


Ask the community...
Don't forget about the home office deduction if you're working from home! Since you're using that laptop and equipment in a home office, you might qualify for the simplified home office deduction of $5 per square foot (up to 300 sq ft) if you have a dedicated space used exclusively for business. Between equipment deductions and home office, you can offset a good chunk of that small income and potentially create a loss to offset your W2 income.
Careful with the home office deduction! It has to be a space used EXCLUSIVELY for business. If you use that room for anything else, even occasionally, you don't qualify. I got audited because of this.
Great question about Section 179! I went through something similar with my freelance photography business. Here's what I learned: First, you absolutely can deduct business equipment on Schedule C even if your income is low, but documentation is key. For Section 179, you need >50% business use to qualify for immediate deduction. If you don't meet that threshold, regular depreciation over 5 years (for computers/phones) is still available. The fact that you only made $375 from one gig but invested $4000+ in equipment isn't automatically a problem - many legitimate businesses have startup costs that exceed initial income. What matters is showing genuine profit motive and business necessity. A few practical tips: - Keep detailed logs of business vs personal use percentages - Document why you needed this specific equipment for your work - Save all purchase receipts and business communications - Consider combining all your similar freelance activities (Fiverr, Upwork, etc.) on one Schedule C if they're related services The business loss you create can offset your W2 income, which is completely legal. Just be prepared to justify the business purpose if ever questioned. Many successful businesses operate at a loss initially while building up their client base and investing in necessary equipment.
This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about the documentation part - when you say "keep detailed logs of business vs personal use percentages," what's the best way to track that? Should I be logging every time I use my laptop, or is there a simpler method that would still satisfy the IRS if they asked? Also, when combining similar freelance activities on one Schedule C, do you report the income from each platform separately somewhere, or just lump it all together as "freelance services" income?
My accountant told me most software engineers aren't SSTBs unless your primarily doing consulting. He said to track hours for each type of work. Anybody using Quickbooks for this? How do you categorize your services?
In QB I created different service items - "Software Development" (non-SSTB) and "Software Consulting" (SSTB). I assign time and invoices to the appropriate category. Makes it super clear at tax time what percentage of revenue came from each activity.
I've been dealing with this exact issue for the past two years with my software engineering business. What really helped me was creating a simple tracking system where I log my activities daily - either "Development" (coding, testing, implementation) or "Consulting" (meetings, architecture discussions, recommendations without implementation). The IRS looks at the substance of what you're actually doing, not just your job title. If you're spending most of your time writing code and building solutions, you're likely in the clear for QBI. But if you're mostly in meetings giving advice without actually creating the software yourself, that could be problematic. One thing that caught me off guard - even project management and client communication can blur the lines. I now make sure my contracts explicitly state that I'm being hired to "develop and implement software solutions" rather than just "provide software consulting services." The language matters more than you'd think. Have you considered restructuring how you bill clients? Breaking out development work separately from any advisory work could help establish a clear pattern that most of your business is non-SSTB.
This is really helpful advice about tracking activities daily. I'm new to this whole QBI situation and honestly didn't realize how important the distinction was between development vs consulting work. Your point about contract language is something I never thought about - I've been using pretty generic "software engineering services" language in all my agreements. Quick question - when you say "project management and client communication can blur the lines," what specifically should I be careful about? I spend a lot of time in client meetings discussing requirements and project status. Does that automatically make it consulting, or is it okay as long as I'm the one actually building what we discuss? Also, do you have any specific templates or examples of how to word contracts to emphasize the development aspect? I'd rather get this right from the start than try to fix it later.
I think there's a fundamental misunderstanding in the original post. An inherited IRA and a partnership interest (which generates a K-1) are completely different things. 1. Inherited IRA: You receive distributions reported on a 1099-R form 2. Partnership interest: You receive a Schedule K-1 (Form 1065) The "at risk" rules only apply to the partnership interest, not the IRA. Is it possible you're involved in a partnership that owns an IRA as one of its assets? That would be unusual, but might explain the confusion.
Omg thank you all for the responses! You're right - I was totally mixing things up. I have BOTH an inherited IRA AND a small partnership interest in my uncle's business that I also inherited. The K-1 is from the business partnership, not the IRA. So for the "at risk" amount, based on everyone's explanations, I think I need to include my inherited ownership value in the partnership ($15,000) plus my portion of any partnership loans I'm personally liable for. The inherited IRA is completely separate and has nothing to do with the K-1 or "at risk" calculations. This makes so much more sense now! Thank you again!
That makes much more sense! Yes, for your partnership interest, your "at risk" amount would typically start with the $15,000 inherited ownership value plus any partnership recourse debt you're personally responsible for, minus any distributions you've received from the partnership. And you're absolutely right that the inherited IRA is completely separate. You'll report any distributions from that on your tax return based on the 1099-R you receive, which has nothing to do with the partnership K-1 or at-risk calculations. Glad we could help clear this up!
Great to see this got sorted out! Just wanted to add one important point for anyone else dealing with inherited partnership interests: make sure you get a stepped-up basis for tax purposes. When you inherit a partnership interest, your basis is typically "stepped up" to the fair market value at the date of death (that $15,000 you mentioned). This is different from your "at risk" amount, but it's crucial for calculating gains/losses if you ever sell the partnership interest. Also, since you inherited both an IRA and partnership interest, you might want to consult a tax professional to make sure you're handling the required minimum distributions from the inherited IRA correctly - those have their own complex rules and deadlines that are completely separate from your partnership tax reporting. Glad the community could help untangle this confusion!
This is really helpful advice about the stepped-up basis! I had no idea that was even a thing. So just to make sure I understand - the $15,000 value becomes my new basis in the partnership for tax purposes, but my "at risk" amount could be different depending on partnership debts and distributions? Also, you're absolutely right about the inherited IRA distributions - I've been so focused on the K-1 confusion that I haven't even looked into the RMD requirements yet. Do you happen to know if there are different rules for inherited traditional IRAs vs inherited Roth IRAs? I think my grandfather's was traditional but I should double-check. Thanks for pointing out these additional considerations - it's clear I have more homework to do!
Not sure if you're aware, but this is actually a classic dark pattern that TurboTax has been doing for YEARS. They've even been sued over it. They intentionally advertise free filing but design the system to force almost everyone into paid upgrades. Simple things like student loan interest (which is super common) trigger their "you need to upgrade" messages.
There was actually a big ProPublica investigation about this! TurboTax (Intuit) and H&R Block actively lobbied against the IRS creating its own free filing system, then made their "free" versions intentionally hard to find and limited. Super shady business practice.
This is exactly why I switched to doing my own taxes with the IRS Free File Fillable Forms a couple years ago. Yes, it's more work and you need to be comfortable reading tax instructions, but at least there are no surprise upgrade fees or dark patterns. For your situation with just a W-2, student loan interest, and basic savings interest, you'd probably only need Form 1040 and maybe Form 8917 for the student loan interest deduction. The IRS provides all the forms and instructions for free, and you can e-file directly through their system. I get that it's intimidating at first, but honestly once you do it once, simple tax situations like yours are pretty straightforward. Plus you learn way more about your taxes than you would clicking through TurboTax's guided questions. Just another option to consider if you want to avoid the upgrade trap entirely!
Liam Duke
Has anyone actually had to repay their subsidy? I'm in a similar situation (family of 4, income around $105k) and worried about tax time. I keep hearing horror stories about people getting surprise tax bills.
0 coins
Manny Lark
ā¢I had to repay about $2,800 last year because I underestimated my income. Got a promotion mid-year and didn't update my marketplace application. Found out the hard way at tax time. Now I update my income estimate anytime anything changes with my pay.
0 coins
Brielle Johnson
I went through this exact situation last year and learned some hard lessons. The key is being conservative with your income projections and updating them regularly throughout the year. One thing that caught me off guard was that the marketplace uses your projected income, but the IRS reconciliation uses your actual MAGI from your tax return. So even if your salary stays the same, things like investment gains, side income, or even unemployment compensation early in the year can push you over the threshold. My advice: project your income on the higher side when applying, and if you end up earning less, you'll get the difference as a credit when you file. It's much easier to get money back than to owe it. Also, keep detailed records of any income changes throughout the year and update your marketplace application immediately - don't wait until open enrollment. The subsidy cliff at 400% FPL is real and steep, so if you're anywhere close to that threshold (which at $116k for your family size, you might be), consider strategies to keep your MAGI down like maxing retirement contributions.
0 coins
Evelyn Rivera
ā¢This is exactly the kind of real-world advice I was looking for! I'm definitely concerned about being close to that 400% FPL threshold. When you say "project your income on the higher side," how much higher would you recommend? Like 5-10% above what I expect, or more conservative than that? Also, you mentioned investment gains - does that include things like 401k growth, or just taxable investment accounts? I want to make sure I'm accounting for everything that could affect my MAGI.
0 coins