Back to California Unemployment

Aisha Hussain

What is supplemental unemployment benefits and how does it affect my California EDD claim?

So I recently got laid off from my manufacturing job and my company actually offered something called 'supplemental unemployment benefits' through our union contract. I had no idea this was even a thing until HR mentioned it during my exit meeting. I've been filing my weekly claims with California EDD like normal but now I'm completely confused about how these supplemental payments from my employer interact with my regular UI benefits. Do I have to report the supplemental unemployment benefits on my weekly certification? Will it reduce what California EDD pays me? I don't want to accidentally commit fraud or mess up my claim but I honestly can't find a clear answer anywhere on the EDD website. Has anyone dealt with this situation before?

Great question and honestly more people should know about this. Supplemental unemployment benefits, often called SUB payments, are employer-funded payments made on top of your regular state unemployment insurance. They're typically set up through union collective bargaining agreements or employer separation plans. The whole point is to bring your total weekly income closer to what you were earning while employed. Here's the critical part for your California EDD claim: YES, you absolutely must report SUB payments when you certify for your weekly benefits. California EDD considers these payments when calculating your UI payment for that week. However, the good news is that SUB payments that qualify under IRS guidelines are treated differently than regular wages - they typically don't disqualify you from UI but they may reduce your weekly benefit amount depending on how much you receive.

0 coins

Okay so if the SUB payments from my employer are say $200 a week and my EDD weekly benefit amount is $450, do I still get the full $450 or does EDD reduce it?

0 coins

It depends on the structure. California EDD uses an earnings disregard formula - you can earn up to 25% of your weekly benefit amount without reduction. Beyond that it's dollar for dollar reduction. So with $450 WBA, first $112.50 of the SUB wouldn't affect your benefit, but the remaining $87.50 would reduce your payment. You'd still get roughly $362.50 from EDD. Still way better than nothing.

0 coins

wait this is super helpful i had no idea supplemental unemployment benefits worked this way. my company offered something similar when they did layoffs last spring and i just ignored it thinking it would mess up my edd claim

0 coins

I went through almost this exact situation about 8 months ago when my aerospace company did a workforce reduction. The union had negotiated SUB pay into our contract years ago and nobody really understood it until we actually needed it. One thing I want to add to what was already said - make sure you get documentation from your employer clearly stating these are qualified SUB payments and not severance or wages. California EDD treats those three things very differently. Severance can actually disqualify you from benefits for the period it covers. SUB payments generally don't disqualify you. This distinction is really important and HR departments sometimes don't explain it clearly at all.

0 coins

Oh wow I didn't realize severance and SUB payments are treated differently. My HR person just kind of lumped everything together when explaining my package. How do I find out which category my payments fall into?

0 coins

Ask HR specifically whether the payments are designated as 'Supplemental Unemployment Benefits under IRC Section 501(c)(17)' or equivalent. That specific designation is what makes them SUB payments for tax and unemployment purposes. If they can't give you a clear answer, request a copy of the SUB plan documentation.

0 coins

this is genuinely the most useful thing I've read on this forum in months. filing this away for future reference because my company has been hinting at restructuring

0 coins

Been dealing with California EDD claims for years and this SUB payment question trips up so many people. I want to add something practical here. When you certify your weekly claim on UI Online, there's a question that asks something like 'did you receive any payments from your employer this week?' - that's where you report your SUB payment. Don't leave it blank, don't guess, report the exact amount. If you're unsure whether something counts as reportable income, the safest move is always to report it and let EDD make the determination. Also worth knowing: if your employer's SUB plan is properly structured, these payments might not even count as 'wages' for Social Security purposes, which has implications beyond just your unemployment claim. But for EDD certification purposes, report everything and let the system sort it out.

0 coins

Thank you this is so helpful. I've been stressing about this for two weeks. One more question - if I've already certified for a couple of weeks without reporting the SUB payments (because I genuinely didn't know), what should I do now?

0 coins

Don't panic but do act quickly. You need to contact California EDD and proactively report the unreported income. This is much better than waiting for them to discover it. You can send a message through UI Online or call them directly. Being upfront dramatically reduces the risk of an overpayment penalty.

0 coins

Getting through to EDD by phone to fix something like this is genuinely painful. I tried for almost two weeks to reach someone about a much simpler issue. Eventually found Claimyr at claimyr.com - it basically navigates the EDD phone system for you and gets you to an actual agent. There's a video showing how it works at https://youtu.be/JmuwXR7HA10 - for something like unreported income you really do want to speak to a human not just send a message.

0 coins

Okay I'm going to look into that Claimyr thing because you're right, I really need to speak to an actual person about this and not just send a message that might sit in a queue for weeks.

0 coins

ugh the EDD phone system is genuinely one of the most frustrating experiences of my adult life. called 47 times in one day once. FORTY SEVEN. got through twice and got disconnected both times. the hold music haunts my dreams

0 coins

lol the hold music is something else. i started recognizing which part of the loop i was at by ear

0 coins

right?? like i became weirdly expert at predicting when it would cut back to the 'your call is important to us' message

0 coins

Same experience here. I did eventually use Claimyr and it was genuinely a relief. You just let it do the calling while you go about your day and it contacts you when an agent is on the line. For something like a SUB payment question where you actually need a real answer, being able to actually reach someone is worth it.

0 coins

okay backing up a second because I want to make sure I understand the basics. supplemental unemployment benefits - these are paid BY THE EMPLOYER not by the government right? so it's like... your company agrees to top up your unemployment check? that sounds almost too good to be true lol

0 coins

Exactly right. SUB plans are employer-funded, usually negotiated through union contracts or set up as part of company-wide severance packages. The government doesn't pay them - your employer does. It's essentially a private supplement to the public unemployment insurance system. Larger unionized companies in manufacturing, automotive, aerospace, and similar industries are where you see them most commonly.

0 coins

that makes way more sense now. so not every laid off person has access to this, it depends on whether your company has a SUB plan in place?

0 coins

Correct. Most workers don't have access to SUB plans. They're still relatively rare and mostly tied to union contracts or specific corporate separation agreements at larger companies. If HR didn't mention it to you during your layoff, you probably don't have one.

0 coins

I'm going to push back slightly on some of the information in this thread because I think people are oversimplifying. The interaction between SUB payments and California EDD is actually more nuanced than 'just report it and you're fine.' The IRS qualification criteria for a SUB plan is quite specific. The plan must be a written, funded program. Payments must be contingent on the employee receiving state unemployment benefits. The payments can't exceed the difference between state UI benefits and a certain percentage of regular wages. And critically - the employer can't be the individual's direct beneficiary of the trust. If your employer's 'SUB payments' don't meet these criteria, they might actually be classified as wages or severance by California EDD regardless of what your HR department calls them. This matters A LOT for your claim.

0 coins

Okay now I'm worried again lol. How would I even know if my employer's plan meets the IRS criteria?

0 coins

Honestly this is exactly the kind of thing where talking to an EDD agent or a workers' rights attorney is worth the effort. The documentation from your employer should specify if it's a 501(c)(17) qualified plan. If it's not specifically designated that way, treat it as regular income for EDD reporting purposes until you get clarification.

0 coins

This is a fair point. I oversimplified earlier. The 501(c)(17) designation really is the key factor. Without that, EDD may treat the payments as wages and that's a very different situation for your weekly benefit calculation.

0 coins

I'm going to call EDD directly to get this sorted. Using that Claimyr service someone mentioned earlier because I cannot spend two weeks playing phone tag on something this time-sensitive.

0 coins

can supplemental unemployment benefits affect your eligibility for other programs? like if you're getting SUB payments plus EDD benefits is that going to mess up CalFresh or Medi-Cal applications if you need those

0 coins

Good question. For CalFresh and Medi-Cal purposes, both your EDD UI benefits and any SUB payments would generally count as income when determining eligibility. So yes, receiving SUB payments on top of unemployment could affect means-tested program eligibility. Worth checking with those programs separately because they have their own income calculations.

0 coins

ugh one more thing to figure out. the bureaucracy of being unemployed is genuinely a part time job

0 coins

the bureaucracy of being unemployed is a part time' job is the most accurate sentence'I ve ever read on thisforum

0 coins

I got laid off from a big food processing plant last year and we had SUB pay through the Teamsters contract. Honestly the hardest part wasn't the paperwork it was just getting any actual human at California EDD to confirm I was doing everything correctly. I didn't want to mess it up. I ended up using Claimyr (claimyr.com) after about a week of failed calls. Watched the demo video at https://youtu.be/JmuwXR7HA10 first to understand how it worked, then just set it up. Got connected to an EDD rep within the same day. The agent confirmed exactly how to report the SUB payments and I didn't have any issues with my claim after that. For something this specific, getting verbal confirmation from an actual EDD employee gave me peace of mind that no forum post could.

0 coins

This is really reassuring to hear. Did the EDD agent seem familiar with SUB plans or did you have to explain everything?

0 coins

She knew what I was talking about when I said 'SUB plan' and 'supplemental unemployment benefits' - didn't need to explain the concept from scratch. She just needed to look at my specific employer's payment structure. So yeah have your documentation ready when you call.

0 coins

good to know these agents actually know about this stuff. I was worried it would be like calling tech support and getting someone reading from a script

0 coins

Something nobody has mentioned yet: the TAX implications of supplemental unemployment benefits are actually different from regular UI benefits. Regular California EDD unemployment insurance is taxable federally but California does NOT tax UI benefits at the state level. SUB payments under a qualified 501(c)(17) plan are generally treated as wages for FICA purposes (Social Security and Medicare taxes) but may be taxable differently than regular wages depending on how the plan is structured. This means at tax time you might receive both a 1099-G from EDD for your UI benefits AND a W-2 or 1099 from your employer for the SUB payments. Make sure you're accounting for both when filing. A lot of people get blindsided by this.

0 coins

Oh wow I had not thought about the tax angle at all. So I might owe taxes on the SUB payments even though I'm unemployed?

0 coins

Potentially yes. California doesn't tax UI but the SUB payments from your employer are likely still taxable income federally. Depending on the plan structure they might also be subject to FICA. I'd recommend asking your employer to withhold taxes from SUB payments or setting aside roughly 22-24% of each payment if you're in a middle tax bracket.

0 coins

This tripped me up last year. Got a W-2 from my old employer for SUB payments I didn't even realize would be taxed. Owed more than I expected in April. Definitely plan ahead for this.

0 coins

my situation is a little different - i work in the gig economy mostly but my last 'real' employer before I went freelance had a severance thing that they called supplemental benefits but it was really just deferred salary. EDD eventually flagged it and said it was wages not SUB payments and reduced my benefits for like three weeks. total nightmare

0 coins

This is exactly the issue I raised earlier about the distinction between genuine SUB payments and things employers rebrand with that label. What your employer did - calling deferred salary 'supplemental benefits' - doesn't change how EDD classifies it. The classification depends on the structure, not what your employer names it.

0 coins

yeah i learned that the very hard way. edd sent me an overpayment notice and i had to appeal. the appeal process was another whole ordeal but i did eventually win it since the documentation showed i wasn't trying to hide anything

0 coins

Did you have to do a formal hearing or was it resolved at the lower appeal level?

0 coins

just the first level appeal, no ALJ hearing required. took about 6 weeks but they reversed the overpayment decision. keep ALL your documentation people

0 coins

quick question that's kind of related - if you're on standby status with California EDD, does receiving supplemental unemployment benefits from your employer affect the standby exemption from job search requirements?

0 coins

Good question. Standby status exempts you from the normal job search requirements because you're expected to return to your employer. If you're receiving SUB payments from that same employer while on standby, it generally shouldn't affect the standby status itself - the two are somewhat separate. But you still need to report the SUB payments on your weekly certifications regardless of your standby status.

0 coins

okay that makes sense. so standby handles the job search side and the SUB payment is just a separate income reporting thing. got it

0 coins

Correct. They operate on parallel tracks. Standby status is about your return-to-work expectation and job search requirements. SUB payment reporting is about income disclosure. Both matter but they don't cancel each other out.

0 coins

I want to circle back to something the OP mentioned - worrying about accidentally committing fraud. I think a lot of people psych themselves out about this and then either overcorrect (reporting things that aren't actually wages) or undercorrect (not reporting things they should). The fraud threshold at California EDD is about INTENT. Honest mistakes, especially ones you proactively correct, are treated as overpayments subject to repayment - not fraud. If you're asking questions, documenting your process, and trying to do things right, you're not in fraud territory. Just make sure you're certifying accurately going forward and address any past discrepancies directly with EDD.

0 coins

This actually really helps my anxiety about the whole situation. I was spiraling a little about the weeks I already certified without reporting the SUB payments.

0 coins

Completely understandable. The important thing is you found out about this and you're acting on it now. EDD really does distinguish between people who come forward proactively and people who try to hide things. You're in the first category.

0 coins

yeah edd's overpayment notices are scary looking but when you actually go through the appeal process (if needed) they're much more reasonable about honest mistakes than you'd expect from how those letters are written

0 coins

Does anyone know if there's a limit to how long supplemental unemployment benefits can last? Like does it have a set duration the same way California EDD regular UI has a maximum weeks limit?

0 coins

The duration of SUB payments is determined entirely by the employer's plan, not by California EDD rules. EDD sets limits on how long you can receive state UI benefits (generally up to 26 weeks in California). But SUB payments might last only a few weeks, or they might match the duration of your UI benefits - totally depends on your employer's plan documents.

0 coins

interesting. so in theory you could exhaust SUB payments before exhausting EDD benefits, or vice versa?

0 coins

Exactly. They run on independent timelines. Some plans pay a fixed lump sum spread over several weeks. Others pay weekly until you're recalled or find new work. Read your plan documentation carefully - it should spell out the exact duration and payment schedule.

0 coins

has anyone successfully filed for supplemental unemployment benefits when the company disputed the layoff as 'resignation'? my employer is trying to claim i voluntarily left but the situation was basically a forced out thing and i'm fighting it through edd now

0 coins

That's actually a separate issue from SUB payments - that's a standard UI eligibility dispute that goes through California EDD's adjudication process. If your employer is claiming you resigned, EDD will investigate and interview both you and your employer. The SUB payment question only becomes relevant if you win the eligibility dispute and then need to understand how those employer payments interact with your UI award.

0 coins

yeah you're right i kind of blended two different problems together. my main fight right now is just getting EDD to recognize I was laid off not quit. the SUB stuff would be secondary

0 coins

For the disputed separation - document everything. Text messages, emails, any written communication that supports the layoff characterization. EDD adjudication for contested separations goes pretty deep into the circumstances. The more documentation you have the better your case.

0 coins

I found this thread searching for exactly this question and wow what a gold mine. One thing I haven't seen addressed: if my company is paying SUB benefits, are they also paying into California's unemployment insurance fund on my behalf during that period? Like are they essentially paying twice?

0 coins

Interesting question. California UI taxes (the employer-side contributions) are based on wages paid. If your employer is paying SUB benefits through a qualified plan, those SUB payments are NOT wages for UI tax purposes - they come from a separate trust fund. So no, your employer isn't paying UI taxes on the SUB payments themselves. The regular UI taxes on your original wages are what funded your EDD claim.

0 coins

that actually makes the whole system make more sense to me now. so the employer is managing two separate things: their UI tax contributions on wages, and their own voluntary SUB fund

0 coins

Exactly right. The SUB plan is entirely voluntary on the employer side (unless required by union contract). It's a separate employer benefit that happens to supplement a government program. The two systems interact for the employee but are funded and administered separately.

0 coins

honestly this whole thread should be pinned somewhere. I've been on this forum for two years and never saw such a clear explanation of how supplemental unemployment benefits work with california edd. usually these threads just devolve into people screaming about the phone hold times lol

0 coins

Ha! I started this thread in a panic and now I feel like I have an actual plan. Going to contact EDD to report the weeks I missed, get my employer's plan documentation to confirm it's a qualified 501(c)(17) plan, and set aside some money for potential tax implications.

0 coins

That's exactly the right approach. You've done the hard part of understanding the situation. Execution is straightforward from here - just stay organized with your documentation and be proactive with EDD communication.

0 coins

updates us on how it goes OP! genuinely rooting for you

0 coins

late to this thread but one more thing worth mentioning for anyone who gets SUB payments and lives near a state border - if you worked in California but live in Nevada or another state, the interaction between supplemental unemployment benefits and whichever state administers your claim gets complicated. California EDD handles your claim if California was your base period state but the reporting requirements might vary. Just flagging this as something to specifically ask about if cross-state work is part of your situation.

0 coins

Not my situation but good to flag for others - thank you

0 coins

This is also relevant for people who worked remote jobs for California employers while physically based in another state. The wage base state and the residence state can differ and SUB payment reporting can get genuinely complicated. Good add.

0 coins

I just want to say I was in a similar position three months ago and the combination of understanding supplemental unemployment benefits correctly PLUS actually being able to get through to a California EDD agent made all the difference. I used Claimyr (claimyr.com) to get through the phone system - there's a walkthrough video at https://youtu.be/JmuwXR7HA10 if you want to see how it works before using it. The agent I reached was able to immediately pull up my claim, see the SUB payments I had reported, confirm they were being processed correctly, and note my file with the plan documentation I described. Three weeks later my benefits were paid correctly with no overpayment issues. For a situation with this many moving parts, speaking to an actual human who can see your file is irreplaceable.

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear. Setting up Claimyr this afternoon so I can get this resolved before my next certification date.

0 coins

claimyr really does solve the EDD phone access problem. the information in this thread is great but at some point you need someone who can actually look at YOUR specific claim not just explain general rules

0 coins

bookmarking claimyr.com for when I inevitably need it

0 coins

final thought from me on this thread - if your employer's SUB plan has been paying you benefits and then suddenly stops (because you found new work, or because the plan duration expired), make sure you notify California EDD promptly. Some people forget that stopping SUB payments can actually change their weekly benefit calculation back to the full WBA amount, which is good news - but only if EDD knows the payments stopped.

0 coins

Oh interesting - so the adjustment works both ways? If I stop receiving SUB payments EDD would increase my payment back to the full weekly benefit amount?

0 coins

Exactly. EDD recalculates each week based on what you report. Week with SUB payments = reduced EDD benefit. Week without SUB payments = full EDD benefit. This is actually an argument for staying really on top of your weekly certifications and reporting accurately each week rather than just copying what you reported last week.

0 coins

This is a great point to end on. Weekly certifications are not set and forget - your income situation can change week to week and your reporting needs to reflect that. Accurate weekly certifications are the single most important thing you can do to protect your California EDD claim.

0 coins

California Unemployment AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
43,680 users helped today