Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
For the student loan aspect - which I'm guessing is why y'all are filing separately - make sure you really run the numbers! Sometimes the tax benefits of filing jointly outweigh the student loan payment savings. My wife and I were in a similar boat (about 220k vs 85k incomes) and we found that we saved more overall by filing jointly and just paying the higher loan payment. Totally depends on how much debt, interest rates, and how close to forgiveness you are though.
Ethan Davis
ā¢This is great advice. We did the same calculation and found joint filing was better for us once we factored in the lost credits from filing separately. The Child and Dependent Care Credit alone (which you can't claim when filing separately) was worth more than 3 months of the higher student loan payments!
Avery Saint
Great question! As someone who's navigated this exact scenario, here are the key factors to consider: **Tax Credits:** With your income levels, you'll want to calculate who can still qualify for the Child Tax Credit. The phase-out begins at $200k for single/MFS filers, so your spouse at $98k would likely get the full $2,000 per child credit, while you might be partially or fully phased out. **Student Loan Impact:** This is huge! Whoever claims the kids will have a larger household size for IDR calculations, which typically means lower monthly payments. Given that your spouse is the one with student loans, having them claim the children could significantly reduce their monthly obligation. **Head of Household:** Since you lived together, neither of you can file as Head of Household, so you're both stuck with MFS rates. **My recommendation:** Have your spouse claim both children. They'll likely get better tax benefits due to income limits, AND it will help with the student loan payments by increasing their household size for IDR purposes. Definitely run the numbers both ways to be sure, but in most cases with your income split, the lower earner claiming dependents works out better overall when you factor in both tax savings and loan payment reductions.
Join the conversation
Has anyone considered the state tax implications? Each state handles entity transitions differently. In California, for example, using an old sole prop bank account for your corp can trigger a "successor liability" issue where your corp could be responsible for any unpaid taxes from the sole prop. On the flip side, in some states incorrectly attributing income to a corporation when it should be on the sole prop could trigger minimum corporate tax requirements you otherwise might have avoided.
This is a really complex situation that touches on several areas - entity separation, tax compliance, and banking regulations. From what I've seen in similar cases, the key is to act quickly to clean this up before it becomes a bigger problem. First, I'd strongly recommend getting that bank account ownership updated to your corporation ASAP. Most banks will let you do this with the right paperwork (corporate resolution, new signature cards, etc.). This eliminates the appearance that your sole prop is still operating. Second, you need to be very careful about how you're documenting any transfers between accounts. The IRS will want to see clear business purposes for any money movement between entities. If it looks like you're just using them interchangeably, that could jeopardize your corporate status. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet - make sure you're not accidentally triggering any state franchise tax or minimum tax requirements by keeping the sole prop "active" through bank activity. Some states consider any business banking activity as evidence the entity is still operating, which could create ongoing tax obligations you don't need. I'd also suggest talking to a CPA who specializes in entity transitions. They can help you figure out if you need to file any forms with the IRS to properly document the transfer of assets from your sole prop to the corporation. Getting this documented properly now could save you major headaches if you ever get audited.
Aidan Hudson
ā¢Great question about multi-state issues! Each state definitely handles this differently. Most states have their Secretary of State and Department of Revenue websites where you can find entity status requirements, but honestly the rules can be buried in regulations that aren't always clear. For a quick check, I'd start by looking up "[state name] dissolved entity banking activity" or "[state name] inactive business franchise tax" on each state's tax department website. Some states like Delaware and Nevada are pretty explicit about when banking activity keeps an entity "active" for tax purposes. If you can't find clear guidance online, calling the state tax departments is probably your best bet, but be prepared for potentially conflicting answers depending on who you talk to. You might also want to check with a multi-state tax specialist - they usually have experience with these nuances across different jurisdictions and can spot potential issues you might miss. The tricky part is that some states have "gotcha" rules where even minimal activity can trigger ongoing obligations, while others only care about actual business operations. Better to know now than get surprised later with back taxes and penalties!
CyberSiren
ā¢Great question! Most states publish their entity dissolution and inactive status rules on their Secretary of State or Department of Revenue websites. For franchise taxes specifically, I'd check each state's tax department website - they usually have FAQs about what constitutes "doing business" in their state. A few states I know off the top of my head: California considers any bank account activity as potential evidence of doing business, Texas looks at revenue generation regardless of the account used, and Delaware focuses more on whether you're actually conducting operations. But these rules change, so definitely verify current requirements. For multi-state situations, you might want to consider hiring a service that specializes in multi-state compliance - they can do the research across all your states and give you a comprehensive report. It's usually cheaper than dealing with unexpected tax bills later. The National Association of Secretaries of State website also has links to all state business filing offices if you want to research directly.
Join the conversation
KylieRose
22 Everyone's talking about documentation, but I want to emphasize HOW you present those documents matters too. Been through 2 audits in my life. For the first one, I just dumped everything I had on the auditor - total mess. They ended up disallowing several legit expenses because I couldn't clearly show how they related to my business. For the second audit, I created a simple spreadsheet that listed each item being questioned, with references to the specific supporting documents (which I numbered). Made the auditor's job way easier and I got a much better result. They actually thanked me for being organized!
KylieRose
ā¢1 That's really helpful advice! When you organized your documents the second time, did you group them by category (like all travel expenses together) or by date? And did you have to provide originals or were copies acceptable?
KylieRose
ā¢22 I grouped them by the categories on Schedule C - so all advertising expenses together, all office expenses together, etc. This matched how they appear on the tax form which made it easier for the auditor to reconcile. For your second question, copies are generally fine - I've never had to provide originals. I scanned everything and made a PDF file for each category, then also brought physical copies to the audit. The auditor actually seemed impressed with the digital organization and mainly reviewed those files. Just make sure the copies are clearly legible, especially for receipts that tend to fade.
KylieRose
5 Something nobody has mentioned yet - if you're being audited, consider getting professional help! I tried handling my first audit alone and it was a disaster. For my second one, I hired a tax attorney and the difference was night and day. The attorney knew exactly what the IRS was looking for, which arguments would work, and kept me from saying things that could have caused bigger problems. Yes, it costs money, but they saved me way more than their fee in the end.
KylieRose
ā¢13 Is an attorney better than a CPA for audit representation? I've heard mixed things. Also, what's a reasonable price range for either one? I'm trying to figure out if I can afford it.
Both CPAs and tax attorneys can represent you in an audit, but there are some key differences. CPAs are generally less expensive (usually $150-300/hour vs $300-500/hour for attorneys) and are great for straightforward audits involving documentation and calculation issues. Tax attorneys are better if you're facing potential fraud allegations or criminal issues, since they have attorney-client privilege protection that CPAs don't have. For most small business audits like yours, a CPA with audit experience is probably sufficient and more cost-effective. Some will even work on a flat fee basis for simple audits. Shop around and ask specifically about their audit representation experience - not all tax preparers are comfortable or skilled at handling IRS audits.
Join the conversation
3 Just to add - I've worked in tax preparation for years, and I want to emphasize that the IRS absolutely can tell the difference between an honest mistake and deliberate fraud. Remember that your employer sent a copy of that W-2 to the IRS already, so eventually their automated matching system would flag the discrepancy. But by filing an amended return before they contact you, you're demonstrating good faith. The IRS generally looks at patterns of behavior. A single forgotten W-2 that you correct voluntarily? Not a big deal. Repeatedly "forgetting" income or claiming false deductions year after year? That's when they start looking more carefully.
8 Is there a time limit on when the IRS would catch this on their own? Like if I forgot a W-2 from 2021, would they still find it?
3 The IRS typically processes information returns (like W-2s) and matches them against filed tax returns within 1-2 years, but they can go back up to 3 years routinely, and up to 6 years in some cases. For 2021 returns, they're definitely still matching those against information returns. When they find a discrepancy, they send a CP2000 notice (proposed tax adjustment), which will include the additional tax plus interest and possibly penalties. The penalties are typically higher if they catch it versus you correcting it voluntarily, which is why filing an amended return is usually the best approach.
18 There's a LOT of misinformation about going to jail for tax mistakes. To be clear: the IRS has to prove WILLFUL evasion to pursue criminal charges. Forgetting to include a W-2 is not going to meet that standard! I used to work at a tax resolution firm, and in 5 years I never saw a single case where someone went to jail for an honest mistake like this. The people who face criminal charges are the ones who set up elaborate schemes to hide millions, file totally fake returns, or consistently lie to IRS agents during an audit. File your amendment, pay what you can, and set up a payment plan for the rest. I promise you'll be fine.
11 This is really reassuring. I've been worried about a similar situation. What about penalties though? Are those automatic or can you get out of them?
Penalties aren't always automatic - you can often get them reduced or waived if you have reasonable cause. For first-time offenders who file an amended return voluntarily, the IRS is usually pretty lenient. When you file your 1040-X, include a letter explaining it was an honest mistake and that you discovered the error yourself. They have something called "first-time penalty abatement" that can eliminate penalties entirely if you have a clean compliance history. Even if you don't qualify for that, they'll often reduce penalties when you can show reasonable cause for the error.
Hunter Edmunds
Has anyone used TurboTax to handle this specific situation? I use TurboTax Premier and am wondering if it has a way to handle this properly.
0 coins
Ella Lewis
ā¢I used TurboTax last year for this exact scenario. In the "Other Income" section, I entered the full amount from the 1099-MISC first. Then I created a second entry also in "Other Income" but as a negative amount for the cost basis. I labeled it clearly as "Cost Basis for IBKR Prediction Contracts reported on 1099-MISC". TurboTax asked if I wanted to attach an explanation statement and I said yes. It worked fine and I didn't have any issues.
0 coins
Grace Thomas
I went through this exact same situation with IBKR prediction contracts last year and can confirm the Schedule 1 approach works perfectly. The key is being very clear in your documentation. I reported the full $23,000 on Schedule 1, Line 8i "Other Income" with the description "IBKR 1099-MISC Prediction Contract Proceeds." Then on the very next line, I entered -$22,350 with the description "Cost Basis Adjustment - IBKR Prediction Contracts per 1099-MISC Instructions." I also attached a one-page statement explaining that IBKR reports gross proceeds on 1099-MISC but doesn't account for cost basis, referencing their own documentation that instructs taxpayers to make this adjustment. No red flags, no audit, no problems. The IRS computers can easily see that you're reporting what matches the 1099 they received while properly calculating your actual taxable gain. Keep all your IBKR statements showing the initial purchase and final sale amounts. This is actually a very common issue with prediction market brokers, so the IRS is familiar with it.
0 coins