IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Just wondering - have you considered scanning everything and e-filing instead? Even for prior year returns, there are options like TaxAct that still allow e-filing for previous tax years.

0 coins

Laura Lopez

•

E-filing doesn't work for everything. I tried to e-file an amended return last year and the software wouldn't allow it because of some specific schedules I had to include. Some prior year returns also can't be e-filed after a certain date.

0 coins

Another option to consider is USPS Priority Mail Express, which includes signature confirmation and insurance up to $100 automatically. It's more expensive than regular Priority Mail but gives you the same delivery proof as Certified Mail plus faster delivery (1-2 business days). I've used this for several large tax documents and the IRS processes them just like any other mailed return. The key thing is keeping your tracking number and receipt as proof of timely mailing - the IRS postmark deadline rule applies regardless of which mail service you use. One tip: if your return is that thick, consider using a small Priority Mail box instead of the flat rate envelope. Sometimes the boxes are actually cheaper for heavy documents and they definitely won't get damaged in transit like an overstuffed envelope might.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

One thing no one has mentioned yet - check if your father was making contributions to his pension while he was working. Federal employees often contribute after-tax dollars to their pension during their working years. When they retire and receive annuity payments, a portion of each payment is actually a return of those already-taxed contributions. That portion is tax-free, and this might be why box 2a shows "unknown" - because it depends on the individual's contribution history. The OPM should have sent your father (and now you as his executor) an annual statement showing how much of his annuity payment was taxable vs. non-taxable. Look for a statement from OPM at the beginning of the year or with his January payment.

0 coins

Raj Gupta

•

Thank you for this info! I'll check through his papers for an OPM statement. I do remember him mentioning that part of his pension was from money he put in while working. So if I find this statement, would it clearly show what portion was taxable? Would this resolve the "unknown" issue in box 2a?

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

Yes, if you find that OPM statement, it should specifically show what portion of his annuity payments was taxable and what portion was a return of his contributions (non-taxable). This statement is usually sent annually, and it would definitely resolve the "unknown" in box 2a. If you can't find the statement, you can contact OPM directly as the executor of his estate. They should be able to provide you with this information. Another option is to check his previous year's tax returns to see how he reported his annuity income - the taxable vs. non-taxable breakdown would be consistent from year to year unless something changed with his benefits.

0 coins

I just went through this exact situation with my mother's CSRS pension last year. The key thing to understand is that OPM annuities are fundamentally different from 401(k)s or IRAs - they're already structured as lifetime payments, so the concept of "required minimum distributions" doesn't apply in the traditional sense. Your father was already receiving his required distributions through the monthly annuity payments. The RMD rules are designed to force people to start taking money out of tax-deferred accounts, but your father's pension was already being distributed regularly. For the "unknown" in box 2a, this is very common with federal pensions. You'll need to determine what portion of his annuity was taxable based on his contribution history. If he retired after 1986, you'll likely use the simplified method outlined in IRS Publication 721. The calculation is based on his age when payments began and his total contributions to the retirement fund. I'd suggest bringing IRS Publication 721 to your tax appointment - it's specifically for federal retirement benefits and will help your tax preparer understand that these annuities operate under different rules than traditional retirement accounts.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detailed explanation I was looking for! Thank you for mentioning Publication 721 specifically - I had found references to it but wasn't sure if it applied to my father's situation. I'm going to look through his papers tonight to see if I can find any documentation about his contribution history. If he did contribute after-tax dollars during his working years, would that information typically be in his annual OPM statements or somewhere else? Also, when you mention the simplified method for someone who retired after 1986, is that something I can calculate myself or should I let the tax preparer handle it once I provide them with Publication 721?

0 coins

This entire discussion has been incredibly helpful! I came into this thread with the same frustration as the original poster - that 12% to 22% jump seemed like such a harsh penalty for middle-class earners trying to get ahead. What really opened my eyes was learning that this is actually a marginal system, not a cliff. I embarrassingly didn't fully understand that only the income ABOVE each threshold gets taxed at the higher rate. When I calculated my effective tax rate using the examples people shared, it was so much lower than that scary 22% number. The historical context was fascinating too - knowing that we used to have a 15% to 25% jump makes the current structure feel much more reasonable. It's amazing how tax policy that initially seemed punitive actually represents an improvement for families like mine. I'm definitely going to start being more strategic about my 401k contributions and look into maximizing my HSA. It's empowering to realize that understanding these brackets gives you tools to work with the system rather than just feeling victimized by it. Thanks to everyone who took the time to explain this so clearly!

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•

I'm so glad this thread has been as enlightening for you as it was for me! That "aha moment" when you realize the brackets work marginally rather than as cliffs is huge - I think so many people carry around unnecessary stress about taxes because of that misunderstanding. Your point about feeling "victimized" by the tax system really resonates. I used to dread tax season and felt like I was just at the mercy of whatever the government decided to take from my paycheck. But understanding how the brackets actually work, and more importantly, how you can work WITH them through strategic contributions, completely changed my relationship with taxes. The HSA strategy is particularly powerful if you're eligible - it's essentially a triple tax advantage (deductible going in, grows tax-free, and tax-free withdrawals for medical expenses). Combined with maximizing your 401k, you can really optimize which bracket your income falls into. It's refreshing to see so many people in this community sharing practical knowledge that actually helps people make better financial decisions. This is exactly the kind of real-world tax education that makes a difference!

0 coins

This discussion has been incredibly eye-opening! I've been in the 22% bracket for a couple years now and always felt like I was being punished for earning a decent living. The way everyone explained the marginal vs. effective tax rate concept finally made it click for me. What really helped was seeing the actual math - when I calculated my effective rate, it came out to around 17%, which is so much more manageable than that intimidating 22% figure I'd been fixated on. It's amazing how much psychological relief comes from understanding that you're not paying 22% on your entire income! I'm also motivated by all the strategic advice about 401k and HSA contributions. I've been contributing to my 401k but not maxing it out, and I completely overlooked the HSA option. Knowing that these contributions can help keep more of my income in the 12% bracket while also building my retirement and healthcare savings feels like discovering a financial life hack. Thanks to everyone who shared their knowledge - this thread should be required reading for anyone trying to understand how tax brackets actually work!

0 coins

I've been following this thread and wanted to add my own experience since I literally just went through this exact situation last month with my Q2 payment. Like you, I scheduled it for one day late through EFTPS and immediately started panicking about what kind of penalties I'd face. The reality ended up being much less dramatic than I feared! The interest came out to $2.73 on a $3,500 quarterly payment when I calculated it using the current federal short-term rate plus 3%. When I mentioned it to my accountant, she just laughed and said she sees this mistake probably 20-30 times per year - it's incredibly common. What really helped my peace of mind was realizing that the IRS penalty structure is designed to be proportional to both the amount owed AND the time it's late. One day late on a quarterly payment that you were already planning to pay? That's about as minor as tax penalties get. I'd definitely recommend just accepting the small interest charge rather than trying to make a corrective payment. The administrative headache of potentially having duplicate payments in the system isn't worth saving what amounts to less than a fancy coffee drink. Also, pro tip from my accountant: when you file next year, make sure to keep that EFTPS confirmation showing the 9/17 settlement date. Most tax software will ask for the actual payment dates of your quarterlies, and having that documentation makes everything smooth and automatic. You've got this - don't let a tiny administrative mistake stress you out!

0 coins

Nia Watson

•

Thank you so much for sharing your recent experience! It's incredibly reassuring to hear from someone who just went through this exact situation last month. The fact that your accountant sees this 20-30 times per year really drives home how common this mistake is - makes me feel much less foolish about it. Your point about the penalty structure being proportional is really helpful perspective. You're absolutely right that one day late on a payment I was already planning to make is pretty much the lowest-impact tax mistake you can make. I was definitely catastrophizing this in my head! I'm definitely keeping that EFTPS confirmation email with the 9/17 date. Good to know that having that documentation will make everything smooth when I file next year. At this point I think I've learned way more about estimated tax payment penalties than I ever wanted to know, but at least I'll be prepared! Really appreciate you taking the time to share your story. This whole thread has been exactly what I needed to stop stressing about this and just move on. Sometimes you need to hear from real people who've been there to realize you're making a mountain out of a molehill!

0 coins

I can definitely relate to that sinking feeling when you realize you've made a scheduling mistake with your estimated taxes! Reading through everyone's experiences here, it sounds like you're absolutely right about the penalty being minimal - just daily interest for that one day. I made a similar mistake a couple years ago with my Q4 payment and spent way too much time worrying about it. The actual interest ended up being around $4 on a $4,200 payment, and my tax software calculated it automatically when I filed. The IRS systems are really set up to handle these minor timing issues seamlessly. One thing that helped me was realizing that estimated tax payments are meant to help you stay current throughout the year, and being one day late doesn't change the fact that you're still being responsible about making your payments. The interest charge is really just a tiny administrative cost for the timing mishap. Definitely don't make a duplicate payment - the hassle of dealing with overpayments and refunds isn't worth avoiding such a small interest charge. Just keep that EFTPS confirmation for your records and let your tax software handle the calculation when you file in 2025. And yes, absolutely set up those calendar reminders! I now have mine set for a week before each deadline with a backup reminder three days prior. Haven't had any timing issues since implementing that system.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

I'm a tax professional and want to emphasize something important that hasn't been mentioned yet: you need to be very careful about how you handle the timing of reporting this income. Since we're already well into the tax year, you have some strategic decisions to make. If you've been paid regularly since February, you've likely already earned several thousand dollars in unreported income. The IRS expects quarterly estimated tax payments for income that doesn't have taxes withheld, so you may already be behind on required payments. This could trigger underpayment penalties even if you report everything correctly on your annual return. My recommendation: calculate your total earnings to date and consider making an estimated tax payment for Q3 (due September 15th) to minimize potential penalties. You can use Form 1040ES to calculate what you might owe. This shows good faith compliance even while you're sorting out the employment classification issues. Also, start setting aside about 25-30% of each paycheck going forward for taxes - this includes federal income tax, state income tax (if applicable), and the full 15.3% self-employment tax burden you'll likely face. It's better to overpay and get a refund than to be hit with a large tax bill plus penalties next April. Don't let your employer's poor decisions create a financial crisis for you. Take control of the situation now and protect yourself.

0 coins

Julian Paolo

•

This is incredibly helpful advice about the quarterly payments - I hadn't even considered that aspect! Since I've been earning about $1,800/month since February, I'm definitely looking at a significant amount of unreported income by now. Quick question on the estimated tax calculation - when using Form 1040ES, should I be calculating this as if I'm self-employed (and thus owing the full 15.3% self-employment tax), or should I try to estimate it based on the assumption that I'll eventually file Form 8919 and only owe the employee portion? I'm worried about either underpaying and getting penalties or overpaying and having to wait months for a refund. Also, is there any benefit to making the Q3 payment even if I'm planning to look for a new job soon? I'm wondering if it's worth the complexity if I might only be in this situation for another month or two.

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

For the Form 1040ES calculation, I'd recommend taking the conservative approach and calculating as if you'll owe the full self-employment tax initially. Here's why: if you overestimate and make payments based on the 15.3% SE tax rate, but then successfully use Form 8919 to shift the employer portion back to your boss, you'll get a refund of the overpayment with interest. If you underestimate and only pay the employee portion but end up stuck with the full SE tax burden, you'll face underpayment penalties plus interest on the shortfall. Regarding making the Q3 payment even if you're job hunting - absolutely yes, it's worth it. Even if you leave next month, you'll still have earned around $9,000+ in unreported income by September. The underpayment penalty is calculated based on how much tax you owed and when it should have been paid, regardless of your future employment status. A Q3 estimated payment shows the IRS you're making good faith efforts to stay compliant, which can help if you need to request penalty waivers later. Plus, job hunting can take longer than expected, and you don't want to compound the tax issues while you're trying to find new employment. Better to be overprepared than scrambling to catch up later.

0 coins

I'm really sorry you're dealing with this situation - it's incredibly stressful to discover that someone you trusted with your employment has been handling things improperly. The good news is that you've caught this relatively early and there are clear steps you can take to protect yourself. First, please don't blame yourself for this. You filled out what you thought were proper tax forms and had every reason to believe your employer was handling things correctly. The fact that you're concerned about compliance now shows you're acting in good faith. Here's what I'd prioritize: Start documenting everything immediately - take photos of your work schedules, keep records of all payments received (bank deposits, cash, etc.), and save any text messages or emails about work. This documentation will be crucial regardless of which path you choose. For immediate tax compliance, you'll need to report this income on your return. Based on the other comments, Form 8919 seems like the best approach to avoid paying both halves of employment taxes. You should also seriously consider making estimated tax payments going forward to avoid penalties. Regarding your job situation - I know you need the income, but any employer willing to casually mention tax evasion is likely cutting corners in other areas too. Start looking for other opportunities while you handle the tax issues. You deserve an employer who follows the law and protects their employees properly. You can absolutely get through this, just take it one step at a time and prioritize protecting yourself legally and financially.

0 coins

Emma Bianchi

•

This is really reassuring advice, thank you. The documentation point is so important - I've already started taking screenshots of my work schedule that she posts in our group chat and keeping a spreadsheet of all my payments. One thing that's been bothering me is that she mentioned "not needing to worry about reporting this income" so casually, like it was just a normal business practice. It makes me wonder how many other employees she might be doing this to, and whether this is something I should consider reporting to protect other workers too. I'm definitely going to start job searching more seriously. You're right that if she's this casual about tax violations, there are probably other issues I haven't discovered yet. Better to get out before I find myself in an even worse situation. @fc329fc715f8 Do you happen to know if there's any protection for employees who report these kinds of violations? I'm worried about retaliation if she finds out I'm taking steps to comply with tax laws properly.

0 coins

Prev1...14511452145314541455...5643Next