IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm going through almost the exact same situation right now! Filed my 83(b) election in November and somehow misplaced my certified mail receipt despite being super careful with tax documents. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly reassuring. What really stands out to me is how consistent everyone's advice is - the photo documentation seems to be universally accepted as sufficient proof. I love the idea of creating that comprehensive documentation package with the USPS tracking screenshot, the affidavit explaining the lost receipt, and getting confirmation from my company's equity team. One thing I'm curious about - has anyone ever actually had the IRS question their 83(b) election documentation during an audit? It sounds like most of the advice here is precautionary, but I'd be interested to hear if anyone has real experience with the IRS actually scrutinizing these records and what that process looked like. Either way, this thread has definitely helped me stop panicking about this situation. Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences and advice!

0 coins

I'm glad this thread has been helpful for your situation too! Regarding your question about actual IRS scrutiny of 83(b) elections during audits - I haven't personally experienced this, but I can share what I've learned from tax professionals and other community members who have been through audits. From what I understand, the IRS typically only examines 83(b) elections if there's a broader audit of your tax return or if there are discrepancies in how you've reported stock transactions in later years. Alice Fleming mentioned earlier in this thread that she went through an audit where they questioned her 83(b) election, and they accepted screenshots of USPS tracking info as proof. The key thing seems to be that the IRS is primarily focused on verifying the timing - that you filed within the 30-day window. They're not as concerned with the format of your proof as long as it's reasonable and demonstrates compliance with the deadline. I think the comprehensive documentation approach everyone is recommending here is smart because it shows good faith effort and thoroughness, which the IRS tends to view favorably. Even if they never question it, having that complete record gives you peace of mind and demonstrates responsible tax compliance practices. Hope that helps with your situation! It definitely sounds like we're both in good shape with our photo documentation.

0 coins

I can definitely relate to your frustration - losing important tax documentation is such a stressful experience! Based on everything I've read here and my own research, you should be completely fine with your photo of the certified mail receipt. The IRS Publication 15-A specifically addresses situations where original documentation is unavailable, and they apply what's called a "reasonableness standard." Your photo shows the three critical elements they care about: the postmark date (proving timely filing within 30 days), the tracking number, and the correct IRS address. I'd suggest taking these additional steps to create bulletproof documentation: 1. Immediately screenshot the USPS tracking history while it's still available online (typically expires after 120 days) 2. Write a brief statement explaining how you lost the original receipt and attach it to your photo 3. Contact your company's HR/equity team for written confirmation they received their copy of your election 4. Ensure you have a copy of your tax return showing the 83(b) election was filed that year The key thing to remember is that the 83(b) election itself is what matters to the IRS - the certified mail receipt is just proof you filed on time. Your photo provides that proof perfectly. Store multiple copies of everything in different locations (cloud storage, email, physical files) and you'll be well-prepared for any potential questions. You're being much more thorough than most people in this situation, which shows excellent tax compliance practices!

0 coins

Cynthia Love

•

I went through almost the exact same situation about two years ago - F-1 student with CPT, employer incorrectly withholding FICA taxes for nearly a year, and payroll initially refusing to fix it. The advice here is spot-on, but I wanted to add one more strategy that really helped me get results. After escalating to HR with all the proper documentation (Form 941-X references, IRS Publication 519, Treasury Regulation citations), I also requested a meeting with both HR and a representative from their legal/compliance team. I framed it as wanting to ensure the company was fully compliant with IRS regulations regarding international employees. During that meeting, I presented a one-page summary showing: 1. The specific IRS regulations requiring FICA exemption for F-1 CPT students 2. The company's legal obligation to correct withholding errors once discovered 3. The potential compliance risks of not correcting known errors 4. The straightforward solution (Form 941-X filings) Having their legal team in the room made all the difference - they immediately understood the compliance implications and directed payroll to process the corrections within two weeks. I think sometimes payroll departments don't realize that refusing to correct known tax errors could expose the company to regulatory scrutiny. The total process took about a month from escalation to receiving my $1,950 refund, but having that legal/compliance perspective really accelerated things. If your company has a legal department or compliance officer, definitely try to get them involved in the conversation.

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

This is brilliant advice about involving the legal/compliance team! I never would have thought to frame it as a compliance risk discussion rather than just a payroll correction request. Getting them to see it from a regulatory liability perspective rather than just "employee wants money back" probably makes them take it much more seriously. The one-page summary format you described sounds perfect - concise, professional, and focused on the company's obligations rather than just the employee's rights. I'm definitely going to adapt this approach when I escalate to HR next week. Do you remember if you included any specific language about potential IRS scrutiny, or did you keep it more general about "compliance risks"? Also, did you find it helpful to suggest the meeting format upfront, or did you start with a written request and then ask for a meeting if they seemed hesitant? I'm trying to figure out the best sequence for escalation that shows I'm serious but not unnecessarily confrontational. Thanks for sharing such a detailed and successful strategy - it's reassuring to know that persistence with the right approach really does work for these situations!

0 coins

Dylan Baskin

•

I kept the compliance language fairly general - something like "ensuring full compliance with IRS regulations for international employee taxation" and "addressing potential regulatory concerns regarding known withholding errors." I found that being too specific about penalties or scrutiny could come across as threatening, which might make them defensive rather than cooperative. For the sequence, I actually started with a formal written request to HR that included a line like "I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this compliance matter with the appropriate team to ensure a prompt resolution." This let them know I was open to a meeting while still documenting everything in writing first. When they responded (somewhat reluctantly), I then suggested including their compliance/legal team "to ensure we're addressing all regulatory requirements properly." The key was positioning myself as helping them stay compliant rather than challenging them. I even said something like "I want to make sure we handle this correctly to protect the company from any potential issues with the IRS." It's amazing how much more receptive people become when you frame it as being on the same team working toward proper compliance rather than adversaries fighting over money. One more tip - I brought printed copies of all the relevant IRS publications and regulations to the meeting, already highlighted and tabbed. Being that prepared really reinforced that this was a serious compliance matter, not just a casual request.

0 coins

I've been following this thread closely as I'm dealing with a similar situation with my F-1 OPT employer who has been incorrectly withholding FICA taxes. The strategies shared here are incredibly valuable, especially the emphasis on proper documentation and using the right terminology. One thing I'd add based on my experience working with HR departments is to always request written confirmation of their process and timeline once they agree to make the corrections. Even after my employer acknowledged the error and promised to file Form 941-X, it took several follow-ups to actually get it processed. Having them commit to specific dates in writing helped keep things moving. Also, for anyone in this situation, consider reaching out to your state's Department of Labor if your employer continues to refuse after proper escalation. While this is primarily an IRS/federal tax issue, some state labor departments have resources for workers dealing with improper payroll deductions, and sometimes a call from a state agency can motivate employers to resolve things quickly. The collaborative approach mentioned by others really works - framing it as "let's make sure we're both compliant" rather than "you owe me money" makes a huge difference in how receptive they are to fixing the problem.

0 coins

Naila Gordon

•

This is such a practical addition to all the great advice in this thread! The point about getting written confirmation of their process and timeline is crucial - I've seen too many situations where employers verbally agree to fix something but then it gets lost in their internal processes or pushed to the bottom of someone's to-do list. Your suggestion about state Department of Labor involvement is really interesting. I hadn't considered that angle, but you're right that sometimes having a third-party agency inquiry can suddenly make things move much faster. Even if they can't directly resolve the federal tax withholding issue, the attention from a regulatory body often motivates companies to clean up any payroll compliance problems they might have. The collaborative framing really is key - I've found that HR departments are much more responsive when they feel like you're helping them identify and solve a compliance issue rather than accusing them of wrongdoing. It's the difference between "you made an error and need to fix it" versus "we discovered a compliance gap that we should address together." For anyone following this approach, I'd also suggest being patient but persistent with follow-ups. Set calendar reminders to check in every 2-3 weeks if you don't hear back, and always reference your previous communications to show you're tracking the timeline professionally.

0 coins

Indiana Department of Revenue Reviewing My 2024 Schedule C - Documentation Required by February 27, 2025

Just checked my USPS informed delivery and saw an IRS letter is coming, but it's actually from the Indiana Department of Revenue. They sent me a letter dated January 29, 2025 saying they're reviewing my 2024 Indiana individual income tax return. I'm getting super nervous about this! The letter states: "The Indiana Department of Revenue is reviewing your 2024 Indiana individual income tax return. To complete this review, provide copies of all the supporting documentation below regarding your Federal Schedule C by February 27, 2025." They're asking for: - Description of my business(es) including start date - Documentation supporting my three largest business expense categories - Documentation supporting all my business income (Federal Schedule C, Part I, line 1) - My original Federal (1040) return(s) and all supporting schedules filed with the IRS - All original and amended income statements (1099 MISC, NEC, R, K), K-1, and/or W-2 or W-2G forms The letter specifically mentions that they won't accept Excel spreadsheets or QuickBooks reports as sole proof of income or expenses. They want actual proof like paid invoices/receipts and/or canceled checks for income, and canceled checks or bank statements for expenses. They're warning that if I don't provide documentation by February 27, 2025, my "return will be adjusted to verifiable income" which they say will "likely result in a reduced refund or a bill." Even worse, they say "Future tax returns will be placed on hold for compliance review and you may not be notified by mail." There are several ways to submit documents: - Online via INTIME (intime.dor.in.gov) using the Letter ID - Email to DORITCInfo@dor.in.gov - There's also a note that documents "submitted online using the unique Letter ID printed in the upper right-hand corner will be applied to your account within 24 hours" I thought my return was pretty straightforward but I'm really worried now. Is this a full audit? Has anyone dealt with this kind of state review before? How extensive does my documentation need to be?

I can totally understand the anxiety from seeing that letter in your informed delivery! But based on what you've described, this is actually a routine Indiana Department of Revenue compliance review for Schedule C filers - definitely not the scary federal audit situation your mind might be jumping to. The fact that they gave you nearly a month to respond (until February 27th) is actually a really good sign that this is standard verification, not an urgent red flag. Indiana DOR does these reviews pretty regularly to make sure business income and expenses are properly documented. Here's what I'd suggest to make this manageable: Start by organizing your documents into the exact categories they requested - business description (keep it simple, just a few sentences), your three largest expense categories with supporting docs, and all your income documentation. The INTIME portal sounds like your best bet since you get that 24-hour confirmation they mentioned. Remember, they're not trying to catch you doing anything wrong - they just want to verify that what you reported matches your actual documentation. As long as your Schedule C was accurate, you should be totally fine! Take it one step at a time and don't let the stress overwhelm you. You've got plenty of time to get organized! 😊

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful! As someone who's never dealt with any kind of tax review before, I really appreciate you breaking down why the February 27th deadline is actually a good sign rather than something to panic about. Your point about Indiana DOR doing these reviews regularly for Schedule C filers really helps put this in perspective - I was definitely catastrophizing and thinking I must have made some major error. The step-by-step approach you outlined makes this feel so much more manageable. I'm going to start organizing my docs by their categories today and definitely use the INTIME portal for that peace of mind confirmation. Thanks for helping me reframe this as routine verification rather than something scary! šŸ™

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

•

I completely understand your stress about this! But honestly, this sounds like a very routine Indiana Department of Revenue compliance review for Schedule C filers - not the federal IRS audit your anxiety is probably making it seem like. The fact that they gave you until February 27th (almost a full month) is actually a great sign that this is standard verification, not an emergency situation. I've seen several friends go through similar state reviews and they're really much more straightforward than they sound. The key is just staying organized: gather your business description (literally just a paragraph about what you do and when you started), pull together documentation for your three biggest expense categories, and collect all your income docs (1099s, etc.). Definitely use that INTIME portal with your Letter ID - getting that 24-hour confirmation that they received everything will be such a relief! This is really just them making sure your Schedule C documentation matches what you reported. As long as you were honest on your return, you'll be totally fine. Take it one step at a time and try not to let the official language psych you out - you've got this! šŸ’Ŗ

0 coins

Anna Kerber

•

This is such a relief to read! As someone completely new to any kind of tax review, I was definitely spiraling and imagining worst-case scenarios. Your point about the February 27th deadline being a good sign rather than something to panic about really helps reframe my whole perspective on this. I love how you broke it down into simple, manageable steps - it makes the whole process seem so much less overwhelming. The 24-hour confirmation through INTIME sounds like exactly what I need for peace of mind. Thank you for taking the time to walk through this so clearly and remind me that as long as I was honest on my return, I'll be fine. This community has been incredible for helping me see this as routine rather than scary! šŸ™

0 coins

Anybody know if OP should consider a Traditional IRA instead of Roth at this income level? With such low income wouldn't it be better to take the tax deduction now?

0 coins

At this income level, a Roth is almost definitely better. OP probably won't owe much federal income tax anyway with the standard deduction, so the traditional IRA deduction has minimal value. Plus they'd pay tax on withdrawals in retirement when their tax rate will likely be higher than it is now as a student.

0 coins

Great question! You're absolutely on the right track thinking about retirement savings at 19. Just to add some clarity to what others have mentioned - your Roth IRA contribution limit is based on your "earned income" which for self-employed folks like you is your net profit from Schedule C (after business expenses like mileage, but before the self-employment tax deduction). So if your net profit after all business deductions is $6,500, that's exactly what you can contribute to your Roth IRA. The fact that it matches the contribution limit perfectly is just a coincidence - you're not required to have "extra" income beyond what you contribute. One thing to double-check: make sure you're tracking your mileage accurately since that's usually the biggest deduction for delivery drivers. The IRS standard mileage rate for 2025 is 67 cents per mile, which can really add up with delivery work. Keep up the smart financial planning - starting retirement savings this early will pay off huge in the long run!

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm also just getting started with gig work and had no idea about tracking mileage properly. Do you need to track every single trip or just business miles? Like if I drive to get gas between deliveries, does that count as business mileage too?

0 coins

Dose this work for amended returns to?

0 coins

amended returns are totally different beast my friend šŸ’€

0 coins

KylieRose

•

This is super helpful! I've been trying to figure out my processing cycle for months. Just checked my 2023 transcript and my cycle code ends in 02 - so I'm on daily processing. No wonder I've been seeing random updates throughout the week instead of just Fridays like some people. Thanks for sharing this method, way better than guessing!

0 coins

That's awesome you figured it out! I'm still trying to decode mine - where exactly on the transcript do you find the cycle code? Is it in the same section where it shows the processing date? I've been staring at my transcript for like 20 minutes and can't figure out which numbers you're talking about šŸ˜…

0 coins

Prev1...16411642164316441645...5644Next