


Ask the community...
My HR department told me that 125PL stands for "Section 125 Plan" and covers all the pre-tax deductions for benefits like health insurance, dental, vision, etc. The 125IN might be for disability insurance premiums maybe? These codes can vary by employer so it might be worth asking your HR or payroll department for a full list of their specific W-2 codes and what they mean.
Does anyone know if these codes would show up the same way if you use different tax software? I started with TurboTax but switched to FreeTaxUSA and now I'm worried these codes might be handled differently.
I can help clarify these Box 14 codes for you! You're right to be confused - these employer-specific codes can be tricky. **125PL ($1,495.32)** - This is almost certainly your health insurance premiums paid through a Section 125 cafeteria plan (pre-tax). The "PL" likely stands for "Premium" or "Plan." This is NOT union dues - your tax software was probably just guessing based on common deductions. **125IN ($37.92)** - This is probably insurance-related as well, possibly supplemental insurance like life, disability, or vision coverage, also paid pre-tax through your Section 125 plan. **RET ($3,067.61)** - This represents your retirement plan contributions (401k, 403b, etc.). **Important:** All of these amounts have already been subtracted from your taxable wages shown in Box 1 of your W-2. You typically don't need to enter them separately when filing your taxes - they're just informational to show you what pre-tax deductions were taken. However, double-check your pay stubs for clearer descriptions of these codes, and if you're still unsure, contact your HR/payroll department for a definitive explanation of your employer's specific Box 14 codes. Better safe than sorry when it comes to taxes!
This is really helpful, thank you! I've been stressing about these codes for weeks. Just to confirm - since these pre-tax amounts are already factored into Box 1, I should just ignore them completely when using tax software like TurboTax or H&R Block? And is there any situation where I would actually need to report these Box 14 amounts separately, or are they truly just for my own records?
Great question about EPD! You're actually thinking about this correctly - the $65 in distributions you received likely aren't immediately taxable because they're classified as a return of capital that reduces your tax basis in the partnership. Here's what's happening: EPD typically generates significant depreciation and depletion deductions that flow through to partners, which is why your K-1 shows negative income. The distributions exceed your allocated share of taxable income, so the excess reduces your basis rather than creating a current tax liability. The key things to track going forward: 1. Your original purchase price (basis) 2. Each year's distributions (these reduce basis) 3. Any income/loss allocations from the K-1 4. Your adjusted basis = original basis - cumulative distributions + cumulative income allocations You'll need this information when you eventually sell to calculate your capital gain/loss. Also keep in mind that any suspended passive losses from the partnership can typically be used to offset gains when you dispose of your entire interest in EPD. So yes, you're being appropriately optimistic - no immediate tax liability for 2023 from your EPD investment!
This is exactly the kind of clear explanation I was hoping for! Thank you for breaking down the basis tracking - I hadn't realized I needed to keep such detailed records of the cumulative distributions and income allocations. One quick clarification: when you mention "suspended passive losses," does this mean if I have other passive income in future years (like rental property income), I could potentially use the EPD losses against that? Or do the suspended losses only become usable when I sell the entire EPD position? Also, is there a specific form I should be keeping track of this basis information on, or is a simple spreadsheet sufficient for now?
Great questions! For suspended passive losses, you have two potential ways to use them: 1. **Against other passive income**: Yes, if you have rental property income or income from other passive activities in future years, you can use your suspended EPD losses to offset that passive income on an annual basis. 2. **Upon disposition**: When you sell your entire EPD position, any remaining suspended losses become fully deductible against any type of income (not just passive), which can be quite valuable. Regarding record-keeping, a simple spreadsheet is absolutely sufficient for now. The IRS doesn't require a specific form for tracking basis - you just need to maintain accurate records. I'd suggest columns for: - Date - Transaction type (purchase/distribution/K-1 income or loss) - Amount - Running basis balance Many investors also keep a separate tab tracking suspended losses by year. Just make sure to keep all your K-1s and brokerage statements as supporting documentation. When you eventually sell, you'll report the final gain/loss calculation on Schedule D, but the detailed tracking can be done however works best for you organizationally.
As someone who's dealt with EPD and other MLPs for several years, I wanted to add a few practical tips that might help you going forward: First, EPD typically sends out their K-1s quite late in tax season (often March), so plan accordingly if you're eager to file early. Second, consider setting up a simple tracking system now - I use a basic Excel sheet with tabs for each MLP I own, tracking original basis, annual distributions, and K-1 income/losses. One thing that caught me off guard initially was that even though you're not paying tax on the distributions now, you'll want to consider the tax implications when you do eventually sell. Since your basis keeps getting reduced by the distributions, you might end up with a larger capital gain than you initially expect. Also, if you're planning to buy more EPD shares, be aware that additional purchases will have their own basis tracking requirements. Each lot purchased will have its own cost basis that gets reduced by the proportional share of distributions. The good news is that EPD has been pretty consistent with their distribution policy, so the tax treatment should remain fairly predictable year over year. Just keep good records and you'll be fine!
This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about your comment regarding additional EPD purchases - if I buy more shares throughout the year at different prices, how exactly does the proportional distribution tracking work? Do I need to calculate what percentage of my total holdings each purchase represents and then allocate distributions accordingly? Also, you mentioned EPD sends K-1s out late - is there any way to estimate what my tax situation will be before the K-1 arrives, or do I just have to wait? I'm trying to do some preliminary tax planning and it would be nice to have at least a rough idea of whether I'll have taxable income or more basis reduction.
I went through almost the exact same situation last year! The frustrating thing about the ACA premium tax credit system is that it's designed to work on annual income, but life doesn't happen that way - people get new jobs, lose jobs, have income changes throughout the year. What you're experiencing is completely normal (though annoying). When you applied for marketplace coverage, you estimated $31K annual income and received advance premium tax credits based on that. But since your actual annual income was $52K, the IRS sees that you received more credits than you should have based on your final income level. The good news is that there are repayment caps based on your income level. At $52K annually, you're probably looking at a maximum repayment of around $1,500, which seems to match what you're seeing with your refund reduction. A few tips: - Don't ignore that IRS notice - they have your 1095-A from the marketplace and need to see proper reporting - Make sure you complete Form 8962 correctly, especially the monthly allocation section (Part III) which shows you only had marketplace coverage Jan-June - Consider having a tax pro review your 8962 form since you're already dealing with IRS correspondence It definitely feels unfair, but unfortunately this is how the system works. The important thing is to handle it properly now to avoid bigger issues later.
This is such a common frustration with the ACA system! I'm actually going through something similar right now. Your explanation about the repayment caps is really helpful - I didn't realize there were limits based on income level. One thing I'm curious about though - when you mention the Form 8962 monthly allocation section, does that actually help reduce the repayment amount, or does it just make the calculation more accurate? I'm trying to figure out if it's worth the extra complexity or if I'll end up with the same result either way. Also, did you find that having a tax pro review the form was worth the cost? I'm debating whether to try to handle this myself or get professional help, especially since I'm already nervous about the IRS notice.
Great question! The monthly allocation section can definitely help reduce your repayment amount in situations like this where you had a significant income change mid-year. It doesn't change your annual income, but it allows the IRS to calculate your premium tax credit eligibility more precisely for each month you actually had marketplace coverage. In your case, since you only had marketplace coverage during your lower-income months (Jan-June), the monthly allocation method should show that you were legitimately eligible for those credits during the time you received them. This often results in a lower repayment than the simplified annual calculation method. As for the tax pro review - in my experience, it was absolutely worth it. I paid about $175 for a CPA to review my Form 8962, and she caught several errors I would have made that could have triggered additional IRS correspondence. Since you're already dealing with a notice, having a professional ensure everything is done correctly the first time can save you months of back-and-forth with the IRS. Plus, many CPAs are seeing these marketplace coverage issues frequently now, so they know exactly how to handle the monthly allocation properly. The peace of mind alone was worth the cost for me, especially since one mistake on the 8962 could delay resolving your notice for months.
I went through this exact same situation two years ago and it's incredibly frustrating! The system really doesn't account for real-life income changes throughout the year. One thing that helped me was understanding that the IRS has a "safe harbor" provision for situations like yours. If you can demonstrate that your income estimate was reasonable at the time you applied (which it clearly was - you were making $15/hr), and that you promptly reported changes when they occurred (which you did by switching to employer coverage), it can sometimes help with the reconciliation process. Also, make sure you're taking advantage of the Alternative Calculation for Year of Marriage method on Form 8962, even though you didn't get married. This method can apply to significant income changes and might reduce your repayment. It's in Part V of the form and many people miss it. The key is being proactive with that IRS notice. Don't let it sit - respond with your documentation showing the coverage periods and income changes. Include a brief explanation of your situation. The IRS agents who handle these cases see income fluctuations all the time and are usually understanding when you provide clear documentation. Your situation is definitely not uncommon, especially in today's job market where people are making significant career moves. Hang in there!
This is really encouraging to hear from someone who went through the same thing! I had no idea there was a "safe harbor" provision or that the Alternative Calculation for Year of Marriage method could apply to job changes. That's exactly the kind of information I needed. I'm definitely going to look into Part V of Form 8962 - I completely missed that section when I was trying to figure this out on my own. It's frustrating that these options aren't more clearly explained in the standard tax software. Your point about being proactive with the IRS notice is well taken. I've been putting it off because I was hoping to figure out the tax software issue first, but it sounds like I need to just tackle this head-on. Did you find that explaining your situation in writing helped, or did you end up having to call them directly? Thanks for the reassurance that this isn't uncommon - it really does feel like the system penalizes you for improving your financial situation!
Just wanted to mention that if you're overwhelmed by the DIY approach, look into the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program or Tax-Aide through AARP. They sometimes help with back tax returns, not just current year filing. Also, the IRS has a formal program called "First Time Penalty Abatement" where they'll often waive penalties for the first time you've had filing/payment issues if you've otherwise been compliant in prior years. Definitely worth asking about if this is your first time having tax troubles.
I used VITA last year for my back taxes and they were amazing! Just want to clarify though that most VITA sites only handle relatively simple tax returns and many have income limits (usually around $60k). Also, not all VITA sites handle prior year returns - you need to call ahead and ask specifically.
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of filing in the correct order - you'll want to file your oldest returns first and work your way forward to the most recent year. This is because each year's tax calculation can be affected by carryforwards from previous years (like capital losses, charitable contributions, or net operating losses). Also, if you had any estimated tax payments or extensions filed for any of those years, make sure to include that information on your returns. The IRS already has records of any payments you made, so you want to make sure you get credit for them. Another tip: when you do file all these back returns, send them via certified mail with return receipt requested. This gives you proof of when the IRS received them, which can be important for penalty calculations and establishing your "good faith" effort to come into compliance voluntarily. The process feels overwhelming now, but once you get started and have a system in place, it goes faster than you'd expect. You've got this!
This is incredibly helpful advice about filing in chronological order - I hadn't thought about how carryforwards could affect the calculations! Quick question though: if I'm missing some documents for the earliest years but have everything for more recent years, should I wait to file anything until I have all the old documents? Or can I start with what I have and amend the older returns later if needed? Also, the certified mail tip is brilliant. I'm definitely paranoid about the IRS claiming they never received something, especially given how long I've already let this drag on. Thanks for taking the time to share all this detail - it's exactly the kind of practical advice I needed to hear!
TillyCombatwarrior
Great thread everyone! I've been dealing with the same frustration trying to find affordable 1065 filing options. Based on all the recommendations here, I'm leaning toward trying FreeTaxUSA or TaxAct for this year - the $60-80 range sounds much more reasonable than the $200 I paid last year. One question I haven't seen addressed yet: do any of these cheaper options offer good import features? Part of what made TurboTax expensive but convenient was being able to import data from QuickBooks and my bank accounts. If I have to manually enter everything, the time savings might not be worth the cost savings for me. Also really appreciate the tip about getting a CPA review after self-preparing - that's such a smart middle ground approach I never considered!
0 coins
NeonNova
ā¢Great question about import features! FreeTaxUSA does have decent import capabilities - they can pull in data from QuickBooks Online and QuickBooks Desktop, plus they support bank account imports from most major banks. The interface isn't quite as slick as TurboTax's import wizard, but it definitely saves you from manual data entry. TaxAct also has solid import features, including QuickBooks integration and the ability to import previous year returns from other software (including TurboTax), which can save time on basic business info that doesn't change year to year. One thing to keep in mind - even with imports, you'll probably want to double-check the categorizations since different software sometimes handles business expense categories slightly differently. But overall, both options should give you most of the convenience you're used to at a much better price point!
0 coins
Axel Bourke
Just wanted to share my experience as someone who made the switch from expensive tax software last year! I ended up going with TaxAct for our LLC's 1065 return after reading similar discussions, and it saved us about $120 compared to what we were paying before. What really impressed me was their error-checking system - it caught a mistake I made with our office equipment depreciation that could have been costly down the road. The interface took a little getting used to compared to the more polished options, but honestly once you're in there working on your return, functionality matters way more than fancy graphics. One tip I'd add: if you're switching from TurboTax or another service, most of these alternatives can import your prior year return data, which saves a ton of time on the basic business information that doesn't change. Made the transition much smoother than I expected. For a straightforward two-person LLC like yours, any of the options mentioned in this thread should handle your needs well. The key is just making sure they support any specific forms or schedules your business might need before you get too far into the process!
0 coins