IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Ravi Kapoor

β€’

I totally understand the confusion! I work in government benefits administration and see questions like this all the time. The "fed-prov/terr Canada" deposit you received is definitely a legitimate government benefit payment - most likely the GST/HST credit, Canada Workers Benefit, or a provincial climate action payment. These deposits can seem random because they're based on your previous year's tax return, not your current job situation. So your new second job wouldn't trigger this payment, but it might affect your eligibility for benefits when you file next year's taxes. The quickest way to identify exactly what this payment is for is to call the CRA's automated telephone information service at 1-800-387-1193. You just need your SIN and it will tell you all recent benefit payments without any wait time. No need to stress about setting up online accounts or waiting on hold for hours. Most importantly - don't worry about having to pay this back! If the CRA deposited money into your account, you're entitled to it based on your tax filing. These aren't accidental overpayments. The government systems are quite accurate when it comes to benefit eligibility and payments.

0 coins

Nia Johnson

β€’

This is exactly the kind of expert insight I was hoping for! Having someone who actually works in government benefits administration explain this makes me feel so much better about the whole situation. I really appreciate you taking the time to break down what these payments are and confirming that they're legitimate. The automated phone line sounds like the perfect solution - quick and straightforward without all the hassle of online accounts or endless hold times. It's such a relief to know that if the CRA deposited it, I'm actually entitled to it and don't need to worry about surprise clawbacks. Thanks for the professional perspective!

0 coins

Carmella Fromis

β€’

I completely understand your confusion - those unexpected government deposits can be really nerve-wracking when you don't know what they're for! Based on your description and the "fed-prov/terr Canada" label, this is almost certainly a legitimate benefit payment you're entitled to. The timing with your second job is just coincidence since these payments are calculated from your previous year's tax return. However, that second job might actually work in your favor for next year's benefits depending on your total income bracket. I'd definitely recommend trying the automated phone line at 1-800-387-1193 that several people mentioned - it's by far the easiest way to identify the payment without waiting on hold or dealing with websites. Just enter your SIN and you'll know exactly what it is within minutes. Don't stress about spending the money - if the CRA deposited it, you've earned it based on your tax filing. These systems are pretty accurate and they don't send payments by mistake. Once you know what specific benefit it is, you'll also know if you can expect similar payments throughout the year. It's actually kind of nice to get these surprise reminders that filing your taxes properly pays off!

0 coins

This is such great advice! I really appreciate everyone in this thread being so helpful and patient with explaining this. As someone new to dealing with government benefits, it's been really reassuring to see so many people share similar experiences and confirm that these deposits are legitimate. The automated phone line tip seems to be the winner - I'll definitely try calling 1-800-387-1193 this weekend to figure out exactly what my deposit was for. It's also encouraging to know that having two jobs might actually help with benefits next year. Thanks to everyone for making what seemed like a scary situation into a learning experience!

0 coins

CyberSiren

β€’

I've been following this thread with great interest since I'm in a similar situation with my two kids. What strikes me most is how many different angles people have found to approach this problem - from checking state transportation laws to identifying related deductible expenses. After reading all the responses, I realize I've been too narrowly focused on trying to deduct the basic daily school transportation miles. Instead, I should be looking at the bigger picture of ALL education-related expenses and transportation to see what might legitimately qualify. For instance, I drive my youngest to speech therapy twice a week that was recommended by the school for his developmental delays - those miles could potentially qualify as medical deductions. I also volunteer at the school library once a month and attend monthly school board meetings to advocate for special needs resources - those might qualify for charitable mileage deductions. The key takeaway for me is documentation and categorization. I'm going to start tracking everything separately rather than just seeing it all as "school driving." Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise - this has been incredibly educational!

0 coins

Debra Bai

β€’

You've really captured the essence of what I've learned from this thread too! I came here initially frustrated about not being able to deduct my daily school driving, but now I see there's a much more strategic approach to handling education-related expenses. Your examples are perfect - the speech therapy miles definitely sound like they'd qualify as medical deductions, especially since they were school-recommended for a diagnosed condition. And the volunteer work plus advocacy at school board meetings could add up to meaningful charitable deductions over time. I think the biggest lesson here is that while the IRS won't let us deduct regular school transportation, there are often legitimate related expenses hiding in plain sight that we're not claiming. The detailed record-keeping approach mentioned by the tax preparer is going to be key - I'm starting a spreadsheet today to track all school-related trips by category and purpose.

0 coins

This has been such an enlightening discussion! As someone who drives 15 miles daily for school transport, I came here feeling frustrated about the lack of tax relief. But reading through everyone's experiences has completely changed my approach. I'm particularly grateful for the tax preparer's advice about detailed record-keeping and categorizing different types of school-related trips. I never realized that while basic transportation isn't deductible, related activities might be. For example, I drive my son to weekly tutoring sessions recommended by his teacher for reading comprehension issues - those could potentially qualify as educational or even medical expenses if there's a learning disability diagnosis. Also, the success story about challenging the district's transportation policies was inspiring. I'm going to research our state's requirements since we live 4 miles from school and have never been offered bus service. What I love most about this community is how we've collectively turned a "no, you can't deduct that" answer into a comprehensive strategy for maximizing legitimate deductions and ensuring we're getting the services we're legally entitled to. Sometimes the best tax advice isn't about creative deductions - it's about understanding all your options and rights!

0 coins

Yara Khoury

β€’

This is such valuable information! I wish more parents knew about this scholarship exception. Just to add one more important detail - make sure you understand the difference between "tax-free" scholarships and "taxable" scholarships when calculating your penalty-free withdrawal amount. If your daughter received scholarships that exceeded her qualified education expenses, that excess amount would be considered taxable income to her. You can only take penalty-free 529 withdrawals up to the amount of tax-free scholarships she received. So if she got $30K in scholarships but only $25K was tax-free (because $5K exceeded her qualified expenses), you could only withdraw $25K penalty-free from the 529. This is a nuance that trips up a lot of families, so definitely worth double-checking with the school's financial aid office or a tax professional if you're unsure about the tax treatment of any specific scholarships.

0 coins

This is such an important distinction that I hadn't considered! So if I'm understanding correctly, I need to look at each scholarship individually to see if it was applied to qualified expenses or if any portion exceeded those expenses and became taxable income to my daughter? This seems like it could get really complicated with multiple scholarships from different sources. Do schools typically provide this breakdown on their financial aid statements, or would I need to calculate this myself by comparing total scholarship amounts to her actual qualified education expenses for each year? I'm wondering if this is where having professional help might be worth it, since getting this calculation wrong could lead to problems down the road if audited.

0 coins

Sofia Gomez

β€’

Great question about the scholarship tax treatment! You're absolutely right that this can get complicated with multiple scholarships from different sources. Most schools will provide a Form 1098-T that shows the total scholarships/grants received and qualified tuition/fees paid, but they typically don't break down which specific scholarships were applied to qualified expenses versus excess amounts that became taxable income to your daughter. Here's what I'd recommend: Start by gathering all scholarship award letters and your daughter's 1098-T forms for each year. Then compare the total scholarship amounts to her qualified education expenses (tuition, fees, required books/supplies). Any scholarship money that exceeded those qualified expenses would have been taxable income to her (and should have been reported on her tax returns). You're spot-on that professional help can be valuable here - a tax professional can help you reconstruct this analysis for each year and ensure you're calculating the correct penalty-free withdrawal amount. The stakes are high enough with potential penalties and interest that getting expert guidance is often worth the cost, especially when dealing with multiple years and substantial amounts. The key is being conservative and well-documented. When in doubt, it's better to withdraw slightly less than risk penalties on an overly aggressive interpretation.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

β€’

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! As someone just learning about these 529 scholarship rules, the distinction between qualified vs. excess scholarship amounts is crucial but not well explained in most basic articles I've read. One follow-up question: if my child received scholarships in one year but we spread out her qualified expenses across multiple semesters that spanned two tax years, how does that affect the calculation? For example, if she got a $15K scholarship in 2022 but her spring semester tuition was paid in early 2023, does that complicate which year's scholarship amount I can use for penalty-free withdrawals? I'm starting to see why so many families miss out on this benefit - the rules seem straightforward on the surface but get complex quickly when you dig into the details. Thank you for emphasizing the importance of being conservative and well-documented!

0 coins

I'm dealing with this exact same issue right now! Just started a new job two weeks ago and my federal withholding seems way higher than expected. I'm also single with no dependents and one job, but I made the mistake of leaving everything blank except the basic info. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful - especially the explanation about how leaving the optional sections blank defaults to "single with 0 allowances" equivalent. That explains why so much is being taken out compared to my previous job where I claimed 2 allowances. I'm definitely going to try the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator first since it's free and seems to be the most accurate approach. The $8,600 deduction amount that several people mentioned gives me a good starting point to expect, but I want to make sure I get the exact right number for my salary. Has anyone here had experience with how long HR departments typically take to process W4 changes? I'm hoping to get this sorted out quickly since I'm losing a significant amount from each paycheck right now.

0 coins

AstroAce

β€’

I can share my recent experience with W4 processing times! I submitted my updated W4 to HR on a Tuesday, and the changes showed up in my paycheck exactly two weeks later (which was my next pay period). My company processes payroll every other Friday, so it worked out perfectly. Most HR departments I've worked with process W4 changes within 1-2 pay cycles, but it really depends on when you submit it relative to their payroll processing schedule. If you submit it right after they've already processed the current period, you might have to wait for the next cycle. I'd suggest submitting your new W4 as soon as you run the IRS calculator and get your numbers. Even if it takes a few weeks to kick in, at least you'll know you're on track to have the right withholding for the rest of the year. The temporary over-withholding will just mean a slightly bigger refund, which isn't the end of the world. Good luck with the calculator - it really is much easier than people make it sound once you have your pay stub and last year's return handy!

0 coins

Nathan Kim

β€’

I'm going through this exact situation right now too! Just switched jobs last month and was completely thrown off by the new W4. Like many others here, I left the optional sections blank and my first paycheck had way more federal taxes taken out than I expected. The explanation about how leaving sections blank defaults to "0 allowances" equivalent really clicked for me - no wonder the withholding felt so high compared to my old job where I also claimed 2 allowances. I just finished using the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator that everyone's been recommending, and it was actually much simpler than I anticipated. Took about 15 minutes with my pay stub and last year's tax return. For my situation (single, one job, ~$65K salary), it recommended putting $8,400 in Step 4(b), which is pretty close to that $8,600 rule of thumb people mentioned. Planning to submit the updated W4 to my HR department tomorrow. Really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences - it's so helpful to know I'm not the only one confused by this transition from the old allowances system!

0 coins

Naila Gordon

β€’

That's so reassuring to hear someone else went through the exact same experience! I was starting to feel like I was the only one who found this transition so confusing. The fact that the IRS calculator gave you $8,400 for a similar salary range gives me confidence that the tool really does provide personalized recommendations rather than just generic numbers. I'm curious - did you find any parts of the calculator particularly tricky, or was it pretty straightforward once you had your documents ready? I'm planning to tackle it this weekend but want to make sure I set aside enough time and have everything I need prepared beforehand. It's also good to know that even with all the confusion, we're all ending up with fairly similar numbers for the deductions line. Makes me feel more confident that there's actually a logical system behind all this, even if it's not immediately obvious like the old allowances were.

0 coins

Liam O'Connor

β€’

One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the AMT (Alternative Minimum Tax) implications. Investment interest deductions that are allowed for regular tax purposes might be treated differently under AMT calculations. If you're subject to AMT, some of your investment interest deductions could be disallowed or limited further. Also, make sure you're not double-counting any expenses. For example, if you paid property taxes with the loan proceeds, you can't deduct both the property tax payment AND claim the loan interest as deductible - the interest portion used for property taxes would be non-deductible personal interest. Another consideration is state tax implications. Some states don't conform to federal rules for investment interest or home equity interest deductions, so you might need to make adjustments on your state return even if everything is properly handled federally. The allocation method you choose needs to be reasonable and consistently applied. Whatever approach you use for dividing the interest expense, document your methodology thoroughly in case you need to defend it later. The IRS appreciates clear, logical allocation methods backed by solid documentation.

0 coins

This is really helpful information about AMT implications that I hadn't considered! I'm potentially subject to AMT this year due to some stock option exercises. When you mention that investment interest deductions might be treated differently under AMT, does this mean I need to calculate my allowable investment interest deduction twice - once for regular tax and once for AMT? And if there's a difference, how do you handle that on the forms? I'm using Form 4952 for the investment interest calculation but I'm not sure how AMT factors into that process.

0 coins

Hattie Carson

β€’

@5509c0e41992 Yes, you're absolutely right that AMT can create additional complications! You do need to calculate investment interest limitations separately for AMT purposes. The tricky part is that certain types of investment income that count for regular tax purposes (like private activity bond interest) might be treated differently under AMT. For Form 4952, you'll complete it normally for regular tax purposes first. Then, if you're subject to AMT, you'll need to recalculate your net investment income using AMT rules on Form 6251. The investment interest deduction allowed under AMT might be different from your regular tax calculation. If there's a difference, the excess investment interest that's disallowed under AMT gets carried forward separately for AMT purposes. You'll need to track both regular tax and AMT carryforwards going forward, which can get quite complex. Given that you're dealing with stock option exercises (which often trigger AMT) AND mixed-use loan interest allocation, I'd strongly recommend working with a tax professional who has experience with AMT calculations. The interaction between these two complex areas can create some unexpected results, and the penalties for getting AMT calculations wrong are substantial.

0 coins

Malia Ponder

β€’

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I used a margin loan for multiple purposes. One additional consideration I wanted to mention is the wash sale rule implications if you're using loan proceeds to buy stocks. If you sell stocks at a loss and then use your margin loan to repurchase the same or substantially identical securities within 30 days, the wash sale rule could disallow the loss deduction, which would affect your net investment income calculation for Form 4952. This could indirectly impact how much of your investment interest expense you can actually deduct. Also, for anyone considering this type of financing strategy going forward, it might be worth opening separate accounts or taking separate loans for each intended use. While it's more complex to manage multiple credit facilities, it makes the interest allocation much cleaner from a tax perspective and reduces audit risk. The documentation requirements mentioned by @fd111dffc265 about maintaining clear paper trails really cannot be overstated. I've seen cases where taxpayers lost substantial deductions simply because they couldn't adequately document how loan proceeds were used, even when the underlying transactions were legitimate.

0 coins

Cassandra Moon

β€’

@21ef95541142 Great point about the wash sale rule complications! I hadn't even thought about how that could affect the investment interest deduction calculation. This is getting quite complex with all the interconnected rules. Your suggestion about separate accounts for different purposes makes a lot of sense for future planning. It's making me think I should have structured my margin borrowing differently from the start. Do you know if there's any way to "clean up" the allocation retroactively, or are we stuck with whatever documentation we have from when the transactions originally occurred? Also, I'm curious about the practical aspects of managing multiple credit facilities. Did you find that brokerages are generally willing to set up multiple margin accounts for the same investor, or do you mean using different types of loans entirely (like a separate home equity line for home improvements)? The wash sale interaction is particularly concerning since I did do some tax loss harvesting around the same time I was making additional stock purchases with the loan proceeds. I'll definitely need to review those transactions to see if any wash sales occurred that might affect my Form 4952 calculations.

0 coins

Prev1...11151116111711181119...5643Next