


Ask the community...
I can confirm that mailing Form 1065 is absolutely allowed for partnerships. The IRS accepts paper filings for most partnership returns, with the main exception being partnerships with 100+ partners that are required to e-file. For your asset protection limited partnership with minimal activity, paper filing should work perfectly fine. Just be aware of a few key points: 1. Processing times are significantly longer for paper returns - typically 3-6 months versus a few weeks for e-filed returns 2. Make sure you're using the current tax year's forms and follow the mailing address instructions exactly (they vary by state) 3. You'll still need to prepare Schedule K-1s for each partner and provide copies to them by the March 15th deadline, regardless of when the IRS processes your return 4. Consider sending via certified mail with return receipt to have proof of timely filing The cost savings versus business tax software can definitely make sense for a simple partnership with minimal activity. Just budget extra time for any follow-up communications with the IRS since paper processing is much slower.
This is really helpful information, Amara! I'm curious about the certified mail recommendation - is this just for peace of mind or have you heard of situations where the IRS claimed they never received a paper filing? I'm trying to decide if the extra cost is worth it for the return receipt, especially since I'm already trying to keep costs down by avoiding tax software. Also, when you mention the March 15th deadline for K-1s, does that apply even if I file an extension for the 1065? I want to make sure I understand the timing correctly since this will be my first year filing as a partnership.
The certified mail is definitely worth the small extra cost - I've seen cases where paper returns got lost in processing, and without proof of mailing, taxpayers had to deal with late filing penalties and interest. The return receipt gives you documentation that the IRS received your filing by the deadline, which can save you thousands in penalties if there's ever a dispute. Regarding the K-1 deadline, yes, the March 15th deadline for providing K-1s to partners applies regardless of whether you file an extension for the 1065. Even if you extend the partnership return to September 15th, partners still need their K-1 information by March 15th to file their personal returns (unless they also extend). If you can't get the K-1s to partners by March 15th, they'll likely need to file extensions on their personal returns too. The partnership return extension only gives you more time to file the 1065 with the IRS - it doesn't extend the deadline for getting information to your partners.
I've been handling paper filing for our small real estate partnership for several years now, and it's definitely a viable option. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already shared here is to make sure you understand the backup withholding rules if your partnership has any investment income. Even with minimal activity, if you receive dividends or interest and don't have proper TIN certification from all partners, you might need to deal with backup withholding issues. This doesn't prevent paper filing, but it's something to be aware of when preparing your return. Also, I've found that including a simple partnership activity statement (even if it just says "holding assets, no active business operations") can help prevent follow-up questions from the IRS. It doesn't need to be fancy - just a one-page summary of what the partnership actually does. The paper filing route has worked well for us, especially since our partnership structure hasn't changed and we have consistent minimal activity year over year. The key is just being thorough with your documentation and patient with the processing timeline.
I'm dealing with this exact same situation right now and honestly, this thread has been a lifesaver! I bought a rental property in late 2018 and just realized I've been missing out on depreciation deductions for 5+ years. The panic is real when you discover a mistake like this so close to tax season. What's really helped me is breaking this down into manageable steps based on everyone's advice here: 1. File my 2023 return on time with proper depreciation starting this year 2. Gather all my documentation (HUD-1, property tax assessments, improvement receipts) 3. Work on Form 3115 for next year's filing to catch up on 2018-2022 I've been using my county's property tax records online to help split the land vs building value - they actually have pretty detailed breakdowns that I never knew existed. For my $280k purchase, they show about 25% land value, so I'll be depreciating roughly $210k over 27.5 years. The relief knowing this is fixable and that the IRS has procedures for exactly this situation has really helped with the anxiety. Plus seeing how many people have successfully navigated this gives me confidence I can too. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - it's amazing how much collective knowledge is in this thread!
@001d91057593 Your step-by-step approach is exactly what I needed to see! Breaking it down like that makes this whole situation feel so much more manageable instead of this overwhelming mess I thought it was. I'm really glad you mentioned using the county property tax records online - I had no idea those detailed breakdowns existed either. I just looked up my property and you're right, they show the land vs improvement values clearly. That's going to save me a lot of guesswork and stress about getting the depreciation basis right. Your purchase price and situation sound very similar to mine, so it's really reassuring to see someone else working through the same process. The fact that you're feeling more confident about tackling this gives me hope that I can handle it too. One thing that's still making me a bit nervous - when you file your 2023 return with depreciation for the first time, are you planning to include any kind of note or explanation about the change? Or just file normally and let the Form 3115 next year handle all the explaining? Thanks for sharing your approach - it's exactly the kind of practical roadmap I was looking for!
I've been through this exact situation and want to share what worked for me! I missed depreciation on my rental condo for 4 years (2019-2022) and was absolutely panicking when I discovered it in March last year. Here's what I learned that might help ease your anxiety: **Timing**: You absolutely CAN file your regular 2023 tax return on time with proper depreciation for just 2023. The IRS won't flag this as suspicious - they actually expect corrections like this. Then handle Form 3115 with your 2024 return next year. **Documentation**: Your HUD-1 closing statement is gold for establishing your depreciation basis. I also used my county assessor's website to get the land/building value split - most counties have this info online and it's IRS-accepted documentation. **Form 3115 Reality Check**: It's definitely complex, but not impossible. The key sections you'll need are Parts I, II, and IV. Part IV is where you calculate your Section 481(a) adjustment (the catch-up for missed years). **Professional Help Decision**: I ended up doing it myself using tax software, but I spent probably 15-20 hours researching and double-checking everything. If you have major improvements or a complex situation, professional help might be worth it for peace of mind. The relief when I finally got that massive catch-up deduction on my 2023 return was incredible - it was like getting a tax refund for all those years I overpaid! You're going to be fine, and you're actually handling this responsibly by addressing it proactively.
@6bd0aac941de Thank you so much for sharing your experience! This is incredibly reassuring to hear from someone who actually went through the entire process successfully. The fact that you got that massive catch-up deduction must have been such a relief after all that stress. I'm really curious about the 15-20 hours you spent researching - what were the main resources you used besides this community? I want to make sure I'm prepared if I decide to tackle this myself rather than hiring a professional. Also, when you mention the Section 481(a) adjustment in Part IV - was that calculation straightforward once you had all your numbers, or was that the most complex part of the form? I've been trying to understand how exactly that catch-up deduction gets calculated and applied. One more question - you mentioned using tax software to complete Form 3115. Was this just regular tax prep software like TurboTax, or did you need something more specialized? I'm trying to figure out what tools I'll need to have ready when I tackle this next year. Your success story gives me a lot of confidence that this is manageable. The idea of getting back all those years of missed deductions in one big adjustment sounds like it'll make all this stress worth it!
This discussion has been absolutely invaluable! I'm dealing with a similar situation for my small marketing agency, and the level of detail everyone has provided here is incredible. What really resonates with me is the emphasis on consistency across all tax filings. I've been treating my design software purchases as depreciable property on my books, but I hadn't made the connection to how that should impact my 199A calculations until reading this thread. The point about documentation is particularly important - I can see how having clear evidence that software is "off-the-shelf" rather than custom-developed would be crucial if the IRS ever questions the classification. I'm going to start keeping better records of my software purchases, including vendor documentation that shows the products are commercially available. One thing I'm wondering about is timing - if I change how I'm classifying software for 199A purposes mid-year, do I need to file amended returns for previous years to maintain consistency? Or is it acceptable to start applying the correct interpretation going forward as long as I'm consistent from that point on? Thanks again to everyone who shared their experiences and research. This kind of peer-to-peer knowledge sharing is exactly what small business owners need when dealing with complex tax issues!
Great question about the timing issue! From what I understand, you generally don't need to amend prior years just to start applying a correct interpretation going forward, especially if your previous treatment wasn't clearly wrong. The key is that you're being consistent from the point where you adopt the correct position. However, if the change would result in significant tax savings for prior years, it might be worth considering amendments - especially since you have until 3 years from the original filing date to amend. You'd want to weigh the potential refund against the time and cost of filing amended returns. I'd definitely recommend discussing this with a tax professional who can look at your specific situation. They can help you determine whether your previous treatment was reasonable under the circumstances, and whether amending would be beneficial. The most important thing is being consistent going forward and having good documentation to support your position, which it sounds like you're already planning to do!
As a tax professional who's dealt with numerous 199A calculations, I wanted to add some clarity to this excellent discussion. The software classification issue comes up frequently with my small business clients, and the analysis here has been spot-on. The key really is Section 167 depreciation treatment. If your software qualifies for depreciation (rather than amortization under Section 197), it can be considered qualified property for 199A purposes. The IRS has generally taken the position that computer software that is: 1. Readily available for purchase by the general public 2. Subject to a nonexclusive license 3. Has not been substantially modified ...qualifies as tangible personal property eligible for depreciation. For your $45,000 engineering software investment, you'll want to review whether it meets these criteria. Most industry-specific software packages (like AutoCAD, specialized engineering analysis tools, etc.) would typically qualify as "off-the-shelf" even though they're specialized. One practical tip: if you're unsure about the classification, look at how the software vendor markets it. If it's sold through standard commercial channels with standard licensing terms, that supports the "readily available" classification. Custom development work or significant modifications would push it toward intangible treatment. The documentation suggestions in this thread are excellent - maintain clear records showing the commercial availability and your consistent depreciation treatment across all filings.
Is anyone familiar with the current processing time for amendments involving Form 8801? I filed a similar amendment about 4 months ago and haven't heard anything yet. The "Where's My Amended Return" tool just says it's been received.
I went through this exact same situation last year when I switched from TaxAct to FreeTaxUSA and my AMT credit from 2018 completely vanished. It's frustrating but you're absolutely on the right track with the sequential amendment approach. A few things that helped me navigate this process: 1. Before filing any amendments, I created a detailed spreadsheet tracking my original AMT payment year, the credit amounts that should have carried forward each year, and what was actually claimed. This became invaluable reference material. 2. When I filed my 2020 amendment, I included copies of my original 2019 Form 8801 showing the credit carryover that got lost. The IRS processor appreciated having that documentation right in front of them. 3. Be prepared for long processing times - my first amendment took about 20 weeks, but once it was approved, the subsequent years seemed to move faster (maybe 12-16 weeks each). 4. Keep detailed records of when you mail each amendment and get delivery confirmation. The IRS lost one of mine initially and I had to refile it. The good news is you caught this in time and you're definitely due those refunds plus interest! It's tedious but worth it in the end.
This is such helpful advice, especially the spreadsheet idea! I'm definitely going to create that tracking document before I start filing anything. Quick question about the documentation - did you include copies of ALL your previous years' Form 8801s, or just the year where the credit originated? I'm trying to figure out exactly what paperwork to gather before I dive into this process. Also, 20 weeks for the first amendment is pretty daunting, but at least knowing what to expect helps with planning. Thanks for sharing your experience!
Ethan Wilson
This is a complex situation with multiple properties and uses! Based on what you've described, here's how I'd approach each scenario: For your home office tree removal ($3,200): You can likely deduct the business-use percentage of this cost on Schedule C. If your home office is 20% of your home, you could deduct about $640. The wildfire zone aspect strengthens your case since it's a legitimate business protection expense. For the insurance-mandated removals: These are tricky. For your primary residence, the portion related to your home office could be deductible (same percentage as above). The rest is generally personal and non-deductible, even though insurance required it. For your rental properties ($4,800): This gets complicated because of the mixed use. You'll need to allocate costs based on actual usage - what percentage is pure rental income vs. photography business use. The rental portion goes on Schedule E as a maintenance expense (assuming it's not a capital improvement), while the business portion could go on Schedule C. Key documentation to keep: Before/after photos, insurance correspondence, wildfire zone designation proof, detailed invoices showing specific work done, and logs of how you use each property. Consider consulting a tax professional for the mixed-use allocation calculations - with almost $8,000 in total costs, getting it right is worth the consultation fee!
0 coins
Henrietta Beasley
ā¢This is really helpful breakdown! One question about the mixed-use allocation - do you need to track this on a daily basis or can you use a reasonable estimate? Like if I use the rental properties for photography shoots maybe 30 days out of the year and rent them out 200 days, would that be sufficient documentation for the IRS? Also, does it matter if the photography work generates significantly more income per day than the rental income when calculating the allocation percentages?
0 coins
Zoe Kyriakidou
ā¢Great question about the allocation methodology! You don't need daily tracking, but you should have reasonable documentation to support your allocation method. Using days of use (30 photography vs 200 rental) is one valid approach, but the IRS generally focuses on the "facts and circumstances" of your situation. Income per day typically doesn't factor into the expense allocation - it's usually based on time, space, or usage. However, you might want to consider square footage if you use specific areas differently (like if photography uses the whole property but rentals only use certain rooms). Keep a simple log showing dates of business use, type of activity, and any rental periods. Photos of your setups and client contracts can also support business use. The key is being consistent and reasonable - if audited, you need to show your allocation method makes sense and reflects actual usage patterns. For mixed-use properties like yours, many tax pros recommend the simpler time-based allocation you mentioned, as it's easier to document and defend.
0 coins
Xan Dae
This is exactly the type of situation where having proper documentation becomes crucial! I've dealt with similar mixed-use property scenarios, and the IRS really does focus on the "ordinary and necessary" test for business expenses. For your wildfire zone situation, the safety aspect actually strengthens your position significantly. Fire prevention measures for business property are generally well-accepted deductions. Just make sure to get documentation from your local fire authority about the wildfire risk designation for your area. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet - if you're removing trees that are diseased or pest-infested, that can actually qualify as preventive maintenance rather than just aesthetic improvement, which makes the deduction even stronger. Ask your tree service to note any disease/pest issues in their assessment. Also, consider timing - if you're planning to do this work anyway, spreading it across tax years might help manage the impact on your overall deduction picture, especially if you're approaching any percentage limits for home office deductions. Keep detailed records of everything, including any communications with insurance companies. Those letters demanding removal are gold for supporting your deduction if questioned!
0 coins
Amara Torres
ā¢That's a really good point about timing the work across tax years! I hadn't considered that strategic approach. Quick question - when you mention "percentage limits for home office deductions," are you referring to the simplified method vs. actual expense method? I'm trying to figure out which approach would be better for my situation with the tree removal costs. Also, would getting a written assessment from an arborist about disease/pest issues be worth the extra cost to strengthen the deduction documentation?
0 coins