IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This is great advice from everyone! Just to add another perspective - I've been through this exact situation multiple times as both a taxpayer and working in tax preparation. The approach of keeping the appointment but only preparing the non-investment portions is definitely the way to go. What I'd also suggest is asking your dad to call the brokerage one more time before Friday to get a firm date on when the final documents will be available. Sometimes they can expedite delivery if you explain you have a tax appointment scheduled. Also, if your dad has last year's tax documents, bring those along to the appointment. The accountant can use them as a reference point to estimate this year's investment income, especially if his portfolio hasn't changed dramatically. This can help with planning and give a rough idea of his tax situation even while waiting for the final brokerage statement. One last tip - if the final statement ends up being significantly delayed (like into March), don't stress about it. Extensions are very common and completely normal. The IRS expects some taxpayers to need extensions due to delayed K-1s, corrected 1099s, and other late-arriving documents. It's much better to file correctly late than incorrectly on time!

0 coins

This is all really helpful advice! I especially like the suggestion about bringing last year's tax documents - my dad is pretty organized so he definitely has those. His portfolio hasn't changed much, so that should give the accountant a good baseline to work from. I'm going to have him call the brokerage tomorrow morning to see if they can give a more specific timeline. Sometimes a little pressure about having a scheduled tax appointment can motivate them to prioritize getting the final documents out. Thanks everyone for the reassurance about extensions too. I think we were both way more stressed about this than we needed to be. It sounds like this is actually a pretty common situation during tax season, so at least we're not alone in dealing with delayed brokerage statements!

0 coins

Pedro Sawyer

•

I've been a tax preparer for over 15 years and this situation comes up constantly during tax season. You're absolutely right to be cautious about using preliminary statements - I've seen too many clients get burned by doing this. The differences between preliminary and final statements can be substantial. Just last week, I had a client whose preliminary 1099-DIV showed $2,400 in qualified dividends, but the final version came back with $1,850 qualified and $550 ordinary dividends due to late reclassifications from several mutual funds. Using the preliminary would have understated their tax liability by about $160. Here's my standard advice for this exact scenario: Keep the Friday appointment and have the accountant prepare everything they can without the investment income. Most professional tax software allows us to save returns in progress and easily update them later. This way your dad keeps his spot during the busiest time of year, and we can usually complete about 85-90% of the return. I always tell clients to bring any investment statements they have (even preliminary ones) so I can at least estimate the tax impact and give them a rough idea of what to expect. But I never file with preliminary documents - the risk of amendments and penalties just isn't worth it. If the final statement is delayed significantly, filing an extension is totally normal and doesn't increase audit risk. I probably prepare extensions for about 25% of my clients each year due to late K-1s, delayed 1099s, or other missing documents.

0 coins

This is incredibly reassuring to hear from someone with 15 years of experience! That example about the $160 difference really drives home why we shouldn't risk using preliminary documents. I had no idea that mutual fund reclassifications could cause such significant changes between preliminary and final statements. Your approach of preparing everything except the investment portion makes perfect sense, and knowing that you can complete 85-90% of the return gives me confidence that we're not wasting the accountant's time by keeping Friday's appointment. The fact that 25% of your clients need extensions really puts this in perspective - we're definitely not alone in dealing with delayed documents. I'm going to share all this information with my dad tonight. I think hearing that this is such a common situation will really help ease his stress about the whole thing. Thank you for taking the time to share your professional experience - it's exactly the kind of insight we needed!

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

Thanks for all the detailed explanations everyone! I'm in a similar situation - my refund shows as issued on WMR but hasn't hit my account after 8 days. I've been hesitant to call the IRS because of the wait times, but reading about the trace process here makes it seem more straightforward than I expected. One question though - when you get the trace number, can you check the status online or do you have to call each time for updates? Also, has anyone noticed if certain banks are more prone to rejecting refunds? I bank with a smaller credit union and wondering if that could be part of the issue.

0 coins

TechNinja

•

Unfortunately, you can't check trace status online - you have to call each time for updates, which is definitely frustrating. Regarding banks, I've noticed smaller credit unions and online banks seem to be more sensitive about name mismatches or account changes. They often have stricter fraud protection that can trigger rejections. Since you're at 8 days, you're right at the threshold for requesting a trace (5 business days). I'd recommend calling your credit union first to make sure there aren't any holds or issues on their end before going through the IRS trace process.

0 coins

I just want to add my experience for anyone reading this thread - I went through the trace process earlier this year and it was actually much smoother than I expected. My refund showed as issued but never arrived after 10 days. Called the IRS, waited about 45 minutes on hold, and the agent immediately started the trace process over the phone. Got trace number TR-19847562 that same day. Turns out my bank had flagged the deposit as suspicious because it was larger than my usual deposits. The trace helped the IRS agent identify this issue quickly, and they were able to coordinate with my bank to release the funds. The whole thing was resolved in about 2 weeks. My advice: don't hesitate to request a trace if you've waited the proper timeframe - it's a legitimate process and the agents are trained to handle these situations efficiently.

0 coins

Taylor Chen

•

This is really helpful to hear from someone who went through the process recently! I've been putting off calling because I assumed it would be a bureaucratic nightmare, but your experience makes it sound much more manageable. The fact that they could coordinate directly with your bank is particularly encouraging - I didn't realize the IRS agents had that capability. Did you have to provide any specific information about your bank when you called, or were they able to look everything up with just your SSN and filing information?

0 coins

Debra Bai

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my parents. One thing I'm curious about - what's the typical timeline for setting up these trusts? My dad is 78 and in good health, but I'm wondering if there are any age-related considerations or if it's "too late" to start this process. Also, are there minimum asset thresholds where trusts actually make financial sense after accounting for setup and ongoing administration costs?

0 coins

CyberNinja

•

Great questions! At 78, your dad is definitely not too late - I've seen trusts set up successfully for clients well into their 80s. The key is mental capacity and health status for executing documents. Since he's in good health, that's a positive factor. Regarding timelines, simple revocable trusts can often be completed in 2-4 weeks, while more complex irrevocable structures might take 6-12 weeks depending on the specifics. For estate tax planning, it's actually better to act sooner rather than later since some strategies work best when you have a longer life expectancy for actuarial calculations. As for minimum thresholds, revocable trusts can make sense with estates as low as $500K-$1M when you factor in probate avoidance benefits. For irrevocable tax-planning trusts, you typically want at least $2-3M in assets to justify the setup costs ($5K-$15K) and ongoing administration expenses ($2K-$5K annually). The current federal estate tax exemption is $12.92M per person, so if your parents' combined estate exceeds that, the tax savings can be substantial.

0 coins

As someone who recently went through estate planning with my elderly parents, I wanted to share a few practical tips that might help others in similar situations: First, don't get overwhelmed by all the complex trust types mentioned here. Start with understanding your parents' specific goals - is it avoiding probate, minimizing taxes, protecting assets, or providing for grandchildren? This will help determine which strategies are most relevant. Second, consider getting a professional estate tax calculation done before diving into complex irrevocable structures. Many families think they need sophisticated trusts when simpler solutions might work just as well. With the current high exemption levels ($12.92M per person), many estates won't even owe federal estate tax. Third, if your parents do move forward with trusts, make sure they understand the practical implications. I've seen families create irrevocable trusts without fully grasping that they can't easily change their minds later. Also, factor in the ongoing costs - trustee fees, tax preparation, and administrative expenses can add up over time. Finally, timing matters for some strategies. If your parents are considering charitable giving or have appreciated assets, there might be specific windows where certain trust structures are most beneficial. Don't rush, but don't delay indefinitely either. The key is finding the right balance of tax efficiency and practical management that works for your family's specific situation.

0 coins

One practical thing to consider - are you planning to continue the business with Tony's heirs? If they inherited his 50% interest, you should review your operating agreement ASAP. Many partnership agreements have buy/sell provisions that trigger upon death. This could impact whether you even need to worry about the step-up basis if you're required to buy out their interest at the agreed value.

0 coins

This is great advice. Our partnership had this exact issue and we were so focused on the tax aspects that we almost missed the buy-sell agreement that required the purchase of the deceased partner's interest within 90 days. Would have created a complete mess if we had filed for the step-up and then did the buyout!

0 coins

StarStrider

•

I'm sorry for your loss, Chris. This is a complex situation that requires careful planning beyond just the tax implications. One important point that hasn't been mentioned yet - you'll want to determine Tony's basis in his partnership interest at the time of death. His heirs will receive a stepped-up basis in their inherited partnership interest equal to the fair market value of that interest ($340,000 based on the 50% share of the $680,000 property value). However, this is separate from the partnership's election under Section 754. The stepped-up basis for the heirs applies to their partnership interest, while the Section 754 election creates a special basis adjustment for the partnership's assets. Also, consider the timing carefully. You have until the due date of the partnership return (including extensions) for the year of Tony's death to make the Section 754 election. But as others mentioned, check your operating agreement first - there may be mandatory buyout provisions that could change your entire approach. Given the complexity and the significant dollar amounts involved, I'd strongly recommend consulting with a tax professional who specializes in partnership taxation before making any elections or decisions.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive guidance I was looking for! Thank you for breaking down the difference between the stepped-up basis for Tony's heirs (their partnership interest) versus the Section 754 election (partnership assets). I hadn't realized these were two separate but related concepts. So if I understand correctly, Tony's heirs automatically get a stepped-up basis of $340,000 for their inherited partnership interest, but the Section 754 election is something we choose to make that affects how gains/losses are allocated when partnership assets are sold? I'm definitely going to review our operating agreement first thing tomorrow. We drafted it years ago and honestly I can't remember what it says about death/buyout provisions. Hopefully we don't have any surprise requirements that would complicate this further. Do you happen to know if there are any downsides to making the Section 754 election? It seems like it would generally be beneficial, but I want to make sure I'm not missing any potential negative consequences before we commit to it.

0 coins

Serene Snow

•

I want to emphasize something crucial that others have touched on but bears repeating: you absolutely need to fix this excess contribution issue before your tax filing deadline to avoid the 6% excise tax penalty. Here's what you need to do immediately: 1. Calculate your actual eligible contribution: Since you had HDHP coverage for only 3 months out of 12, you're eligible for 3/12 of the annual maximum contribution limit. 2. Contact your HSA administrator to request removal of the excess contribution PLUS any earnings attributed to that excess. This is called a "return of excess contribution." 3. The earnings portion will need to be reported as income on your tax return for the year you receive the distribution. 4. Make sure your HSA provider sends you a corrected Form 5498-SA showing the adjusted contribution amount. The IRS does track this information through Forms 5498-SA from HSA providers and Forms 1095-B/C from insurance companies, so they will eventually catch discrepancies if you don't correct them voluntarily. Don't wait on this - the penalty compounds each year the excess remains in your account, and it's much easier to fix proactively than during an audit.

0 coins

Mary Bates

•

This is exactly the kind of clear, actionable advice I was looking for! I had no idea about the earnings portion needing to be reported as income - that could have been a nasty surprise at tax time. Quick question: when you say "earnings attributed to the excess," how do HSA providers typically calculate that? Is it based on the performance of my entire HSA account or do they somehow track gains/losses specifically on the excess amount? Also, do you know if there's any wiggle room on the timeline if I've already filed my taxes but just realized this issue? Or am I stuck with the penalty at that point?

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Great questions! HSA providers typically calculate earnings on excess contributions using what's called the "net income attributable" (NIA) method. They look at the overall performance of your HSA account from the date of the excess contribution to the date of removal, then calculate what portion of those gains/losses should be attributed to the excess amount. So if your account gained 5% during that period, they'd apply that same percentage to your excess contribution. Regarding the timeline - you actually have some options even after filing! You can file an amended return (Form 1040X) to correct the issue, as long as you remove the excess contribution by the extended deadline (October 15th if you filed an extension, otherwise April 15th). The key is getting that excess out of your account before the deadline, even if you've already filed your original return. If you miss that deadline entirely, you'll owe the 6% excise tax for that year, but you should still remove the excess to avoid owing 6% again next year and every year thereafter until it's corrected.

0 coins

Luca Bianchi

•

This is a really comprehensive thread with excellent advice! I just wanted to add one more resource that might be helpful for anyone dealing with HSA contribution issues. The IRS has Publication 969 which covers Health Savings Accounts in detail, including the month-by-month eligibility rules and excess contribution procedures. It's available for free on the IRS website and explains exactly how the proration works when you switch between HDHP and non-HDHP coverage mid-year. What's particularly useful in Pub 969 is the worksheet for calculating your maximum annual contribution when you have partial-year HDHP coverage. It also has examples of different scenarios (like switching from individual to family coverage, or changing plans mid-year) that might apply to your situation. For anyone who's more of a visual learner, the publication includes step-by-step examples that walk through the math for prorating contributions based on eligible months. It also explains the difference between the contribution deadline (tax filing deadline) and the deadline for removing excess contributions to avoid penalties. While the other suggestions for professional help are great, starting with Pub 969 can give you a solid understanding of the rules before you contact your HSA provider or file any corrected forms.

0 coins

Chris Elmeda

•

Thanks for mentioning Publication 969! I'm new to HSAs and this whole thread has been incredibly educational. I just started an HDHP this year and want to make sure I don't make similar mistakes. One thing I'm still confused about - if I start my HDHP coverage in March, can I contribute for January and February retroactively as long as I do it before the tax deadline? Or am I only eligible to contribute starting from March when my coverage actually began? Also, does anyone know if there are different rules for employer contributions vs. individual contributions when it comes to the monthly eligibility requirements?

0 coins

Prev1...16541655165616571658...5644Next