IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Noah Irving

•

I'm dealing with a similar situation but want to make sure I understand the withholding part correctly. My 1099-R shows code 1B with $12,000 in box 1 (gross distribution) and $1,200 in box 4 (federal income tax withheld). Does the $1,200 include the 10% early withdrawal penalty, or would that penalty be shown separately somewhere else on the form? I'm trying to figure out if the penalty was actually withheld or if I still need to calculate and pay it myself. The form doesn't seem to break down what portion of the box 4 withholding is for regular taxes versus the penalty.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

Great question! The withholding in box 4 of your 1099-R typically only covers regular federal income tax, not the 10% early withdrawal penalty. The penalty would usually be shown separately or calculated when you file your return. However, with code 1B, you should check if your plan administrator actually did withhold the penalty. Some 401k plans will withhold both regular taxes and the 10% penalty when you request it, but they don't always break it down clearly on the 1099-R form. I'd recommend calling your plan administrator to confirm exactly what was withheld. If they only withheld regular income tax, then you'll likely need to either pay the penalty when you file or have it calculated on your return. If they did withhold the penalty, they should be able to provide documentation showing the breakdown, which would help you determine if you qualify for that Schedule 2 line 8 exception everyone's been discussing.

0 coins

Ellie Lopez

•

This is such a helpful thread! I had the same exact confusion with my 1099-R code 1B situation. What really helped me was understanding that the "1B" code specifically indicates that both regular income tax AND the 10% early withdrawal penalty were subject to withholding from your distribution. For anyone still unsure about their specific situation, I found it helpful to look at the total amount withheld in box 4 and compare it to what 10% of your distribution would be. If the withholding amount seems higher than just regular income tax, that's usually a good sign the penalty was included. The Schedule 2 line 8 exception is definitely the way to go when the penalty was already withheld. Just saved me from having to file that extra 5329 form, which would have been a pain for no reason. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - it's so much more helpful than trying to decode the IRS instructions alone!

0 coins

AstroAce

•

This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been stressing about this for weeks. My 1099-R shows code 1B with about $15,000 distributed and $2,100 withheld in box 4. When I do the math, regular income tax on $15K would probably only be around $3,000-4,000 depending on my bracket, but if you add the 10% penalty ($1,500), the $2,100 withholding makes much more sense. Your point about comparing the withholding to what 10% would be is really smart - I hadn't thought to do that calculation. It definitely seems like both taxes and penalty were withheld in my case. I feel much more confident now about using the Schedule 2 line 8 exception instead of filing the separate 5329. Thanks for breaking it down so clearly!

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

This thread has been absolutely essential for me as someone who just joined this community! I'm filing my taxes for the first time this year and had no clue there were different verification systems to navigate. Reading through everyone's experiences really shows how this ID.me confusion is like a universal trap that catches taxpayers off guard - clearly indicating this is a systematic communication failure by the IRS rather than individual mistakes. The airport security vs passport control analogy finally made it click for me that these are two entirely separate identity checkpoints serving different functions. What gives me confidence is seeing the consistent pattern where people got their issues resolved in 15-20 minutes once they called the RIGHT verification number, versus weeks of spinning their wheels on the wrong ID.me system. I'm definitely saving this entire thread as my emergency reference guide since it provides clearer guidance than any official IRS documentation I've encountered. It's honestly frustrating that taxpayers have to rely on community wisdom to understand basic government processes, but I'm incredibly grateful this resource exists. Now I know that if I ever receive a verification letter, I should completely skip ID.me and immediately call the specific phone number listed on that letter. Thanks to everyone who shared such detailed real-world experiences - you're probably preventing countless tax season meltdowns for newcomers like me!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful for me too as someone who just joined this community! I'm also filing my first complex tax return this year and was honestly feeling overwhelmed about all the potential verification scenarios I might face. Reading through everyone's detailed experiences has been such a relief - it's clear that the ID.me confusion isn't about individual taxpayers being careless, but rather a fundamental flaw in how the IRS presents this information. The airport security vs passport control analogy really made everything click for me as well. What's particularly reassuring is seeing how quickly people resolved their issues (literally 15-20 minutes) once they reached the correct verification department, compared to the weeks of stress when stuck on the wrong path. I'm definitely bookmarking this entire discussion as my go-to resource and will be sharing it with other first-time filers I know. It's amazing how this community provides clearer, more actionable guidance than the official government websites. Thanks to everyone for creating such a comprehensive resource - you're probably saving thousands of newcomers like us from unnecessary confusion during an already stressful time!

0 coins

Natalie Chen

•

This thread has been a lifesaver! As someone brand new to this community and dealing with my first potentially complex tax situation, I had no idea ID.me and IRS verification were completely separate systems. Reading everyone's experiences really drives home how this confusion seems almost designed to trap taxpayers - so many smart, experienced people fell into the same mistake, which clearly shows this is a communication failure by the IRS rather than user error. The airport security vs passport control analogy finally made it all click for me. What's most reassuring is seeing the consistent pattern where people resolved their issues in literally 15-20 minutes once they called the correct verification number, versus weeks of stress when stuck in the ID.me loop. I'm definitely saving this entire discussion as my emergency reference guide since it provides way clearer guidance than anything on the official IRS website. It's honestly mind-boggling that we have to rely on community wisdom to understand basic government processes that should be clearly explained upfront. Now I know that if I ever receive a verification letter, I should completely ignore ID.me and immediately call the specific number on that letter. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed real-world experiences - you're probably preventing countless tax season meltdowns for newcomers like me who would otherwise waste weeks on the wrong system!

0 coins

Demi Hall

•

I went through something very similar last year with a different company. Here's what worked for me: **Start with Google's Merchant Services team** - They handle 1099 disputes better than their general tax department. You can find their contact info in your Google Pay console (even if you don't remember having one - sometimes accounts get created automatically). **Check if you ever had a YouTube channel or Google AdSense account** - Even channels with no uploads can sometimes trigger payments if there were any ad revenue sharing programs you might have unknowingly been enrolled in. Also check if you ever participated in Google Opinion Rewards or any beta testing programs. **Document everything immediately** - Take screenshots of your Google account activity, payment history, and any apps you've purchased/returned. The $30 in refunds you mentioned could be relevant if their system somehow miscategorized those transactions. **File Form SS-8 with the IRS** if Google insists the payment is legitimate - This requests a determination of worker status and can help clarify whether you actually had any business relationship with them. The good news is that Google is usually pretty responsive to 1099 disputes once you reach the right department. Most of these turn out to be system errors rather than identity theft, especially with smaller amounts like $1,427. Just be persistent and keep detailed records of every interaction.

0 coins

This is really helpful! I never thought to check for things like Google Opinion Rewards or beta testing programs. Now that you mention it, I vaguely remember installing some app a while back that asked me to rate things, but I thought I deleted it pretty quickly. Could something like that really generate $1,427 though? That seems like a lot for just rating some apps or products. Also, when you say check the Google Pay console - how do I access that if I don't remember ever setting up an account? Is there a way to see if an account was created automatically using my information?

0 coins

You'd be surprised how these programs can add up! Google Opinion Rewards typically pays small amounts per survey, but if you were enrolled in multiple programs or beta testing initiatives, it could accumulate over time. Some of their research programs or product testing can pay significantly more than the basic survey rewards. To access Google Pay console, go to pay.google.com and try logging in with any Google accounts you might have (even old Gmail accounts you forgot about). If an account exists, you'll see transaction history there. You can also check myaccount.google.com under "Data & privacy" to see all Google services associated with your accounts. Another thing to check - look through your email (including spam folders) for any Google payments notifications from last year. Even if you deleted apps quickly, payment notifications usually get sent to your email and might help piece together what happened. Sometimes these programs continue running in the background even after you think you've opted out.

0 coins

This is a stressful situation, but you're taking the right steps by asking for help! I've seen similar cases where erroneous 1099s were issued, and they're usually resolvable with patience and proper documentation. **Priority Steps:** 1. **Contact Google/Alphabet directly** - Look for their tax department or business services contact. Be clear that you never performed any services and request a corrected 1099-NEC showing $0. 2. **Check all your Google-related activities** - Review any Google accounts you might have (Gmail, YouTube, Play Store, etc.). Sometimes payments can come from unexpected sources like old AdSense accounts, app reviews, or beta testing programs you might have forgotten about. 3. **Secure your identity** - Pull your credit reports from all three bureaus and look for any accounts you didn't open. Consider placing a fraud alert while you investigate. **If Google won't correct it before filing:** Report the $1,427 as miscellaneous income, then take an equal deduction on Schedule 1, line 8z as "Income erroneously reported on 1099-NEC." Attach documentation showing your attempts to resolve this with Google. **Keep detailed records** of every phone call, email, and letter. If this drags on, you may need Form 14039 (Identity Theft Affidavit) or assistance from the Taxpayer Advocate Service. Most importantly - don't panic! The IRS understands that erroneous 1099s happen, and there are established procedures to handle them properly.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

This is excellent comprehensive advice! I especially appreciate the point about checking all Google-related activities - I hadn't thought about old AdSense accounts or beta testing programs. One question about the Schedule 1 reporting: when you mention attaching documentation, what specific documents should be included? Should I attach copies of emails to Google, their responses (if any), or just a written statement explaining the situation? I want to make sure I provide enough detail without overwhelming the return with unnecessary paperwork. Also, at what point would you recommend escalating to the Taxpayer Advocate Service? Is that something to consider if Google doesn't respond within a certain timeframe, or should I wait until after filing to see if the IRS questions the return?

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

Great questions! For documentation, I'd recommend attaching a simple one-page statement that includes: (1) a brief explanation that you never performed services for Google/Alphabet, (2) the dates you contacted them and method (phone/email), (3) any case/reference numbers they provided, and (4) their response or lack thereof. Don't attach every email - just summarize the key facts and keep the originals for your records. Regarding the Taxpayer Advocate Service, I'd suggest escalating if: Google hasn't responded after 30 days, they refuse to investigate, or they insist the 1099 is correct without providing evidence of services performed. You can also contact TAS if the IRS starts correspondence about the discrepancy and you need help explaining the situation. One more tip: when contacting Google, ask specifically for their "Information Returns Department" or "1099 Corrections Department" - these specialized teams understand the legal requirements better than general customer service and can actually authorize corrected forms.

0 coins

PixelWarrior

•

I've been through this exact situation with my cattle ranch operations and want to share a few practical tips that might help. Your calculations look correct for the Section 179 and bonus depreciation combination. One thing that saved me during my IRS examination was keeping a simple monthly business use log. I documented specific farm activities that required the truck - hauling feed to remote pastures, transporting cattle panels, pulling equipment trailers to different fields. The examiner was particularly interested in why I needed that specific truck versus a smaller vehicle, so having records showing payload requirements (like hauling 2,000 lbs of feed) and towing needs (pulling a 12,000 lb equipment trailer) was crucial. Also, regarding your question about the $15,200 "extra" - that's not how it works. The deduction reduces your taxable income, so if you're in the 22% tax bracket, that $63,200 deduction would save you about $13,904 in actual taxes ($63,200 Ɨ 0.22). You wouldn't get a refund for more than you actually paid in taxes. One last tip - I set up a dedicated fuel card for the truck and only used it for business trips. This made tracking business vs personal use much cleaner for record-keeping purposes. Made the whole audit process much smoother when I could show clear documentation of business-only fuel purchases.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of real-world advice I was hoping to get! The monthly business use log idea is brilliant - I've been overthinking the documentation requirements but your approach sounds much more manageable. Quick question about the dedicated fuel card setup: did you also track mileage separately, or was the fuel card record sufficient for proving business use percentage? I'm wondering if I should set up both systems or if one is adequate. Also, thanks for the tax bracket clarification - that makes much more sense than thinking I'd get a direct refund of the difference!

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

I tracked both fuel purchases and mileage, but honestly the fuel card made it so much easier. I kept a simple mileage log in the truck's glove box and recorded the odometer reading, date, destination, and business purpose for each trip. But having the fuel card created an automatic backup record that showed consistent business use patterns. What really helped was that the fuel purchases correlated with my mileage logs - if I logged 500 business miles in a month, the fuel usage made sense for that distance. The IRS examiner appreciated having both records because they reinforced each other. Plus, if you ever forget to log a trip, the fuel card receipts can help you reconstruct your records. I'd recommend setting up both systems from day one. The mileage log is legally required for the deduction, but the fuel card makes your life easier and provides that extra layer of documentation that auditors love to see. It shows you're serious about maintaining proper business records.

0 coins

Luca Bianchi

•

As someone who's been managing farm equipment purchases and depreciation for over a decade, I wanted to add a few points that might help with your decision. Your Section 179 calculations look correct, but I'd strongly recommend running the numbers both ways - taking the full Section 179 deduction versus spreading it out with regular MACRS depreciation. Sometimes the immediate deduction isn't always the best strategy, especially if you're expecting higher income in future years or if your current year income is already pretty low. One thing I learned the hard way - make sure you have a clear business justification for choosing that specific $85K truck over less expensive alternatives. During my audit, the examiner wanted to understand why I needed a $75K truck instead of a $45K one for my farming operations. Having documentation showing specific payload requirements, towing capacity needs, and terrain conditions that required the heavy-duty features was essential. Also, consider the timing of your purchase carefully. If you buy the truck in December 2024, you can claim the full deduction for 2024 even though you only owned it for a few weeks. But if you're planning other major equipment purchases in the next few years, you might want to spread out those Section 179 deductions to maximize your overall tax savings. The depreciation recapture rules mentioned by others are real - I've seen farmers get caught off guard when their business use drops below 50% in later years. Make sure this truck will genuinely be used primarily for farm business for the foreseeable future.

0 coins

This is really comprehensive advice, thank you! I'm particularly interested in your point about running the numbers both ways. Could you elaborate on what circumstances would make regular MACRS depreciation more beneficial than the immediate Section 179 deduction? I'm trying to understand when someone would choose to spread out the deduction instead of taking it all upfront. Also, regarding the business justification documentation you mentioned - beyond payload and towing capacity, what other types of evidence did you find helpful? I'm thinking about specific features like 4WD for muddy field conditions or extended cab space for transporting farm workers, but I want to make sure I'm documenting the right things from the start. One more question - when you mention timing the purchase for December to get the full 2024 deduction, are there any downsides to that strategy, or is it generally just a smart tax move?

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Great questions! Regular MACRS depreciation can be better in a few scenarios: 1) If your current year income is already low (say under $50K) and you expect much higher income in future years, spreading the deduction might put you in higher tax brackets later when the savings are worth more. 2) If you're near retirement and expect to be in a lower bracket soon, taking the deduction now might waste it. 3) If you have other major equipment purchases planned and might hit the Section 179 annual limit ($1.16M for 2024). For business justification documentation, I kept records showing: specific crop acreages that required heavy equipment transport, soil conditions requiring 4WD capability, documented need for crew cab to transport seasonal workers safely, and payload requirements for seed/fertilizer quantities I regularly haul. Photos of field conditions during wet seasons helped show why I needed the ground clearance and traction features of a heavy-duty truck. The December purchase timing is generally smart for immediate tax savings, but there's one downside - you'll have very limited actual business use to document in that first tax year. If you get audited, having only 3-4 weeks of business use records might look suspicious. I prefer making major purchases in spring or summer so I have substantial business use documentation for the tax year I'm claiming the deduction.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

my sister in PA got hers in like 5 days im so jealous rn

0 coins

Mila Walker

•

facts PA be living in 3025 while NY stuck in 1999 šŸ’€

0 coins

Logan Scott

•

This happens literally every year and we never learn lol. NY always slower than molasses in January smh

0 coins

first time filer here... wish someone warned me šŸ˜…

0 coins

Prev1...10391040104110421043...5644Next