IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I've been dealing with forex tax reporting for a few years now and wanted to add a few practical tips that might help: First, keep detailed records from day one - not just your broker statements, but also notes about your trading strategy and any hedging purposes. The IRS loves documentation, especially for forex where the rules can be complex. Second, consider consulting with a tax professional who specializes in trader taxation before making the Section 988 vs 1256 election. The $4,300 profit you mentioned might seem small, but if you're planning to scale up your trading, getting the right foundation now will save you headaches later. Third, be aware that some brokers provide better tax reporting than others. If you're serious about forex trading, it might be worth switching to a broker that provides detailed 1099 forms or at least comprehensive trade summaries that break down your activity by currency pair and trade type. One last thing - don't forget about state taxes! Some states have different rules for how they treat forex gains, and a few states don't conform to federal elections for Section 1256 treatment. Make sure you understand your state's position too. The learning curve is steep, but once you get your system down, tax season becomes much more manageable!

0 coins

Jordan Walker

β€’

This is really helpful advice! I'm just getting started with forex trading (only been at it for about 6 weeks) and honestly hadn't even thought about the state tax implications. I'm in California - do you know if they have any special rules for forex trading that differ from federal treatment? Also, when you mention switching brokers for better tax reporting, are there specific ones you'd recommend that are known for good 1099 forms? I'm currently using a smaller broker and their statements are pretty basic.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

β€’

Great questions! For California specifically, they generally conform to federal tax treatment for forex, so if you make the Section 1256 election federally, California will usually honor that. However, California does have some quirks with capital gains treatment that might affect the tax benefit you get from the 60/40 split, so definitely worth double-checking with a CA tax pro. As for brokers with better tax reporting, I've had good experiences with TD Ameritrade (now Schwab), Interactive Brokers, and OANDA. Interactive Brokers is particularly good - they provide detailed trade-by-trade breakdowns and even have tools to help you calculate your tax obligations throughout the year. They also clearly separate different types of forex transactions (spot vs futures) which makes the Section 988/1256 distinction much clearer. OANDA is solid too and their statements are pretty comprehensive. They also have a good reputation for customer service if you need clarification on their reporting. One thing to watch out for with smaller brokers is that they might not provide 1099s at all for forex trading (it's not required for spot forex), which means you'll be doing all the calculations yourself from basic trade statements. The bigger brokers tend to provide much more detailed reporting even when they're not required to.

0 coins

Joshua Hellan

β€’

This is such a timely post for me! I've been trading forex for about 8 months now and just realized I need to get my tax situation sorted out before year-end. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful. I had no idea about the Major Currency Pair Election for Section 1256 treatment - I thought that was only for futures contracts. The fact that you can potentially get the 60/40 capital gains treatment on spot EUR/USD and GBP/USD trades is huge. I'm definitely going to look into making that election. One question I have - if I make the Section 1256 election now for the remainder of this year, does that lock me into using it for all future years, or can I change my mind for next year's trading? I'm profitable this year but not sure what next year will look like. Also, for anyone else reading this who's newer to forex taxation like me - I found Publication 550 from the IRS to be somewhat helpful for understanding the basics, though it's definitely not the easiest read. The examples in there helped me understand the difference between ordinary income treatment vs capital gains treatment. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this stuff is way more complicated than I expected when I started trading!

0 coins

Noland Curtis

β€’

I want to echo what others have said about avoiding the rental route - it's absolutely not worth the risk. As someone who works in tax compliance, I've seen the IRS come down hard on these arrangements, and the penalties can be career-ending. However, I do want to offer some hope for your timeline. The IRS has actually streamlined their EFIN processing significantly for the 2025 season. If you submit a complete, error-free application now, you're looking at closer to 4-5 weeks rather than the traditional 6-8 weeks. The key is making sure everything is perfect the first time - any errors or missing documents will reset your timeline. For the PTIN, definitely apply today. It's straightforward and you'll have it immediately. In the meantime, consider reaching out to local tax preparation offices, enrolled agents, or CPAs who might need seasonal help. Many are actually looking for qualified preparers right now and would be open to a legitimate subcontractor arrangement. This gives you income, experience, and a legal way to prepare returns while your own credentials process. The temporary partnership route that others mentioned is really your best bet. It's completely legal, gives you practical experience, and positions you well for when your own EFIN comes through. Don't let impatience derail what could be a successful long-term career!

0 coins

Amara Okafor

β€’

This is really helpful information about the streamlined processing times! I'm curious about something though - you mentioned making sure the application is "error-free" to avoid delays. Are there common mistakes that people make on EFIN applications that I should specifically watch out for? I want to make sure I don't accidentally sabotage my timeline by missing something obvious. Also, when you say "local tax preparation offices" - would places like H&R Block or Jackson Hewitt be open to these kinds of subcontractor arrangements, or are you thinking more about independent practitioners?

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

β€’

Great question about common EFIN application mistakes! From what I've seen, the most frequent issues are: 1) Inconsistent business information across forms (make sure your business name, address, and EIN match exactly on all documents), 2) Incomplete or expired background check documentation, 3) Missing or unclear business formation documents, and 4) Not providing adequate documentation for your physical business location if working from home. Regarding the big chains like H&R Block or Jackson Hewitt - they typically don't do subcontractor arrangements since they have their own training programs and employment structures. You'll have better luck with independent CPAs, enrolled agents, or smaller local tax offices. Many of these practitioners actually prefer working with someone who already has experience rather than training from scratch. I'd recommend calling around to offices in your area and explaining your situation - you might be surprised how many are interested, especially as we get closer to busy season.

0 coins

Donna Cline

β€’

As someone who just went through the EFIN application process myself, I want to add that the IRS has also improved their communication this year. You'll actually get email updates at key stages of your application review, which helps eliminate the guesswork about timing. One thing I learned the hard way - when gathering your business documentation, make sure your business address on your state registration exactly matches what you put on the EFIN application. I had to resubmit because my state filing used "Street" while my EFIN application used "St" and that small difference caused a delay. Also, if you're planning to work from home initially, the IRS now accepts a simple business use statement for your home office rather than requiring complex documentation. This has streamlined things significantly for solo practitioners. The partnership route everyone's suggesting really is the way to go. I reached out to about 6 local preparers and 4 were interested in some kind of arrangement. Most were looking for 70/30 or 60/40 splits depending on who provides the software and handles the administrative work. It's actually a win-win since many established preparers want help during busy season but don't want permanent employees. Don't give up on starting this season - there's definitely still time to do this properly!

0 coins

Darren Brooks

β€’

This is incredibly helpful! Thank you for sharing those specific details about the application process. The email updates feature sounds like a huge improvement - I remember hearing horror stories about people waiting weeks with no communication. Quick question about the business address matching - did you have to go back and amend your state registration, or were you able to just update the EFIN application? I'm wondering if I should double-check all my business filings before submitting to make sure everything is perfectly consistent. Also, when you reached out to those 6 local preparers, how did you structure that initial conversation? I'm a bit nervous about cold-calling offices, but it sounds like there's real demand for this kind of arrangement. Did you lead with your experience or focus more on the partnership benefits for them?

0 coins

I've been in a similar situation with multiple jobs and variable hours, and honestly, the approach that worked best for me was keeping it simple. Don't overthink the multiple jobs checkbox - with your variable schedule (8-15 hours vs 12-40 hours), the standard calculations won't be accurate anyway. Here's what I'd recommend: Update your current job's W-4 to add about $75-80 per paycheck on line 4(c) (a bit more than your calculated $67 to account for hour variability). Leave the multiple jobs box unchecked on both forms. For your new job, just fill out the W-4 normally as if it's your only job. This "one job handles all adjustments" approach is much cleaner than trying to coordinate withholding between two employers with unpredictable schedules. Plus, if your hours change dramatically at either job, you only need to update one W-4 form rather than trying to rebalance both. The key is monitoring your withholding every few months by checking your paystubs against a tax calculator. If you're still on track to owe money, bump up that extra withholding amount. If you're over-withholding, reduce it. Way less stressful than trying to make the worksheets work with irregular income!

0 coins

Ian Armstrong

β€’

This is such a relief to read! I've been overthinking this whole W-4 situation for weeks. Your "one job handles all adjustments" approach makes so much more sense than trying to coordinate between two employers, especially with my crazy variable schedule. I think I was getting too caught up in the official IRS worksheets when a simpler manual approach is probably better for my situation. I'm definitely going to go with adding around $80 per paycheck to my current job's W-4 (line 4(c)) and keep the new job's form basic. The monitoring approach you mentioned sounds smart too - checking every few months to see if I need to adjust up or down based on actual hours worked. Thanks for keeping it practical! Sometimes the simplest solution really is the best one, even when dealing with taxes.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in almost the exact same boat - currently full-time but transitioning to two part-time jobs with variable hours. The consensus here seems clear: handle all the withholding adjustments through one job rather than trying to coordinate between both. From what everyone's shared, I'm planning to: 1. Add extra withholding ($75-80 per paycheck) to my higher-paying job's W-4 on line 4(c) 2. Leave the multiple jobs box unchecked on both forms 3. Fill out the new job's W-4 as if it's my only job (no special adjustments) 4. Monitor my withholding quarterly and adjust that one number if needed The "primary vs secondary job" approach makes so much more sense than the official worksheets when you have unpredictable schedules. It's reassuring to see multiple people confirm this method works well in practice. One follow-up question - for those who've done this, do you typically round up your extra withholding calculation to the nearest $5 or $10? The math gives me around $67-70 per paycheck, but I'm thinking of going with $80 to keep it simple and build in a buffer for those weeks when hours spike unexpectedly.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

β€’

Yes, absolutely round up to keep it simple! I've found that rounding to the nearest $5 or $10 makes everything much easier to track and remember. Going with $80 per paycheck instead of the calculated $67-70 is smart - that extra buffer will definitely help when your hours spike unexpectedly at either job. I actually do the same thing and round up my extra withholding amounts. It's much cleaner on the W-4 form and gives you that peace of mind knowing you're covered even if your variable hours lean toward the higher end. Plus, if you end up over-withholding slightly, you'll just get a refund rather than owing money. Your plan sounds solid - the "primary job handles everything" approach has worked really well for me and several others here. Good luck with your transition to the two part-time jobs!

0 coins

I work as a CPA specializing in nonprofit compliance, and what you're describing raises serious red flags. The variable "management fees" that coincidentally equal year-end excess funds is a textbook example of what the IRS calls private inurement - using a tax-exempt organization's resources to benefit private parties. Legitimate management agreements have several key characteristics that seem missing from your situation: fixed fee structures based on actual services, detailed contracts outlining specific responsibilities, and payments that don't fluctuate based on the nonprofit's financial performance. When payments are structured to essentially distribute all excess funds to related for-profit entities, it suggests the nonprofit is being used as a pass-through to avoid taxes on what should be taxable income. The fact that the same people control both the nonprofit and the for-profit entities makes this even more problematic. The IRS has specific intermediate sanctions (excise taxes) for exactly these types of arrangements, and in severe cases, they can revoke the organization's tax-exempt status entirely. If you decide to document this situation, focus on: the management agreements (if they exist), board resolutions approving these payments, the organization's conflict of interest policies, and how these transactions are reported on Form 990. You may also want to review whether the nonprofit is actually fulfilling its stated charitable purpose or primarily serving as a tax shelter. Consider speaking with a nonprofit attorney before taking any action, as whistleblower protections and proper reporting procedures can be complex.

0 coins

Chloe Green

β€’

This is exactly the kind of professional insight I was hoping for. As someone new to understanding nonprofit regulations, the distinction you made about legitimate management agreements having "fixed fee structures based on actual services" really clarifies what I'm observing. From what I can tell, there aren't detailed contracts outlining specific responsibilities - it seems more like the payments are determined after-the-fact based on available funds. Would the absence of proper documentation itself be a red flag to the IRS, or do they focus more on the economic substance of the transactions? Also, you mentioned intermediate sanctions - are those applied to the individuals involved or the organization itself? I'm trying to understand what the potential consequences might be for everyone involved, including employees like myself who aren't part of the decision-making.

0 coins

The absence of proper documentation is absolutely a red flag to the IRS. They look at both the economic substance AND the documentation requirements. Section 4958 of the Internal Revenue Code requires that compensation arrangements be "reasonable" and properly approved through specific procedures - including advance approval by an independent board, use of comparable data, and adequate documentation of the decision-making process. Regarding intermediate sanctions under Section 4958: these excise taxes are imposed on the individuals who benefited improperly (called "disqualified persons") and potentially on organization managers who knowingly participated in the transactions. The taxes can be 25% of the excess benefit amount initially, and up to 200% if not corrected. The organization itself doesn't lose its exempt status for intermediate sanctions violations, but could still face revocation if the violations are severe or ongoing. As an employee who isn't involved in decision-making, you generally wouldn't face personal liability. However, you should be aware that if you have knowledge of potential violations and are in a position where you could be considered to have participated in covering them up, that could potentially create issues. The key is that you're not a "disqualified person" (typically board members, officers, or substantial contributors) and you're not an "organization manager" who participated in approving the transactions. If you're concerned about your position, document what you've observed objectively and consider consulting with an employment attorney about whistleblower protections before taking any action.

0 coins

Elijah O'Reilly

β€’

Having worked in nonprofit financial oversight for several years, I want to emphasize that what you're describing sounds like a serious compliance violation that needs immediate attention. The pattern of variable year-end transfers to related for-profit entities controlled by the same individuals is exactly what the IRS looks for when investigating private benefit schemes. Beyond the legal implications others have mentioned, there's also the reputational risk to consider. If this arrangement becomes public or triggers an IRS investigation, it could severely damage the organization's credibility and ability to fulfill its charitable mission. Donors, grantors, and the community generally have little tolerance for nonprofits that appear to be gaming the tax system. I'd strongly recommend that you start by reviewing the organization's most recent Form 990 (available on sites like GuideStar or the Foundation Directory). Look specifically at Part VII (compensation), Schedule L (transactions with interested persons), and Schedule R (related organizations). If these transfers aren't properly disclosed there, that's another major red flag. Given the complexity and potential consequences, this really warrants consultation with both a nonprofit attorney and a CPA who specializes in exempt organizations. Many state attorneys general also have nonprofit oversight divisions that investigate these types of issues. Document everything you can while being mindful of any confidentiality agreements you may have signed, and consider whether your state has whistleblower protections that might apply to your situation.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

β€’

This is really helpful guidance about checking the Form 990 disclosures. I'm completely new to understanding nonprofit compliance, so having specific sections to look for makes this much more manageable. I'm particularly concerned about the reputational damage you mentioned - this organization provides medical products to underserved communities, so if there really is improper financial activity happening, it could hurt people who genuinely need these services. That makes me feel even more obligated to understand what's going on. Quick question about the state attorney general oversight - do they typically investigate based on employee reports, or do they mainly respond to formal complaints from the public? I want to make sure I understand the proper channels before taking any steps that might escalate the situation unnecessarily.

0 coins

Max Knight

β€’

State attorneys general typically accept reports from various sources, including employees, board members, donors, and the general public. Most have online complaint forms or hotlines specifically for nonprofit issues. They generally investigate when there's credible evidence of potential violations, regardless of the source. Given that this organization serves underserved communities with medical products, the stakes are indeed higher. You might want to start by gathering the documentation I mentioned (Form 990s, board minutes if accessible, any contracts) and perhaps consulting with a nonprofit attorney first. Many offer initial consultations that could help you understand your options and the strength of your concerns before deciding whether to file a formal complaint. Some states also have whistleblower protection laws that specifically cover nonprofit employees reporting potential violations. You should research what protections might apply in your state before taking any formal action. The important thing is that you're approaching this thoughtfully and systematically rather than rushing into anything that could backfire.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

β€’

I went through this exact same situation last year when I became trustee for my grandmother's estate. The confusion is totally understandable - the IRS instructions for 1041-ES aren't the clearest! To confirm what others have said: you only mail the payment voucher (the detachable portion) with your check. Keep all the worksheets and calculations for your own records. The worksheets are just to help you figure out the right payment amount, but the IRS doesn't need to see your work. A few additional tips from my experience: - Make copies of everything before you mail it - Send it certified mail so you have proof it was delivered - Double-check the mailing address in the 1041-ES instructions - it varies by state and sometimes by the type of entity - If you're late on this first payment, don't panic. You can include the penalty when you file the final 1041 return The hardest part is that first payment when everything feels uncertain. After that, you'll have the routine down and it becomes much more manageable. Good luck with the estate administration!

0 coins

Jamal Carter

β€’

This is such great advice, especially about sending it certified mail! I never would have thought of that but it makes total sense given how important these payments are. The tip about making copies before mailing is really smart too - I can already imagine myself second-guessing whether I filled something out correctly after it's already in the mail. Having those copies will definitely help with peace of mind. Thanks for mentioning that late payment penalties can be handled when filing the final return. That takes some pressure off knowing that even if I mess up the timing, it's not the end of the world and can be corrected later.

0 coins

Noah Ali

β€’

Just wanted to add one more thing that might help - if you're ever unsure about whether your payment was processed correctly, you can call the IRS at 1-800-829-0115 and they can confirm receipt of your estimated payment. Have your EIN and the payment date ready when you call. I had a situation where I wasn't sure if my check had been cashed (it took almost 6 weeks to clear), and calling to confirm gave me peace of mind that the payment was properly credited to the trust's account. They can also tell you your current balance and any upcoming payment due dates. Also, keep in mind that if the estate closes before all four quarterly payments are made, you'll need to make a final estimated payment when you file the final 1041 return. The IRS doesn't automatically know when an estate is closed, so you're responsible for making sure all the tax obligations are met through the closing date. Hope this helps ease some of the anxiety around your first trustee experience!

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

β€’

That's really helpful about being able to call and verify payment receipt! I had no idea you could do that. Six weeks for a check to clear seems like forever when you're worried about whether the IRS got your payment on time. The point about making a final estimated payment when the estate closes is something I definitely wouldn't have thought of. It makes sense though - the IRS wouldn't automatically know when everything wraps up. Do you happen to know if there's a specific form or process for that final payment, or is it just calculated as part of filing the final 1041? I'm definitely saving that phone number for future reference. Having that direct way to check on things will be a huge stress reliever as I navigate through this whole process.

0 coins

Prev1...12871288128912901291...5643Next