


Ask the community...
Something nobody's talking about - did you sell the house within a year of inheriting it? If not, make sure you're looking at the long-term capital gains rate for the house sale, which is usually more favorable. And don't forget to adjust your basis for any improvements you made before selling!
Good point about improvements! Even basic stuff like painting, repairs, or fixing up the yard before selling can be added to your basis and reduce any potential gains. Keep those receipts!
Yes, I actually sold it about 14 months after inheriting it. I did do some minor repairs - fixed a leaky faucet, repainted a couple rooms, and had the carpets professionally cleaned. Total was around $2,800 for those improvements. I've kept all those receipts, so I'll definitely add those to my basis. Thanks for the reminder!
Just to add another perspective - if you're worried about documentation for the furniture sales, consider creating a simple spreadsheet now while the details are still fresh in your memory. List each item (or group of similar items), approximate date sold, sale price, and your best estimate of fair market value at inheritance. For regular household furniture that's been used, the fair market value is typically much lower than original purchase price. Think about what someone would reasonably pay for used furniture at a garage sale or on Facebook Marketplace - that's probably close to the stepped-up basis value you inherited. Since you mentioned getting around $3,800 total and it was all regular household items, you almost certainly sold everything at or below the stepped-up basis values, meaning no taxable gains to report. But having that documentation organized will give you peace of mind and be helpful if you ever need to reference it later.
This is really solid advice! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now after inheriting my grandmother's belongings. Creating that spreadsheet sounds like a smart move - I wish I had done it right after I started selling things instead of trying to piece it together now from memory and random notes. One thing I'm curious about - for items where you genuinely can't remember exactly what you sold them for (like cash sales where you didn't write it down), is it better to estimate conservatively or try to be as accurate as possible? I sold some kitchen appliances for cash and honestly can't remember if I got $150 or $200 for the whole lot.
Has anyone here actually upgraded from a normal SUV to one over 6,000 lbs GVWR specifically for the tax advantages? I'm considering trading my Ford Edge (business use about 70%) for a Ford Expedition or similar just to take advantage of the Section 179 expensing and bonus depreciation. Is it worth the extra gas and higher purchase price just for the tax benefits? My CPA says absolutely yes but I'm not convinced.
I did exactly this last year - traded my Highlander for a Chevy Tahoe. The difference in Section 179 treatment was substantial. I was able to deduct almost the entire purchase price in year 1 (subject to business use percentage of course). Just be aware that you must maintain at least 50% business use for the entire recovery period, or you'll face recapture. With gas prices what they are now, I'm not sure I'd make the same decision again, but the tax savings were significant up front.
I've been through this exact situation with my construction business vehicles. The key thing to understand is that the IRS requires you to maintain consistent records of your business use percentage throughout the vehicle's life, not just calculate it once at purchase. For your varying business use percentages (60-70% annually), you need to track this each year because it affects both your annual depreciation deduction and the final disposition calculation. When you traded in that first SUV, if your business use in the final year was different from previous years, the IRS requires you to "true up" the depreciation based on the actual business use over the vehicle's entire life in your hands. The inflated basis on your second SUV ($49K vs $41K) is correct - that's the deferred depreciation recapture from your first vehicle rolled into the new basis under the pre-2018 like-kind exchange rules. You're not losing anything, just spreading the tax impact over a longer period. One crucial point: since you mentioned retiring, be very careful about suddenly dropping business use to zero on a vehicle with remaining basis. The IRS may require you to recapture excess depreciation taken in prior years. Consider gradually reducing business use as you approach retirement rather than an abrupt change. For your GVWR question - the total lifetime deduction is generally the same whether you buy a heavy vehicle or not. The advantage is timing: you can accelerate deductions into earlier tax years when you might be in higher tax brackets, versus spreading them out over the vehicle's depreciation life.
This is incredibly helpful, thank you! The "true up" concept you mentioned makes so much sense - I was wondering why my depreciation seemed to jump around in the final year of ownership. Your point about gradually reducing business use as I approach retirement is something I hadn't considered at all. Right now I'm about 5 years from retirement and my SUV is probably 2-3 years from needing replacement. Would you recommend starting to reduce business use percentage now, or wait until I actually get the replacement vehicle? I'm worried about triggering an audit if my business use suddenly drops from 70% to 30% in one year. Also, when you say "true up" the depreciation - does this happen automatically when I file my taxes, or is there a specific form I need to complete to show this calculation?
This exact thing happened to me last month! So frustrating. I found out that if you haven't logged in for 90+ days, ID.me automatically flags your account as "inactive" and makes you re-verify for security purposes. It's not just the IRS - this happens with other agencies that use ID.me too. The good news is that if you still have access to the same phone number and email you used originally, the re-verification process is usually much faster than the initial setup. You probably won't need to do the full document upload and video call again - just the MFA verification. Also, pro tip: once you get back in, log in at least once every 60 days to keep your account "active" and avoid this happening again. I set a calendar reminder now because dealing with ID.me customer service is absolutely the worst!
That's really helpful to know about the 90+ day inactive flag! I had no idea that was a thing. I'm definitely going to set up a reminder too because you're absolutely right - dealing with their customer service is a nightmare. Thanks for sharing the tip about logging in regularly. Hopefully the re-verification goes smoothly for everyone dealing with this issue.
I had this happen to me twice now! The first time I went through the whole re-verification process thinking I had to, but the second time I realized it was actually just a browser issue. Try these steps before doing the full verification again: 1. Clear your browser cache and cookies specifically for irs.gov and id.me 2. Make sure you're not using any ad blockers or privacy extensions that might interfere 3. Try a different browser entirely (I switched from Firefox to Edge and it worked) 4. Check if you're using a VPN - turn it off if you are If none of that works, you might have an account flag like others mentioned. But definitely try the simple fixes first before spending hours on re-verification. The IRS system is just really finicky and sometimes these technical issues masquerade as security problems.
This is such great advice! I wish I had seen this before spending 3 hours going through the full verification process again last week. The browser cache clearing trick especially makes sense - I bet that's what was causing my issue since I'm pretty obsessive about clearing my browsing data regularly. Going to bookmark this comment for future reference because knowing my luck, this will probably happen again. Thanks for taking the time to write out all the troubleshooting steps!
The complexity you're facing with Form 8960 is incredibly common, and you're asking all the right questions. Based on your description of actively managing commercial properties through your LLC, you're in a gray area that requires careful analysis. Here's my take: Your rental activities likely DO qualify as a Section 162 trade or business under the Groetzinger standard (regular, continuous activity with profit motive), especially given your hands-on management approach. However, the passive activity determination is separate and more restrictive. For line 4b adjustments, you can only reduce NIIT for income from trades or businesses that are NOT passive activities. Unless you qualify as a real estate professional (750+ hours annually in real estate activities AND more than half your total working time), your rentals remain passive regardless of your involvement level. The expenses you mentioned (mortgage interest, taxes, repairs) already reduce your Schedule E income before it flows to Form 8960 - they're not additional line 4b adjustments. Your investment advisor fees also don't qualify for line 4b treatment under current rules. My recommendation: Start documenting your time and activities meticulously NOW. Track every hour spent on property management, tenant relations, maintenance coordination, etc. If you can demonstrate you meet the real estate professional thresholds, you could potentially exclude significant rental income from NIIT through line 4b adjustments. Consider consulting with a tax professional who specializes in NIIT and real estate taxation - this area has evolved significantly with recent court cases and the stakes are high enough to justify expert guidance.
This is exactly the kind of comprehensive breakdown I needed! The distinction between Section 162 trade or business qualification and the passive activity rules was really confusing me. So if I understand correctly, I could potentially have rental activities that qualify as a legitimate business under Groetzinger but still be considered passive for NIIT purposes unless I hit that real estate professional threshold? The time tracking advice is spot on - I wish I'd started this earlier in the year. Do you know if there's any flexibility in how the 750+ hours are calculated? Like, does time spent researching new properties or analyzing market conditions count toward that threshold, or is it strictly hands-on property management activities? Also, you mentioned recent court cases have evolved this area - are there any specific cases beyond Aragona Trust that property owners should be aware of when structuring their documentation and arguments?
Yes, you've got it exactly right! You can have rental activities that clearly qualify as a Section 162 trade or business under Groetzinger (regular, continuous, profit-motivated activity) but still be considered passive for NIIT purposes. It's frustrating but that's how the tax code works - two separate tests with different thresholds. For the 750+ hour calculation, the IRS is actually quite broad in what counts. Time spent researching properties, analyzing markets, evaluating financing options, attending real estate seminars, and even reasonable travel time to properties all count toward your hours. The key is that activities must be directly related to your real estate business operations. Keep detailed records of everything - even phone calls with lenders or reviewing property reports. Beyond Aragona Trust, you should know about the Hawkins case (2023) which further clarified that rental activities can constitute trades or businesses even without significant development or improvement activities. Also, the Sesler case (2022) is helpful for understanding how courts evaluate the "regular and continuous" standard. These cases have made it easier to argue that actively managed rental operations qualify as Section 162 businesses. The documentation Jean Claude mentioned is crucial - start that activity log immediately. Even if you don't hit real estate professional status this year, having detailed records will help you plan for future years and support your Section 162 business argument regardless.
The confusion you're experiencing with Form 8960 is completely understandable - this is one of the most complex areas of tax law right now. Let me break down your situation based on what you've described. Your commercial rental properties managed through your single-member LLC likely DO qualify as a Section 162 trade or business under current case law, especially given your hands-on involvement. The Groetzinger standard looks at whether you're engaged in regular, continuous activity with a profit motive - which clearly describes your situation. However, here's the critical distinction that trips up many taxpayers: qualifying as a Section 162 business and being "non-passive" are two separate determinations. For Form 8960 line 4b adjustments, you need BOTH conditions to be met. Unless you can qualify as a real estate professional (750+ hours annually in real estate activities AND it represents more than half your total working time), your rental activities will be treated as passive regardless of how actively you manage them. This is different from the "active participation" standard used for the $25,000 rental loss allowance. Your expenses (mortgage interest, property taxes, maintenance) already reduce your net rental income on Schedule E before it flows to Form 8960 - these aren't separate line 4b adjustments. Similarly, investment advisor fees don't qualify for line 4b treatment under current NIIT regulations. My advice: Start meticulously documenting your real estate activities immediately. Track every hour spent on tenant management, property maintenance coordination, market research, financial analysis, etc. If you can demonstrate you meet the real estate professional thresholds, you could potentially exclude significant rental income from NIIT through line 4b. Given the complexity and potential tax savings involved, consulting with a tax professional who specializes in NIIT and real estate taxation would be a wise investment.
This is really helpful, thanks! I'm starting to see why this has been so confusing - I was thinking that being hands-on with my properties automatically meant I could use line 4b adjustments, but now I understand there are actually two separate hurdles to clear. Quick question about the real estate professional qualification - you mentioned 750+ hours AND more than half of total working time. If someone has a regular W-2 job working 40 hours per week (roughly 2,080 hours annually), would they need to spend over 1,040 hours on real estate activities to meet that second test? That seems almost impossible for someone who isn't doing real estate full-time. Also, when you say "meticulously document," what's the best way to track this retrospectively for activities I've already done this year? I have emails, calendar entries, and receipts, but no formal time log. Should I try to reconstruct based on what records I do have?
Mikayla Davison
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that you should also check if your state has any specific rules about scholarship taxation. Some states conform to federal tax treatment, but others have their own rules. For example, some states might not tax scholarship money that the federal government considers taxable income. Also, make sure you understand the timing of when to report this income. Since you received the $16k refund this year, you'll report it as income for this tax year - even if some of it was from scholarships awarded in previous years. The key is when you actually received the money, not when the scholarship was originally awarded. If you're using TurboTax, look for the education section and specifically the "Taxable scholarships and fellowships" area. It should walk you through calculating exactly how much of your total scholarship money was used for qualified vs. non-qualified expenses. Don't just guess at the numbers - use your actual receipts and 1098-T to get it right!
0 coins
Ella Knight
ā¢Great point about state tax differences! I'm in California and had to learn this the hard way. California does follow federal rules for scholarship taxation, but the state tax rate is different, so even though the taxable amount was the same, I ended up owing both federal and state taxes on that scholarship money used for housing. Also, that timing issue you mentioned is super important. I received a large scholarship refund in January from aid that was technically awarded the previous year, and I almost reported it on the wrong year's tax return. The financial aid office confirmed it goes on the return for the year you actually received the cash, not when it was awarded. This stuff is way more complicated than it should be for students just trying to get through school!
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
I've been following this thread and want to emphasize something that might get overlooked in all the technical details - keep EXCELLENT records of everything! I learned this lesson when I got randomly selected for an IRS audit two years after filing. Save receipts for every qualified education expense (books, required supplies, lab fees, etc.), keep copies of your scholarship award letters, and document exactly how you used each dollar. Create a simple spreadsheet showing scholarship source, amount, what it was used for, and whether it's taxable or not. The IRS auditor told me that education-related audits are becoming more common because so many students incorrectly report scholarship income. Having organized documentation made my audit quick and painless - I actually got a small refund because I had missed some qualified expenses I could have claimed. Without proper records, you could end up owing back taxes, interest, and penalties even if you filed correctly the first time. Also, don't assume TurboTax or other software will catch everything automatically. Double-check their calculations against the actual IRS Publication 970 (Tax Benefits for Education). I found a mistake in how TurboTax allocated my scholarship money and caught it before filing.
0 coins
Ethan Davis
ā¢This is incredibly valuable advice, thank you! The audit aspect is something I never even considered. I'm definitely going to start organizing my records better right now. Quick question - when you say "document exactly how you used each dollar," do you mean I should literally track every expense down to the penny? Like if I got a $16k refund like the original poster, should I have receipts showing exactly where all $16k went (rent payments, groceries, textbooks, etc.)? And what's the best way to organize this - just a simple Excel spreadsheet or is there some specific format the IRS prefers? I want to make sure I'm doing this right from the start rather than scrambling to recreate records later if I ever get audited.
0 coins