IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm going through the exact same thing! Filed on 1/31 and my state refund came through yesterday with TurboTax taking their fees directly from it - totally caught me off guard since they've always deducted from federal in previous years. My federal return is still stuck on "no record of filing" even though it was accepted over 3 weeks ago. After reading through all these responses, I'm definitely going to check my transcript to see what's actually happening behind the scenes. It's both frustrating and somewhat reassuring to see so many people experiencing this same issue - at least it seems like it's a systemic problem rather than something specific to individual returns. The WMR tool has been completely unhelpful this year. Thanks for posting this question - it's nice to know we're all in this together!

0 coins

Wow, reading through all these responses has been both reassuring and eye-opening! I filed on 1/23 and I'm dealing with the exact same situation - state processed with TurboTax taking fees (which was a total surprise) and federal still showing "no record" despite being accepted weeks ago. I had no idea about checking transcripts or that there were services to help decode them. It's crazy how the WMR tool has become basically useless this year. At least now I know this seems to be a widespread issue and not just something wrong with my specific return. Definitely going to look into getting my transcript to see what's really going on behind the scenes. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - it really helps to know we're not alone in this mess!

0 coins

I'm experiencing the exact same thing! Filed on 1/25, got my state refund this week with TurboTax taking their fees out (which has never happened before in the 4 years I've used them), and my federal is still showing "no record of filing" despite being accepted over a month ago. It's incredibly frustrating not knowing what's actually happening behind the scenes. The WMR tool seems completely useless this year - just gives you that generic "no record" message with no real information. Reading through everyone's responses here has been really helpful though. I had no idea about checking transcripts or that there were services to help decode them. It's somewhat reassuring to know this appears to be a widespread issue and not just something wrong with individual returns, but the waiting is still so stressful when you're counting on that money! Definitely going to look into getting my transcript to see if there are any holds or issues I'm not aware of. Thanks for posting this - it's nice to know we're all struggling through this together!

0 coins

Thais Soares

•

This is a complex transaction that requires careful documentation and planning. In addition to the excellent points already raised about appraisals, AGI limitations, and private inurement, I'd strongly recommend your client consider getting a formal legal opinion on the conversion structure. One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the potential impact on any existing S Corp elections or tax attributes. If the S Corp had NOL carryforwards, suspended losses, or other tax attributes, these would typically be lost in the conversion process. Also, make sure the conversion was done properly under state law - some states have specific procedures for converting profit entities to non-profits that must be followed exactly. The IRS has been increasingly scrutinizing these types of conversions, especially when substantial value is involved and the former owner maintains control. I'd also suggest reviewing Revenue Ruling 2004-51 and the regulations under Section 501(c)(3) regarding private benefit restrictions. Given the complexity and audit risk, this might be worth bringing in a specialist in exempt organization law for a second opinion.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

This is such valuable insight, especially about the state law requirements for conversion procedures. I'm new to this area of practice and wondering - when you mention Revenue Ruling 2004-51, does that specifically address S Corp to non-profit conversions, or is it more broadly about charitable contributions of business interests? Also, are there any red flags or common mistakes you've seen in these conversions that practitioners should be particularly careful to avoid? I want to make sure I'm not missing anything critical for future clients who might consider similar transactions.

0 coins

Revenue Ruling 2004-51 deals more broadly with charitable contributions of business interests, but the principles apply directly to S Corp conversions. It addresses when a business owner can claim a charitable deduction for transferring business interests to a charity while maintaining some level of involvement. Common red flags I've seen: 1) Failing to establish true independence of the non-profit board (having family members or business associates as directors), 2) Setting executive compensation before getting comparable data, 3) Not properly terminating the S Corp election with the IRS, 4) Inadequate documentation of the charitable purpose for the conversion, and 5) The big one - retaining too much control or economic benefit after conversion. Also watch out for timing issues with the appraisal and make sure all state conversion requirements are met before claiming any deductions. Some states require specific notice periods or approval processes that can't be skipped.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

Great discussion here! I'd like to add one more critical consideration that could significantly impact the charitable deduction calculation - the timing of when the S Corporation election was terminated versus when the actual conversion to non-profit status occurred. The IRS requires that the charitable contribution be valued at the time the donor relinquishes dominion and control over the donated property. If there was any gap between terminating the S Corp status and completing the non-profit conversion, this could affect both the valuation date and the character of what's being donated. Also, don't forget about potential state-level implications. Some states don't automatically recognize federal charitable deductions or have their own limitations that could reduce the overall tax benefit. And if the business operates in multiple states, each jurisdiction may have different requirements for the conversion process itself. Given all the complexities mentioned in this thread - from appraisal requirements to private inurement concerns to state law compliance - I'd strongly recommend engaging both a tax specialist experienced in exempt organizations AND legal counsel familiar with entity conversions in your state. The potential audit exposure and penalties for getting this wrong far outweigh the cost of professional guidance upfront.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive analysis that makes me grateful for communities like this! The timing issue you raised about S Corp election termination versus conversion completion is something I hadn't considered but could be crucial for my client's situation. Quick question - when you mention engaging legal counsel familiar with entity conversions, are there specific credentials or specializations I should look for? I want to make sure I'm referring my client to someone who truly understands both the tax and legal complexities of these transactions, not just general corporate law. Also, has anyone dealt with situations where the IRS challenges the valuation after the fact? I'm wondering what kind of documentation trail we should be building now to defend the appraisal and conversion structure if it gets scrutinized years later.

0 coins

Has anyone used a nanny payroll service? I'm thinking of signing up for one to handle all this tax stuff. Seems like it might be worth the money for peace of mind.

0 coins

I've been using HomePay for about a year and it's been super smooth. They handle all the tax filings, generate pay stubs, and manage the withholding calculations. It costs me about $50/month which feels worth it to not worry about making mistakes.

0 coins

Mason Davis

•

I went through this exact same dilemma last year and ended up learning the hard way that the IRS really doesn't mess around with household employee classifications. What helped me understand it was thinking about the "control test" - if you're setting your nanny's schedule, telling them what tasks to do with your kids, and they're working exclusively in your home with your supplies, then you're exercising the kind of control that makes them an employee, not a contractor. The threshold everyone mentioned ($2,600 annually) is key - once you hit that, you're definitely in employer territory. But honestly, even below that threshold, misclassifying can still get you in trouble if audited. I ended up going with a nanny payroll service after trying to handle it myself for a few months. Yes, it's an extra monthly cost, but the peace of mind is worth it. They handle all the quarterly filings, generate proper pay stubs, and make sure I'm compliant with both federal and state requirements. One thing I wish someone had told me earlier - you can still claim the Child and Dependent Care Credit even when properly employing your nanny as an employee. You just need their SSN and to report the wages correctly. The tax benefits don't disappear just because you're doing it the right way!

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm actually in a similar situation right now and was leaning toward just paying cash to avoid the hassle. But reading about everyone's experiences here, especially the audit stories, has me convinced I need to do this properly from the start. Quick question - when you mention the Child and Dependent Care Credit still applies, is there a limit to how much you can claim? I'm trying to figure out if the tax benefits might offset some of the extra costs of running payroll properly. Also, for anyone who's used payroll services, do they help with setting up the initial EIN and everything, or do you need to get that sorted before signing up with them?

0 coins

I'm a newcomer to this community but facing a very similar situation as Lauren. My spouse and I are both green card holders and have been putting off estate planning because every attorney we consulted gave us conflicting advice about QDOTs and the marital deduction. Reading through this discussion has been incredibly enlightening - especially the clarification that we do get the full $12.92M exemption per person, not just the small amount I thought applied to non-citizens. The real issue being the loss of unlimited marital deduction makes much more sense now. I'm particularly interested in the estate equalization strategy that several people mentioned. We currently have very unequal asset ownership (about 80% in my name, 20% in my spouse's name) which seems like it could create a significant problem if I pass first. For those who have implemented the annual gifting approach to rebalance estates - are there any practical considerations about retitling assets between spouses? For example, if we need to transfer ownership of real estate or investment accounts, are there state-level transfer taxes or other costs we should factor in? Also, the point about starting early really resonates. We've been green card holders for 6 years now and I'm kicking myself that we didn't start this process sooner. Better late than never, but I wish we had understood these rules years ago. Thank you to everyone who shared their experiences - this thread is exactly the kind of practical guidance that's so hard to find elsewhere.

0 coins

Ezra Collins

•

Welcome to the community, Abigail! Your situation sounds very similar to what many of us have faced. You're absolutely right to focus on the estate equalization strategy given your 80/20 asset split - that's exactly the type of imbalance that can create major tax problems. Regarding the practical aspects of retitling assets, here are some key considerations from my experience: **Real Estate**: Most states don't impose transfer taxes on interspousal transfers, but you should verify this in your specific state. Some states have documentary stamp taxes or recording fees that apply even to spousal transfers. Also consider whether changing ownership might affect homestead exemptions or property tax assessments. **Investment Accounts**: These are usually easier to retitle, but watch out for any restrictions in retirement accounts (401k, IRA) - those have different rules for spousal ownership and beneficiary designations. **Gift Tax Returns**: Even though interspousal transfers are generally not taxable, you may still need to file gift tax returns (Form 709) if you're transferring more than the annual exclusion amount, just for reporting purposes. The timing aspect you mentioned is so important. Six years means you've potentially missed out on $102,000 in annual exclusion gifts per year ($17,000 x 6 years) if we're talking about 2018-2023, but that's still a significant amount going forward if you start now. One thing I'd add - document everything clearly when you do start retitling assets. Keep records showing the transfers were for estate planning purposes, not to avoid creditors or other obligations. This helps if there are ever questions later about the timing or motivation for the transfers. You're definitely not too late to start! The key is beginning the process now rather than continuing to delay.

0 coins

As another green card holder couple dealing with these same estate tax challenges, I want to share what we learned after working with a specialized international estate planning attorney. The key breakthrough for us was understanding that while we can't use QDOTs effectively (since we're both non-citizens), we actually have several powerful strategies available: **Portability Election**: This is huge but often overlooked. When the first spouse dies, the surviving spouse can elect to use the deceased spouse's unused estate tax exemption. Since we each get $12.92M, if the first spouse only uses $8M of their exemption, the survivor can claim that unused $4.92M in addition to their own full exemption - effectively giving the surviving spouse access to nearly $17M in exemptions. **Disclaimer Planning**: We structured our estate plan so the surviving spouse can disclaim (refuse) inherited assets that would push them over the exemption limit. Disclaimed assets pass directly to our children/trust, avoiding estate tax entirely. **Generation-Skipping Strategy**: Instead of everything passing spouse-to-spouse-to-kids, we're using trusts that benefit both the surviving spouse AND children simultaneously. This removes future appreciation from the taxable estate while still providing access for the surviving spouse. The misconception about only having $175k in exemption seems to come from confusing the rules for non-resident aliens with the rules for green card holders. As domiciled residents, we get the full citizen exemption - we just lose some of the spousal transfer benefits. Don't let anyone tell you that being green card holders makes estate planning impossible. It's more complex than for citizens, but there are definitely workable solutions if you plan properly.

0 coins

Honorah King

•

One thing nobody's mentioned - if you're married and your spouse qualifies as a real estate professional, their status can apply to your jointly owned properties too. My wife works full-time in property management (easily meets the 750+ hours), so all our rental properties are treated as non-passive activities. Might be worth considering if your spouse has real estate involvement.

0 coins

Tyler Murphy

•

This is a great point that I hadn't considered! Does the spouse need to be actively involved in ALL the properties to qualify, or just meet the general real estate professional requirements? Also, do both spouses need to be on the title, or can one spouse's professional status cover properties owned solely by the other spouse?

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

The spouse needs to meet the real estate professional requirements (750+ hours annually in real estate activities AND more than half their working time in real estate), but they don't need to be involved in every single property you own. Once they qualify as a real estate professional, that status can apply to rental properties owned by either spouse or jointly owned properties when filing a joint return. However, there's an important caveat - the non-real-estate-professional spouse still needs to "materially participate" in each specific rental activity to avoid passive treatment. This usually means being significantly involved in management decisions for that particular property. So while your spouse's professional status opens the door, you can't be completely hands-off and still get active treatment. For properties owned solely by the non-professional spouse, the professional spouse would need to be involved enough in that property's management to establish material participation for the couple as a unit.

0 coins

Gianna Scott

•

One more angle to consider - if you're dealing with non-paying tenants and significant losses, you might want to look into whether any of this qualifies as a "theft loss" or "casualty loss" rather than just passive rental losses. If tenants damaged the property beyond normal wear and tear or if there was actual criminal activity involved (like breaking lease agreements fraudulently), you might be able to claim some losses under different tax provisions that aren't subject to the passive activity rules. Also, make sure you're maximizing all your deductions related to this situation - legal fees for eviction proceedings, property management costs, repairs from tenant damage, etc. These can all potentially offset rental income from other properties even if you can't use them against ordinary income. The documentation suggestions everyone's made are spot-on. I'd also recommend taking photos of any property damage and keeping copies of all communications with tenants, including payment demands and eviction notices. This creates a paper trail that shows your active involvement in trying to manage the situation.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

This is really helpful advice about exploring theft/casualty loss angles! I hadn't thought about that possibility. Quick question - do you know if there's a specific threshold for tenant damage that would qualify it as a casualty loss versus just normal rental property depreciation? My tenants left the place pretty trashed, but I'm not sure if it rises to the level of casualty loss or if it's just considered part of the rental business risks. Also, regarding the legal fees - can those be deducted in the year incurred even if I'm subject to passive loss limitations, or do they get swept up in the same passive activity rules?

0 coins

Prev1...16841685168616871688...5644Next