


Ask the community...
Just a heads up - make sure you keep good documentation of everything. Your mom might still try to claim the credit anyway, and if both of you claim it, the IRS will definitely flag both returns. Maybe have a calm conversation with her explaining what you've learned here. If she still insists on trying to claim it, you might want to file your return early so it goes through first. The second person to file claiming the same credit will likely get a letter from the IRS.
This happened to my cousin! His parents claimed education credits they weren't entitled to, and both returns got flagged. It was a huge mess that took months to resolve, and his parents ended up having to pay back the credit plus penalties. Definitely file early if you think your mom might try to claim it anyway!
I went through almost the exact same situation last year! My dad was convinced he should claim my education credits because he helped pay for some of my expenses, even though I wasn't his dependent anymore. What really helped me was sitting down with him and going through the actual IRS dependency tests together. We used the IRS Interactive Tax Assistant online to determine my status step by step. Once we confirmed I didn't meet the criteria to be claimed as a dependent (mainly because of my income level), it became crystal clear that the education credits belonged to me. The key thing to remember is that it's not about who contributed money - it's purely about dependent status. Since you're working full-time and not a dependent, those credits are legally yours to claim. Your mom can't just decide to take them because she helped with expenses. I'd suggest showing her Publication 970 (like others mentioned) or even using the IRS Interactive Tax Assistant together. Sometimes having that official IRS source makes all the difference in family tax discussions. Good luck!
That's such a great suggestion about using the IRS Interactive Tax Assistant together! I think having that neutral, official tool walk through the dependency tests step-by-step could really help defuse the tension. It's not me arguing with my mom - it's just following what the IRS system determines based on the actual criteria. I'm definitely going to try this approach before things get more heated. The fact that it worked for your situation gives me hope that we can resolve this without it turning into a bigger family issue. Thanks for sharing your experience!
Has anyone actually been audited over this? I've been deducting my gym membership for years as a 1099 dance instructor and never had a problem. I figure as long as it's not a crazy amount and I'm not claiming other suspicious deductions, the IRS has bigger fish to fry.
Thanks for sharing your experience, Jasmine - that's exactly the kind of real-world outcome people need to hear about. For anyone considering this deduction, it's worth noting that even if you have a legitimate business case, you need to be prepared to defend it with solid documentation if audited. The fact that fitness is required for your job doesn't automatically make gym memberships deductible - the IRS still applies the "personal benefit" test pretty strictly. If you do decide to take this deduction, I'd recommend: 1) Keep a detailed log showing gym usage specifically for work-related fitness (not general health) 2) Document any specific fitness requirements in your referee contracts 3) Consider whether you'd have the membership anyway for personal reasons 4) Maybe consult with a tax professional if the deduction is substantial The potential tax savings might not be worth the audit risk and hassle for everyone, especially if it's a borderline case.
This is really helpful advice, Keisha. I'm new to the 1099 world and honestly had no idea that even legitimate business expenses could be challenged like this. The documentation requirements you mentioned make sense - I guess it's not enough to just say "I need to be fit for my job." One question though - when you mention keeping a log of gym usage for work-related fitness versus general health, how specific does that need to be? Like would noting "cardio training for endurance during games" be enough, or do you need to get more detailed about specific exercises and how they relate to referee performance? Also wondering if anyone knows whether having a cheaper gym membership (like Planet Fitness vs. an expensive boutique gym) affects how the IRS views the deduction?
One thing to keep in mind is that you can't actually "choose" which mortgage to claim - if both properties qualify as your primary residence and second home, you're entitled to deduct the interest on both mortgages up to the applicable limits. You can't selectively ignore one to maximize the other. What you CAN do is make sure you're maximizing the deductible portions within the rules. Since your first mortgage ($550k) is grandfathered under the old $1M limit, you can deduct all the interest on that. For your new $1.3M mortgage, you'd be able to deduct interest on $750k of that loan amount. The key is making sure your total itemized deductions (including both mortgage interests, state taxes, charitable donations, etc.) exceed the standard deduction to make itemizing worthwhile. With mortgages totaling $1.85M, you'll likely have substantial interest payments that would justify itemizing.
This is really helpful clarification! I was definitely misunderstanding the rules and thought I could pick and choose which mortgage to claim. So just to make sure I understand correctly - with my first mortgage at $550k (pre-2018) and the new one at $1.3M, I'd be able to deduct interest on the full $550k plus interest on $750k of the new mortgage? That's actually better than I initially thought since I was worried about being capped at just $750k total. Thanks for breaking this down so clearly!
Just to add one important consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure you understand the order of payments if you end up with a mortgage over the deduction limit. For your new $1.3M mortgage where only $750k qualifies for deductions, the IRS treats the deductible portion as being paid first throughout the year. So if you pay $91,000 in interest on that 7% mortgage ($1.3M Ć 7%), you'd be able to deduct interest on the first $750k of principal, which would be about $52,500 ($750k Ć 7%). The remaining $38,500 in interest payments wouldn't be deductible. Also, double-check that both properties will actually qualify as residences under IRS rules. The second home needs to have basic living accommodations (sleeping, cooking, and toilet facilities) and you need to use it personally for more than 14 days per year or 10% of the days it's rented out, whichever is greater. Since you mentioned using it 3 months per year, you should be fine on that front.
This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown I was looking for! The calculation example really helps me understand how the interest deduction would work in practice. So with my $1.3M mortgage at 7%, I'd be looking at roughly $52,500 in deductible interest from that loan plus whatever interest I pay on my existing $550k mortgage at 2.875%. I'm definitely planning to use the second home more than 14 days per year - we're hoping to spend most of our summer vacations there. Thanks for mentioning the basic living accommodations requirement too. I hadn't thought about that but the property we're looking at is a fully furnished home so that shouldn't be an issue. One follow-up question - do I need to track which specific payments go toward principal vs interest throughout the year, or will the lender's 1098 form handle all of that for me?
Have you checked your bank account for deposits? If they paid you by direct deposit or you deposited checks, you should be able to see exactly how much you made there.
This is actually a really important point. Your bank statements are valid supporting documentation for income. I've used them before when I lost a W-2. Just add up all the deposits from that employer.
If they paid you cash and you're trying to reconstruct the exact amount, another approach is to look at your work schedule if you kept any record of it. Even something as simple as text messages to friends about your work shifts or calendar entries can help you calculate the total. Since you mentioned working "about three weekends" as a hostess, try to remember your hourly rate and approximate hours per shift. Most hostess positions pay minimum wage plus tips. If you can recall your hourly wage, multiply that by your estimated hours worked to get your base pay, then add any tips you remember receiving. The IRS cares more about you making a good faith effort to report all income accurately than having perfect documentation, especially in situations like this where the employer is no longer available to provide proper forms.
Chloe Zhang
Has anyone else noticed that this seems to be happening more often lately? I returned something to HomeGoods last week and they tried to keep the tax too. When I questioned it, they suddenly "found a way" to refund the full amount. I think some retailers are trying this as a sneaky profit tactic hoping people don't notice or complain.
0 coins
Brandon Parker
ā¢I work in retail (not naming the store) and can confirm some places are starting to do this intentionally. Our system was recently updated to default to "tax retained" on returns unless the manager overrides it. Most customers don't notice the small difference, especially on cheaper items. Probably doesn't help my job security to admit this but it feels dishonest.
0 coins
Teresa Boyd
This is really concerning if retailers are systematically doing this. I work in tax compliance and can tell you that what BigTech Store told you is absolutely incorrect. Sales tax refunds on returned merchandise are governed by state law, not store policy. When you return an item, the original transaction is essentially being reversed. The store collected that tax as an agent of the state - they don't get to keep it when the underlying sale is canceled. Most states have specific provisions requiring retailers to refund sales tax on returned items, and failure to do so can result in penalties for the retailer. I'd recommend going back with your receipt and asking to speak with a manager. If they refuse, you can file a complaint with your state's department of revenue. They take sales tax compliance seriously and will investigate retailers who aren't following proper refund procedures. The fact that some commenters are seeing this happen more frequently suggests this might be a deliberate policy at some chains, which is even more problematic from a regulatory standpoint.
0 coins
Grace Johnson
ā¢Thanks for the detailed explanation from a compliance perspective! This is exactly the kind of professional insight I was hoping to find. The fact that you mention this could be a deliberate policy at some chains is really alarming. I'm definitely going back to BigTech Store with this information. Do you happen to know if there's a specific timeframe I need to file a complaint with the state department of revenue if they continue to refuse? And would it help to document the conversation or get something in writing from them about their "policy" of keeping sales tax on returns? I'm also wondering if this affects their sales tax remittance to the state - like are they essentially double-dipping by keeping customer refunds AND potentially not adjusting their tax payments to the state?
0 coins