


Ask the community...
Don't forget about FBAR filing requirements if your foreign accounts exceeded $10,000 combined at any point during the year! That's separate from your tax return and has huge penalties if missed. The deadline is April 15 with an automatic extension to October.
And to add to this - FBAR is different from Form 8938 (FATCA). You might need to file both depending on your account balances. The thresholds are different and so are the filing methods. FBAR is filed electronically through FinCEN, not with your tax return.
I just went through this exact situation last year and want to share what worked for me. You're absolutely right to be confused - foreign income reporting is one of the most complicated parts of US tax filing! For your foreign interest and dividends, you'll report them on Schedule B alongside your US income. Make sure to check the box indicating you have foreign accounts and specify the countries. The fact that you don't have 1099 forms doesn't matter - you still report the income based on your foreign bank statements. For the foreign capital gains, these go on Schedule D and Form 8949 just like US capital gains. You'll need to convert the foreign currency amounts to USD using the exchange rate from the date of sale. The key is Form 1116 for claiming your foreign tax credits. I'd strongly recommend filing separate Form 1116s for different income categories (passive income vs capital gains) as others mentioned - this typically maximizes your credit. One thing that really helped me was keeping detailed records of the foreign taxes paid with documentation from the foreign tax authorities. The IRS may ask for proof later, and having everything organized upfront saved me a lot of headaches. Also, double-check if you need to file FBAR (FinCEN Form 114) if your foreign account balances exceeded $10,000 at any point during the year. It's a separate filing requirement with serious penalties for non-compliance.
This is really helpful, thank you! I'm just starting to navigate foreign income reporting myself and your point about keeping detailed records resonates with me. Did you have any issues with currency conversion when the foreign bank statements showed amounts in different currencies throughout the year? I have some accounts that had transactions in both euros and pounds, and I'm not sure if I need to convert each transaction individually or if there's a simpler approach for reporting purposes.
One thing that might help speed up the record-gathering process is to check if you have any old tax documents that could fill in the gaps. Look for Form 5498s from the years between your last statement (2017) and the rollover (2021) - your tax preparer might have copies even if you don't. Also, when you contact Charles Schwab, ask specifically about their "account reconstruction" services. Many major brokerages can recreate historical account summaries even when you don't have all the paperwork. They might be able to tell you exactly how much of that $33K was principal vs. gains when it came in. Before you make any moves, I'd strongly suggest running the numbers on what the tax hit would be under different scenarios. Sometimes it makes sense to do a partial conversion over multiple years to stay in lower tax brackets, especially if you're dealing with a substantial amount in taxable gains.
This is really helpful advice about the account reconstruction services! I had no idea brokerages could do that. One question though - if we do find out there were significant gains in the original Roth that would be taxable when converting back, would it make sense to just leave some of that money in the traditional IRA for now? Like maybe convert the contributions first and then deal with the taxable portion later when we're in a lower tax bracket? Or does the IRS require you to convert everything proportionally?
Great question! Unfortunately, the IRS doesn't allow you to cherry-pick which portions to convert - it's done on a pro-rata basis. This means if your traditional IRA contains both taxable and non-taxable amounts, any conversion will include a proportional mix of both. For example, if 30% of your IRA is non-deductible contributions (tax-free) and 70% is taxable (deductible contributions plus all earnings), then any conversion amount will be treated as 30% tax-free and 70% taxable, regardless of which "dollars" you think you're converting. However, your strategy of spreading conversions across multiple years is still smart for managing tax brackets! You could convert smaller amounts each year to stay in lower brackets, but each conversion would still be subject to the pro-rata rule. The key is getting that account reconstruction from Schwab first so you know exactly what percentages you're working with. Then you can plan the optimal conversion timeline based on your current and projected future tax situations.
One additional consideration that might help with your decision-making: check if your wife's current income situation makes her eligible for any Roth IRA contribution limits or phase-outs. If she's in a lower tax bracket now than she expects to be in the future, it might make sense to bite the bullet and do the full conversion sooner rather than later. Also, don't forget about the "5-year rule" for Roth conversions. Even though some of this money originated from a Roth IRA, when you convert from traditional back to Roth, you'll need to wait 5 years from the conversion date before withdrawing any of the converted amounts penalty-free (though the original contribution portions should retain their character). Given that your money has been earning basically nothing at 0.01%, getting it properly situated in a Roth where it can grow tax-free long-term is probably worth paying the taxes on the earnings portions now, especially if you're relatively young and have time for that tax-free growth to compound.
Quick tip that helped me - if you can pay even part of what you owe immediately, do it! Even paying $500-1000 of your balance shows good faith and might make them more willing to work with you on the rest. I was able to get on an installment plan for the remaining balance and they held off on filing the lien.
Does paying part of it stop the interest from adding up so fast? I've heard horror stories about tax debts doubling because of interest and penalties.
Yes, paying part of your balance absolutely helps reduce the interest since interest is calculated on the remaining balance. So if you can pay even a portion upfront, you'll save money in the long run. The penalties are also based on the outstanding amount, so reducing your principal balance helps with both interest and penalties. While it won't stop them completely, it definitely slows down how quickly they accumulate. Every dollar you pay now saves you money in future interest charges.
Don't let this overwhelm you - a Notice of Federal Tax Lien sounds scarier than it actually is in practice! I went through something very similar about 18 months ago when I owed around $4,200 to the IRS after some freelance work complications. The key thing to remember is that the IRS actually WANTS to work with you - they'd rather get their money through a payment plan than go through the hassle of seizing assets. When I called them (after many attempts to get through), the agent was surprisingly understanding and helped me set up a $130/month payment plan. Here's what I wish I'd known earlier: once you're on an approved installment agreement, they typically won't file the lien as long as you keep making your payments on time. Even if they do file it, you can request a lien withdrawal after making just 3 consecutive payments under your agreement. My biggest mistake was waiting so long to contact them. The penalties and interest kept piling up while I was avoiding the situation. Act now - call them first thing Monday morning, explain your job loss situation, and they'll likely be very willing to work with you on affordable monthly payments. You've got this!
This is such reassuring advice! I'm in a similar boat with tax debt and have been avoiding dealing with it out of fear. It's really helpful to hear from someone who actually went through the process and came out okay. Quick question - when you called the IRS, did you need to have specific financial documents ready? I'm worried they'll ask me questions I'm not prepared to answer about my income and expenses. Also, did setting up the payment plan affect your credit score at all, or only if they actually file the lien? I'm definitely going to follow your advice and call them Monday morning instead of continuing to stress about it!
Has anyone had success claiming the LLC when taking online courses that aren't part of a degree program? I'm taking some professional development courses that my employer isn't paying for.
Yes! I claimed LLC for coding bootcamp courses last year. The key requirement is that the educational institution needs to be eligible and provide you with a 1098-T. The courses don't need to be part of a degree program for LLC (that's only a requirement for the American Opportunity Credit).
One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet - even though the Lifetime Learning Credit is non-refundable and won't give you cash back if your income is too low, you should still claim it on your return. Here's why: if you end up owing any taxes (like self-employment tax on that $320 from DoorDash), the credit can offset those taxes. Also, for your DoorDash income, you'll likely owe self-employment tax even if you don't owe regular income tax. Self-employment tax kicks in at just $400 of net earnings, so your $320 might be close depending on any expenses you can deduct (like mileage). The LLC could help reduce your overall tax burden even with minimal income. Make sure to keep all your education-related receipts too - not just tuition but also required books, supplies, and equipment. The LLC covers a broader range of expenses than people often realize.
Ava Harris
I think everyone is overthinking this! Just enter the info from the W2 and you're fine. The IRS only cares about who paid you and if the correct taxes were withheld. I've worked for like 5 different staffing agencies over the years and never had an issue. That checkbox in H&R Block is probably asking if you're self-employed. Since you got a W2, you're not self-employed, so don't check it. Simple as that!
0 coins
Jacob Lee
ā¢This is the right answer. I worked in payroll for years and the company that issues your W2 is your legal employer, period. The client company where you physically work is irrelevant for tax filing purposes.
0 coins
Theodore Nelson
I went through this exact same situation last year when I worked for a client through Kelly Services! You're absolutely right to treat Robert Half as your employer for all tax purposes since they issued your W2. The key thing to remember is that from the IRS perspective, you were an employee of Robert Half who happened to be assigned to work at their client's location. This is a completely normal and well-understood employment arrangement. For that checkbox you're seeing in H&R Block - if it's asking about self-employment status, definitely don't check it since you received a W2 (not a 1099). If it's asking something else and you're still unsure, you can always skip it for now and come back to it, or look for a help button that explains what that specific question is asking. Don't stress too much about it - staffing agency employment is super common and the tax software is designed to handle it properly!
0 coins
Javier Morales
ā¢This is really helpful, thank you! I'm actually in a similar situation right now - working through Aerotek but placed at a manufacturing company. I was getting confused because the physical workplace has nothing to do with Aerotek, but you're right that the W2 issuer is what matters for taxes. One thing I'm curious about - did you have any issues with state taxes when you filed? I'm wondering if working in a different state than where my staffing agency is headquartered could complicate things.
0 coins