IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Beth Ford

•

Accounting professional here. My firm handles dozens of grantor trusts, and we generally take the conservative approach and issue 1099-NECs for service providers paid over $600, even to family members. Here's why: 1) The penalty for not filing a required 1099 can be substantial ($280 per form for 2025) 2) Filing a 1099 doesn't create additional tax implications if the income would be reported anyway 3) The IRS has been increasingly strict about information reporting requirements If you're uncertain, issuing the 1099-NEC is the safer approach. It documents the payment properly and doesn't create any negative consequences if it turns out it wasn't strictly required.

0 coins

Liam Cortez

•

@Kingston Bellamy That s'a really important distinction! I wasn t'aware of the Goodwin case or Rev. Rul. 58-5. So if the daughter is essentially acting as a trustee or in a trustee-like capacity for the grantor trust, those fees might avoid self-employment tax entirely even if a 1099-NEC is issued? This seems like it could be the best of both worlds - issue the 1099-NEC for proper information reporting avoiding (penalties but) the recipient can still report it as other "income rather" than Schedule C income. Do you know if there are specific criteria that need to be met for this trustee fee exception to apply?

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

The trustee fee exception applies when the services performed are essentially trustee duties - things like investment management, asset protection, and fiduciary oversight. The key factors courts look at include: 1) Whether the person has discretionary authority over trust assets, 2) Whether they're performing ongoing fiduciary duties rather than one-time services, and 3) Whether the compensation is reasonable for trustee-type services. In Rev. Rul. 58-5, the IRS specifically stated that trustee fees are not subject to self-employment tax because trustees are not engaged in a "trade or business" - they're performing fiduciary duties. This applies even to family members serving as trustees. So if the daughter in this case is essentially acting as a trustee or investment manager with ongoing fiduciary responsibilities (rather than just providing occasional investment advice), the trustee fee exception would likely apply. She could report the 1099-NEC income as "other income" on Schedule 1 instead of Schedule C, avoiding the SE tax burden.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone new to trust taxation, I've learned so much from reading through everyone's experiences and insights. From what I'm gathering, the key factors seem to be: 1) Whether the services are truly professional/business-like vs. informal family help, 2) The $600 threshold, 3) How the trust document is structured, and 4) Whether the recipient has fiduciary responsibilities that could qualify for the trustee fee exception. The conservative approach of issuing the 1099-NEC when in doubt makes a lot of sense, especially given the penalties for non-compliance. And knowing about the trustee fee exception for SE tax purposes is a game-changer - it seems like you can satisfy the IRS reporting requirements while still protecting the recipient from unnecessary self-employment tax if they qualify. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and cited specific regulations. This is exactly the kind of practical guidance that's hard to find elsewhere!

0 coins

Wait, I'm confused. If you were working as a consultant, wouldn't you get a 1099-NEC from your old employer? Then I think that would go on Schedule C. Did you receive any tax forms from them or were you just paid directly?

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

•

Yes, consulting work would typically be reported on a 1099-NEC (or 1099-MISC in previous years), and that income absolutely goes on Schedule C if you're operating as a sole proprietor. The IRS is incorrect in saying it should be on Line 8 (Other Income). This sounds like either a processing error where they didn't see the Schedule C that was filed, or possibly they're challenging whether this was a legitimate business (vs hobby), but even then they'd handle it differently than just saying "put it on line 8.

0 coins

This definitely sounds like a processing error on the IRS's part. Schedule C income should never be reclassified to "Other Income" on Line 8 - that's completely incorrect. Schedule C is specifically designed for business income from sole proprietorships, and the net profit flows to Schedule 1 and then to your main 1040. I'd recommend taking a multi-pronged approach here: 1. **Immediate response**: Call the IRS business tax line (not the general number) and explain that this appears to be a processing error where they didn't properly recognize your filed Schedule C. 2. **Documentation**: Gather copies of your original return showing the Schedule C was properly filed, along with any 1099-NEC forms you received from your former employer. 3. **Written response**: Send a formal written response before their deadline explaining that the income was correctly reported as business income on Schedule C, not as "other income." The fact that they're trying to move the entire revenue amount (not just disallowing expenses) strongly suggests this is a data processing mistake rather than a hobby vs. business classification issue. If they were challenging it as a hobby, they'd typically allow the income on Schedule C but disallow the business deductions. Don't panic - this is fixable, but definitely respond promptly to avoid additional penalties and interest while they sort out their error.

0 coins

Benjamin Kim

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm dealing with something similar right now and was panicking thinking I'd done something majorly wrong with my filing. Your explanation about how they would handle a hobby classification differently (allowing income but disallowing expenses) versus what's happening here (moving entire revenue to other income) really clarifies what's likely going on. I'm definitely going to try calling the business tax line specifically rather than the general number. Do you happen to know if there's a particular time of day that's better for getting through to someone knowledgeable? I've heard morning calls sometimes work better but wasn't sure if that applies to the business line too.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

I went through this exact situation two years ago and can share what I learned. Your accountant is incorrect - you cannot file as "Single" for 2024 taxes if you're still married on December 31, 2024, even if the divorce is finalized in early 2025. Here's what I'd strongly recommend: File "Married Filing Separately" and don't let your ex pressure you into joint filing. Yes, you'll both be required to use MFS if you choose it, and yes, you might pay slightly more in taxes. But the peace of mind and financial protection is absolutely worth it. I made the mistake of filing jointly during my divorce to "save money" and it created so many additional complications - we had to coordinate on every single deduction, share sensitive financial information, and I remained liable for any issues with his portion of the return. The $800 we "saved" wasn't worth the stress and ongoing financial entanglement. Also, make sure you understand the timing - whatever status you choose for 2024 taxes only affects that tax year. Once your divorce is final, you'll be able to file as Single for 2025 taxes (filed in 2026). Trust your instincts about keeping things clean during this transition. Your financial independence starts with your tax filing decisions.

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

This is such valuable advice from someone who's been through it! I'm leaning heavily toward filing separately now, especially after reading about the liability issues others have mentioned. The idea of remaining financially entangled through joint tax filing when we're trying to separate everything else just doesn't make sense. Can I ask - when you filed separately, did you run into any issues with dividing up deductions like mortgage interest or property taxes? We own a house together and I'm not sure how that gets handled when filing MFS.

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

Another important consideration during divorce - make sure you update your withholdings and estimated tax payments if you decide to file separately! When I switched from joint to separate filing mid-divorce, I didn't realize my withholdings were still calculated based on the married filing jointly tax brackets. I ended up owing an additional $2,100 at tax time because my employer was withholding too little for my new filing status. The IRS has a withholding calculator that can help you adjust your W-4 once you decide on your filing status. Also, if you have any estimated tax payments due for the current year, you'll need to make sure those are calculated correctly for separate filing too. Just another reason to get your filing status decision locked in sooner rather than later so you can adjust everything accordingly.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

This is such an important point that I hadn't even thought about! I'm still working at my regular job during the divorce process, so my withholdings are definitely set up for married filing jointly. If I switch to married filing separately, I could definitely end up owing money at tax time. Do you know if there's a big difference in the withholding amounts between MFJ and MFS? I'm trying to figure out if I should update my W-4 right away or if it's something that can wait until I make my final decision on filing status.

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•

Great question about the S Corp home office setup! I went through something similar last year. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of establishing exclusive business use of the space. The IRS requires that the area be used "regularly and exclusively" for business purposes - so if your partner uses that same space for personal activities, it could complicate the deduction. Also, since you're the sole employee getting a W-2, make sure you're taking a reasonable salary before considering any distributions. The IRS looks closely at S Corp owner-employees who try to minimize payroll taxes by taking low salaries. This becomes especially important when you're also trying to maximize business deductions like office expenses. Document the business necessity for having an office in that specific location rather than your own home - maybe it's better internet, dedicated space, proximity to clients, etc. Having a clear business reason strengthens your position regardless of whether you go with rent payments or the accountable plan approach.

0 coins

This is really solid advice about the exclusive use requirement - I didn't even think about that aspect! Since the office is in my partner's house, I need to make sure we can demonstrate that space is used only for business purposes. Your point about reasonable salary is spot on too. I've been working with my accountant to make sure my W-2 compensation meets IRS expectations before we worry about optimizing other deductions. It's definitely a balancing act between minimizing overall tax burden and staying compliant. The business necessity documentation is a great suggestion. In our case, the space has better lighting and a more professional setup for client video calls compared to what I could create at my own place. I'll make sure to document those practical business reasons along with the exclusive use requirements. Thanks for bringing up these often-overlooked details!

0 coins

I've been through a similar situation with my S Corp and home office deduction. One thing that really helped was establishing a clear business purpose for why the office needed to be at my partner's location rather than my own home. In my case, it was due to better internet infrastructure and a more professional setup for client meetings. A few practical tips from my experience: - Document everything with photos and measurements showing exclusive business use - Keep detailed records of all expenses if going the accountable plan route - Have a formal written agreement regardless of which approach you choose - Make sure your salary as the sole employee meets "reasonable compensation" standards before optimizing other deductions The accountable plan approach worked well for us because my partner wasn't itemizing deductions anyway due to the higher standard deduction. This meant we weren't losing personal deductions they would have claimed, and the S Corp got the full business deduction for the reimbursed expenses. Whatever you decide, consistency in your approach and thorough documentation will be key if you ever face an audit. The IRS pays close attention to arrangements between related parties, so having everything properly documented and business-justified is essential.

0 coins

Amara Nwosu

•

This is really comprehensive advice! I'm curious about the "reasonable compensation" aspect you mentioned - how do you determine what's considered reasonable for an S Corp owner-employee? I've heard the IRS scrutinizes this closely, but I'm not sure what benchmarks they use. Also, when you set up your accountable plan, did you have to establish specific reimbursement rates upfront, or could you reimburse actual documented expenses as they occurred? I'm trying to figure out the best way to structure this to avoid any compliance issues down the road.

0 coins

Great questions! For reasonable compensation, the IRS looks at several factors: what you'd pay an unrelated person to do the same work, your qualifications and experience, time devoted to the business, and compensation paid by similar companies for comparable services. I used salary data from sites like PayScale and Glassdoor for my industry and location as benchmarks. My accountant also helped ensure we were in a defensible range. For the accountable plan, we reimburse actual documented expenses as they occur rather than setting fixed rates upfront. This approach is more defensible because you're reimbursing real costs with proper documentation (receipts, invoices, etc.). We established clear procedures for what expenses qualify and how they should be documented, but the actual reimbursement amounts vary based on actual business use. The key is having written policies that spell out what expenses are reimbursable, what documentation is required, and how business use percentages are calculated. This way you're following a consistent, documented process rather than making ad-hoc decisions that could look suspicious later.

0 coins

Yara Abboud

•

Pro tip from someone who used to work at H&R Block: If you're mailing double-sided documents, use a highlighter to mark "CONTINUED ON BACK" at the bottom of each page that continues on the reverse. This little trick helps ensure nothing gets missed during processing. Also, use certified mail with return receipt. The extra $7-8 is worth the peace of mind knowing exactly when the IRS received your documents.

0 coins

PixelPioneer

•

Great tips! Does the highlighter cause any issues with their scanning equipment? I've heard some colors don't scan well.

0 coins

Nora Bennett

•

Yellow highlighter works fine - it's what we recommended when I worked there. Avoid red, dark blue, or green as those can interfere with scanning. Fluorescent yellow shows up clearly to human reviewers but doesn't confuse the optical character recognition systems. One more thing I forgot to mention: if you're including multiple 1099-B forms, arrange them in chronological order by date issued, not alphabetically by broker. The IRS processors appreciate this organization and it can speed up your processing time. Also make sure any corrected forms (1099-B-C) are clearly marked and placed immediately after the original they're correcting.

0 coins

Kayla Morgan

•

This is incredibly helpful! I had no idea about the chronological ordering for 1099-B forms. I've been organizing mine alphabetically by broker name this whole time. Do you know if this same chronological rule applies to other investment forms like 1099-DIV and 1099-INT, or is it specific to the 1099-B forms? Also, when you say "date issued," do you mean the date printed on the form or the tax year the form covers?

0 coins

Prev1...16541655165616571658...5643Next