IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Oscar O'Neil

โ€ข

Don't overthink this! I've been married 10+ years and here's my simple advice: if you want a bigger refund next year, put "Married filing jointly" and don't check the box in Step 2(c). If you're okay with possibly owing a bit at tax time but having bigger paychecks throughout the year, check the box. The old exemptions/allowances system was more confusing because you had to guess how many to claim. The new form is better but still not perfect.

0 coins

Sara Hellquiem

โ€ข

This is backwards advice. If you DON'T check the box when both spouses work, you'll likely UNDERWITHHOLD and OWE taxes. If you DO check the box, you'll likely withhold the correct amount or slightly overwithhold. Please don't spread misinformation.

0 coins

Mei Lin

โ€ข

Hey Victoria! Congrats on getting married! I totally understand the confusion - the W-4 changes a few years back made things different from what many of us learned when we first started working. Just to clarify what others have mentioned: the current federal W-4 (2020 and later) doesn't use "exemptions" anymore. If you're seeing that terminology, you might have an old form or be looking at your Pennsylvania state form (PA does still use some of the old language). For your situation as a newly married couple with two jobs, here's the simplest approach: 1. Both of you should select "Married filing jointly" in Step 1 2. In Step 2, since you have exactly two jobs total between you, check the box in option (c) - this tells the system to account for both incomes properly 3. Skip Steps 3 and 4 unless you have dependents or want to make adjustments 4. Sign and date The key difference from the old system: instead of claiming a number of allowances/exemptions, the new form directly accounts for your actual tax situation (marriage, multiple jobs, dependents, etc.). It's designed to be more accurate for situations like yours where both spouses work. Your coworker and dad both have points, but the goal should be accurate withholding rather than maximizing refunds or minimizing them. The new system helps achieve that better than the old one did!

0 coins

Cassandra Moon

โ€ข

This is such a clear explanation, thank you! I think I was definitely looking at an old form or maybe mixing up the federal and state forms. One quick follow-up question - when you say "check the box in option (c)" for Step 2, does that mean we both check it on our individual W-4s, or just one of us? And does it matter who submits their W-4 first to HR? I really appreciate everyone's help on this thread. Makes me feel a lot less overwhelmed about the whole thing!

0 coins

How to correctly complete Form 8621 for PFIC using mark-to-market election - need advice on calculation example

I've been researching PFICs because everyone warns how complicated reporting them on Form 8621 can be. But after reading through the requirements, I'm wondering if it's actually simpler than people make it out to be? Either I'm missing something crucial or maybe people just have more complex situations than my example. Before I spend money on expensive tax software, I wanted to work through a simple example to check my understanding. I'm looking at the Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL) as my example. I understand this qualifies as a PFIC because over 75% of its income is from passive sources. I also believe it counts as a "marketable stock" since it trades regularly on a qualified exchange according to ยง 1.1296-2(a)(1). Here's my purchase history for 2024: April 15: 8 shares at โ‚ฌ82.15 = โ‚ฌ657.20 August 3: 15 shares at โ‚ฌ84.65 = โ‚ฌ1,269.75 November 22: 12 shares at โ‚ฌ88.32 = โ‚ฌ1,059.84 On December 31, the fair market value was โ‚ฌ91.45 per share. I believe I only need to file one Form 8621 for this PFIC, not separate forms for each purchase. If I make the mark-to-market election (line 10a on Form 8621), my understanding is: - Fair market value at year-end: 35 shares ร— โ‚ฌ91.45 = โ‚ฌ3,200.75 - My adjusted basis in the stock (line 10b): โ‚ฌ657.20 + โ‚ฌ1,269.75 + โ‚ฌ1,059.84 = โ‚ฌ2,986.79 - Unrealized gain taxed as ordinary income: โ‚ฌ3,200.75 - โ‚ฌ2,986.79 = โ‚ฌ213.96 Is this calculation correct? Am I missing anything important about reporting PFICs with mark-to-market? Thanks for any help!

Sophia Clark

โ€ข

Your PFIC calculation looks solid! I've been through this exact process with several European ETFs, and your mark-to-market approach for VWRL is definitely the right choice. A few practical tips from my experience: **Documentation system**: Create a simple Excel file with tabs for each tax year. Include columns for transaction date, shares, EUR price, Treasury.gov exchange rate, and USD basis. This becomes your master file that carries forward annually and makes audit preparation much easier. **Exchange rate timing**: You're correct to use the specific purchase date rates for basis (April 15, August 3, November 22) and December 31 for your FMV calculation. I bookmark the Treasury.gov historical rates page and take screenshots immediately after each purchase - don't wait until tax season to hunt down historical rates. **Quarterly check-ins**: While not required, I recommend noting your position's FMV at each quarter-end. This helps anticipate your year-end tax liability and makes the final calculation feel less daunting when tax time arrives. **VWRL advantages**: You picked an excellent fund for mark-to-market reporting. It trades on multiple major exchanges with consistent pricing, has clear PFIC status, and reliable year-end valuations. Much simpler than some smaller European funds that can have pricing gaps around holidays. Your โ‚ฌ213.96 unrealized gain methodology is spot-on - just remember to convert everything to USD using the appropriate exchange rates. The mark-to-market election will save you from the nightmare of excess distribution calculations under Section 1291, making this much more manageable than PFIC reporting horror stories suggest!

0 coins

Freya Larsen

โ€ข

This has been such an educational thread! As someone completely new to PFIC reporting, I really appreciate how everyone has broken down what initially seemed like an impossibly complex topic into manageable steps. Sophia, your suggestion about quarterly check-ins is brilliant - I can see how tracking the position throughout the year would help with tax planning and cash flow management, especially since mark-to-market gains get taxed as ordinary income rather than capital gains rates. Reading through Diego's example and all the responses has given me confidence that PFIC reporting with the mark-to-market election really is doable for individual investors, as long as you stay organized with documentation and choose appropriate funds like VWRL. One thing that strikes me is how important the record-keeping discipline is from day one. It seems like the people who struggle most with PFIC reporting are those who try to reconstruct everything at tax time rather than maintaining good records throughout the year. The spreadsheet system several people have mentioned sounds like a small investment in time that pays huge dividends during tax season. Thanks to everyone who contributed their experience and expertise to this discussion - this thread should be required reading for anyone considering international ETF investments!

0 coins

Ethan Moore

โ€ข

This is exactly the kind of practical walkthrough that makes PFIC reporting less intimidating! Your calculation approach for the mark-to-market election looks correct, and VWRL is an excellent choice for this method since it's highly liquid and trades on qualified exchanges. A few additional considerations based on my experience with international ETF reporting: **State tax implications**: Even though you're focused on federal Form 8621, check how your state treats mark-to-market PFIC income. Most states follow federal treatment, but there can be variations that affect your overall tax liability. **Dividend reinvestment tracking**: If VWRL automatically reinvests dividends during the year, treat each reinvestment as a separate purchase transaction. You'll need to track the date, shares acquired, EUR price, and exchange rate for each reinvestment to properly calculate your adjusted basis. **Annual basis reset**: Remember that your starting basis for 2025 will be the December 31, 2024 FMV (โ‚ฌ91.45 per share converted to USD at year-end rates). This annual reset is actually one of the benefits of mark-to-market - it keeps your records clean going forward. **Professional software consideration**: While your example is straightforward, if you plan to make regular investments or hold multiple PFICs, consider dedicated tax software that handles currency conversions and basis tracking automatically. The time savings can be significant as your portfolio grows. Your systematic approach of working through the calculation before filing is smart. Many investors get overwhelmed by PFIC horror stories, but as you've demonstrated, the mark-to-market election makes reporting quite manageable for liquid ETFs!

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

โ€ข

Just wanted to share my experience as someone who went through this exact situation last year. I panicked when I couldn't find my 1095-A form anywhere and the filing deadline was approaching fast. Here's what I learned: Don't file without it, period. The IRS processing systems are set up to catch missing Form 8962 (Premium Tax Credit reconciliation) and will automatically flag your return. This means delays, correspondence, and potential penalties. The key is being persistent with getting your replacement form. I had to call the marketplace multiple times, but once I got through, they were actually very helpful. They can see if your form was mailed to an old address (which happened to me after moving) and can immediately email you a corrected version. One tip that worked for me: Try calling early in the morning (like 8 AM) when the phone lines first open. I had much better luck getting through then versus calling during peak hours. Also, regarding your income being $4,000 higher than estimated - that's exactly why you need the accurate 1095-A numbers. The reconciliation calculation on Form 8962 is very precise, and estimating could result in you owing money to the IRS or missing out on credits you're entitled to. It's frustrating to wait, but trust me, doing it right the first time will save you months of headaches later.

0 coins

Mei Wong

โ€ข

This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about the early morning calling tip - do you happen to know if that works for both the federal marketplace (healthcare.gov) and state marketplaces? I'm in a state that runs its own exchange and wondering if they have similar staffing patterns. Also, when you say the reconciliation calculation is "very precise," can you give an example of how much difference a small error might make? I'm trying to decide if it's worth potentially delaying my filing by a few weeks to get the exact numbers versus making my best educated guess based on my monthly premium statements.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

โ€ข

@69130aba881c Great question about state vs federal marketplaces! The early morning strategy should work for both since most customer service operations follow similar staffing patterns. State exchanges often have even better phone support than the federal marketplace, so you might have luck calling right when they open. As for the precision of the reconciliation - even small errors can have big impacts. For example, if your actual income was $4,000 higher than estimated (like Diego's situation), that could easily shift you into a different subsidy bracket. I've seen cases where a $3,000 income difference resulted in owing back $800+ in premium tax credits, or conversely, being entitled to an additional $500+ credit. The calculation uses very specific tables based on your exact income and the "second lowest cost silver plan" premium in your area. Even being off by $50/month on your premium amounts could swing your final tax liability by hundreds of dollars. Honestly, a few weeks delay for accurate numbers is way better than potentially owing the IRS money you weren't expecting, or worse, having them hold your refund for months while they sort it out. The Form 8962 reconciliation is one area where you really don't want to guess.

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation two years ago and completely understand the panic! Here's what I learned from my experience: First, absolutely do NOT file without your 1095-A if you received advance premium tax credits. The IRS systems will automatically flag your return as incomplete, and you'll face significant delays - I'm talking 3-4 months minimum while they request the missing documentation. For getting your replacement 1095-A quickly, here are the most effective strategies I found: 1. **Check your marketplace account thoroughly** - Look under "Tax Documents," "Forms," or "1095-A" sections. Sometimes they're buried in unexpected places. 2. **Call during off-peak hours** - I had the best luck calling the marketplace at 7-8 AM or after 6 PM when call volumes are lower. 3. **Have your information ready** - Your marketplace application ID, SSN, and the approximate months you had coverage will speed up the process. Regarding your income being $4,000 higher than estimated - this is actually a common situation and exactly why the 1095-A numbers need to be precise. You'll likely need to repay a portion of your advance premium tax credits, but the exact amount depends on your final income level and the specific premium amounts on your 1095-A. Don't estimate the premium amounts - I tried this and ended up owing an additional $300 because my estimates were off. The Form 8962 calculations are very sensitive to exact dollar amounts. If you absolutely can't get your 1095-A before the deadline, file for an extension using Form 4868. This gives you until October to file correctly without penalties, though you should still pay any estimated taxes owed by the original deadline. Trust me, waiting for the correct form is way less stressful than dealing with IRS correspondence and delayed refunds later!

0 coins

This is such comprehensive advice, thank you! I'm dealing with a similar situation but have an additional complication - I had marketplace coverage through two different states because I moved mid-year. Do you know if I need separate 1095-A forms from both state marketplaces, or would everything be consolidated somehow? Also, when you mention filing Form 4868 for an extension, do you have any guidance on how to estimate what you might owe for the premium tax credit reconciliation? I'm worried about underpaying and facing penalties, but I obviously can't calculate the exact amount without my 1095-A forms. The stress of not knowing whether I'll owe money or get a refund is really getting to me, especially since like the original poster, I'm counting on that refund for some necessary expenses.

0 coins

Isaiah Sanders

โ€ข

This is such a helpful thread! I've been dealing with the same confusion about Form 5498 and non-deductible IRA contributions. What really clicked for me after reading everyone's responses is that the Form 5498 serves multiple purposes - it's not just about what I need to report on my current tax return, but also creates a paper trail for the IRS to track things like RMDs and conversions down the road. @Eli Wang - your original question really resonated with me because I had the exact same confusion about why the fair market value gets reported if we don't use it directly. Now I understand it's more about the IRS having complete records of account growth over time. One thing I'd add for anyone in a similar situation: make sure you're filing Form 8606 every single year you make non-deductible contributions, even if your tax software doesn't explicitly prompt you for it. I almost missed this one year because I was using a different tax program that didn't walk me through IRA basis tracking as clearly. That form is crucial for maintaining your basis records with the IRS, and it's what will protect you from double taxation when you eventually withdraw those contributions.

0 coins

Caleb Stark

โ€ข

@Isaiah Sanders - you make such a great point about Form 8606! I actually made that exact mistake in my second year of non-deductible contributions. I was using a basic tax software that didn t'prompt me for it, and I just assumed since I wasn t'getting a deduction, there was nothing to report. It wasn t'until I switched to TurboTax the following year that it asked about my total "IRA basis and" I realized I had missed filing the 8606. Had to go back and amend that return, which was a real headache. The scary part is that without that form on file, the IRS would have no record of my non-deductible contributions, so when I eventually withdraw from my IRA, they might try to tax the entire distribution instead of just the earnings portion. Definitely learned my lesson about being proactive with that form rather than waiting for software to remind me! Thanks for highlighting this - it s'such an important detail that could save people a lot of trouble down the road.

0 coins

Ellie Lopez

โ€ข

This thread has been incredibly enlightening! I've been making non-deductible IRA contributions for about 3 years now and was always puzzled by the Form 5498 - especially why my brokerage sends it to the IRS if I'm not supposed to enter that fair market value anywhere on my tax return. Reading through everyone's explanations, it finally makes sense that the FMV serves as a tracking mechanism for the IRS rather than something I need to actively report. It's like they're building a complete picture of my account over time for future reference, particularly for RMDs and any potential conversions. One thing I want to emphasize for anyone just starting with non-deductible contributions: keep meticulous records! I've been maintaining a simple spreadsheet that tracks my annual non-deductible contributions, cumulative basis, and account values. It takes 5 minutes to update each year but will save me hours of headaches if I ever need to reconstruct my basis or if there are any discrepancies with my Form 8606 filings. Also, thanks to everyone who shared their experiences with the various tools and services. It's reassuring to know there are resources available when the IRS phone system becomes impossible to navigate. The complexity of IRA tax rules really highlights how much we need better taxpayer support and clearer guidance from the IRS.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

โ€ข

@Ellie Lopez - your spreadsheet approach is brilliant! I wish I had started doing that from day one. I m'now in year 5 of non-deductible contributions and have been relying entirely on tax software to track my basis, which makes me nervous about switching programs or if there s'ever a glitch. Your point about the IRS building a complete picture over time really resonates. It s'like they re'creating a comprehensive audit trail even though we re'only reporting our contributions annually. The FMV tracking probably helps them catch discrepancies too - like if someone claims a huge basis but their account values don t'support the growth pattern you d'expect. I m'definitely going to start my own tracking spreadsheet this year. Do you include anything beyond the annual contributions and cumulative basis? I m'wondering if it s'worth tracking the account growth too, or if that s'overkill since the brokerage handles that reporting directly to the IRS. Thanks for the practical advice - sometimes the simplest solutions are the most effective!

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

โ€ข

Has anyone used TurboTax Business to file their single-member S corp return? Can it handle the K-1 generation properly? I'm trying to decide between doing it myself or paying my accountant $950 to file it all.

0 coins

Alexander Evans

โ€ข

TurboTax Business can handle the basic 1120-S and K-1, but I found it lacking for more complex situations. If your business is straightforward with minimal assets and simple income sources, it's probably fine. But if you have multiple income streams, business assets, or special deductions, you might find it frustrating.

0 coins

Gemma Andrews

โ€ข

I went through this exact same situation when I formed my single-member S corp two years ago. Yes, you absolutely need to issue yourself a Schedule K-1 even though you're the only shareholder. The S corporation is a pass-through entity, so all income, deductions, and credits flow through to you as the owner via the K-1. Think of it this way: your W-2 shows the salary you earned as an employee of the corporation, while the K-1 shows your share of the business profits/losses as the owner. These are two different capacities - employee vs. shareholder - so you need both forms. The K-1 will report things like your share of ordinary business income, any rental income if you have it, business deductions that pass through to your personal return, and various credits. Make sure when you prepare the 1120-S that you're consistent between what's reported on the corporate return and what flows to your K-1. The IRS matches these up, so any discrepancies will trigger questions.

0 coins

Zara Malik

โ€ข

This is really helpful! I'm curious about the timing - when do you need to issue the K-1 to yourself? Is it by the same March 15th deadline as the 1120-S filing, or do you have until your personal tax deadline in April? And do you physically mail it to yourself or just keep it with your records since you're both the issuer and recipient?

0 coins

Prev1...13051306130713081309...5644Next