Can I get EDD benefits if fired for refusing hybrid work after maternity leave due to childcare issues?
I'm currently on maternity leave (due back next month) and just found out my company is completely restructuring my department. My new boss emailed me saying they're changing my role to require 3 days in-office weekly instead of the previous remote arrangement. The problem is, I don't have reliable childcare to accommodate this schedule, and the cost of childcare for those days would eat up most of my salary anyway. I'm worried they might terminate me if I can't comply with the new hybrid requirement. I absolutely don't want to quit, but I'm trying to prepare myself for worst-case scenarios. If they fire me because I can't do the hybrid schedule due to childcare limitations: 1. Would I qualify for unemployment benefits while I search for a fully remote position? 2. Does it matter how they classify the termination? (performance, job elimination, etc.) 3. If they're willing to say my role was eliminated/dissolved during restructuring rather than firing me for refusing the schedule change, would that make unemployment approval more likely? I'm panicking a bit because I need to have a backup plan financially. If anyone has been through something similar, I'd really appreciate your insights!
16 comments
Selena Bautista
This is definitely a complicated situation, but I can offer some guidance based on my experience with EDD claims. Generally speaking, if you're fired because you can't meet new job requirements (like the hybrid schedule) through no fault of your own (lack of childcare is considered a compelling reason), you should qualify for unemployment. The key here is that you're not refusing to work - you're unable to meet the new requirements due to childcare constraints, which EDD often recognizes as a valid reason. It would definitely help if your employer classifies it as a layoff or job elimination rather than firing you for performance or insubordination. Make sure to document everything: save the email about the restructuring, any communication about your childcare limitations, and exactly how they frame your termination. When you file, be very clear that you were willing to continue working your original position but that the terms changed substantially after your maternity leave.
0 coins
Tasia Synder
•Thank you! This is really helpful. Should I try to get something in writing from them that explicitly states my position was eliminated during restructuring if that happens? I'm just worried my new boss might make it sound like I'm refusing to work rather than being unable to meet the new hybrid requirement.
0 coins
Mohamed Anderson
OMG i went thru almost the EXACT same thing last yr!!! my boss changed my hours after i came back from having my baby and i couldnt get daycare for the new schedule. they fired me saying i was "refusing to work scheduled shifts" but EDD approved my claim cuz i explained i TRIED to find childcare but couldnt! jst make sure u tell EDD ur side of the story, dont let the employer control the narrative!!!!
0 coins
Tasia Synder
•That's so reassuring to hear you were approved! How long did it take for your claim to be processed? Did you have to do an interview with EDD about the circumstances?
0 coins
Ellie Perry
I handle unemployment cases professionally, and this situation comes up frequently. Here's what you need to know: 1. EDD considers a substantial change in working conditions (like switching from remote to hybrid) after a protected leave as potential grounds for a valid claim. 2. Document that you're willing to work but specifically cannot accommodate the new arrangement due to childcare constraints. This is critical - it's not that you're refusing work, but that you physically cannot arrange care. 3. Yes, the termination reason matters significantly. "Job elimination" or "layoff due to restructuring" is ideal. "Unable to meet new job requirements" is acceptable. "Misconduct," "insubordination," or "refusal to work" will likely result in disqualification. 4. If they offer you the opportunity to resign instead of being fired, DON'T TAKE IT. A voluntary resignation is much harder to qualify for benefits with. 5. If approved, you'll need to certify that you're available for work - meaning you're available for suitable work that matches your skills in a remote capacity.
0 coins
Mohamed Anderson
•Thats EXACTLY what happened 2 me!! They tried 2 get me 2 resign & i almost did but my sister told me not 2!! So glad i got fired instead lol never thought id say that 😂
0 coins
Landon Morgan
If they fire you, make sure to apply for unemployment right away and document everything. I've seen people get denied initially but win on appeal. Good luck!
0 coins
Teresa Boyd
I went through something similar in 2024, except it was after a medical leave. When I came back, my role had been changed and I couldn't physically do the new requirements. EDD initially denied my claim saying I "refused suitable work," but I appealed and went through an eligibility interview where I explained the situation. The most frustrating part was actually REACHING someone at EDD to explain my situation. I spent 3 weeks calling hundreds of times without getting through. Finally found this service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to an EDD representative within 30 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/JmuwXR7HA10?si=TSwYbu_GOwYzt9km It was worth it because once I actually talked to someone and explained that the job duties had substantially changed and why I couldn't perform them, they reversed the denial. The key was having that conversation rather than just what was in the initial paperwork.
0 coins
Tasia Synder
•Thank you for the tip about Claimyr! If I end up needing to file a claim, I'll definitely keep that in mind. It's good to know there's a way to actually reach someone if there are issues. Did you have to provide any documentation about how your job changed?
0 coins
Lourdes Fox
this is totally discrimination!!! they cant change ur job while ur on maternity leave, thats illegal. u should file a complaint with the labor board not just worry about EDD. companies always do this to new moms hoping theyll just quit!!!!
0 coins
Ellie Perry
•This isn't necessarily discrimination under California law. Companies can reorganize departments and change job requirements, even while someone is on leave, as long as they would have made the same changes regardless of the leave status. If everyone in the department is moving to hybrid and she's not being singled out, it's likely legal. However, OP might be eligible for job protection under CFRA/FMLA if she hasn't exhausted her leave time, which would require them to restore her to the same or equivalent position upon return. But "equivalent" doesn't always mean identical working conditions.
0 coins
Bruno Simmons
I don't think you'll qualify for UI actually. My sister-in-law was in almost this exact situation and EDD ruled it as a voluntary quit because she couldn't meet the new schedule requirements. EDD said she chose family responsibilities over work which counts as voluntary. Maybe it depends on the EDD interviewer you get?
0 coins
Selena Bautista
•The difference here is that OP is being fired, not quitting. If the employer terminates her employment because she can't meet the new requirements, that's not the same as her choosing to quit. The law recognizes this distinction. Your sister-in-law's case sounds like she may have resigned rather than being formally terminated, which can lead to different outcomes with EDD.
0 coins
Aileen Rodriguez
When you file your claim, make sure to explain that this was a substantial change in working conditions after your protected leave. I'd recommend using these exact phrases in your application: "material change in working conditions" and "childcare constraints preventing compliance with new requirements." Also, be prepared for an eligibility interview. EDD almost always schedules these for cases involving potential job refusal issues. During the interview, stick to facts about the changes and your childcare limitations rather than expressing negative opinions about your employer. One last thing - when you certify for benefits, make sure you indicate you're available for full-time work. If you say you can only work part-time or remote-only, it can complicate your claim. You can explain the childcare limitations during the interview process.
0 coins
Tasia Synder
•This is really helpful specific advice, thank you! If I do end up in this situation, I'll definitely use those exact phrases. About being available for full-time work - that's tricky since I would need a remote position due to childcare. Would checking that I'm available for full-time work when I actually need remote work be considered misrepresentation?
0 coins
Ellie Perry
To answer your follow-up question about availability - this is a nuanced area. When certifying, you're asked if you're available for full-time work. The best approach is to answer "yes" and then explain your specific circumstances during the eligibility interview. Remote work is now common enough that it's considered a standard work arrangement in many industries, not a special accommodation. If your field typically offers remote positions, you can be considered "available for suitable work" while limiting your search to remote positions due to childcare constraints. During your interview, explain that you're actively seeking full-time employment that matches your skills and experience in arrangements that accommodate your childcare needs. Emphasize that you're not turning down suitable work - you're specifically seeking work that's compatible with your situation.
0 coins