I'm also an F1 student. Last year I only had my W-2 and no 1042-S because I only worked off campus under CPT, no scholarships or anything. Sprintax worked fine but it kept asking me for a 1042-S i didnt have??

Great question about the 1042-S! As others have mentioned, you likely don't need it if you only have off-campus employment income (which should be on your W-2). The 1042-S is mainly for scholarship/fellowship income or treaty benefits. Since you're using Sprintax, it will guide you through this during the interview process. When it asks about scholarships, fellowships, or treaty benefits, just answer "No" if you don't have any. The software is pretty good at determining which forms you actually need based on your specific situation. One tip: make sure you have all your documents ready before starting Sprintax, including any state tax documents if you need to file state returns. The process is much smoother when you're not stopping to hunt for paperwork halfway through. You've got this - don't stress too much about the deadline, you still have time!

I'm dealing with almost the exact same situation! My spouse and I co-own a rental property that we inherited, and we've been getting conflicting advice about whether we need to form a partnership or can just handle it as co-owners. From what I've researched, the IRS Publication 541 specifically addresses this. It states that "a joint undertaking merely to share expenses does not create a partnership." Since you're just collecting rent and sharing expenses (not providing substantial services like property management beyond basic maintenance), you should qualify for simple co-ownership treatment. The approach that @MoonlightSonata described sounds solid - having one person report the full 1099-K income then deducting the co-owner's share as an expense. This way the numbers match exactly what the IRS receives from the platform, but each owner only pays tax on their actual share. One thing to consider: make sure you keep detailed records of how expenses are split and document your ownership agreement somewhere (even if it's just an informal written agreement between you and your sister). This will be helpful if the IRS ever has questions about the arrangement. Have you considered asking the rental platform if they can at least put both names on the account, even if the 1099-K can only go to one person? That might help establish the co-ownership paper trail.

I've been dealing with a similar situation for the past two years with my mother-in-law on a duplex we co-own. We started out really overthinking it and almost went the partnership route, but our tax preparer convinced us to keep it simple. What we ended up doing is exactly what several people have mentioned here - I receive the 1099-K since I handle most of the tenant communications, then report 100% of the rental income on my Schedule E. But then I take a line item deduction for "Co-owner's share of rental income" for exactly 50%. This nets me down to my actual 50% share while keeping the IRS matching system happy. My mother-in-law reports her 50% share on her Schedule E with a statement explaining she's reporting her portion of rental income from our co-owned property, referencing the full amount on the 1099-K that went to me. One tip that our preparer emphasized: be consistent every year. Don't switch who receives the 1099-K or change your reporting method, because that could trigger questions. We've stuck with this approach for two years now without any issues. The key insight for us was realizing that the IRS cares more about the total tax being paid correctly than about which specific person initially receives the 1099-K. As long as 100% of the income is being reported somewhere across both returns, and it's clearly documented, you should be fine.

Something no one's mentioned yet - make sure you're taking advantage of all your photography business deductions to lower your taxable income in the first place! Equipment, studio space (even home office), software subscriptions, website costs, travel to shoots, professional development courses, etc. The less profit you show, the less you'll owe in quarterly payments.

One thing that helped me when I was starting out - consider making your quarterly payments slightly higher than the minimum required if your cash flow allows it. I know it sounds counterintuitive when money is tight, but hear me out. If your business grows throughout the year (which hopefully it will!), you'll avoid underpayment penalties and won't get hit with a massive tax bill in April. Plus, any overpayment gets refunded or can be applied to next year's taxes. I learned this the hard way when my freelance income doubled mid-year and I suddenly owed way more than expected. The safe harbor rule (paying 100% of last year's tax or 110% if your AGI was over $150k) can be a lifesaver for new businesses with unpredictable income.

Has anyone actually tried telling the IRS they just don't have the money? Like what happens if you literally can't pay?

I went through something similar last year - owed about $11k in self-employment taxes and was frantically looking for ways to reduce it. Unfortunately, as others have mentioned, charitable donations won't help with your current tax debt since they're deductions, not credits, and they only apply to future tax years anyway. What helped me was actually going through all my business expenses with a fine-tooth comb to make sure I hadn't missed any legitimate deductions when I originally filed. Things like home office expenses, business meals, professional development courses, even subscriptions to industry publications - it all adds up. I ended up finding about $2,800 in deductions I had overlooked and filed an amended return. For the remaining balance, I set up a payment plan with the IRS. The monthly payment was much more manageable than trying to come up with the lump sum, and the penalties/interest weren't as bad as I expected. The key is to contact them before they start collection actions - they're actually pretty reasonable to work with if you're proactive about it.

This is actually a really common misunderstanding about wash sales. What matters isn't the lot numbers but the timing. Whenever you have a loss sale with a purchase of substantially identical securities within the 61-day window (30 days before/after), you have a potential wash sale. I had this exact situation last year with NVDA stock - sold some at a loss and had other shares purchased within the window. My accountant explained that the way the IRS applies the rule, you look at all purchases of the same security within the window, regardless of lot designation.

This is exactly the kind of complex wash sale scenario that trips up so many taxpayers! Based on your description, you're dealing with a partial wash sale situation. Here's what's happening: You sold 140 shares at a loss, but you only have 60 remaining shares from Lot 2 that were purchased within the wash sale window. The wash sale rule will apply, but only to the extent of the shares you still hold - so 60 shares worth of your loss will be disallowed and added to the cost basis of those remaining 60 shares. The math works out like this: - Loss on 60 shares: $1,800 (60 × $30) - this gets disallowed and added to basis - Loss on remaining 80 shares: $2,400 (80 × $30) - this should be deductible Your remaining 60 shares would have an adjusted basis of $125/share ($75 original + $30 disallowed loss per share). Make sure to double-check your 1099-B when it arrives - brokers sometimes miss these nuanced partial wash sale calculations, especially with same-day transactions. You may need to make adjustments on Form 8949 if your broker doesn't report it correctly. Keep detailed records of your calculation method in case the IRS has questions later!