IRS

Pay nothing until a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

$0 upfront. We only hold your card.
No live agent, no charge.

$9.99 is charged only once a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Liam Sullivan

β€’

Got my refund today! Had similar confusion last month. Refund showed sent. Nothing in my account. Called IRS. Started trace. Got number TR-28453901. Bank found issue within days. Wrong account number. IRS reissued payment. Whole process took 3 weeks. Trace number made all the difference. Every time I called for updates I just gave that number. No long explanations needed.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

β€’

Thanks for all the detailed explanations everyone! I'm in a similar situation - my refund shows as issued on WMR but hasn't hit my account after 8 days. I've been hesitant to call the IRS because of the wait times, but reading about the trace process here makes it seem more straightforward than I expected. One question though - when you get the trace number, can you check the status online or do you have to call each time for updates? Also, has anyone noticed if certain banks are more prone to rejecting refunds? I bank with a smaller credit union and wondering if that could be part of the issue.

0 coins

Zoe Dimitriou

β€’

I work as a financial advisor and wanted to add that life insurance trusts (ILITs) are another powerful tool wealthy families use. Life insurance proceeds are generally income-tax free, but still count toward your taxable estate. By creating an irrevocable life insurance trust that owns the policy, the death benefit stays outside your estate. This can provide liquidity for heirs to pay estate taxes on illiquid assets (like businesses or real estate) without having to sell them quickly at potentially reduced values.

0 coins

Aisha Hussain

β€’

That's fascinating. So the trust owns the policy, not the person? How do premiums get paid? Wouldn't that be considered a gift to the trust?

0 coins

Zoe Dimitriou

β€’

Exactly - the trust owns the policy, not the individual. For premium payments, the grantor makes cash gifts to the trust, and then the trustee uses those funds to pay the premiums. Yes, these premium payments are considered gifts to the trust beneficiaries, but that's where the annual gift tax exclusion comes in ($17,000 per beneficiary in 2023). To qualify for this exclusion, beneficiaries need "present interest" in the gifts, so trusts typically include "Crummey powers" - named after the court case that established them - giving beneficiaries temporary withdrawal rights over contributions. Most never exercise these rights, allowing the trustee to use the funds for premium payments instead.

0 coins

Debra Bai

β€’

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my parents. One thing I'm curious about - what's the typical timeline for setting up these trusts? My dad is 78 and in good health, but I'm wondering if there are any age-related considerations or if it's "too late" to start this process. Also, are there minimum asset thresholds where trusts actually make financial sense after accounting for setup and ongoing administration costs?

0 coins

One practical thing to consider - are you planning to continue the business with Tony's heirs? If they inherited his 50% interest, you should review your operating agreement ASAP. Many partnership agreements have buy/sell provisions that trigger upon death. This could impact whether you even need to worry about the step-up basis if you're required to buy out their interest at the agreed value.

0 coins

This is great advice. Our partnership had this exact issue and we were so focused on the tax aspects that we almost missed the buy-sell agreement that required the purchase of the deceased partner's interest within 90 days. Would have created a complete mess if we had filed for the step-up and then did the buyout!

0 coins

StarStrider

β€’

I'm sorry for your loss, Chris. This is a complex situation that requires careful planning beyond just the tax implications. One important point that hasn't been mentioned yet - you'll want to determine Tony's basis in his partnership interest at the time of death. His heirs will receive a stepped-up basis in their inherited partnership interest equal to the fair market value of that interest ($340,000 based on the 50% share of the $680,000 property value). However, this is separate from the partnership's election under Section 754. The stepped-up basis for the heirs applies to their partnership interest, while the Section 754 election creates a special basis adjustment for the partnership's assets. Also, consider the timing carefully. You have until the due date of the partnership return (including extensions) for the year of Tony's death to make the Section 754 election. But as others mentioned, check your operating agreement first - there may be mandatory buyout provisions that could change your entire approach. Given the complexity and the significant dollar amounts involved, I'd strongly recommend consulting with a tax professional who specializes in partnership taxation before making any elections or decisions.

0 coins

Yuki Watanabe

β€’

So I'm not seeing anyone addressing another important aspect: what happens if you use HSA funds for medical expenses during months when you DIDN'T have an HDHP? OP mentioned using HSA funds for expenses at the end of the year when they had PPO coverage. My understanding is that you can use HSA funds anytime for qualified medical expenses regardless of your current insurance type - it's just the contributions that are restricted to HDHP months. Am I correct about this? Once the money is properly in your HSA, you can use it for qualified expenses even when you no longer have an HDHP?

0 coins

You're absolutely correct! This is an important distinction that should be clarified. HSA contributions are only allowed during months with HDHP coverage. However, once money is properly in your HSA, you can use those funds for qualified medical expenses at any time, regardless of your current insurance type - even years later or when you have a different type of insurance. The qualified status of the expense, not your current insurance, determines whether the distribution is tax-free. So the OP using HSA funds while having PPO coverage is perfectly fine, as long as they were for qualified medical expenses.

0 coins

Serene Snow

β€’

I want to emphasize something crucial that others have touched on but bears repeating: you absolutely need to fix this excess contribution issue before your tax filing deadline to avoid the 6% excise tax penalty. Here's what you need to do immediately: 1. Calculate your actual eligible contribution: Since you had HDHP coverage for only 3 months out of 12, you're eligible for 3/12 of the annual maximum contribution limit. 2. Contact your HSA administrator to request removal of the excess contribution PLUS any earnings attributed to that excess. This is called a "return of excess contribution." 3. The earnings portion will need to be reported as income on your tax return for the year you receive the distribution. 4. Make sure your HSA provider sends you a corrected Form 5498-SA showing the adjusted contribution amount. The IRS does track this information through Forms 5498-SA from HSA providers and Forms 1095-B/C from insurance companies, so they will eventually catch discrepancies if you don't correct them voluntarily. Don't wait on this - the penalty compounds each year the excess remains in your account, and it's much easier to fix proactively than during an audit.

0 coins

I've been dealing with a similar multi-tiered partnership situation for the past two years, and here's what I've learned through painful experience: First, you're absolutely right to be cautious about unnecessary filings. Since Florida has no personal income tax and Texas generally doesn't tax passive investment income for non-residents, you likely won't owe anything in those states even if you technically have sourced income there. However, the key thing to watch for is whether the underlying LLCs are engaged in active business operations versus just holding rental properties. If they're actively managing real estate (property management, development, etc.), some states might consider this "doing business" which could trigger different filing requirements. One thing that really helped me was requesting a detailed breakdown from the Colorado partnership showing exactly what type of income is being sourced from each state. Many partnerships provide generic K-1s without this detail, but they should have the underlying information available. Also, don't overlook potential reciprocity agreements or credits. Wisconsin might have provisions that reduce your overall tax burden from multi-state filings, especially if you end up owing taxes in other states. The bottom line: get the state-by-state income breakdown first, then determine actual filing requirements rather than assuming you need to file everywhere income is sourced.

0 coins

Donna Cline

β€’

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with a twist - I'm a Wisconsin resident with K-1s from a Delaware partnership that invests in rental properties across California, New York, and Illinois. After reading through all these responses, I realize I need to get much better organized. The spreadsheet approach mentioned by Fiona sounds like exactly what I need to implement. I've been flying blind trying to figure out my obligations in each state. One thing I'm still unclear on though - several people mentioned checking with the partnership about composite returns, but what if the partnership is unwilling or unable to provide detailed state breakdowns? My partnership's management company has been pretty unhelpful when I've asked for specifics about state-sourced income. They just keep referring me back to the K-1, which doesn't have the level of detail everyone's discussing. Has anyone had success getting this information through other means? I'm wondering if there are specific questions I should be asking or if I need to escalate to someone higher up in their organization. The lack of clear state-by-state information is making it really difficult to determine my actual filing obligations. Also, for those who've used Claimyr to get through to state tax departments - did you find the state representatives knowledgeable about these complex partnership situations, or did you sometimes get conflicting information? I'm hesitant to rely solely on one phone call for such important filing decisions.

0 coins

I had a similar issue with an uncooperative partnership management company last year. What finally worked was submitting a formal written request (email works) specifically asking for "state-by-state income allocation schedules" and mentioning that you need this information to comply with your tax filing obligations. I referenced IRC Section 6031 which requires partnerships to provide necessary information to partners for tax compliance. When they continued to stonewall, I escalated to their tax compliance officer (most larger partnerships have one) rather than dealing with general management. I explained that without proper state allocation information, I might have to file conservatively in ALL states where they have any activity, which could trigger unnecessary scrutiny for the partnership itself during audits. That got their attention quickly - suddenly the detailed breakdown materialized within 48 hours. The key is framing it as a compliance issue rather than just a request for convenience. Regarding Claimyr and state tax departments, I've found the representatives generally knowledgeable about partnership basics, but you're right to be cautious about relying on a single phone call. I always ask for the representative's name and extension, and follow up with an email summarizing what was discussed. Most state tax departments will confirm their guidance in writing if you request it, which gives you some protection if their advice turns out to be incorrect later.

0 coins

Prev1...16551656165716581659...5645Next