IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Emma Wilson

•

I'm so glad I found this thread! I'm dealing with the exact same situation - had to close my small business (selling handmade soaps) earlier this year and kept about $450 worth of remaining inventory for personal use. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been incredibly reassuring. I was also getting those frustrating TurboTax errors when trying to enter negative purchase amounts, and I was starting to worry I was doing something fundamentally wrong. The consensus approach seems crystal clear now: - Line 35: Beginning inventory ($450 in my case) - Line 36: Purchases ($0) - Line 40: Other costs - "inventory withdrawn for personal use" ($450) - Line 41: Ending inventory ($0) The "selling to yourself at cost" analogy really helps me understand why this creates a neutral business impact. I'm not generating income or creating a deductible loss - I'm just closing out the business inventory by transferring it to personal use at exactly what I originally paid. One thing I'm curious about - has anyone had their return reviewed or audited when using this approach? I want to make sure this method is rock-solid from an IRS perspective, especially since it seems like such a common point of confusion for small business owners. Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world examples and numbers. Connor, Dylan, Carmen, and others - seeing your actual situations makes this so much less intimidating!

0 coins

Kevin Bell

•

Emma, I haven't personally been audited for this specific issue, but I can share some perspective as someone who's worked in tax preparation for several years. The approach everyone's describing here - using Line 40 for inventory withdrawn for personal use - is actually the standard, IRS-approved method for handling this situation. The key factors that make this approach audit-resistant are: 1) It creates a neutral business impact (no artificial loss or gain), 2) It properly removes inventory from business books, and 3) It follows the logical flow of the Cost of Goods Sold calculation. The IRS expects to see personal withdrawals handled this way rather than as manipulated purchase amounts. What's most important for audit protection is keeping detailed documentation of what you withdrew and its cost basis - which it sounds like you're planning to do. That inventory list showing the $450 total broken down by specific items and their original costs would be your best defense if questions ever arise. The fact that this is such a common scenario for small business closures means the IRS has well-established guidance on it. As long as you're reporting the withdrawal honestly and not trying to create artificial tax benefits, you should be in great shape. Your soap-making example fits perfectly with all the other successful cases shared in this thread!

0 coins

Ezra Beard

•

This thread has been absolutely invaluable! I was in the exact same boat as Marcus - closed my small photography props rental business after a tough year and had about $825 in remaining inventory (backdrops, lighting equipment, small props) that I decided to keep for personal photography projects. Like everyone else, I initially tried to enter this as a negative purchase in TurboTax and kept getting those frustrating validation errors. After reading through all these detailed explanations and real-world examples, I finally understand why that approach doesn't work. The method that worked perfectly for me: - Line 35: Beginning inventory ($825) - Line 36: Purchases ($0) - Line 40: Other costs - "inventory withdrawn for personal use" ($825) - Line 41: Ending inventory ($0) Result: Cost of Goods Sold = $0, which makes perfect sense since I had no sales. The mental framework that really clicked for me was thinking of it as "closing out" the business inventory rather than trying to create some kind of transaction. I'm not selling to myself, I'm not creating a business expense - I'm simply removing inventory from the business books because the business no longer exists. I also took everyone's advice about documentation seriously. Created a detailed spreadsheet listing every item I kept with its original purchase price, totaling exactly $825. This gives me peace of mind for the current filing and will be essential if I ever sell any of these items personally in the future. Thanks to Marcus for asking the original question and to everyone who shared their experiences - Carmen, Connor, Emma, Fatima, and all the others. This community approach to solving tax problems is amazing!

0 coins

Evelyn Xu

•

Ezra, your photography props example really resonates with me! I'm just starting the process of closing my small business (handmade jewelry) and have been dreading dealing with the inventory I want to keep. Seeing yet another successful real-world example with actual numbers ($825) gives me so much confidence. The "closing out" mental framework you mentioned is brilliant - that's exactly what this is. Not a sale, not an expense, just removing inventory from business books because the business is ending. I think I was overcomplicating it by trying to think of it as some kind of transaction when it's really just an accounting cleanup. Your documentation approach sounds smart too. I'm going to create that detailed spreadsheet before I even start my tax filing so I have all my numbers organized and justified upfront. Better to do it now while I still have all my purchase records easily accessible. Thanks for adding another successful example to this thread! Between your photography props, Connor's jewelry supplies, Emma's soap materials, and all the others, it's clear this method works across all types of small businesses and inventory.

0 coins

Luca Greco

•

Great thread everyone! I just want to emphasize something that might not be obvious - the "multiple jobs" checkbox on the W-4 actually uses a pretty simplified calculation that assumes both jobs are worked simultaneously for the full year. Since you started your restaurant job recently, you might get more accurate withholding by skipping that checkbox entirely and instead calculating the exact additional withholding needed using line 4(c). Here's why: The multiple jobs checkbox essentially takes your annual income from the higher-paying job, finds the tax on that amount, then finds the tax on your total combined income, and withholds the difference. But if you only worked the second job for part of the year, this creates an over-withholding situation. For your situation ($42K main job + partial year restaurant work), I'd recommend: 1. Use the IRS withholding estimator with your actual start date for the restaurant job 2. Input realistic projections for your restaurant earnings through year-end 3. Use the specific dollar amount it recommends for line 4(c) rather than the checkbox This approach has worked really well for me with seasonal and mid-year job changes. You'll get much more precise withholding that accounts for the actual timing of your income rather than the simplified assumptions built into the multiple jobs checkbox.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

This is really insightful advice about the timing issue with the multiple jobs checkbox! I'm actually in a similar boat - started a second job in June and have been wondering why my withholding seemed off even after checking that box. Your point about the checkbox assuming full-year employment for both jobs makes total sense. I never realized it was making that assumption. For someone like Omar who started the restaurant job recently, this could definitely lead to over-withholding the rest of the year. Quick question - when you use the line 4(c) approach with the IRS estimator, do you typically update it again if your second job hours end up being significantly different than what you projected? I'm finding my part-time hours are pretty unpredictable, so I'm wondering how often I should be recalculating this. Thanks for sharing this approach - I think I'm going to try switching from the checkbox method to the specific dollar amount method for the rest of this tax year!

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation - just started a part-time evening job at a retail store while keeping my full-time day job. Reading through all these responses, it sounds like the key takeaway is to be really careful about not under-withholding. One thing I'm curious about that I didn't see mentioned - how do bonuses from either job factor into this? My main job gives annual bonuses in December, and I'm wondering if that could throw off my withholding calculations since it's hard to predict the exact amount. Also, for those who have used the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator, how user-friendly is it really? I tried using some online tax calculators before and they were confusing as heck. Is the official IRS one actually easier to navigate? Thanks to everyone sharing their experiences - this is exactly the kind of real-world advice I needed to hear!

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

I'm currently working as a tax advisor at a mid-sized firm in Leeds and completed my CTA about 18 months ago, so I can definitely share some insights from a similar background to yours! The corporate restructuring projects you mentioned will actually be incredibly valuable for your CTA preparation - I found that having real-world exposure to complex transactions made the exam scenarios much more intuitive. I'd strongly recommend timing your studies to take advantage of this practical experience, perhaps targeting the Taxation of Corporate Reorganisations paper while you're actively working on those projects. In terms of time commitment, I found 15-18 hours per week was sustainable while working full-time. The key is consistency rather than marathon sessions. I did 2 hours most weekday evenings (6-8pm before dinner) and 5-6 hours on Saturday mornings when I was fresh. During particularly busy periods at work, I scaled back to 1 hour of reading per day rather than stopping completely - maintaining momentum is crucial. For paper selection, I'd suggest starting with the area that most closely aligns with your current work. Given your corporate focus, Advanced Corporation Tax or Taxation of Corporate Reorganisations would be natural choices. The practical application you're getting will make the technical content much more meaningful. One tip that really helped me: treat your CTA study as professional development rather than just exam preparation. When working on complex matters, I actively looked for connections to my study material. This approach made both work and study more engaging and helped reinforce key concepts. The exams are challenging but very achievable with proper planning. The career benefits have been substantial - I was promoted to senior advisor within a year of qualifying and now lead our corporate tax team. Happy to discuss specific study strategies or paper choices if helpful!

0 coins

This is such valuable advice from someone who's recently been through the whole process! Your point about treating CTA study as professional development rather than just exam prep really resonates with me - it completely changes the mindset from seeing it as an extra burden to viewing it as enhancing your current role. I'm particularly encouraged by your timing suggestion about aligning the Taxation of Corporate Reorganisations paper with active project work. That synergy between practical experience and study material sounds like it would make both more meaningful and memorable. The 15-18 hours per week commitment seems much more realistic than some of the horror stories I'd heard about needing to study every waking moment! Your scaling back strategy during busy periods (1 hour reading vs stopping completely) is brilliant - I was worried about losing momentum entirely during our upcoming restructuring projects, but maintaining that minimal consistent effort makes perfect sense. The career progression you've described is exactly what I'm hoping to achieve - moving from routine work into more strategic advisory roles. It's really motivating to hear that the benefits started showing up even before you finished the qualification. Thanks for offering to discuss study strategies further - I'd love to take you up on that once I've made my final decision and started mapping out my approach. This whole thread has been incredibly helpful for someone just starting to consider this path!

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

I'm actually in a very similar position to you - working as a tax paralegal at a mid-sized firm in Glasgow and my manager has been encouraging me to consider CTA as well. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful and reassuring! What's really struck me from everyone's experiences is how the practical work experience actually enhances the study process rather than competing with it. The point about those corporate restructuring projects being valuable preparation rather than a hindrance has completely changed my perspective. I was viewing them as obstacles to overcome, but it sounds like they could actually be the perfect foundation for papers like Taxation of Corporate Reorganisations. The consensus seems to be that 15-20 hours per week is sustainable while working full-time, with the key being consistency rather than intensity. I love the approach several people mentioned about maintaining some minimal study even during busy periods rather than stopping completely - that addresses one of my biggest concerns about losing momentum during peak work periods. The career progression stories shared here are exactly the motivation I needed. Hearing about people getting promoted and taking on more complex advisory work even while still studying shows that the investment pays dividends throughout the journey, not just at the end. I think I'm convinced to take the plunge and start next year. The supportive community aspect that several people mentioned is already evident in this thread - it's clear that people who've been through this process are genuinely willing to help newcomers succeed. Thanks to everyone who's shared their experiences. It's made what seemed like an impossible challenge feel genuinely achievable with the right planning and mindset!

0 coins

Oliver Becker

•

Welcome to the CTA journey Paolo! It's great to see another newcomer taking the plunge after reading through all these encouraging experiences. I'm actually just starting my CTA preparation as well, so it's brilliant to connect with someone at a similar stage. Your observation about practical work experience enhancing rather than competing with study really resonates with me too. I'd been so focused on the time management challenge that I hadn't fully appreciated how valuable our day-to-day corporate work could be for the exam preparation. The corporate restructuring angle that several people mentioned sounds like it could be a real advantage for both of us. The 15-20 hours per week commitment that keeps coming up seems much more realistic than I initially feared. I was imagining having to sacrifice all social life for months on end! The approach of scaling back to minimal reading during busy periods rather than stopping completely is such practical advice. Since we're both at similar firms and considering similar timing, maybe we could stay in touch as we start this process? It might be helpful to have someone else going through the same journey to bounce ideas off and share experiences with. The community support aspect that everyone's mentioned clearly extends beyond just the formal study groups. Good luck with your planning - it sounds like we're both making this decision for all the right reasons. The career development opportunities everyone's described are exactly what I'm hoping to achieve as well!

0 coins

I've been dealing with similar gift tax situations for years, and one thing that really helped me understand Form 709 requirements was keeping detailed records throughout the year. I create a simple spreadsheet tracking every gift over $100 to any recipient - it makes filing season so much easier! For your aunt's situation, the strategy of splitting between Jason and his wife Sarah is definitely smart. Just make sure she documents the gifts properly (bank records, check copies, etc.) in case the IRS ever asks. Also worth noting that if she plans to make regular large gifts in future years, she might want to consider setting up a more formal gifting strategy to maximize her lifetime exemption usage. One last tip - if your aunt decides to go with the Form 709 filing route, don't wait until the last minute. The form can be tricky to complete correctly, and you want time to double-check everything or get professional help if needed.

0 coins

That's really smart advice about keeping detailed records! I never thought about tracking gifts over $100 throughout the year. Do you include things like expensive birthday or holiday gifts in that tracking, or just cash gifts? Also, when you mention "formal gifting strategy" - are you talking about things like annual gifting plans or setting up trusts? My aunt is pretty overwhelmed by all the options and we're trying to figure out what makes sense for her situation.

0 coins

Yes, I include ALL gifts over $100 - cash, expensive birthday/holiday gifts, even things like paying for someone's vacation or car repairs. The IRS considers anything of value a gift, so it's better to track too much than too little. I learned this the hard way when I got audited and realized I'd been under-reporting gifts for years! For formal gifting strategies, I was thinking more along the lines of annual gifting plans where your aunt decides upfront how much she wants to give each person every year to maximize her annual exclusions. For example, if she wants to help multiple family members, she could give $17,000 to several people each year rather than larger lump sums that trigger Form 709 filing. Trusts are definitely more complex and probably overkill unless your aunt has a really large estate. For most people, just being strategic about timing and amounts of direct gifts works great. The key is consistency and good record-keeping!

0 coins

Oliver Becker

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my mom wants to help multiple grandchildren with college expenses. Based on what everyone's shared here, it sounds like the key is being strategic about timing and amounts. One thing I wanted to add - if your aunt is planning to help with education costs, she might want to consider paying tuition directly to the school instead of giving cash to the students. Those direct payments to educational institutions don't count toward the annual gift tax exclusion at all, so she could pay unlimited tuition amounts without any gift tax implications. Then she could still give each person up to the annual exclusion amount ($17,000 for 2023) on top of that. This could be a great way to maximize her giving without triggering Form 709 filing requirements. Just make sure the payments go directly to the institution - if she gives the money to the student who then pays tuition, it counts as a regular gift subject to the annual limits.

0 coins

When my wife needed an ITIN (she's from Brazil, we live there), we used a Certified Acceptance Agent in our country instead of mailing everything to the IRS. Made the process way easier because they verified all her documents locally so we didn't have to send originals or certified copies through international mail. The IRS website has a directory of acceptance agents worldwide. Might be worth checking if there's one near you: https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/acceptance-agents-1

0 coins

How much did the acceptance agent charge you? I found one in my country but they want $200 which seems steep.

0 coins

I went through this exact situation last year! As others mentioned, you definitely need to get your wife an ITIN even when filing separately - it's required for the spouse field on your tax return. A few practical tips from my experience: 1. Don't stress about the "date of entry" field being blank - just attach a brief statement explaining she's never entered the US 2. Make sure to get a certified copy of her passport (not just a regular photocopy) 3. The process took about 12 weeks for us, so plan accordingly One thing I wish I'd known earlier: you can actually request expedited processing if you're facing a hardship due to the delay. We didn't know about this option and just waited the full processing time. Also, keep copies of everything you send - the IRS sometimes requests additional documentation and it helps to have everything on hand. The good news is once you get through this first year, you'll have her ITIN for all future tax filings. It's a pain initially but worth getting it sorted out properly.

0 coins

Aaliyah Reed

•

This is really helpful, thank you! I'm in the same boat right now. Quick question about the expedited processing - what qualifies as a "hardship"? I'm worried about missing some tax deadlines because of the ITIN delay, but I'm not sure if that counts as a valid reason for expedited processing. Also, when you say "certified copy" of the passport, did you have to get this done at a specific place like the embassy or consulate? I'm living in a smaller city and not sure where to get proper certification done.

0 coins

Prev1...10181019102010211022...5643Next