UCC security agreements - debtor name changes affecting perfection status?
Running into a complex situation with our security agreements under UCC and hoping someone can clarify the perfection requirements. We have a borrower who filed bankruptcy last year, emerged with a confirmed plan, but during the process their legal entity name changed slightly (LLC became Corp). Our original UCC-1 was filed with the old entity name and we're coming up on the 5-year continuation deadline. The collateral is manufacturing equipment worth about $450K. My question is whether we need to file an amendment to correct the debtor name BEFORE filing the continuation, or if we can do both simultaneously? The state portal seems to allow both but I'm worried about creating a gap in perfection. Has anyone dealt with debtor name changes in the context of security agreements where the entity structure actually changed during bankruptcy? Want to make sure we don't accidentally create an unperfected security interest.
34 comments
Join the conversation
Holly Lascelles
This is exactly the kind of situation where you want to be extra careful with your UCC filings. Generally speaking, if the debtor's legal name has changed, you'll want to file a UCC-3 amendment first to correct the debtor name, then file your continuation. The reason is that a continuation statement needs to match the current debtor information exactly. If you try to continue under the old name while the debtor's legal name has changed, you risk having an ineffective continuation.
0 coins
Malia Ponder
•Wait, doesn't the UCC have some kind of safe harbor for name changes? I thought there was a 4-month window or something where the old name still works for filings.
0 coins
Holly Lascelles
•You're thinking of the seriously misleading rule, but that applies more to new filings against collateral acquired after a name change. For continuations, you want the debtor name to match exactly what's currently correct.
0 coins
Kyle Wallace
Had this exact issue last year but with an entity that changed from Corp to LLC. Filed the amendment first, waited for it to process, then filed the continuation about a week later. Everything went smooth. The key thing is making sure both the old name and new name are properly reflected in your amendment filing so there's a clear chain of title in the UCC records.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•Did you have any issues with the timing? I'm worried about the continuation deadline approaching and whether there could be a gap if the amendment takes too long to process.
0 coins
Kyle Wallace
•No issues with timing in my case. Most states process amendments pretty quickly, usually within 1-2 business days for electronic filings. Just don't wait until the last minute on your continuation deadline.
0 coins
Ryder Ross
•Actually had a situation where I was cutting it close on timing and discovered Certana.ai's document checker. You can upload your UCC-1, the proposed amendment, and continuation to verify everything aligns properly before filing. Saved me from making a costly name mismatch error - it flagged that my debtor name formatting wasn't consistent across documents.
0 coins
Gianni Serpent
Hold up - you said the entity changed during bankruptcy? That might complicate things beyond just a simple name change. If it's actually a different legal entity (even if substantially the same business), your security agreement might need to be reviewed to ensure it properly covers the new entity. This isn't just a UCC filing issue, it's potentially a documentation issue.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•Good point - I should clarify. The bankruptcy court approved the entity conversion as part of the plan. Same EIN, same principals, just changed from LLC to Corp status. Our security agreement includes standard successor entity language.
0 coins
Gianni Serpent
•OK that's better. With court approval and successor language you should be fine on the documentation side. Still would recommend the amendment-first approach for the UCC filings though.
0 coins
Henry Delgado
Why are banks always overthinking this stuff?? Just file the continuation with the correct current name. If there's any question later you can always point to the original UCC-1 and the business records showing the name change. The UCC system isn't designed to trip up secured parties over technicalities like this.
0 coins
Holly Lascelles
•That's risky advice. The UCC is actually pretty strict about debtor names for good reason - searchers need to be able to find filings reliably. A continuation filed under the wrong debtor name could be legally ineffective.
0 coins
Henry Delgado
•Maybe in theory but I've never seen a case where a court invalidated a security interest over a minor name variation, especially when the entity is clearly the same business.
0 coins
Olivia Kay
•There are definitely cases where courts have ruled security interests unperfected due to debtor name errors. It's not worth the risk when filing an amendment is straightforward.
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
I've been doing UCC filings for 15 years and here's what I'd recommend: File a UCC-3 amendment to change the debtor name first, then file your UCC-3 continuation. Some states allow you to do both in a single UCC-3 filing (both amendment and continuation), but I prefer to do them separately for clarity. Also make sure you're using the exact legal name as it appears on the current state business registry - don't guess or abbreviate.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•Thanks, that matches what I was thinking. Do you happen to know if there's a standard timeframe I should wait between the amendment and continuation filings?
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
•I usually wait 2-3 business days just to make sure the amendment has been processed and indexed, but technically you could probably file them same day as long as the amendment is filed first.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
This is giving me anxiety about my own filings. We have several security agreements under UCC and I'm realizing I haven't been checking for debtor name changes regularly. How often should lenders be monitoring for entity changes like this? Is there some automated way to track when borrowers change their legal entity status?
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
•Good question. Most loan documents require borrowers to notify the lender of any entity changes, but in practice that doesn't always happen. I usually check state business registries annually or when doing UCC continuation filings.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
•We started using Certana.ai's document verification tool for this kind of monitoring. You can upload your loan docs and UCC filings and it flags inconsistencies in entity names and other key data points. Helps catch these issues before they become problems.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
The portal errors alone will drive you crazy with this stuff! Last month I spent 3 hours trying to file a continuation because the system kept rejecting it for "debtor name mismatch" even though I was using the exact same name as the original filing. Turned out there was an extra space character in my entry. These systems are way too picky about formatting.
0 coins
James Johnson
•OMG yes! The formatting requirements are insane. I've had filings rejected for punctuation differences, extra spaces, even capitalization issues.
0 coins
Holly Lascelles
•The systems are picky because precision matters for UCC searches. A small formatting difference could mean a searcher doesn't find your filing when they need to.
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
Just went through something similar with a client whose entity changed from Partnership to LLC. Filed the amendment first, then the continuation. Worked perfectly. The key is making sure your amendment clearly shows both the old name (being changed FROM) and the new name (being changed TO). Don't leave any ambiguity in the amendment filing.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•That's helpful - I was wondering about how to structure the amendment language. Did you include any explanation in the amendment about the bankruptcy/entity conversion or just stick to the basic name change format?
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
•Just the basic name change format. The UCC-3 form has specific fields for this and you don't need to explain the reason for the change. Keep it simple and factual.
0 coins
Mia Green
Honestly this whole thread is making me appreciate how much easier it is to just stay on top of this stuff from the beginning. We require quarterly compliance certificates from all our borrowers that include confirmation of legal entity name and status. Catches these changes early before they become a problem for UCC filings.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•That's smart. We do annual compliance certs but quarterly would probably catch more changes. Do you have issues with borrower pushback on the frequency?
0 coins
Mia Green
•Some pushback initially but once they understand it protects both parties, most borrowers are fine with it. The key is explaining WHY you need the information.
0 coins
Ryder Ross
Update on my earlier comment about Certana.ai - I've now used their UCC document checker on three different amendment/continuation situations and it's been incredibly helpful. The tool specifically flags debtor name inconsistencies between your original UCC-1 and your proposed amendment or continuation. Takes about 2 minutes to upload the PDFs and get a verification report. Would definitely recommend it for anyone dealing with complex entity changes like this.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•That sounds useful. I'm definitely going to check that out before I file anything. Better to catch errors before they hit the state system.
0 coins
Malia Ponder
•Does it work for other UCC filing issues too or just name verification?
0 coins
Ryder Ross
•It checks all the key data points - debtor names, secured party info, collateral descriptions, filing numbers. Really comprehensive verification of document consistency.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
This is a great discussion - really helpful to see all the different approaches. I'm dealing with a similar situation where one of our borrowers converted from an LLC to a C-Corp during a restructuring (not bankruptcy, but still court-supervised). The timing issue Madison mentioned is what concerns me most. We're about 45 days out from our continuation deadline and I'm worried about cutting it too close. From what I'm reading here, it sounds like the consensus is: 1) File UCC-3 amendment to correct debtor name first, 2) Wait for processing (2-3 business days), 3) File UCC-3 continuation with correct name. Does anyone know if there are states where you absolutely CANNOT combine these into a single filing? Our borrower operates in multiple states so I need to check each jurisdiction's requirements.
0 coins