IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Oliver Cheng

•

How long ago did you move? Does the IRS have any grace period for military relocations? My brother had a similar situation last year.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

For military members specifically, you should also contact the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) at 877-777-4778. They have special procedures for active duty personnel dealing with PCS moves and can often expedite address changes or intercept refunds before they're mailed to the wrong address. TAS is designed to help when normal IRS procedures aren't working fast enough for your situation. Also, make sure you're using the military mail forwarding system through your finance office - they sometimes have direct channels to update your tax information that civilian moves don't have access to.

0 coins

One more thing to consider for your Schedule OI question: your answer should align with any tax treaties that might apply between the US and your home country. Some treaties have specific provisions for dual-status taxpayers. For example, if you're claiming any treaty benefits on your return, your declared residency on Schedule OI becomes even more important as it establishes which treaty benefits you can claim. This is especially relevant if you have income types specifically covered by treaties (like certain investment income, pensions, etc.).

0 coins

Chris King

•

I thought tax treaties don't apply to US citizens, only to foreign nationals? This stuff is so confusing.

0 coins

Just wanted to add my experience as someone who went through this exact situation last year. For Schedule OI on your 1040NR, you should definitely only list your foreign country (Canada in your case), not both countries. The form is specifically asking about your foreign tax residency claim during the period covered by the 1040NR. What really helped me was understanding that even though you're a dual-status alien for the entire tax year, each form (1040 and 1040NR) covers a specific period. The Schedule OI attached to your 1040NR only relates to the non-resident portion of your year, so you're only declaring your foreign residency for that period. Also, make sure you're consistent across all your forms - if you claim Canadian residency on Schedule OI, that should align with any treaty benefits you might be claiming and your dual-status statement. The IRS looks for consistency across all these documents. One tip: keep detailed records of your exact residency change date and any supporting documentation (visa approvals, entry/exit stamps, etc.) in case the IRS has questions later. Dual-status returns do get more scrutiny than typical returns.

0 coins

How to interpret "Paid/adjusted in 2024, but for 2023" entries on my 1099-DIV form?

I'm going through my wife's 2023 1099-DIV and noticed several stocks have values in the "Paid/adjusted in 2024, but for 2023" column. This is confusing me. Looking closer, I see that for 2 stocks, they're basically canceling out ordinary dividends and reclassifying them as qualified dividends. But for 3 other stocks, only some of the ordinary dividends are being reclassified as qualified. Since qualified and ordinary dividends have different tax rates, I'm trying to figure out how they determined which dividends got reclassified. Here's an example: Stock B had $302.45 in 2023 dividends, initially all reported as ordinary dividends. But in 2024, they adjusted it by removing $180.27 from ordinary dividends and adding $201.50 as qualified dividends. In the transaction history, I see dividend payments of $201.96 in December, $1.45 in September, and $99.04 in June, totaling $302.45. But how do I determine if all, some, or none of the June payment is now considered qualified? I think I'm covered under safe harbor rules this year since I've paid at least 90% of current year's tax through withholding (calculated as even payments). But what about the future if I need to use the annualized method and figure out what's allocated to specific quarters to avoid penalties? Should I assume the adjustment applies entirely to Q4, meaning my tax liability was higher in previous quarters? Also, there's no specific date showing when foreign tax was paid on the form, which might explain why the amount removed from ordinary dividends ($180.27) doesn't match the amount added to qualified dividends ($201.50) for Stock B.

Has anyone else noticed that these dividend reclassifications seem to be happening more frequently in recent years? I swear I never had to deal with this before 2020, but now almost half my dividends get some kind of adjustment after year-end.

0 coins

It's definitely becoming more common. I think it's related to increased international investments and more complex corporate structures. My tax guy said companies are getting more careful about proper classification because the IRS has been focusing on this area more.

0 coins

That makes sense. I have noticed most of my reclassifications are from international stocks or more complex investments. I guess I should start planning for this every year and not be surprised when it happens. Seems like February is the new tax season instead of January since we have to wait for all these corrections!

0 coins

I've been dealing with this exact issue for the past few years and wanted to share what I learned from my tax preparer. The key thing to understand is that these "Paid/adjusted in 2024, but for 2023" entries represent corrections companies make after they've completed their year-end analysis. For your specific example with Stock B, the reason the ordinary dividend reduction ($180.27) doesn't match the qualified dividend increase ($201.50) is likely due to foreign tax withholding or other adjustments. When foreign taxes are withheld from dividends, the gross amount might qualify as a qualified dividend, but the net amount you received was reduced by the foreign withholding. Regarding your quarterly payment concerns - you're absolutely right to think about this. For future years, I recommend keeping a spreadsheet tracking when you receive dividend reclassifications. If they come in February or March (which is typical), you can document that you made your Q1 estimated payment based on the best information available at the time. The IRS generally won't penalize you for underpayment if you can show you used reasonable assumptions based on the information you had. Since most of these corrections favor taxpayers (moving dividends to the lower qualified rate), you're usually in good shape. One tip: if you're using tax software, make sure to enter the final corrected amounts from the 1099-DIV rather than trying to manually track each payment. The software will handle the proper reporting automatically.

0 coins

Has anyone mentioned Form 8824? If this distribution is part of a partnership dissolution or restructuring, you might need to report it as a like-kind exchange. I had a similar situation and my CPA insisted we needed this form.

0 coins

Form 8824 wouldn't apply here. That's for like-kind exchanges under Section 1031. A partnership distribution of property to a partner isn't a like-kind exchange - it's governed by the partnership distribution rules under Sections 731-737. Your CPA might've been confusing this with a different transaction.

0 coins

I've been through several partnership property distributions and want to emphasize something that often gets overlooked - make sure you're also considering the impact on the remaining partners' capital accounts and basis adjustments. When property gets distributed, the partnership needs to make corresponding adjustments to all partners' capital accounts under Section 704(b). If you have a Section 754 election in place (which many partnerships forget they have), you'll also need to make basis adjustments to the partnership's remaining assets under Section 734(b). For your Box 19 reporting, beyond what Giovanni mentioned about the basic disclosures, you should also confirm whether the partnership needs to report any Section 734(b) adjustments that affect the other partners. These adjustments can be complex but are crucial for maintaining proper basis tracking going forward. Also double-check your partnership agreement for any special allocation provisions that might affect how this distribution should be treated from a book vs. tax perspective. Sometimes the agreement has specific language about property distributions that can impact the reporting requirements.

0 coins

Qualified use vs. non-qualified use for main home: Sold property after 12 years ownership with 2-year rental period in between

I sold my house last year and I'm really confused about whether I need to deal with the "non-qualified use" rules for capital gains exclusion. Here's my situation: I bought my house in Chicago back in 2010, lived in it as my main home until 2018. Then I got a job offer in Dallas that was too good to pass up, so I moved and rented out my Chicago house for about 2 years (from May 2018 to June 2020). In 2020, I decided to move back to Chicago and lived in my house again from July 2020 until September 2022 when I sold it. So overall, I owned the place for 12+ years, lived in it for 10 years total, but had this 2-year rental period in the middle. My question is about the $250,000 capital gains exclusion. I thought I qualified for the full exclusion since I lived there for 2 of the last 5 years, but when I was talking to a tax preparer, they mentioned something about "non-qualified use" that might affect how much of my gain is taxable. But then they showed me their own training materials that seemed to contradict what they were saying. The materials said that "non-qualified use" means using your home as something other than your main residence after 2008, BUT it doesn't include periods AFTER using it as your main home. So do I have "non-qualified use" for those 2 years when I rented it out between living there myself? Do I need to calculate a partial exclusion? I made about $119,000 on the sale and I'm trying to figure out if all of that is tax-free or not. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Emma Wilson

•

I'm dealing with a similar situation and this thread has been incredibly helpful! I owned my home for 15 years, lived in it for the first 10 years, then rented it out for 3 years when I moved for work, and finally moved back in for the last 2 years before selling. Based on all the information shared here, especially the specific tax code reference in Section 121(b)(5)(C)(ii)(I), it sounds like my 3-year rental period wouldn't count as non-qualified use since I lived there first. This is such a relief because I was worried I'd have to pay capital gains on a portion of my $180,000 gain. The explanations about how this exception exists specifically for people who relocate for work or other reasons really makes sense. It's good to know the IRS recognizes that homeowners sometimes need flexibility without losing their tax benefits. Has anyone here actually filed their taxes using this interpretation and had it accepted without issues? I want to make sure I'm not missing anything before I finalize my return.

0 coins

Jamie Weeks

•

I have an issue with mixed answers too. My husband and I purchased a home in May 2009 that we lived in until July 2014. We then moved to another state and rented out the home until Feb 2022. We moved back into the home in May 2022 and finally sold the home in April 2025. I am confused as to is we have a non-qualified use since this took place after 2008 and we won't qualify for the full exclusion or if this qualifies as an exception since we lived in the property before and after the rental period. If it falls under the exception, then I believe I would only need to recapture the depreciation during the time of the rental period. Does anyone have clarification?

0 coins

Prev1...13261327132813291330...5645Next