IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

PixelPioneer

•

I went through this exact same confusion when I started my S Corp two years ago! Your accountant is absolutely correct - S Corps do need to issue 1099-NECs to qualifying service providers, but the key word is "qualifying." Here's what helped me sort through the maze: Start by understanding that you DON'T need to issue 1099s to corporations, LLCs taxed as corporations, or for payments made via credit card/third-party processors. This eliminates a lot of vendors right off the bat. For your entertainment industry expenses like hair/makeup, these can absolutely be legitimate business deductions if they're specifically for performances, auditions, or professional appearances. Just make sure you can document the business purpose - I keep notes linking each service to specific gigs or professional events. The W-9 collection process gets easier once you establish it as standard practice. I now require W-9s before making any payments over $100 to new vendors. Most professionals understand this is normal business procedure, though some personal service providers might need a gentle explanation about why you need their tax info. Don't feel bad about not knowing this initially - the entertainment industry is notorious for informal payment practices, but as an S Corp you need to follow corporate tax rules. It's a learning curve but you'll get the hang of it!

0 coins

Fiona Sand

•

This is really reassuring to hear from someone who's been through it! I'm definitely feeling less overwhelmed knowing that not every vendor on my accountant's list will actually need a 1099. The part about documenting the business purpose for entertainment expenses is super valuable - I hadn't thought about keeping notes linking services to specific gigs, but that makes total sense for audit protection. Quick follow-up question: when you say you require W-9s before payments over $100, is that just to be safe, or is there a specific reason for that threshold? I know the 1099 requirement kicks in at $600 annually, but I'm wondering if starting the W-9 collection earlier helps with organization or if there are other tax implications I should know about. Also, did you find any good resources or templates for explaining to personal service providers why you need their tax info? Some of my regular beauty team seem a bit wary when I mention tax forms, and I want to approach it professionally without making them uncomfortable.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

I'm just starting my S Corp journey too and this thread has been incredibly helpful! I was literally panicking yesterday when my accountant handed me a similar list of vendors who need 1099s. One thing I'm still confused about - if I paid someone like $400 in cash for makeup services throughout the year but then also Venmo'd them $300 for additional work, does that $700 total mean they need a 1099? Or since the Venmo portion might be handled by the payment processor, do I only count the cash payments toward the $600 threshold? Also, for those of you who've been through this process - how far back do you typically keep records of these vendor payments? I'm trying to organize everything for this year but also wondering if I should be worried about prior years before I had the S Corp set up. Thanks for sharing all your experiences - it's making this whole learning curve feel way less intimidating!

0 coins

LLC Tax Distribution for 2-Member Partnership: How to Handle Unequal Tax Payments

I've got a small marketing agency (LLC with 50/50 ownership) with my college roommate, and I'm completely confused about our tax situation. For the past two years, my business partner has been handling all the tax stuff with her accountant, which seemed fine until I noticed something odd. My partner earns around $125k from her day job while I'm only making about $32k at my part-time gig. When tax time comes, she takes approximately $12k from our business account to pay her taxes, but I only take about $4k for mine. We split all business profits 50/50, so it feels weird that she's withdrawing so much more than I am for taxes. I don't think she's stealing or anything - she explained that before our LLC, she would get substantial tax refunds (like $3k) but now doesn't because of the business income. She claims she's actually saving our company money because she could technically take even more. I'm completely lost when it comes to taxes and have no idea how to properly separate our LLC taxes from our personal situations. I've scheduled a meeting with her accountant to figure this out, but I wanted some outside perspective first. Should I be compensated for the difference between what she's taken versus what I've taken? Is there a way to file our 2023 taxes that doesn't mix our personal income situations? My friends and family think something sounds off about our setup, and I'm starting to feel gaslit about the whole thing. Any advice would be really appreciated!

I think the key issue here is that you need complete transparency and documentation of how these tax distributions are calculated. While it's true that your partner may legitimately owe more taxes due to being in a higher bracket, the current setup sounds problematic from an accountability standpoint. Here's what I'd recommend: First, request detailed calculations showing exactly how much of each person's total tax liability is attributable to the LLC income versus other sources. Second, establish a formal policy for tax distributions in writing - many partnerships use a formula where distributions are made based on each member's estimated tax rate multiplied by their share of business income. Most importantly, consider changing your process so that tax distributions go to each partner individually, and then you each pay your own taxes. Having one person write checks directly from the business account to cover their personal tax obligations creates unnecessary confusion and potential for disputes. You should also verify that you're both getting the same K-1 amounts - if you're truly 50/50 partners, your Schedule K-1 forms should show identical income allocations. If they don't, that's a red flag that needs immediate attention. The fact that your friends and family think something's off suggests your instincts are right to question this arrangement, even if the underlying tax principles are legitimate.

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

This is excellent advice, especially about verifying that both K-1 forms show identical income allocations. That's something I hadn't thought to check but would be a clear indicator if something's wrong. The suggestion about changing the process so tax distributions go to each partner individually makes a lot of sense too. Having one person write business checks for their personal taxes does seem like it muddies the waters unnecessarily, even if the amounts are technically justified. I'm definitely going to ask to see both of our K-1 forms side by side and request the detailed calculations you mentioned. If my partner is truly paying legitimate higher taxes on the same business income, she should have no problem providing that documentation. The transparency piece is really what's been missing from our arrangement.

0 coins

Ravi Malhotra

•

Your situation highlights a really common issue with LLC partnerships - the tax implications can be vastly different for each partner even when profits are split equally. What you're describing could very well be legitimate, but the lack of transparency is the real problem here. From what you've shared, your partner's higher tax withdrawals could be justified if she's in a significantly higher tax bracket due to her $125k day job income. When LLC profits "pass through" to your personal returns, someone earning $125k + LLC profits might pay 32% federal tax on that business income, while someone earning $32k + LLC profits might only pay 12-22%. Add in the 15.3% self-employment tax that you both pay, and the difference becomes substantial. However, you absolutely have the right to understand exactly how these calculations work. I'd recommend: 1. Ask to see both of your Schedule K-1 forms side by side - they should show identical income allocations if you're truly 50/50 partners 2. Request a breakdown showing how much of each person's total tax bill is specifically attributable to the LLC income 3. Consider amending your operating agreement to include a formal tax distribution policy with clear calculation methods 4. Change your process so tax distributions go to each partner individually rather than having one person pay taxes directly from the business account The meeting with her accountant is a great idea, but go in prepared with specific questions about the calculations. If everything is legitimate, there should be complete transparency about how the numbers work.

0 coins

This breakdown is really helpful - I hadn't fully grasped how dramatically different our tax situations could be even with identical business income. The specific tax bracket percentages you mentioned (32% vs 12-22%) really put it in perspective. I'm definitely going to follow your recommendations, especially comparing our K-1 forms side by side. That seems like the most straightforward way to verify we're actually getting equal treatment from the business side. The suggestion about changing our process so distributions go to each partner individually is something I want to bring up with her accountant. It would eliminate a lot of the confusion and make the whole arrangement feel more equitable, even if the dollar amounts end up being different. Thanks for laying out such a clear action plan - I feel much more prepared for that meeting now.

0 coins

I can definitely relate to your panic about this situation! I had something very similar happen with BetMGM last year - got a W2-G for around $85,000 from a lucky streak on blackjack, but when I looked at my actual year-end numbers, I was down about $12,000 overall. The most important thing to understand is that you're NOT stuck paying taxes on $68,000 you didn't actually win. The W2-G is just a reporting mechanism for individual winning sessions, not your net gambling result. Here's exactly what you need to do: 1. **Get your complete DraftKings annual statement immediately** - Log into your account and look for "Tax Documents" or "Win/Loss Statement." This will show your true net position for the entire year, which sounds like it will be a loss. 2. **Report the W2-G income on Schedule 1, Line 8b** - Yes, you have to report the full $68,000 as gambling winnings. 3. **Claim your losses on Schedule A** - You can deduct gambling losses up to the amount of your winnings. If you lost money overall for the year, this should offset most or all of the reported income. 4. **Run the numbers on itemizing vs. standard deduction** - You can only claim gambling losses if you itemize, so calculate which option gives you a lower tax bill. The key is documentation. Keep everything from DraftKings and don't worry about having "ruined yourself financially" - the tax system does account for gambling losses when you follow the proper procedures. You've got this!

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

•

Thank you so much for this detailed breakdown! This is exactly the kind of step-by-step guidance I needed. I'm feeling much less panicked now knowing that there's actually a system in place to handle these situations. I just logged into my DraftKings account and found the "Responsible Gaming" section where I can request the annual win/loss statement. It looks like it will show all my activity across different games for the entire tax year, which should definitely prove I was down overall. One follow-up question - when you itemized to claim your gambling losses, did you lose out on other deductions that you normally would have claimed? I'm trying to figure out if there are any other tax implications I should be considering beyond just the gambling piece. Also, did you have any issues with DraftKings providing the documentation in a format that was acceptable for tax purposes? I want to make sure I'm requesting everything I might need upfront rather than having to go back and forth with them. @CosmicCrusader Really appreciate you sharing your experience - it's incredibly reassuring to hear from someone who successfully navigated this exact situation!

0 coins

Xan Dae

•

I completely understand your panic about this situation - I work as a tax preparer and see this exact scenario with online gambling platforms multiple times every tax season. The good news is you're absolutely NOT stuck paying taxes on $68,000 you didn't actually win. The W2-G is misleading because it only reports individual winning transactions over the threshold ($1,200+ for slots), not your actual net gambling results. Since you mentioned being down money overall with DraftKings for the year, you should be able to offset that reported income with your documented losses. Here's your action plan: **Immediate steps:** - Request your complete annual win/loss statement from DraftKings showing ALL activity for the tax year - This will likely show you had a net loss, which is what actually matters for taxes **Filing process:** - Report the full $68,000 on Schedule 1, Line 8b as required - Deduct your gambling losses on Schedule A (up to the amount of winnings) - Compare itemizing vs. standard deduction to see which saves more money **Key point:** You can only claim gambling losses if you itemize deductions, but with $68,000 in reported winnings to offset, itemizing will almost certainly save you thousands even if you lose other deductions. Keep all your DraftKings documentation - their annual statements are comprehensive and IRS-acceptable. You haven't financially ruined yourself; you just need to navigate the somewhat counterintuitive way gambling taxes work. The system does protect people in your exact situation when you follow the proper procedures.

0 coins

Eva St. Cyr

•

This is such helpful professional insight, thank you! As someone who's completely new to dealing with gambling taxes, I really appreciate having a tax preparer explain this so clearly. I had no idea that the W2-G only reports individual winning sessions rather than net results - that explains why I was so confused and panicked when I saw that $68,000 figure. It seemed impossible that I could owe taxes on money I never actually received. I'm definitely going to request that annual statement from DraftKings right away. Based on what everyone here is saying, it sounds like it should clearly show that I had a net loss for the year, which would offset most or all of that reported income. One question about the itemizing decision - when you help clients with similar situations, are there any other factors besides just comparing the total deduction amounts that I should consider? Like are there any long-term implications of itemizing versus taking the standard deduction that might affect future tax years? @Xan Dae Really grateful for your professional perspective on this. It s'giving me so much more confidence that I can handle this properly without making costly mistakes.

0 coins

Maya Lewis

•

Has anyone here dealt with converting a farm property from an LLC back to individual ownership before a parent's passing? We did this with my grandfather's farm last year to ensure we got the stepped-up basis, but now I'm worried about potential gift tax implications since the LLC was originally in our names (the kids).

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

When we did something similar, our tax attorney advised us to dissolve the LLC and distribute the property back to my father (the original owner) more than a year before any anticipated sale. There were no gift tax issues since it was going back to the original owner, but we did have to file some special paperwork with the property transfer. It worked out well - when he passed, we got the full stepped-up basis and saved about 35% on taxes when we eventually sold.

0 coins

Maya Lewis

•

Thanks, that's reassuring! Did you have to pay any transfer taxes or recording fees when moving the property back to your father's name? Our county has some hefty transfer taxes, and I'm trying to figure out if there are any exemptions for this kind of family transfer.

0 coins

The missing LLC documentation is a red flag that needs immediate attention, especially with BOI reporting deadlines approaching. I'd recommend starting with your state's Secretary of State office - they should have the Articles of Organization on file that will show who signed as the organizer and initial members. For the stepped-up basis question, the key factor is who actually owns the LLC membership interests at the time of your father's death. If he retained ownership (making it a single-member LLC), the property gets stepped-up basis. If you kids already own the LLC, no step-up occurs since you technically already own the property. Given the Medicaid planning aspect, I suspect the LLC ownership was likely transferred to you children to protect the asset, which would unfortunately eliminate the stepped-up basis benefit. However, if your father retained even a small percentage of ownership, that portion would qualify for step-up. You might want to consider having the LLC dissolve and distribute the property back to your father if he's still healthy and the goal is to maximize the stepped-up basis for your family. Just be mindful of the Medicaid lookback period implications that others have mentioned.

0 coins

Evelyn Kelly

•

This is really helpful advice, especially about checking with the Secretary of State office first. I'm new to dealing with estate planning issues, but this whole thread has been eye-opening about how complex these LLC arrangements can get. One thing I'm wondering - if we do find out that my father retained some ownership percentage, is there a way to restructure things now to maximize the stepped-up basis without running into Medicaid issues? It sounds like there might be a narrow window to make changes, but I'm not sure what the best approach would be for someone just starting to understand these rules. Also, does anyone know if the BOI reporting requirements might actually help us figure out the current ownership structure, or is that something we need to resolve before we can even file the BOI report?

0 coins

Don't stress too much! I work with a lot of freelancers and this happens more than you'd think. Here's what I tell them: always report your REAL income, not what's on an incorrect form. The IRS computers mainly flag when reported income is LOWER than what's on forms. When you report MORE, it rarely triggers issues. Think about it - the IRS is happy when you pay taxes on more income! Keep solid records, but don't lose sleep over this. The startup's mistake shouldn't become your problem.

0 coins

So what exactly should we put on Schedule C in this situation? Do we list the 1099 amount and then add the additional income somewhere else, or just put the total correct amount?

0 coins

On Schedule C, you just report the total correct amount of income you actually received. Don't try to split it between what's on the 1099 and what's missing - just put the full, accurate total on the appropriate income line. The IRS matching system will see that you reported MORE than what's on the 1099, which typically doesn't trigger any automated notices. If by some chance there are questions later, your documentation showing the actual payments received will support the higher amount you reported. Keep it simple - accurate total income on Schedule C, solid records in your files, and you're good to go!

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation two years ago with a small marketing agency that basically disappeared after sending me an incorrect 1099. Here's what I learned: First, you're absolutely right to report the actual amount you received - that's what the IRS expects. I reported the correct (higher) income on my Schedule C and kept detailed records of all my payments, invoices, and attempts to contact the company. The key thing that gave me peace of mind was creating a simple one-page summary document that I kept with my tax records. It listed: - The incorrect 1099 amount vs. actual income received - Dates and methods of all my attempts to get it corrected - A brief explanation that the company became unresponsive I never needed to submit this with my return, but having it organized made me feel much more confident about my filing. The IRS never questioned anything because I reported MORE income than what was on their forms. Your bank deposits and invoices are solid evidence - you're in good shape. Don't let their poor record-keeping create stress for you when you're doing everything correctly!

0 coins

Prev1...10361037103810391040...5643Next