 value. Many people mess this up and it can change your resident status determination!

0 coins

This is super important! I messed this up my first time. Also worth noting that you need to have been present for at least 31 days in the current year regardless of your lookback total. And partial days count as full days!

0 coins

I went through something very similar with multiple J1 visas! The key thing that helped me was understanding that each J1 category has different exemption rules. Since you had a J1 student visa in 2021, those days are exempt from the Substantial Presence Test (students get a 5-year exemption). For your J1 intern visas starting in 2022, you need to check if they qualify for the 2-year teacher/researcher exemption. Here's what I'd recommend: First, recalculate your substantial presence using only the days that actually count (excluding exempt periods). Second, definitely file Form 8843 regardless of which tax form you end up using - it documents your exempt individual status. Third, if after proper calculation you meet the substantial presence test, file Form 1040 as a resident alien. The IRS website can be confusing on this, but the key is in Publication 519. Don't just go by what friends say - everyone's situation with visa timing and categories is different. Keep detailed records of your calculations in case the IRS ever asks questions later.

0 coins

Sales tax requirements when buying a used company car - fleet vehicle

Hey everyone, I need some advice on a car purchase situation. I'm currently in talks to buy an ex-fleet vehicle directly from the company where I work. I've bought used cars before from private sellers and dealerships, but this feels different. My company's corporate office is telling me I need to pay the sales tax directly to them as part of the purchase process. This seems weird to me because in my past experience buying used cars, I've always paid the sales tax later when I go to the DMV to transfer the title and register the vehicle in my name. Is there something different about buying an ex-fleet vehicle from my employer that changes how sales tax works? Or is corporate making a mistake by asking me to pay them the tax amount upfront? Just trying to make sure everything is being handled correctly before I finalize the purchase.

The receipt should definitely include the company's tax ID number or sales tax permit number - this is crucial documentation that proves they're authorized to collect sales tax on behalf of the state. Without this, the DMV may not accept that you've already paid the tax. At minimum, your receipt should show: - Purchase price of the vehicle - Sales tax amount (listed separately) - Company's tax ID/sales tax permit number - Date of sale - Vehicle identification details (VIN, year, make, model) I'd also recommend asking your company which state they'll be remitting the tax to, especially if there's any question about interstate issues. Some companies have agreements to collect tax for multiple states, while others may only be set up for their home state. Getting this clarified upfront will save you potential headaches at the DMV later.

0 coins

This is a really common confusion point! Your employer is likely correct about collecting the sales tax upfront, especially if they regularly sell fleet vehicles. When businesses dispose of fleet vehicles, they often need to follow commercial seller regulations rather than private party rules. The key thing to verify is whether your company has the proper authorization to collect and remit sales tax in your state. Some larger companies obtain dealer licenses specifically for fleet disposal, while others work through third-party fleet management companies that handle the tax collection. I'd suggest asking your employer for: 1. Their sales tax permit or dealer license number 2. Confirmation of which state they'll remit the tax to (important if you live in a different state than where the company is based) 3. A detailed receipt showing the tax amount separately from the purchase price If they can't provide this documentation, that might be a red flag that they're not properly set up to collect sales tax, and you should handle it directly with the DMV instead. Don't let them pressure you into paying tax without proper documentation - you could end up paying twice!

0 coins

Yes, most states have online databases where you can verify sales tax permits! Usually you can search by business name or permit number on your state's revenue department website. For example, in California it's through the CDTFA website, in Texas it's the Comptroller's office, etc. If your HR department seems unsure about the details, that's definitely a sign they might be using a third-party service. Many companies use fleet management companies like Enterprise Fleet Management or LeasePlan that handle all the paperwork and tax collection on their behalf. In those cases, the third party would be the one with the dealer license and tax permits. You could ask HR specifically: "Are you collecting the tax directly, or is this being handled through a fleet management company?" If it's the latter, they should be able to give you the name of the company handling the sale, and then you can verify that company's credentials instead.

0 coins

Yes, most states have online databases where you can verify sales tax permits! Usually you can search by business name or permit number on your state's revenue department website. For example, in California it's through the CDTFA website, in Texas it's the Comptroller's office, etc. If your HR department seems unsure about the details, that's actually a good sign they might be working through a third-party fleet management company. These companies specialize in vehicle disposal and handle all the tax compliance stuff that regular HR departments wouldn't normally deal with. You could ask HR for the name of any fleet management company they're using - then you can verify that company's credentials instead. Just be prepared that some companies might be doing this correctly but their HR folks just aren't familiar with the technical details since it's handled by a different department or vendor.

0 coins

S-Corp: Shareholder Loan vs Capital Contribution - what's the real difference?

I'm really confused about how to handle capital going into an S-Corp - specifically whether to classify it as a shareholder loan or a capital contribution. Here's my situation: I've got an S-Corp with two shareholders split 51/49. The shareholders have put in a total of $31,370 so far ($29,550 from the 51% owner and $1,820 from the 49% owner). I know S-Corps require proportionate distributions based on ownership percentages, but does the same rule apply for money going IN as capital contributions? If that's the case, would I need to record capital contributions of $1,820 (49%) and $1,890 (51%) with the remaining $27,660 as a shareholder loan from the majority owner? If that proportionate rule doesn't apply for contributions, what's the actual benefit of classifying funds as a shareholder loan versus a capital contribution? My understanding is both methods increase your basis to take losses, but with a shareholder loan, once it's paid back, you have to record income. But with a capital contribution, the shareholder has enough basis for the loss without eventually recording income on their personal return. One more thing - there's no formal loan document in place if that makes any difference in how this should be handled.

I've been through this exact situation with my S-Corp. Here's what my accountant ultimately advised me to do: 1) Document, document, document! Even if you're treating the funds as capital contributions, have corporate minutes showing the board authorized accepting these contributions. 2) If you want to treat the excess contribution from the 51% owner as a loan, create a proper promissory note NOW, even if it's after the fact. Include market interest rates and a realistic repayment schedule. 3) Consider the relationship between the shareholders. Will the 49% owner feel shortchanged if the 51% owner gets loan repayments while they only have their equity stake? My accountant recommended treating everything as capital contributions for simplicity unless there was a specific plan for repayment, since poorly documented "loans" create more risk in an audit scenario.

0 coins

Did your accountant say anything about what happens when you eventually sell the company? Does it make a difference then if it was a loan vs contribution?

0 coins

Excellent question. Yes, it does make a significant difference when selling the company. If treated as a loan, the repayment of principal to the shareholder is tax-free (they're just getting back what they put in). If treated as capital contribution, that money is part of their basis in the company - when they sell their shares, a higher basis means less taxable gain. However, here's where it gets interesting: if the company is sold as an asset sale rather than a stock sale (which buyers often prefer), the treatment of funds can impact how proceeds are distributed. Loans typically get paid back first before any remaining proceeds are distributed to shareholders. This can create friction if one shareholder has a large loan while others don't.

0 coins

Just wanted to add something I learned the hard way - if you're going the shareholder loan route, make sure you actually FOLLOW the terms of the loan!! My S-corp got audited and the IRS reclassified our "loans" as equity because: 1. We hadn't charged or paid the interest specified in our agreement 2. We missed several scheduled repayments without formal amendments 3. We didn't treat the loans consistently in our books and tax returns The loan got reclassified, which meant some "repayments" we had made were actually treated as distributions... which exceeded our basis... which created unexpected taxable income. It was a MESS. Whatever you decide, be consistent in your documentation, your accounting, and how you report it on your taxes!

0 coins

Thanks for sharing that cautionary tale! This is making me lean toward just treating everything as capital contributions since we're still in start-up mode and might not be able to stick to a strict repayment schedule. Would you agree that's the safer option given your experience?

0 coins

@b5cffd586348 Yes, absolutely! Given your situation and what I went through, I'd strongly recommend treating everything as capital contributions. Here's why: 1. You're in startup mode with uncertain cash flow - trying to maintain loan payments and interest calculations will be a headache you don't need right now. 2. The IRS scrutinizes shareholder loans heavily, especially when there are no formal agreements from the start (which you mentioned you don't have). 3. Capital contributions are much simpler - no interest to track, no payment schedules to maintain, and no risk of having distributions reclassified as taxable income later. 4. Both methods give you the basis you need to take losses, but capital contributions won't create future tax complications. The only downside is that the 51% owner can't easily get their extra contribution back without it being treated as a distribution, but honestly, that predictability might be better than the audit risk. You can always document this arrangement in your operating agreement so everyone's expectations are clear upfront. Trust me, the simplicity and reduced audit risk are worth it!

0 coins

Which states have the simplest or least complex tax code for 2025 filing?

So I'm planning to move in the next few months and honestly one of my big considerations is finding a state with taxes that won't make me want to tear my hair out every April. I'm currently in California and the tax situation here is... well, let's just say I need a drink after filing each year lol. I work remotely so I can basically live anywhere. No kids, not married, just me and my dog. I'm wondering which states have the most straightforward tax systems? I've heard some states have no income tax at all but then they get you with other taxes instead. Are there states that are genuinely simpler overall when you consider income, property, sales tax and all that? Just looking for some real world experience from people who've lived in different states. Which ones have been the least painful from a tax perspective? I'm not necessarily looking for the lowest taxes (though that would be nice too), but more focused on which states have systems that don't require an accounting degree to figure out.

Has anyone actually calculated the TOTAL tax burden by state? Like when you add up income, property, sales, gas, special assessments, etc.? Cuz some states brag about no income tax but then property taxes are insane (looking at you, Texas).

0 coins

Tax Foundation puts out a report every year on this! For overall state/local tax burden, the lowest are Wyoming (7.9%), Alaska (8.1%), and Tennessee (8.3%). Highest are New York (15.9%), Connecticut (15.4%), and Hawaii (14.1%).

0 coins

Thanks for this! This is super helpful - I was only looking at income tax and didn't realize the total picture was so different. Wyoming being lowest overall is interesting since I hadn't even considered it as an option.

0 coins

I made the move from California to Nevada last year and can confirm it's been SO much simpler! No state income tax return to file, which eliminates probably 60% of my tax headaches right there. One thing to consider though - Nevada's sales tax can be pretty high depending on which county you're in (up to 8.375% in some areas), and if you're buying a house, you'll want to factor in property taxes which vary wildly by area. But honestly, even with those considerations, April is now just federal taxes and I'm done. No more juggling multiple state forms or trying to figure out California's weird itemization rules. The move process itself was straightforward tax-wise - just had to file a part-year resident return in California for my last year. If you do go with Nevada, make sure you establish residency properly (driver's license, voter registration, etc.) to avoid any questions from California later. They can be pretty aggressive about tracking down former residents!

0 coins

Calculating Basis of Conversion for Roth IRA - totally lost on my taxes

I'm going crazy trying to figure out this Roth IRA conversion situation on my tax return. Last year I decided to convert some money from my traditional IRA to my Roth IRA, and now I'm completely lost on what to put for the "basis of conversion" on my tax forms. The software keeps asking me for the "non-deductible contributions" amount, but honestly I have no idea what that even means. I've been contributing to my traditional IRA for about 8 years, and I think some contributions were deductible and some weren't? I didn't keep the best records and now I'm paying for it. When I look at my 1099-R form from my brokerage, it shows the total distribution amount but doesn't say anything about the basis. I called them and they basically said "that's your responsibility to track." Great. Anyone dealt with this before? How do I figure out my basis of conversion for this Roth IRA move without triggering an audit? The last thing I want is to pay taxes on money I've already been taxed on.

Another overlooked option: If you absolutely cannot determine your basis accurately, you could consider a "fresh start" by doing a full backdoor Roth conversion. Take all your Traditional IRA money, pay the taxes on the full amount (assuming it's all taxable), and move to Roth. Then start tracking properly going forward. Yes, you might pay some extra taxes if you had non-deductible contributions in there, but the peace of mind and clean slate might be worth it for some people. I did this two years ago and while the tax hit wasn't fun, the simplicity going forward has been great.

0 coins

This seems like terrible advice if the person has a large IRA balance. You could end up paying tens of thousands in unnecessary taxes! Plus dumping a large conversion into a single tax year could push you into a higher bracket.

0 coins

You're right that it's not for everyone - should have been clearer about that. It makes sense mainly for smaller balances where the potential overtaxation is less than the hassle of reconstructing years of missing records. For larger balances, it's definitely worth putting in the time to get the basis right. I should have mentioned that doing partial conversions over several years can also help manage the tax impact by spreading it across multiple tax brackets.

0 coins

One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet - if you're still completely stuck on reconstructing your basis, consider consulting with an Enrolled Agent (EA) or CPA who specializes in retirement accounts. They can help you work through the calculations and may have strategies for situations where records are incomplete. Many tax professionals have dealt with this exact scenario and can help you make reasonable assumptions based on your income history and contribution patterns. They can also advise whether it's worth filing amended returns for missed Form 8606s or if there are other approaches that make sense for your specific situation. The cost of a few hours with a qualified professional might be worth it to avoid potential penalties or overpaying taxes, especially if you have a substantial IRA balance or complex contribution history.

0 coins

Prev1...17171718171917201721...5645Next