


Ask the community...
Just a heads up, the IRS might consider this a hobby rather than a business if you never had income or customers. I tried to deduct expenses for my photography "business" a few years ago and got audited because I had no income for 2 years.
But the difference here is they never actually started operating because of the job change. Wouldn't that be different from your situation where you were actively trying to get photography clients but didn't make money?
I was in a very similar situation when I started my CPA practice! The key distinction here is that you had legitimate business intent before circumstances changed due to your employment situation. This isn't a hobby case at all. You should definitely be able to claim these as startup costs under IRC Section 195. Since you invested with genuine profit motive and only stopped due to employment restrictions (not lack of interest), you can deduct up to $5,000 in startup expenses in the first year, with any remaining amount amortized over 15 years. Make sure to document everything: your original business plan, any research you did, receipts showing business intent, and especially your new employer's policy that prevented you from continuing. The IRS looks favorably on situations where external circumstances (like employment contracts) prevent business operations. One tip: If you think you might resume this business after leaving your current job, keep all your documentation. You could potentially carry forward unused startup costs to future tax years when the business becomes active.
This is really helpful advice from a CPA perspective! I'm curious though - when you say "carry forward unused startup costs to future tax years," does that mean if I can't use the full $5,000 deduction this year due to low income, I could use the remainder later? Or are you referring to the 15-year amortization for amounts over $5,000? I want to make sure I understand the mechanics correctly before I file.
Waiting for IRS letters is like watching paint dry while standing in quicksand. You're stuck and it feels like nothing is happening. Last year, I had a friend who waited 7 weeks for their verification letter! The whole system seems designed to test our patience. My advice? Call once a week to check status, document every call (who you spoke with, date/time), and if it's been more than 4 weeks, specifically ask for a supervisor who might have additional options.
That's good advice about documenting calls. I've found that mentioning "I spoke with [agent name] on [specific date]" in follow-up calls makes them take you more seriously and sometimes they can see notes from previous calls.
Also worth noting that the IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service can sometimes help if it's been more than 30 days and you're experiencing financial hardship while waiting. They can't speed up the letter, but they might be able to find alternative verification methods in some cases.
I feel your pain! I'm in a similar boat - my verification letter was supposedly mailed March 20th and still nothing. It's so stressful when you're counting on that refund for something important like tuition. I've been calling weekly and each agent gives me a different timeline estimate. One said 2-3 weeks, another said up to 6 weeks. The inconsistency is almost as frustrating as the wait itself. At this point I'm considering trying some of the alternatives people mentioned here, like checking if there's a local taxpayer assistance center that might help without the letter. Hang in there! š¤
I'm in a similar situation too - waiting since March 12th! The inconsistent timelines from different agents is so annoying. Have you tried calling first thing in the morning? I've had better luck getting through around 8 AM when they open. Also, someone mentioned earlier that you can ask specifically for a supervisor if it's been over 4 weeks - might be worth trying that approach. The tuition deadline stress is real though, I totally get it!
As a tax professional who coordinates VITA training at several universities, I want to add some perspective on timing and expectations. The Link & Learn system downtime between May-August is actually beneficial - it gives the IRS time to incorporate new tax law changes and update materials for the upcoming filing season. Here's my recommended timeline for accounting students: - July-August: Research local VITA sites and contact coordinators to express interest - September: Access should be restored to Link & Learn with updated materials - October-November: Complete certification training and testing - December-January: Complete any additional site-specific training - February-April: Active volunteer season One thing I haven't seen mentioned is that many VITA sites prefer volunteers who can commit to the full season rather than just getting certified. When you contact sites, emphasize your commitment to volunteering through April, not just getting the certification. Also, consider pursuing the Advanced certification if you can - it opens up opportunities to prepare more complex returns and often leads to better networking opportunities with local CPAs and tax professionals who supervise VITA sites. The practical experience you'll gain is invaluable. I regularly have accounting firms contact me looking for students with VITA experience because they know these students have real-world tax prep skills, not just textbook knowledge.
This timeline is incredibly helpful! I've been so focused on just getting certified that I hadn't really thought about the bigger picture of committing to a full volunteer season. Your point about emphasizing long-term commitment when contacting sites makes a lot of sense - they're probably looking for reliable volunteers, not just people trying to add a line to their resume. I'm definitely interested in pursuing the Advanced certification if possible. Could you elaborate on what makes a return "more complex" in the VITA context? I want to make sure I'm prepared for the additional training that might be required. The networking aspect you mentioned is really appealing too. I hadn't considered that local CPAs and tax professionals might be involved in supervising VITA sites. That could be a great way to make professional connections while gaining experience. Thanks for sharing this professional perspective - it's giving me a much more strategic approach to the whole process!
As a former VITA volunteer who struggled with the same certification access issues, I completely understand your frustration! The system downtime is definitely real and poorly communicated to newcomers. Here's what finally worked for me: I contacted my university's Student Accounting Society, and they had a direct connection with a local VITA coordinator who was able to provide alternative access to training materials while the main system was down. Many accounting programs have these partnerships but don't always advertise them well. Also, if you're determined to get started right away, consider reaching out to local H&R Block or Jackson Hewitt offices. While not the same as VITA, many offer free training programs during their hiring seasons (usually starting in October) that can give you similar hands-on tax prep experience. Some of my classmates used this route to gain practical skills while waiting for VITA certification to become available. The key is to start building those professional relationships now, even while you're waiting for the technical issues to resolve. The connections you make often end up being more valuable than the certification itself. Don't give up - the practical experience really does set you apart in interviews!
This is really smart advice about exploring alternative training options! I hadn't thought about reaching out to commercial tax prep companies as a way to gain experience while waiting for VITA access. That could actually be a great backup plan, especially since their hiring/training seasons seem to align better with when the VITA system comes back online. Your point about the Student Accounting Society connections is spot-on too. I just realized I haven't even checked if our school has one of those organizations. It sounds like they might have insider knowledge about local partnerships that could bypass some of these technical headaches. I really appreciate the perspective about relationships being more valuable than the certification itself. That's helping me reframe this whole situation as an opportunity to start networking rather than just a frustrating technical obstacle. Thanks for sharing what worked for you - it's giving me several new avenues to pursue!
Thanks for this comprehensive breakdown! As someone who got burned by unexpected fees last year, I really appreciate you taking the time to explain how SBTPG works. One thing I'd emphasize for anyone reading this - really pay attention during the filing process when you're choosing how to pay your tax prep fees. The "pay from refund" option can seem convenient, but between the tax prep fees and the additional refund transfer fees, you can end up paying significantly more than if you just paid upfront. Last year I chose the refund transfer option with TaxAct because I didn't want to pay $79 immediately, but ended up paying $79 + $39 in processing fees = $118 total. This year I just paid the prep fees upfront with my credit card and my refund came directly from the IRS about a week faster. The math doesn't always work out in favor of the convenience, especially if you're on a tight budget and every dollar of that refund matters. But at least now people can make an informed decision instead of being surprised like I was!
This is exactly the kind of breakdown I wish I had seen before filing! I made the same mistake - chose the "pay from refund" option thinking it was just more convenient, but didn't realize there would be an additional processing fee on top of the tax prep fee. Your math really puts it in perspective. I used H&R Block online and ended up paying $89 for tax prep + $44 refund transfer fee = $133 total, when I could have just paid the $89 upfront. That extra $44 could have gone toward my emergency fund instead. I think a lot of people (myself included) see that "pay from refund" option and think it's basically a free short-term loan, but it's really more like a convenience fee that can add up to a significant percentage of your total tax prep costs. Definitely paying upfront next year - lesson learned!
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I work in tax preparation and see confusion about SBTPG every single year. One thing I always tell my clients is to carefully read through ALL the fee disclosures before hitting "submit" on their return. The refund transfer service can definitely be convenient if you don't have the cash upfront for tax prep fees, but it's important to understand the total cost. What I've noticed is that many people focus on the advertised price of the tax software ($39, $59, etc.) but don't factor in that additional $35-45 refund transfer fee. For folks who are tech-savvy and have relatively simple returns, consider using the IRS Free File program at https://www.irs.gov/filing/free-file-do-your-federal-taxes-for-free - it's completely free for people under certain income thresholds and your refund comes directly from the IRS with no third-party processors involved. Also, if you do use SBTPG and run into issues, definitely document everything. Keep screenshots of your taxpayer portal, save confirmation numbers, and note the dates and times of any phone calls. This makes resolving problems much faster if something goes wrong with your refund.
This is such great advice! I wish I had known about the IRS Free File program before I paid for tax software this year. I definitely fall under the income threshold and my return is pretty straightforward - just W2 income and standard deduction. One question about documenting everything with SBTPG - should I be taking screenshots of the taxpayer portal even if everything seems to be going smoothly? Or just if there's a problem? I'm tracking my refund right now and it shows "processing" but I'm wondering if I should be saving proof of the current status just in case something goes wrong later. Also, do you know if there's a way to avoid SBTPG entirely if you're using paid tax software but want to pay the fees upfront? Some of the software seems to push you toward the refund transfer option pretty heavily during the filing process.
LordCommander
This is such a fascinating intersection of tax law and mental health issues! As someone new to this community, I've been following this discussion with great interest since I'm currently dealing with a similar situation with my elderly father who has early-stage Alzheimer's. What strikes me most about this case study is how the legal framework seems to have provisions for these situations, but the practical implementation requires such careful documentation and procedure. The distinction everyone's made between having medical documentation versus having actual legal authority is really important. One thing I'm curious about - and maybe this could help with the case study analysis - is whether there are any statistics on how often the IRS actually accepts joint returns filed under these circumstances with proper documentation but without formal guardianship? It seems like the theoretical legal framework exists (IRC Section 6013(a)(3), Revenue Procedure 2013-34), but I wonder how it plays out in practice. Also, for anyone who's been through this process, how long does it typically take to establish guardianship? In our situation, the filing deadline is approaching and the legal process seems like it could take months. The information about interim options while pursuing formal legal authority has been really valuable. Thanks to everyone who's shared their expertise and real-world experiences - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these complex situations!
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashimi
ā¢Welcome to the community! Your situation with your father sounds really challenging, and I'm sorry you're dealing with this during an already difficult time. Regarding statistics on IRS acceptance rates for these situations, I don't think the IRS publishes specific data on joint returns filed under mental incapacity provisions. From what I've observed in practice, the key seems to be having extremely thorough documentation and following the procedures exactly as outlined in the revenue procedures. For guardianship timing, it varies significantly by state, but you're right that it often takes 2-6 months depending on the jurisdiction and court schedules. Some states have expedited procedures for emergency situations, which might be worth exploring if you're facing an immediate filing deadline. One interim option that hasn't been mentioned much in this thread is filing for an extension (Form 4868) to buy time while pursuing guardianship. This gives you until October to file the actual return while the legal process moves forward. You'd still need to estimate and pay any taxes owed by the original deadline, but it removes the pressure of having to resolve the signature issue immediately. Also consider reaching out to your local Area Agency on Aging - they often have resources and guidance for families navigating these exact situations and may know attorneys who specialize in expedited guardianship cases. Good luck with everything, and don't hesitate to keep asking questions here!
0 coins
NebulaNinja
This discussion has been incredibly thorough and helpful! As someone new to this community, I wanted to add a perspective from working at a nonprofit that assists families with eldercare legal issues. One thing I'd emphasize for the case study is the importance of understanding state law variations. While the IRC sections and revenue procedures provide the federal framework, some states have different requirements for establishing guardianship or conservatorship, and these can affect the timeline and documentation needed for tax purposes. Also, I've seen families benefit from consulting with both a tax professional AND an elder law attorney simultaneously rather than sequentially. The elder law attorney can expedite the guardianship process while the tax professional prepares the documentation package for the IRS. This parallel approach often saves time and ensures consistency between the legal documents and tax filings. For Jamal's case study analysis, it might be worth noting that this situation highlights a gap in the system - there are legitimate circumstances where people need to file jointly for financial reasons, but the legal processes to establish proper authority can take longer than tax deadlines allow. The IRS provisions seem designed to bridge this gap, but they require very careful execution. One last practical note: if the husband in the scenario proceeds with filing jointly using the medical documentation route, he should be prepared for potential IRS inquiries and have all supporting documents organized and readily available. The IRS may request additional information or clarification, so having everything documented from the start is crucial.
0 coins
Edwards Hugo
ā¢This is such valuable insight about the state law variations! As someone just starting to navigate this area, I hadn't fully considered how the intersection between federal tax requirements and state guardianship laws could create additional complexity. The parallel approach you mentioned - working with both a tax professional and elder law attorney simultaneously - seems like it could save families a lot of stress and potentially costly mistakes. I imagine the coordination between the two professionals also helps ensure that the legal documents and tax filings are consistent from the start, rather than having to backtrack later. Your point about the gap in the system is really thoughtful too. It seems like there's this catch-22 where families need to maintain joint filing status for financial reasons, but the legal system moves slower than tax deadlines. The IRS provisions do seem designed to address this, but as everyone has emphasized throughout this thread, the documentation requirements are so specific and thorough. One question: in your experience with families going through this process, how often do they end up facing IRS inquiries even when they follow all the proper procedures? And when inquiries do happen, what types of additional documentation does the IRS typically request beyond what was originally submitted with the return? Thanks for adding this practical perspective - it's exactly the kind of real-world context that helps make sense of all the legal framework we've been discussing!
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
ā¢Great question about IRS inquiry rates! In my experience working with families, I'd say about 30-40% of cases where joint returns are filed under these mental incapacity provisions do receive some form of IRS follow-up, but it's usually just requests for clarification rather than full audits. The most common additional documentation requests I've seen include: updated medical records if there's a significant time gap between the original diagnosis and filing date, proof of the historical joint filing pattern (they sometimes want 3-5 years of prior returns), and occasionally a more detailed letter from the treating physician specifically addressing the spouse's capacity to understand tax obligations. Interestingly, the IRS sometimes also requests documentation of the couple's financial interdependence - things like joint bank accounts, shared assets, or evidence that filing separately would create genuine financial hardship. They want to ensure this isn't just a convenience filing but reflects the actual financial reality of the marriage. One thing that's helped families I've worked with is creating what we call a "master documentation file" from the beginning - copies of all medical records, previous tax returns, marriage certificate, financial account statements, and any legal documents. Having everything organized and easily accessible makes responding to IRS inquiries much smoother. The key is being proactive with documentation rather than reactive. Most inquiries get resolved quickly when families have comprehensive records ready to go.
0 coins