


Ask the community...
has anyone actually gotten a refund after fixing this error? I made the exact same mistake but Im worried if I call the IRS theyre just going to audit me or something. my additional medicare tax was like $1,300 and thats exactly what my refund was short. so frustrating!!!
Yes! I had the same issue last year (put the 8959 withholding on line 25c instead of 26). After I called and explained, they adjusted my refund and I got the correct amount about 3 weeks later. No audit or anything scary. Just tell them you misunderstood the form instructions.
I had this EXACT same problem last year! Put my Additional Medicare Tax withholding on line 25c instead of line 26 and the IRS adjusted my refund down by that exact amount. It's such a common mistake because the Form 8959 instructions aren't super clear about where the withholding amount goes on the 1040. The good news is that once you understand what happened, it's usually fixable. Like others mentioned, the withholding from Form 8959 line 24 should go on line 26 with your other federal tax withholding, not on line 25c. The IRS computer system catches this and moves it to the correct line, which is why your refund calculation changed. If you haven't heard back from them yet with a correction notice, you might want to call and explain that you misreported the withholding location. Most agents understand this is a common filing error and can help you get it sorted out. Don't stress too much - you're definitely not the first person to make this mistake!
Thank you for sharing your experience! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same thing. I was getting so worried that I had done something seriously wrong, but it sounds like this is just a common filing error that happens because the instructions could be clearer. Did you have to file an amended return or did calling the IRS and explaining the mistake take care of everything? I'm hoping I can just call them and get it resolved without having to do a bunch of additional paperwork.
I work as a tax preparer and see this exact issue constantly during tax season! Your HR person's refusal to accept the current W-4 is actually creating a compliance problem for your employer. The IRS phased out the old allowances system completely in 2020 - it's not just "confusing," it's literally incompatible with current tax law. What many people don't realize is that the new W-4 was specifically designed to work with the post-2017 tax code changes. For families like yours (married with multiple children claiming child tax credits), the old allowances system will almost certainly miscalculate your withholding because it can't properly account for the doubled child tax credit amounts or the new standard deduction. I'd suggest printing out IRS Form W-4 instructions that explicitly state employers must accept the current form. You could also show her the withholding comparison - with three kids, you're probably looking at $200-400 per month in better cash flow instead of that massive refund you've been getting. Frame it as helping both of you avoid problems: "I want to make sure we're both protected by following current IRS procedures, and this will help me budget better throughout the year instead of getting such a large refund.
@Molly, this professional perspective is incredibly valuable! As someone who's new to understanding these tax changes, I had no idea that the old allowances system was literally incompatible with current tax law rather than just being "outdated." That's such an important distinction that could really help in conversations with HR departments who might not understand the technical reasons behind the change. Your point about the $200-400 monthly difference for families with three kids is eye-opening. I've been thinking about this from a "getting my withholding right" perspective, but you're absolutely right that it's really about cash flow management and family budgeting. Having that extra money available throughout the year instead of lending it to the government interest-free makes a huge practical difference. The framing you suggested - "helping both of us avoid problems by following current IRS procedures" - is perfect because it emphasizes protection and compliance without making anyone feel criticized. It's not about doing things differently just for the sake of change, but about following the actual requirements that are in place for good reasons. Thanks for sharing your tax preparer insights! It's really helpful to understand this from the perspective of someone who sees the real-world impact of these withholding miscalculations during tax season.
This is such a common issue, and you're absolutely right to push back on this! As someone who's helped several family members navigate similar situations with their HR departments, I can tell you that the collaborative approach really works best. What struck me about your situation is that you specifically mentioned getting "way too much back in refunds each year" - this is exactly the problem the new W-4 was designed to solve! With three kids and the child tax credit, the old allowances system literally cannot calculate accurate withholding for your family situation under current tax law. I'd recommend bringing a simple one-page summary showing what your current withholding situation looks like versus what it would be with the properly completed new form. When HR people can see the concrete difference - potentially hundreds of dollars per month in better cash flow for your family - it suddenly becomes much more compelling than just "following procedures." Since you have a good personal relationship, you could frame it as: "I really want to make sure we handle this correctly so neither of us has to worry about withholding accuracy issues later. I've done the research and would love to walk through it together so we're both confident in the numbers." The key is making it clear that you're trying to make both your lives easier, not more complicated. Good luck with the conversation!
I verified my Michigan state return on February 18th and got my refund exactly 3 weeks later on March 11th. I did the online verification where they asked me questions about previous addresses and account information - no documents needed to be uploaded. The whole verification took maybe 5 minutes, but then I had to wait for them to review everything. I'd suggest budgeting for the full 3-4 weeks they mention on their website, especially since we're getting into the busier part of tax season. You can track your status on the MI Treasury website, and they do update it pretty regularly. The money hit my direct deposit account the same day the website showed "refund issued.
This is really reassuring to hear! I'm new to Michigan and this is my first time dealing with their tax system. I was getting worried after reading some horror stories online about people waiting months, but it sounds like most people are getting their refunds within the timeframe they promise. Did you have to do anything special to set up the direct deposit, or does it automatically go to the same account info you provided when you filed? I want to make sure I don't accidentally delay things by having the wrong banking information on file.
I verified my Michigan state return on March 5th and received my refund on March 20th - so 15 days exactly. I did the online verification through michigan.gov/mytaxes where they asked questions about my previous addresses and some account information. The process was pretty straightforward and took about 10 minutes. What I found helpful was checking the status every few days rather than obsessing over it daily. The website updates are pretty reliable, and once it switched to "refund issued" the money was in my account within 1-2 business days. Based on what I'm seeing here, it looks like most people are getting their refunds within 2-3 weeks after verification, which is consistent with what Michigan Treasury advertises. I'd plan for 3 weeks to be safe, but you'll likely see it sooner.
One thing nobody has mentioned - there are significant differences between how attribution works for different TYPES of fringe benefits. Health insurance is handled one way, but company cars, education assistance, and group term life insurance might have different rules. For example, with health insurance, the S-Corp can still pay the premiums but they must be included in the W-2 as wages for anyone considered a 2% shareholder (including through attribution). But for something like an accountable plan for business expenses, the attribution rules apply differently. Might be worth looking at exactly which benefits you're trying to provide to make sure you're applying the right attribution rules for each specific benefit type.
This is a great discussion that really highlights how complex S-Corp attribution rules can be! I'm dealing with a similar situation in my family business and wanted to add one important consideration that might help clarify things. The key distinction here is that Section 318 attribution is automatic - it's not something you can opt out of or structure around easily. Once the attribution chain is established (father to son, then son to spouse), the daughter-in-law is treated as a 2% shareholder regardless of whether she actually owns any stock certificates. However, one thing to keep in mind is that the attribution only matters if it pushes someone over the 2% threshold. Since the father owns 100% in this case, any attribution will definitely exceed 2%, but in situations where the family member owns less, you might have different outcomes. Also worth noting - make sure to document everything properly. The IRS can be pretty strict about how fringe benefits are handled for attributed shareholders, so keeping good records of how premiums are paid and reported will save headaches later if there's ever an audit. Thanks for bringing up this topic - it's one of those areas where the rules seem straightforward but get complicated quickly in real family business situations!
Really appreciate you breaking this down so clearly! I've been struggling to understand why the attribution seems so "automatic" - it definitely feels like there should be some way to structure around it, but sounds like that's not really possible once the family relationships are in place. Quick question about your documentation point - what specific records would you recommend keeping? Just the premium payment records and W-2 reporting, or are there other things the IRS typically looks for during audits of family S-Corps? I'm trying to get our recordkeeping in order before we finalize how we handle benefits for the coming year. Better to be over-prepared than scrambling later!
Lincoln Ramiro
Has anyone used the cost segregation strategy for rental property renovations? I heard you can depreciate some components much faster than 27.5 years. My accountant mentioned it might be worth looking into for my fourplex renovation but wanted to charge me $3000 for a study.
0 coins
Lincoln Ramiro
ā¢Thanks for sharing your experience! My renovation was around $65k total, so not as large as yours. Do you think there's a dollar threshold where it makes sense? I'm trying to figure out if the $3000 study cost would be offset by the tax savings.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
ā¢For a $65k renovation, cost segregation could still make sense depending on what you renovated. Generally, you want the study cost to be less than 10-15% of the potential first-year tax savings. If you can accelerate depreciation on 40-50% of your renovation costs from 27.5 years down to 5-15 years, you might save $8-12k in taxes the first year (depending on your tax bracket). That would easily justify the $3k study cost. I'd ask your accountant for a rough estimate of potential savings before committing to the full study.
0 coins
Amara Adeyemi
One thing to keep in mind is that if you're planning to hold this rental property long-term, depreciation is almost always the better choice over trying to claim repairs. Even if some of your $23,000 in costs could arguably be classified as repairs, the IRS tends to be pretty strict about what qualifies - especially for extensive work like kitchen and bathroom remodels. Since you mentioned using a property management company and having good documentation, you're already ahead of the game. Make sure to separate your costs by category (appliances, flooring, fixtures, etc.) because as others mentioned, some items may qualify for accelerated depreciation schedules. Also consider that you're required to take depreciation whether you claim it or not - the IRS will assume you took it when you sell, so you might as well get the tax benefit now rather than miss out on deductions and still face recapture later.
0 coins
Chris Elmeda
ā¢This is really helpful advice, especially the point about being required to take depreciation whether you claim it or not! I had no idea the IRS would assume you took it anyway when you sell. That definitely makes the decision easier - why miss out on the current tax benefits if you're going to face the recapture regardless? I'm definitely going to separate my costs by category like you suggested. Do you happen to know if there's a specific form or worksheet that helps track these different depreciation schedules, or is it just a matter of keeping good records for each category?
0 coins