


Ask the community...
This is a really helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar W-2 situation where my company uses ADP TotalSource as their PEO. My W-2 shows "ADP TotalSource, Inc." first, then my actual employer "GreenLeaf Marketing" underneath in Box C. What's been confusing me is that when I look at my paystubs throughout the year, they only show my actual employer's name (GreenLeaf Marketing), but the W-2 format is completely different. I was worried there might be an error on my W-2. Based on all the advice here, it sounds like this is totally normal and I should just enter both names exactly as they appear on the W-2. The explanation about PEOs being the "employer of record" while your actual company is the "worksite employer" really clears things up. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - it's reassuring to know this is a common situation and not something to stress about!
Maya, you're absolutely right - the paystub vs W-2 difference is totally normal with PEO arrangements! Your paystubs showing only GreenLeaf Marketing makes sense because that's who you actually work for day-to-day. But for tax purposes, ADP TotalSource handles all the official reporting to the IRS, which is why they appear first on your W-2. I had the same confusion last year when my paystubs showed one company name but my W-2 had both. It felt like there was a mistake, but my accountant explained that the W-2 is the "official" tax document that needs to show the legal employer relationship. As long as you enter it exactly as it appears on the W-2 (ADP TotalSource first, then GreenLeaf Marketing), you'll be fine. The IRS systems are designed to handle these PEO arrangements without any issues.
I've been following this thread and wanted to share my experience as someone who works in tax preparation. The advice here is spot-on - PEO arrangements are incredibly common and the IRS processes thousands of these W-2s every day without issues. One thing I'd add is that if you're still uncertain after entering the information, most tax software will run a final check before e-filing and alert you to any potential problems. The IRS matching system compares the EIN in Box B with the employer name in Box C, so as long as those align (which they should if you enter exactly what's on your W-2), you're good to go. Also, keep in mind that having both companies listed actually provides better documentation if there are ever any questions about your employment. It clearly shows the PEO relationship while still identifying where you actually perform your work duties. Don't overthink it - this is a standard business arrangement that the tax system handles routinely. Enter it exactly as printed and you'll be fine!
This is really helpful confirmation from someone who works in tax prep! I was getting anxious about potentially triggering an audit or having my return rejected, but hearing that the IRS processes thousands of these daily is reassuring. Your point about the final check in tax software is great too - I hadn't thought about that safety net. It makes sense that if there was a real mismatch issue, the software would catch it before filing. I'm curious though - in your experience preparing taxes, do you see any common mistakes people make with PEO W-2s that we should watch out for? I want to make sure I'm not missing anything obvious that could cause problems down the line.
This has been such a comprehensive and helpful discussion! As someone who's been considering donation gardening for a while but was intimidated by the tax documentation aspects, this thread has given me the confidence to finally move forward with it. I love how many practical systems everyone has shared - from the waterproof notebook in the garden shed to coordinating with food banks early in the season. The advice about taking photos of specialty varieties alongside regular ones for valuation documentation is particularly clever. One thing that really stands out to me is how this approach benefits everyone involved. Food banks get fresh, high-quality produce that's often expensive for them to purchase. Gardeners get to share their passion and surplus while potentially receiving tax benefits. And families in need get access to nutritious vegetables they might not otherwise be able to afford. I'm planning to start small this year with just a dedicated section of tomatoes, zucchini, and herbs for donation, but I'm already excited about the possibility of expanding in future seasons. The suggestion about connecting with county extension offices to find local programs is something I'll definitely be looking into. Thanks to everyone who's shared their experiences and advice. This community is an amazing resource for navigating these kinds of practical questions about taxes and charitable giving!
What a wonderful way to sum up this entire discussion! You're absolutely right about the triple benefit - it really is a win-win-win situation for everyone involved. Starting small with tomatoes, zucchini, and herbs is a perfect approach for your first year. Those crops are not only reliable producers but also highly valued by food banks since they're versatile and nutritious. Plus, they'll give you a good foundation for developing your documentation system without being overwhelming. I'd echo the suggestion about reaching out to your county extension office. Many people don't realize how many resources they offer beyond just gardening advice. Some even host workshops specifically about donation gardening that cover both the growing and record-keeping aspects. One small tip as you get started - consider keeping a simple "lessons learned" section in whatever tracking system you choose. Things like which varieties produced best for donations, what the food banks were most excited to receive, or which documentation methods worked smoothest for you. It'll be invaluable when planning next year's expansion! Welcome to the world of donation gardening - you're going to love the experience of combining your passion for growing with helping your community. And thanks for highlighting how this benefits everyone involved - that perspective is what makes this whole endeavor so rewarding!
This thread has been incredibly helpful for someone like me who's been hesitant to tackle the documentation side of donation gardening! I've been growing vegetables for my family for a few years now and always end up with way more than we can use, but I never knew how to properly handle the tax aspects of donating the surplus. The practical systems everyone has shared are exactly what I needed to see - especially the idea of keeping a waterproof notebook right in the garden and weighing produce by type rather than just dumping everything together. I'm definitely going to implement the suggestion about taking photos of heirloom varieties next to regular ones for valuation purposes, since I grow a lot of specialty peppers and tomatoes that sell for premium prices at our local farmers market. What really convinced me to move forward is seeing how many of you have been doing this successfully for multiple years. The fact that food banks genuinely appreciate the fresh produce and that the documentation doesn't have to be overly complicated makes this feel much more manageable than I initially thought. I'm planning to start this season with a dedicated donation section focusing on high-yield crops like zucchini, bush beans, and cherry tomatoes. Based on the advice here, I'll coordinate with our local food pantry early in the season and set up a simple tracking system from day one rather than trying to recreate records later. Thanks to everyone for sharing your real-world experiences - this community is fantastic for getting practical answers to questions that seem complicated at first but are actually quite straightforward with the right approach!
Just to summarize everything for Dylan and anyone else still confused - here's the simple breakdown: **401(k) through your employer:** - Already handled automatically through payroll - Pre-tax contributions reduce your taxable income (shown in W-2 Box 1) - No additional forms needed for your tax return - You'll see the total in Box 12 of your W-2 with code "D" **Separate IRA contributions ($2,500 in your case):** - Report on Schedule 1, Line 20 if it's a Traditional IRA - Subject to income limits since you have a workplace 401(k) - For 2025: phase-out starts at $78k (single) or $129k (married filing jointly) - You have until April 15, 2026 to make additional IRA contributions for tax year 2025 **Bottom line:** Your 401(k) is already taken care of, but you'll need to handle that $2,500 IRA contribution on your tax return if you want the deduction and you're under the income limits. The confusion is totally understandable since there are so many different retirement account types and rules. Focus on just these two pieces for your situation and you should be good to go!
This summary is incredibly helpful! As someone who just started contributing to retirement accounts this year, I was getting overwhelmed by all the different rules and forms. Your breakdown makes it so much clearer - I love how you separated the 401k (which is automatic) from the IRA (which requires action on my part). I have a similar situation to Dylan where I've been contributing to my employer's 401k all year, but I also opened a traditional IRA and put in about $3,000. I was panicking thinking I needed to report both somehow, but now I understand that only the IRA needs attention on my tax return. Quick follow-up question - when you mention the income limits for IRA deductions, is that based on my gross income or my adjusted gross income after accounting for things like my 401k contributions?
Great question about income limits! The IRA deduction phase-out is based on your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI), not your gross income. The good news is that your 401(k) contributions reduce your MAGI since they're pre-tax. So if your gross salary is $85,000 but you contributed $8,000 to your 401(k), your MAGI would be around $77,000 (before other adjustments). Since the phase-out for singles starts at $78,000, you'd likely qualify for the full traditional IRA deduction on that $3,000 contribution. MAGI includes your AGI plus certain deductions that were added back in (like student loan interest), but for most people it's pretty close to their AGI. You can find your AGI on line 11 of Form 1040 after all the standard deductions and retirement contributions are factored in. The key takeaway is that your 401(k) contributions actually help you stay under the income limits for IRA deductions, which is a nice bonus!
This thread has been incredibly educational! As someone who's been procrastinating on filing taxes because of similar confusion, I finally feel like I understand the basics. I've been contributing to both a 401k and a traditional IRA, and like many others here, I was completely lost about what needed to be reported where. The key insight for me was learning that 401k contributions are already "baked into" your W-2 - I had no idea that Box 1 was already reduced by my contributions. I kept looking for some separate form to report them on. One thing I'm still curious about though - if I contributed to both a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA during 2025 (split my contributions between both), do I need to report both on different forms, or just the traditional IRA on Schedule 1? I put $2,000 in traditional and $1,500 in Roth, staying under the $7,000 total limit. Also, for anyone else who found the tax software confusing, I ended up calling my IRA provider (Fidelity) and they were able to walk me through exactly how my contributions should be reported. Sometimes the investment companies have tax specialists who can clarify these account-specific questions better than generic tax software.
Just wanted to share my experience as someone who went through this exact situation last year! You're absolutely right about the calendar year calculation - your FICA exemption runs from 2020-2024, so you'll be exempt through December 31, 2024. One thing that really helped me was keeping a detailed timeline of my F1 status and sharing it with my employer's payroll department. I created a simple document showing: arrival date in F1 status (January 2020), graduation date, OPT start date, and the calculated exemption period. This made it much easier for HR to understand and implement correctly. Your previous B2 visit in 2018 definitely doesn't count toward the 5-year calculation since the exemption is specifically tied to time in F1 status. Also, make sure to request Form 843 from your employer if they've been incorrectly withholding FICA taxes during your time with the new company. You're entitled to a refund of any FICA taxes incorrectly withheld during your exemption period. The transition to paying FICA starting January 1, 2025 will be noticeable in your paycheck (about 7.65% additional withholding), so it's good to budget for that change. But at least you'll be earning Social Security credits at that point! Good luck with your STEM OPT application - sounds like you have everything figured out correctly!
This is exactly the kind of practical advice that's so helpful! Creating a timeline document for HR is brilliant - I'm definitely going to do that. It seems like so many payroll departments just aren't familiar with F1 FICA exemptions, so having everything laid out clearly upfront could save a lot of back-and-forth. I'm also glad you mentioned Form 843 for getting refunds of incorrectly withheld FICA taxes. I wasn't sure what the process was for that, but it sounds straightforward if you have the right documentation. The 7.65% hit to the paycheck is definitely something to plan for! I'm already thinking about how to adjust my budget for 2025. At least knowing exactly when it's coming (January 1st) makes it easier to prepare rather than being surprised by it mid-year. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's reassuring to hear from someone who successfully navigated this exact situation!
I just want to emphasize how important it is to get this documentation right with your new employer, especially since you're planning to apply for STEM OPT extension. Based on your timeline (arriving January 2020), you're absolutely correct that your FICA exemption runs through December 31, 2024. Since you mentioned your new company already sent you a form about FICA exemption, that's a good sign they're aware of the rules. Make sure they have a copy of your I-20 showing your January 2020 program start date, and if possible, get them to provide you with written confirmation of your exemption status through 2024. The key forms to ensure they have on file are: - Copy of your I-20 with program start date - Form 8233 (Exemption from Withholding on Compensation for Independent Personal Services of a Nonresident Alien Individual) - Documentation of your F1 entry date If they've been withholding FICA taxes during your 6 weeks there, definitely push for correction and refund. You can file Form 843 (Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement) if they won't handle it internally. Your B2 visit in 2018 is completely irrelevant to this calculation - the 5-year exemption is specifically for time in F1 status. You're all set through the end of this year!
Amina Sy
This is such a timely discussion! I've been using TurboTax online for the past few years without really thinking about the security implications. After reading through all these insights, I'm seriously considering switching to desktop software for next year's filing. The point about data persistence vs. temporary transmission really resonates with me. I had no idea that desktop software only sends data temporarily during e-filing while online versions keep everything stored on their servers. That's a significant difference I never considered. I'm also intrigued by some of the tools mentioned here like taxr.ai for analyzing security practices. Has anyone else tried similar services to evaluate their tax software's security? I'd love to hear more experiences before making the switch. One question for the cybersecurity expert who commented - do you think the security landscape for tax software will change significantly in the coming years, or are we likely to see the same basic tradeoffs between convenience and data control?
0 coins
Nia Thompson
ā¢I'm glad this discussion is helping people think more critically about their tax software choices! As someone new to this community, I've been following along and learning a lot. From what I've gathered reading through everyone's experiences, it seems like the desktop vs. online decision really comes down to your personal risk tolerance and technical comfort level. The cybersecurity expert's point about professional security teams managing online platforms vs. individual computer security is particularly interesting - I hadn't considered that my own computer might actually be the weak link. I'm curious about something though - for those who've switched from online to desktop (or vice versa), was the transition difficult? I'm thinking about making a change but wondering about things like importing previous year data or learning a new interface. Any insights would be appreciated! Also, has anyone looked into whether there are any IRS resources that explain the security requirements for authorized e-file providers? It might be helpful to understand the baseline standards all these companies have to meet.
0 coins
Marcus Williams
Great question about the transition experience! I actually made the switch from TurboTax Online to their desktop version two years ago after a friend's account got compromised (not through a breach, but because they reused passwords). The transition was surprisingly smooth. Most desktop software can import your prior year data even if it was filed online - you just need to download a copy of your previous return from the online platform first. The interfaces are usually very similar since companies want to maintain consistency across their products. For IRS security requirements, you can find information about their "Authorized e-file Provider" standards on the IRS website under Publication 3112. It outlines the minimum security and operational requirements that all e-file providers must meet, including encryption standards, data protection protocols, and audit requirements. One thing I didn't expect was that desktop software actually feels more secure psychologically - there's something reassuring about having your tax files locally and only connecting when you're ready to file. Though as the cybersecurity expert pointed out, that might just be a false sense of security if your personal computer isn't well-protected! The main downside I've found is that you lose some of the automatic syncing features with bank accounts and previous year imports that online versions offer, but for me the trade-off in data control is worth it.
0 coins
Keisha Robinson
ā¢Thanks for sharing your transition experience! That's really helpful to know that the switch can be smooth. I'm particularly interested in your point about Publication 3112 - I had no idea the IRS published their security requirements for e-file providers. That seems like essential reading for anyone trying to make an informed decision about tax software. The psychological aspect you mentioned is interesting too. I think there's definitely something to be said for feeling like you have more control over your data, even if the actual security difference might be more nuanced than it appears. One follow-up question - when you import prior year data from online to desktop, does that process involve uploading your information to their servers again temporarily? I'm trying to understand if there are any points where desktop users might inadvertently expose their data to the same risks as online users during the setup process. Also, for anyone else reading this who's made similar switches - did you notice any differences in customer support quality between the online and desktop versions of the same software?
0 coins