IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

RaΓΊl Mora

β€’

Does anyone know if you need to file Form 8938 (Foreign Financial Assets) for PTPs like UCO? My accountant is saying that because some of the underlying assets in the partnership might be foreign, I might have an FBAR obligation, but that doesn't sound right to me.

0 coins

Your accountant is mistaken. UCO is a domestic PTP traded on US exchanges. You only need to file Form 8938 or FBAR for financial assets held outside the US. The fact that UCO might invest in commodities or futures contracts with international exposure doesn't make it a foreign financial asset for FBAR or 8938 purposes. This is a common misconception. You only need to report on those forms if YOU directly hold the foreign assets or accounts. Since you're just holding the PTP units which are domestic securities, there's no FBAR or 8938 requirement here.

0 coins

PixelWarrior

β€’

I went through this exact same situation with UCO! The key thing to understand is that you're NOT getting double-taxed, but the reporting can definitely be confusing. Here's what's happening: The Schedule K-1 shows your share of the partnership's income/loss for the year, which you must report regardless of whether you sold shares. When you do sell, you need to adjust your cost basis by adding all the K-1 income you've already paid taxes on (and subtracting any distributions received). For your 2022 sale, you'll report both the K-1 income AND the sale on Schedule D/Form 8949, but use your adjusted basis. So if you bought UCO at $20/share, had $5 of K-1 income over the years, and received $2 in distributions, your adjusted basis would be $23/share ($20 + $5 - $2). Make sure to keep all your K-1s from previous years - you'll need them to calculate the proper adjusted basis. The "higher revenue" on your K-1s compared to your brokerage gains is normal because K-1s show the partnership's actual business income, not just price appreciation.

0 coins

Kelsey Chin

β€’

This is exactly the explanation I needed! Thank you for breaking down the adjusted basis calculation so clearly. I was getting really worried about double taxation, but now I understand that the K-1 income and the sale proceeds are different things entirely. One quick follow-up question - do you happen to know if there's a specific IRS form or worksheet for tracking these basis adjustments over multiple years? I'm worried about making calculation errors when I have K-1s spanning several years. Want to make sure I'm documenting everything properly for the IRS.

0 coins

Freya Ross

β€’

I'm so sorry you're going through this - the combination of medical bills and an indefinitely delayed refund is incredibly stressful. I went through something very similar last year and wanted to share what finally worked for me. After my 60-day period expired with no updates, I called the IRS using the early morning strategy others mentioned (7 AM sharp). The key thing I learned is to specifically ask for a "manual refund trace" rather than just asking about your refund status. This is different from a regular case trace and actually requires them to physically locate your return in their system and provide you with the specific reason for the delay. When I did this, I discovered my return had been flagged because I had moved between tax years and they needed to verify my address change, even though I had filed a change of address form months earlier. The agent was able to clear this immediately once she saw the documentation in their system. The whole process took about 2.5 hours on hold, but once connected, the issue was resolved in 15 minutes and I had my refund deposited within 6 business days. For your medical bills situation, definitely reach out to the billing departments and explain you're waiting on a delayed federal tax refund. Most healthcare providers are familiar with IRS delays this year and many will put your account on hold or set up a payment plan without penalty if you can provide them with documentation of your pending refund (like a copy of your 60-day letter). Don't lose hope - your money is there, it's just stuck in bureaucratic quicksand. The squeaky wheel really does get the grease with the IRS.

0 coins

Sean Kelly

β€’

This is such valuable information about requesting a "manual refund trace" specifically! I had no idea there was a difference between that and a regular case trace. The address change issue you mentioned is particularly interesting - it makes me wonder how many of these delays are caused by seemingly minor administrative flags that could be cleared quickly if the right person just looked at them. I'm definitely going to try your approach when I call on Monday. Did the agent give you any indication of how common address-related flags are, or what other types of simple issues tend to cause these extended delays? I'm trying to mentally prepare for what I might hear when I finally get through to someone. The advice about contacting medical billing departments is really practical too. I think I've been so focused on getting the IRS situation resolved that I hadn't considered being proactive with the providers. Thank you for sharing such a detailed success story - it gives me hope that there might be a relatively simple solution once I can actually talk to the right person!

0 coins

I'm really sorry you're dealing with this stress, especially with medical bills adding financial pressure. This exact scenario happened to my neighbor last year - 60-day letter in February, nothing until May. What finally broke the logjam for her was calling the IRS and specifically mentioning "financial hardship" due to medical expenses. The IRS has expedited processing procedures for taxpayers facing financial hardship, and medical bills absolutely qualify. When you call (definitely try the 7 AM strategy everyone's mentioned), tell them you're experiencing financial hardship due to medical expenses and that you need an expedited review of your return. Ask them to flag your account for "hardship consideration" - this can move your return to a priority queue. Also, keep detailed records of all your medical bills and payment due dates. If you need to escalate to the Taxpayer Advocate Service later, having documentation of the financial impact will strengthen your case significantly. The transparency issue is maddening - it's like they expect us to just trust that everything will work out eventually while we're struggling financially. But don't give up! Your refund is sitting there waiting to be processed, and advocating for yourself with the hardship angle might be the key to getting it moved along faster. Hang in there - medical emergencies are stressful enough without the IRS adding to it!

0 coins

is it weird that my accountant just puts a plug number on line 5 to make line 8 match schedule k line 18? he says "everyone does it that way" but it seems kinda sketchy to me...

0 coins

oh crap, seriously? he's been doing this for 3 years on my returns. should i be worried about getting audited? now im freaking out.

0 coins

Liam O'Sullivan

β€’

I'd definitely be concerned about this practice. While it might not automatically trigger an audit, if the IRS does examine your return, they'll expect to see legitimate book-to-tax differences supporting each line of Schedule M-1. You might want to request copies of your prior returns and ask your accountant to provide detailed workpapers showing exactly what items make up those "plug" amounts. If he can't provide specific documentation, consider having another CPA review your filings. The IRS has been increasing S-corp audit activity, and Schedule M-1 reconciliations are often scrutinized. At minimum, going forward, make sure every adjustment on Schedule M-1 is properly documented and represents actual identifiable differences between your book and tax treatment.

0 coins

Victoria Scott

β€’

I've been doing S-corp returns for small businesses for over 15 years, and Schedule M-1 reconciliation is definitely one of the most confusing areas for new filers. Here's my step-by-step approach that might help: 1. Start with your book income (line 1) 2. Add back any federal income tax expense you recorded on books (line 2) - S-corps don't pay entity-level tax 3. Add excess capital losses and charitable contributions that exceeded limits (line 3) 4. This gives you line 4 - your adjusted book income Then for deductions not on books: 5. Add non-deductible expenses like 50% of meals, penalties, etc. (line 5) 6. Add income that's on your tax return but not your books (line 6) 7. Add other deductions on return not on books (line 7) Finally: Line 4 minus line 7 should exactly equal Schedule K line 18. If they don't match, work backwards - there's always a specific reason. Don't ever use "plug" numbers to force a balance. Each adjustment should be traceable to actual transactions or differences in how items are treated for book vs. tax purposes. The key is being methodical and documenting every adjustment you make.

0 coins

StarStrider

β€’

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! As someone who's been struggling with their first S-corp filing, having a clear step-by-step process makes this so much less intimidating. I'm going to work through each line methodically like you suggested. One quick question - when you mention "excess capital losses" on line 3, are you referring to capital losses that exceed the $3,000 annual limit? And for charitable contributions, is that when they exceed the 10% of taxable income limitation? I want to make sure I'm identifying these correctly. Also, your point about never using plug numbers really resonates after reading about @Dmitry Kuznetsov s'situation above. It s'scary to think some preparers take shortcuts like that when accuracy is so important.

0 coins

Has anyone used TurboTax for filing S-Corp returns? I've used it for my personal taxes but not sure if it can handle the 1120-S and all the other forms for a single-member LLC with S-Corp election.

0 coins

Zane Gray

β€’

TurboTax doesn't handle Form 1120-S in their regular versions. You'd need TurboTax Business, which is their most expensive version, and even then it can be tricky for S-Corps. I've found that for S-Corps, even single-member ones, it's worth using either a dedicated tax pro or something like UltraTax or Lacerte, which are professional-grade software. The complexity with S-Corps comes with making sure you're handling the reasonable compensation requirements correctly and properly allocating between salary and distributions. Software helps, but understanding the concepts is more important.

0 coins

Thanks for the info! Sounds like TurboTax Business might be overkill for my small S-Corp. I might look into those other options you mentioned or maybe just hire a tax pro for the first year until I understand the process better. It's a lot more complicated than I thought going from a simple 1040 to all these business forms!

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation last year as a Canadian who moved to the US and set up a single-member LLC with S-Corp election! The learning curve is definitely steep, but you're asking the right questions. One thing I wish someone had told me earlier: make sure you're keeping detailed records of ALL business expenses from day one. With an S-Corp election, the IRS scrutinizes the separation between business and personal expenses much more carefully than with a regular LLC. This includes things like your home office, business meals, equipment, software subscriptions, etc. Also, since you mentioned you have a client in California, be aware that California has some unique rules for LLCs doing business in the state. You might need to register as a foreign LLC in California and pay their annual $800 LLC fee, depending on how much business activity you're conducting there. It's worth checking with the California Secretary of State or a tax professional about this. The good news is that with only $13,500 in revenue, your situation is relatively straightforward compared to higher-earning S-Corps. Just make sure you get everything filed correctly this first year to establish good habits going forward!

0 coins

As a financial advisor who specializes in education funding, I want to add some perspective on the long-term retirement impact that several people have touched on. The rule of thumb I use with clients is that every dollar withdrawn from retirement accounts in your 40s costs roughly 3-4 dollars in retirement purchasing power (assuming 7% average returns over 20+ years). So Chad's potential $30K withdrawal could indeed cost him $90K-$120K in today's purchasing power at retirement. **However**, there's also value in considering the "return on investment" of private education. While we can't put a precise dollar figure on it, quality education often leads to better college prospects, scholarships, and career outcomes for kids. Sometimes the long-term benefit to the family's overall financial picture justifies short-term retirement account sacrifices. **My recommendation for Chad's situation:** 1. First, exhaust all other options - scholarships, 529s if available, education loans at current low rates 2. If you must use Roth funds, limit it to contributions only and spread across multiple years 3. Consider a "hybrid" approach: maybe one child in private school initially while you build other funding sources 4. Set a firm limit on retirement withdrawals - perhaps no more than 10-15% of your current Roth balance The key is making this decision intentionally rather than reactively. Get the analysis done, understand all your options, and make sure both parents are aligned on the trade-offs involved. Anyone else have experience with setting these kinds of family financial boundaries around education expenses?

0 coins

Alana Willis

β€’

This is such a thoughtful analysis, Zainab! Your point about the 3-4x multiplier really puts the retirement impact into perspective. I'm actually facing a similar decision with my daughter starting her junior year, and seeing those numbers spelled out so clearly is both helpful and sobering. The "hybrid" approach you mentioned is something I hadn't considered - maybe starting with one child could be a way to test the financial waters while keeping some flexibility. It might also give families time to see how much the private school experience is actually benefiting their kids before committing fully. I'm curious about your experience with clients who've made these trade-offs. Do you typically see families who prioritize education funding over retirement savings end up regretting it later? Or do the benefits (better college outcomes, scholarships, career prospects) often justify the retirement account sacrifices? Also wondering if there are any creative financing strategies you've seen work well - like parents taking on part-time consulting work specifically earmarked for tuition, or families who've successfully negotiated with schools for payment plans or work-study arrangements. Setting firm boundaries makes so much sense. It's probably easy to get caught up in the emotional aspect of wanting the best for your kids and lose sight of the long-term financial picture.

0 coins

I've been following this discussion and wanted to share my experience as someone who went through this exact decision three years ago. We had twin boys starting private high school with similar costs, and I was 41 at the time with about $52K in my Roth IRA. After much deliberation (and consulting with a fee-only financial planner), we decided on a mixed approach that worked really well for us: **Year 1:** Used about $12K from Roth contributions plus took a small education loan for the remainder **Years 2-4:** Shifted to primarily education loans at low interest rates while preserving the rest of our retirement savings What made this work was getting very granular about our family's priorities and limits upfront. We set a hard cap of $15K total from retirement accounts over all four years, which forced us to get creative with other funding sources. The boys ended up getting partial merit scholarships in their sophomore year (something we hadn't anticipated), which dramatically changed our financial picture. One unexpected benefit was that having some education debt actually helped with FAFSA calculations for college - it showed financial need without the income bump that Roth withdrawals would have created. Looking back, I'm glad we were conservative with the retirement withdrawals. The education loans will be paid off in two more years, but that money we left in the Roth has continued growing tax-free. Sometimes the "pain" of monthly loan payments actually helps families stay more disciplined about education spending. For Chad: definitely get that detailed analysis done before deciding. Having the actual numbers in front of you makes it much easier to have honest conversations with your spouse and kids about what's sustainable for your family's long-term financial health.

0 coins

Owen Jenkins

β€’

This is exactly the kind of real-world experience I was hoping to see shared! Your mixed approach sounds incredibly smart - using just enough from retirement to get started while relying more heavily on education loans for the bulk of the costs. The point about merit scholarships is so important too. It's easy to get locked into thinking about the full sticker price for all four years, but kids can sometimes earn scholarships after demonstrating their abilities in the school environment. That's not something you can count on, but it's a nice reminder that the financial picture might improve over time. I'm really intrigued by your comment about education debt actually helping with FAFSA calculations. That's such a counterintuitive benefit that I never would have considered. It sounds like you really thought through all the second and third-order effects of different funding strategies. Setting that hard cap of $15K from retirement accounts was brilliant - it probably saved you from the temptation to keep dipping into those funds as other expenses came up. Did you find it difficult to stick to that limit when faced with the actual tuition bills, or did having it predetermined make it easier to find alternative solutions? Chad, this seems like a great model to consider - maybe you could set a similar cap that preserves most of your retirement savings while still giving you some flexibility for the transition period.

0 coins

Prev1...14711472147314741475...5644Next