Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
mine got offset last year and tbh the transcript was confusing af to read. wish i knew about those transcript reading tools back then would've saved me so much stress ngl
Just went through this myself - yes, offsets definitely show up on your transcript as code 898 like AstroAdventurer mentioned. The tricky part is they don't tell you WHAT the debt is for specifically. If you want to know ahead of time, you can check the Treasury Offset Program website or call them. Also heads up - if you're married filing jointly and only one spouse owes the debt, you might be able to get the other spouse's portion back by filing an injured spouse claim. Don't stress too much though, at least you'll know what happened when you see that code!
Thanks for mentioning the injured spouse claim! That's super helpful info I didn't know about. Quick question - do you know roughly how long that process takes if you have to file one? And is it something you file with your original return or after the offset happens?
Join the conversation
For mental health conditions like depression and anxiety, you absolutely can qualify for HSA coverage of gym memberships! I got mine approved last year for anxiety and depression. The key is making sure your doctor frames exercise as a specific medical treatment, not just general wellness. My psychiatrist wrote that regular cardiovascular exercise was prescribed to help regulate my neurotransmitter levels and provide structured routine to manage my depressive episodes. She included research citations about exercise's effectiveness for treating depression and specified that supervised gym equipment was necessary for safety and consistency. Don't let the BMI thing discourage you - mental health conditions are totally valid medical reasons. Just make sure your letter is detailed about HOW exercise treats your specific symptoms, not just that "exercise is good for mental health." The more medical and specific, the better your chances of approval. Also, keep all your gym receipts and any documentation about which classes or equipment you use - some HSA administrators want to see that you're actually using it as prescribed treatment.
This is really encouraging to hear! I'm curious about the research citations your psychiatrist included - did that make a big difference in getting approved? I'm worried my primary care doctor might not know what specific studies to reference. Also, when you mention "supervised gym equipment," does that mean you had to use gyms with personal trainers or just any commercial gym facility?
The research citations definitely helped legitimize the medical necessity aspect! My psychiatrist referenced a few key studies about exercise's impact on serotonin and dopamine levels. You don't need super specific studies - even general references to "peer-reviewed research on exercise therapy for depression" can work. As for "supervised gym equipment" - this just meant equipment that's maintained and safe to use, not necessarily personal training. My letter specified that home equipment might not be properly maintained or calibrated, making commercial gym facilities the safer medical option. Some gyms also have staff who can help if you have an anxiety attack or need assistance, which was part of the safety argument. If your primary care doctor isn't sure about the research angle, you could ask them to focus more on the clinical aspects they've observed in your treatment. Like how your mood improves with regular exercise, or how structured physical activity helps with your specific anxiety symptoms.
I've been through this exact process with my HSA for anxiety-related gym membership and wanted to share what worked for me. The mental health angle is definitely valid - don't let anyone tell you otherwise! The trick is getting your doctor to be very specific about the therapeutic benefits. My therapist wrote that structured exercise was prescribed to help manage my anxiety symptoms by providing a consistent routine, reducing cortisol levels, and giving me a healthy outlet for nervous energy. She also mentioned that the social aspect of going to a gym (even minimal interaction) was part of my exposure therapy for social anxiety. One thing I learned the hard way - make sure the letter mentions that this is an ongoing treatment, not just a one-time recommendation. My first letter got rejected because it sounded like general advice rather than a prescribed treatment plan. The second letter specified that I needed to maintain this exercise regimen for at least 12 months as part of my anxiety management protocol. Also, keep detailed records of your gym visits. Some HSA administrators want to see that you're actually following through with the prescribed treatment. I started tracking my workouts specifically to show I was using it for medical purposes, not just casual fitness. Good luck! Don't give up if you get rejected the first time - it's often just about tweaking the language in the letter.
This is incredibly helpful, thank you for sharing your experience! I'm particularly interested in how your therapist framed the social aspect as part of exposure therapy - that's such a smart angle I hadn't considered. Quick question about the record keeping - did you just track dates and duration, or did your HSA administrator want more detailed information about specific exercises or classes? I want to make sure I'm documenting everything properly from the start rather than scrambling later if they ask for more details. Also, when you mention "ongoing treatment" versus "one-time recommendation" - did your doctor need to specify exact timeframes, or was saying "at least 12 months" sufficient? I'm trying to figure out how specific to ask my doctor to be about the treatment duration.
Join the conversation
This is incredibly helpful! I've been procrastinating on doing my taxes partly because I was dreading the TurboTax upsell marathon. Last year felt like I spent more time declining premium features than actually answering tax questions. Your point about FreeTaxUSA being done in under an hour really caught my attention. I remember my TurboTax experience dragging on forever, not because my taxes were complicated, but because of all the interruptions trying to sell me audit protection, credit monitoring, and whatever else they could think of. The $20 vs $90 price difference is just insane when you're getting the same (or better) results. I'm definitely going to give FreeTaxUSA a shot this year. Thanks for doing the real-world testing - this kind of side-by-side comparison is exactly what I needed to finally make the switch!
You're absolutely right about the upselling being exhausting! I actually timed my TurboTax session last year and spent nearly 20 minutes just clicking through premium feature offers. It felt like trying to cancel a gym membership - they just wouldn't take no for an answer. FreeTaxUSA's streamlined approach is refreshing. They ask what they need to ask, calculate what they need to calculate, and that's it. No pressure, no constant interruptions. Just straightforward tax filing like it should be. The time savings alone make it worth switching, but when you factor in the massive cost difference, it's really a no-brainer. Good luck with your filing - I think you'll be pleasantly surprised by how smooth the process is without all the sales tactics getting in the way!
This comparison is incredibly thorough and mirrors my own frustrations with tax software pricing! I made the switch from H&R Block to FreeTaxUSA two years ago and haven't looked back. One thing I'd add for anyone considering the switch: FreeTaxUSA's customer support is actually excellent when you need it. I had a question about reporting cryptocurrency transactions last year and their live chat was more helpful than H&R Block's premium support ever was - and it didn't cost me extra. The interface might look less polished than TurboTax, but that actually works in its favor. No distracting animations or constant popups trying to sell you add-ons. You just focus on getting your taxes done correctly and efficiently. For anyone still on the fence: the first year switching requires a bit more manual data entry since you can't import from other platforms, but it's honestly not that bad. After that, everything carries forward seamlessly. The money you save makes those extra 20 minutes totally worth it.
Join the conversation
As a newcomer to this community, I've been following the Innovation Refunds story with deep concern, especially after reading through all these personal experiences shared here. What's most troubling to me is how this situation represents a perfect storm of regulatory failure, predatory business practices, and crisis exploitation. The WSJ article exposed something that goes far beyond just one bad company - it revealed an entire industry built on systematically misleading small businesses about complex tax law. The fact that Innovation Refunds recruited attorneys with zero tax experience to handle billion-dollar credit programs shows just how little regard they had for their clients' actual welfare. What really gets to me is the human cost here. Reading about restaurant owners like Amina facing potential repayment of $180,000, or businesses that used relief money for legitimate expenses now facing financial ruin - these aren't just numbers, they're people who were already struggling and trusted what they thought was professional advice. I think the broader lesson here is about vulnerability during crisis. These companies didn't just sell bad tax advice - they weaponized desperation during a global pandemic. They knew small businesses were scared and desperate for help, and they exploited that fear for profit while leaving all the risk with their clients. For anyone still dealing with ERC issues, the consistent advice I'm seeing here about proactive correction and independent review seems sound. But the real tragedy is that this mess was entirely preventable with proper oversight and professional standards.
Your analysis really captures the systemic nature of this crisis perfectly. As someone just joining this community, I've been shocked by the scope of what happened with Innovation Refunds and similar companies. The "weaponized desperation" phrase you used really hits home - these weren't just business mistakes, they were calculated exploitation of people at their most vulnerable. What's particularly disturbing to me is how these companies created an assembly line of bad advice. They took complex federal tax law that requires genuine expertise and turned it into a sales script that inexperienced attorneys could deliver to desperate business owners. The human cost you mentioned is exactly what should be driving policy changes to prevent this from happening again. Reading through everyone's experiences here, it's clear that the warning signs were there - guaranteed qualifications without reviewing actual circumstances, upfront percentage fees, high-pressure tactics claiming limited time offers. But when you're a small business owner who barely survived COVID lockdowns, those red flags probably looked like green lights toward legitimate relief. I'm hoping this Innovation Refunds exposure leads to serious regulatory reform around who can market tax services and how. The current system obviously failed to protect the very people these relief programs were designed to help. These businesses deserved better than being treated as profit centers by companies with no real expertise or accountability.
As a newcomer to this community, I've been deeply disturbed by the Innovation Refunds story and the broader ERC industry collapse it represents. What's particularly alarming to me is how this situation exposes the complete failure of professional oversight during a national crisis. Reading through everyone's experiences here, I'm struck by how these companies essentially created a predatory ecosystem that targeted the most vulnerable businesses at their weakest moment. The fact that Innovation Refunds recruited attorneys with zero tax experience to handle complex federal credits worth billions shows a complete disregard for professional ethics and client welfare. What really bothers me is the asymmetric risk model these companies used - they collected millions in upfront fees while leaving all the long-term liability with small business owners who trusted them. Now those business owners face potential repayment, penalties, and interest while the companies that created this mess largely escape consequences. The human stories shared here are heartbreaking - restaurant owners facing $180,000 repayments, businesses that used relief funds for legitimate expenses now potentially facing financial ruin. These aren't just statistics, they're real people who were already struggling and made reasonable decisions based on what they believed was professional advice. For anyone still dealing with ERC uncertainty, the consistent advice about proactive review and voluntary correction seems wise. But the real tragedy is that this entire crisis was preventable with proper regulatory oversight and professional standards. We need systemic changes to prevent future exploitation of emergency relief programs.
You've really captured the core tragedy of this situation - the complete breakdown of professional accountability when vulnerable people needed it most. As someone new to this community, I've been appalled reading through these personal stories and seeing how systematic the exploitation was. What strikes me most is how Innovation Refunds and similar companies turned the legal profession into a sales funnel. They took attorneys who had no business giving complex tax advice and put them on the front lines of processing billions in federal credits. That's not just bad business practice - it's a fundamental violation of professional duty to clients. The asymmetric risk model you mentioned is exactly right. These companies structured everything to maximize their upfront profits while ensuring they'd face minimal consequences when things went wrong. They knew that small business owners would be the ones left holding the bag when the IRS came calling, but they didn't care because they'd already collected their fees. I keep thinking about businesses like the restaurant owner who mentioned facing $180,000 in repayments. That money was probably already spent on legitimate business expenses, rent, payroll - things these businesses desperately needed during the pandemic. Now they're potentially facing financial catastrophe because they trusted what seemed like professional advice. The preventable nature of this crisis is what makes it so infuriating. With proper oversight and professional standards, none of these vulnerable businesses should have been put in this position.
Raul Neal
I know exactly how stressful this waiting period is! I went through this last month and wanted to share my positive outcome: • Amendment appeared on transcript: March 4th • Refund approved (code 846): March 19th • Money deposited: March 22nd So that was 15 days from transcript update to refund approval, and 18 days total until money in my account. What helped me was checking my transcript every Tuesday and Friday morning (they seem to update in batches those days). Hang in there - the waiting is the hardest part but it WILL come through!
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
I've been tracking IRS amended return timelines for my accounting practice, and here's what I've observed across multiple clients: Once your amended return appears on transcript, you're typically looking at 10-21 business days until you see the TC 846 (refund issued) code with a deposit date. However, Q1/Q2 processing tends to be slower due to regular filing season backlog. For your investment planning purposes, I'd recommend using a 25-business-day timeline from transcript appearance to actual deposit as your conservative estimate. One thing that might help - if you see TC 971 with AC 052 on your transcript, that usually indicates your amendment is in the final review stage before refund authorization.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
•This is really helpful data! As someone new to dealing with amended returns, I'm wondering - is there any way to tell which "stage" your amendment is in just by looking at the transcript codes? I see you mentioned TC 971 with AC 052 as a good sign, but are there other codes that might indicate delays or issues? My amendment just appeared on my transcript yesterday and I'm trying to understand what to look for as it progresses through the system.
0 coins